Daily Archives: July 3, 2017

Freedom in a Cloister – National Review

Posted: July 3, 2017 at 8:06 am

Linden, Va. About an hour and a half away from the White House, a cloistered nun tells me from behind the grille that separates her physically from the world (even from a friendly visitor like me) about what freedom she lives.

Outside, above the Shenandoah Valley, fog envelops St. Dominics Monastery as I talk to her downstairs in a meeting room made for encounters with family and friends and inquisitors (usually young women who are discerning a vocation to this way of life).

She explains to me how you can live externally free but internally bound. In the monastery, these contemplative nuns live in utter transparency to God and one another, even in their many hours of silence each day. Their vocal chords are used the most for the set prayers of their life together, although there also is designated time for recreation and addressing the needs of community life.

Her comment brings to mind a favorite devotion of Pope Franciss (before he was Pope Francis) to Mary, Our Lady, Undoer of Knots. I think, too, of a sentence in Robert Royals Catholic Martyrs of the Twentieth Century: Willingness to die liberates.

The nun in the cloister has chosen a kind of death to the world, certainly the world in which most of us operate. She does so quite radically. Her choice provides a spotlight on the kind of lives Christians true to the name choose to live, as they believe they are called to live.

At the monastery, were not all that far from Dulles airport. So my thoughts wander. That can happen in an unusually pleasant way when you discover that the WiFi doesnt work as it does not in the basement of the monastery where my guest quarters are. I think about Avery Dulles, the Catholic cardinal who was the son of former secretary of state John Foster Dulles, and about an article he wrote on freedom and truth. He quoted Pope John Paul II, a saint who not only knew about freedom but fought for it in his personal life and in history-changing ways on the world stage: For freedom on the one hand is for the sake of truth and on the other hand it cannot be perfected except by means of truth. Hence the words of our Lord, which speak so clearly to everyone: The truth will make you free (John 8:32). There is no freedom without truth.

Just days before the Independence Day holiday, the Oxford English Dictionary added the word post-truth to its mix an entry to put us on guard about freedom.

Royal also writes about truth in his book about 20th-century martyrs. In part by way of explaining his remark about death and liberation, he writes: Martyrs do more than entertain various possibilities; they put their lives behind the truth. He goes on to quote from Bishop James Edward Walsh, a Maryknoll missionary in China who spent nearly two decades in captivity. Walsh asserted:

Christianity is not a private way of salvation and a guide to a pious life; it is a way of world salvation and a philosophy of total life. This makes it a sort of dynamite. So when you send missioners out to preach it, it is well to get ready for some explosions.

The word martyr, like religion itself, has had its manipulations. During a week that marked the martyrdom of Saints Peter and Paul and other early Church martyrs, Pope Francis told his weekly Wednesday crowd at St. Peters Square that the martyrs are icons of hope. They imitate Christs self-sacrifice and love. They are what this world needs, a witness to the sure hope that faith inspires.

The martyrs who even today lay down their lives for the faith do so out of love, he said. By their example and intercession, may we become ever more convincing witnesses, above all in the events of our daily lives, to our undying hope in the promises of Christ.

Royal wrote the book so that the lives of so many would not go unnoticed and so that we would see Christianity at its truest, most liberating. The monastery in Linden may not be the best spot for viewing Fourth of July fireworks youre not going to find a TV to watch, even in the priests apartment. But it is a place to take a few hours away from the constant headline bombardment, including headlines about religious freedom, to consider what it is about religion that we need, and why its worth giving a life for it in so many different, radical ways.

It was just about a year ago that Pope Francis was in John Paul IIs native land. In the days before, I went to Auschwitz, accompanied by other religious sisters, the Sisters of Life, some of New Yorks finest. They were walking, praying contrasts to the brutality still in the air there, a community of women dedicated to helping all know that they are loved and can live that love and give it to others. Thats why religious freedom matters its the greatest gift that does the greatest honor to humanity: restoring its dignity, like fireworks. An explosion of the kind we need for respite from the kind that plagues us.

Kathryn Jean Lopez is a senior fellow at the National Review Institute and an editor-at-large of National Review. Sign up for her weekly NRI newsletter here. This column is based on one available through Andrews McMeel Universals Newspaper Enterprise Association.

Read the original post:

Freedom in a Cloister - National Review

Posted in Freedom | Comments Off on Freedom in a Cloister – National Review

Freedom of movement helped British creativity thrive. Its loss will diminish us – The Guardian

Posted: at 8:06 am

The grotesque betrayal of the generation that most detests Brexit is like some lost Restoration comedy. The Country Wife at Theatre Royal Haymarket. Photograph: Tristram Kenton for the Guardian

Nothing is more important to the creative industries than innovation. Without it, well quickly lose our international pre-eminence and a sector that in 2014 was worth 84bn, and is growing at twice the rate of the wider economy, will shrivel and die.

New ideas, contrary to romantic myth, dont emerge fully formed from the imagination of a lone genius. By and large, theyre the result of the kind of creative ferment that feeds off direct exposure to whatever and whoever is breaking new ground, wherever it is happening. In the 19th century, when Britain really was the country the Brexit nostalgists want back, you could work anywhere without a passport. Isambard Kingdom Brunel studied in Paris before he came home and revolutionised engineering. John Ruskin developed his thinking on architecture in Italy. George Eliot lived for eight formative months in Germany; three years later she published her first novel.

The young are still ground-breakers, and theyve been the chief beneficiaries of the freedom of movement that has come with EU membership. It cuts both ways: creatives from the rest of Europe come here because they want to be part of a thriving creative economy. They bring new energy to architecture, fashion, design, music, film.

Its no surprise, then, that before the EU referendum, a survey of members of the Creative Industries Federation showed 96% support for remaining in the EU. Arts world groupthink, sneered the Brexit operative who was sent into the TV studios by the leave campaign to urge us to subscribe to alternative groupthink about taking back control. And if groupthink is the consequence of the individual experience of everyone in the group, maybe it was.

Starting out in the theatre, I worked in France, Germany and the Netherlands. More recently, Ive employed artists from all over Europe, and I felt nothing but shame when the National Theatres head of wigs, hair and makeup reminded me recently that he has yet to be assured he can continue to live his life here. Hes Italian, but he has worked and paid taxes in the UK for 15 years.

Young British theatre-makers hit the road and bring back what they discover from living and working in Berlin and Paris

Meanwhile, young British theatre-makers, impatient with the theatre establishment, hit the road and bring back to our theatre what they discover from living and working in Berlin and Paris. Theyre inspired by what can be achieved with European levels of public subsidy, which accounts for as much as 95% of the income of some German theatres. Its not all upside. With lavish subsidy comes political control: government paymasters have recently turfed out admired directors of theatres in Germany, Poland and France. Our own system of arms-length funding via the Arts Council protects artists from political interference. This system is not the European norm, but at no point during the past decades has the EU tried to bring it into line. In the arts, we cant take back control because it was never given away in the first place.

In any event, the freedom to work and learn in the rest of the EU has been every bit as crucial to British creative success as the freedom to hire talented Europeans to work in Britain. During the election campaign, freedom of movement was presented as a one-way street: unrestricted immigration from the EU is the problem; border control is the solution. Continued membership of the single market is off the table, even for the Labour party, which continues to equivocate about a deal that would genuinely protect the interests not just of the economy but of the young people who voted for it in such numbers.

The students who delivered Canterbury for Labour deserve the right that their predecessors enjoyed to work and live without visas outside this country, if only to be able to come back and turn its failing economy around. In our brave new self-controlled world, the not-for-profit arts sector may miss the modest EU subsidies that it could once apply for. The commercial theatre, of which I am now part, may struggle with a doubled immigration skills charge. But far scarier is the prospect of a generation of creative talent crabbed by insularity and stunted by the delusion that our native genius, once unfettered, will be enough to see off the opposition.

The grotesque betrayal of the generation that most detests Brexit is like some lost Restoration comedy. The Restoration playwrights, their eyes wide open to the worlds lust and avarice, show young people with names such as Heartfree, Constant and Worthy doing battle for the future with their self-regarding seniors. Imagine a creaky burlesque called Lady Woodens Stratagem. Like so many old comedies, its not funny. Lady Wooden thinks herself extremely clever but turns out to be dense, and is held hostage by characters whose names announce their hypocrisy and malevolence: Backstab, Brute, Bullingdon, Gove. They scheme to cheat the young of their inheritance. The play ends badly, but theres no reason why it cant be rewritten.

View post:

Freedom of movement helped British creativity thrive. Its loss will diminish us - The Guardian

Posted in Freedom | Comments Off on Freedom of movement helped British creativity thrive. Its loss will diminish us – The Guardian

Micron Technologies: Be Thankful For The Dip – Seeking Alpha

Posted: at 8:06 am

Micron Technologies (NASDAQ:MU) stock has been on a rampage this year, outperforming all major market indices by far. Shares have more than doubled in 2016 and are up over 30 percent this year. The question now is whether this run still has legs or not to keep going.

In my opinion, as long as Micron keeps posting spectacular earnings and growth, there is no reason to question the run. However, it seems like the market sentiment is quickly shifting to a bearish stance on tech stocks. People are trying to hedge their positions and reduce their exposure in the tech sector due to fears about valuations. A lot of people think that there is a bubble currently with tech stocks. Now, while it is true valuations are a bit stretched, there is no logical reason to sell a fundamentally solid company backed by strong earnings just because of the sector it is in.

On Thursday, Micron posted another quarter which outperformed analyst expectations across the board. However, shares were down over 5 percent the next day. I believe this is due to hedge funds and other institutions locking in gains and limiting their exposure to tech stocks - the selling pressure probably drove share prices down. This creates the perfect opportunity for retail investors, though, who have more freedom when investing compared to institutions to pick up some shares in a fantastic company.

No matter how you look at it, this quarter did blow out analyst expectations in every conceivable way. Micron reported an EPS of $1.62 versus analyst expectations of $1.51 and a quarterly revenue of $5.57 billion versus analyst expectations of $5.41 billion. I think it is important for everyone to realize that revenue is 20 percent higher compared to the previous quarter and 92 percent higher year over year. Strong cash flows this quarter also allowed the company to strengthen its balance sheet and pay down $1 billion in debt.

This is the 8th straight quarter where Micron has been able to exceed analyst expectations, and there is no sign that the favorable earnings trend will stop anytime soon either. All its business units posted record-breaking revenues this quarter, and revenue from cloud customers alone was nearly 4 times higher year over year. Micron also projects that strong industry demand will continue to remain healthy and persist into 2018, and the company's portfolio of innovative and high-value products will be able to benefit very much from increasing demand. So far, we can see that it is taking full advantage of this broad industry trend and will not suddenly stop doing so anytime soon.

MU Price data by YCharts

Unfortunately, the price action after this earnings report was negative, and Micron shares traded down over 5 percent the following day. There is most definitely a rational reason for this - it can all be explained by looking at the current market state. People are scared and are trying to protect their gains in a bull market that has lasted over 8 years, and tech stocks have gained the most in these 8 years and are being sold off. Nasdaq has fallen 2 percent over the past month and is taking the brunt of criticism by many market bears. People think valuations are stretched and that the run has gone on for too long.

This type of thinking is often what causes people to miss out on investing in fantastic companies - the bottom line is no one has a crystal ball to predict when a sudden stock market crash will occur. As long as you diversify your holdings and adjust your portfolio positions on a regular basis, you will be fine. You cannot time the market and predict when it will fall. Retail investors who sold Micron after its earnings report will end up buying back at a higher price.

However, it makes sense why you would sell if you were a hedge fund or any other money managing institution. Hedge funds and other institutions like mutual funds have investors they need to appease regularly. They manage a lot of money and need to book profits. A lot of the selling we are seeing in the tech sector in general is due to institutions locking in profits. Most hedge funds and mutual funds also have to show all of their positions to investors at the end of the quarter, and with all of the negative sentiment towards tech, it makes sense why some institutions would reduce/sell their positions to make it seem like they are not too exposed to the tech sector. With Micron stock performing so well in the past few months, people had to take profits eventually. Turns out, Friday was that day.

A lot of analysts also upgraded Micron stock following their earnings report. Deutsche Bank raised their price target on Micron from $35 to $37 while maintaining their rating, and Goldman Sachs upgraded Micron's price target from $30 to $33. Stifel Nicolaus maintained their current buy rating and increased their price target by 50 percent, from $40 all the way up to $60 a share!

The bottom line is that it makes no logical sense for everyday retail investors to sell right now. The company's earnings were stellar and exceeded analyst expectations. Real investors do not buy/sell stocks based on the price action of stock, but rather on the fundamentals and earnings of a company. Micron Technologies has solid fundamentals backed by fantastic earnings numbers. It makes no sense for a company to suddenly be 5 percent less valuable after reporting earnings which exceeded expectations. Some people are saying it's because of Micron's valuation, though it only takes a little logical thinking to completely debunk this idea. When you value a company, you do not just look at the present cash flows and earnings - you look into the future, you look for growth. Growth for this quarter exceeded expectations, reaffirming the positive trajectory the company is going in, and the recent analyst upgrades following the quarterly results support this idea. We give Micron Technology a Buy rating and a conservative $36 price target.

Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, but may initiate a long position in MU over the next 72 hours.

I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

The rest is here:

Micron Technologies: Be Thankful For The Dip - Seeking Alpha

Posted in Technology | Comments Off on Micron Technologies: Be Thankful For The Dip – Seeking Alpha

White House Denies Report That Part of Its Science And Technology Office Is Empty – HuffPost

Posted: at 8:06 am

The White House is denying reports that the one division within the Office of Science and Technology Policy is now completely unstaffed.

CBS News reportedno staff members were left at the offices science division one of four such branches that comprise the OSTP after three employees from President Barack Obamas administration worked their final day on Friday. The OSTP advises the White House on the effects of science and technology on domestic and international affairs, according to its website.

When asked about the alleged vacancies, White House deputy press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders told HuffPost on Saturday the report was false.

This is not true, Sanders said in an email. Sadly, someone was more concerned about attacking [President Donald Trump] than getting their story straight.

A White House official familiar with the OSTP told HuffPost that there are 12 staffers currently working in the science division, despite the report that said otherwise. The official, who requested anonymity to discuss the matter, also said there are 35 people total on staff in the OSTP.

The official said the work of previous science division workers had been passed on to new staffers who have expertise in similar areas of study.

The three science division staffers who finished up on Friday includedElle Celeste, who was previously a biomedical and forensic science expert for the White House. The White House official told HuffPost that Fridays departures were a matter of contract expiration.

After departing from the OSTP, Celeste tweeted her final goodbyes, along with a photo of the science division placard with text saying science division out. mic drop.

Kumar Garg, another former OSTP employee who left his job in January, tweeted that Fridays departures mean there are zero people left in the division. He was the OSTPs assistant director for Learning and Innovation when Trump took office in January.

The Trump administration has faced sharp criticism from the scientific community.In April, tens of thousands of people participated in an estimated 600 March for Science events across the country in protest of the administrations stance on various issues.

Trump, who hascalled climate change a hoax orchestrated by the Chinese, has proposed massive budget cutsfor federal programs including the Environmental Protection Agency, NASA, the Department of Energys office of science, and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

After Trump revealed his 2018 budget proposal in March, Jeffrey Mervis, science policy reporter for Science Magazine wrotethat it confirms two things that U.S. scientists have long suspected: The new president is no fan of research, and his administration has no overarching strategy for funding science.

The White House has also yet to appoint one of the most influential science roles in federal government,the presidential science adviser, who heads the OSTP. When asked about that vacancy, the White House official familiar with the matter told HuffPost that several very promising candidates for OSTP director are under consideration.

Neither Celeste nor Garg immediately responded to requests for comment from HuffPost.

More here:

White House Denies Report That Part of Its Science And Technology Office Is Empty - HuffPost

Posted in Technology | Comments Off on White House Denies Report That Part of Its Science And Technology Office Is Empty – HuffPost

Technology and Commuting: Ford’s 7000 bike launch in San Francisco; Espin is a new spin on eBikes… – ZDNet

Posted: at 8:06 am

The first of 7,000 Ford GoBikes waiting to be shared in downtown San Francisco.

Ford GoBike, a co-venture from Ford Motor Company and Motivate, last week launched the first phase of what will be the second largest bike share network in the US with a goal of 7,000 bikes in San Francisco and the Bay Area from Oakland to San Jose.

The service costs $3 per trip and monthly and annual passes are available plus it works with the Clipper commuter card used by millions of people on local buses and trains.

It might seem strange to see Ford investing in bicycle sharing but the company sees it as a way of better understanding future transportation needs. Last year it acquired San Francisco based Chariot, which provides short route on-demand commuter services.

Ford is the sponsor but the heavy lifting is done by Motivate, a fascinating startup based in New York, which designs, builds and operates bike networks in nine cities and counting. The largest bike share network is in New York with 10,000 CitiBikes.

Motivate does far more than a typical Silicon Valley software startup. It not only develops the mobile app that users need to find and unlock bikes but also installs; thousands of bike stations; while dealing with city permits; and it also designs its bikes -- the San Francisco bicycles are made lighter and with gear ratios for the city's hills.

Cycling commutes...

Ford GoBike is aimed at the commuter: all trips have to be under 30 minutes; and the bike stations are located close to public transport. Building the outlying bike stations quickly is the challenge.

- - -

My Test Ride of Ford GoBike

It's tough for me to get across town to San Francisco's CalTrain station without at least two buses so I was glad I had an alternative using the Ford GoBike service.

About a week ago I downloaded the app to my iPhone and it showed several bike stations close to my apartment.

It was the day after the official launch of Ford GoBike and I had to get to the Mission Bay district of San Francisco so this would be a perfect test of a multi-mode bus, bike, light rail and/or car-share route now made possibly faster.

I fired up the Motivate app but was disappointed there were no bike stations operational yet, near me. But there were plenty of bikes at the downtown stations.

I jumped on a bus downtown and walked a few blocks to find a bike station. No problem unlocking the bike with my Clipper card. Bike seat was very easy to adjust and the radial gear change was easy to operate.

Riding crosstown in San Francisco is not for the feint of heart. Roadworks and heavy traffic make space tight on the bike routes.

Arriving at the Caltrain station I was concerned because there were just four bike slots and each was full. Fortunately, someone unlocked one of the bikes so I was able to park and lock mine.

There was a crew of workers installing several dozen more bike slots. I stopped and chatted with them and they were very friendly. They said a lack of city permits were holding them back in some neighborhoods. I told them I liked the service so far based on one trip!

I've lost plenty of bicycles to theft over the years. Bike share networks outsource that risk for a very small price.

Public transport commutes are vulnerable to missed connections. It's here that a bike share network can make a huge difference to people's commute times.

However, riding is not easy or safe on the streets of San Francisco. The city pulled down its elevated crosstown freeways after the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake forcing traffic onto the streets. This makes for very crowded roads at commute times and makes it more dangerous for cyclists -- potentially discouraging the use of Ford GoBikes.

---

Espin electric pedal-assist bicycle

I recently had a chance to use a pedal-assisted electric bicycle made by a Bay Area company Espin, founded by husband and wife Josh Lam and Yina Liu, and I really liked it. Motivate should use these bikes!

The bike is large and heavy at about 50 pounds but with the pedal assist electric power boost they feel as light as a feather when riding.

This was my first time on such a bike and for about four days I rode it through some rugged urban terrain and along hard-to-pedal tidal beaches and came away very impressed.

I liked the fact that you have to pedal and that there is no free ride. If you stop pedaling the power assist stops dead so it's a very natural way of operating the bike.

The gears are selected as normal from the right handlebar while the left side selects five levels of power assist. Downshifting requires selections from both sides of the handlebar which takes a little practice.

The range is 25 to 50 miles from a powerful electric motor inside the back wheel and a lockable lithium ion battery. Commuters have been buying the bikes but also it's popular among gig workers for delivering food and packages.

The bike can quickly reach 20 to 25mph which builds a lot of momentum but with the excellent stopping power of the disk brakes I had no problem staying comfortably in control.

The Espin bike is a wonderful way to get around a city. The assisted power will take you from a stop to a fast start so there's less temptation to roll through stop signs.

And you can get places very fast. At 20 to 25 miles per hour you are moving faster than than the average speed of a bus in San Francisco at 8mph, or car at 12mph. Plus you arrive sweat-free.

However, if you want a work-out headed home you can simply switch off the assist. These bikes are great off-commute, too. With one of these I could keep up with some of my sportier friends.

Josh Lam says the Espin bikes are less expensive than many other similar bikes because they source their own components and design. The price is $1800 and gig delivery workers get a $400 discount.

Espin or Ford...

Espin is a great choice if this is can be your only way to get to work but for a patchwork commute that's typical of the Bay Area Ford's bike share is a more practical choice.

But until Motivate builds out the next phase of the San Francisco network the downtown areas are of little use because you are already at your destination. It will require building bike stations in the outlying neighborhoods (especially around Divisadero and Eddy 🙂 to test its promise.

Read more from the original source:

Technology and Commuting: Ford's 7000 bike launch in San Francisco; Espin is a new spin on eBikes... - ZDNet

Posted in Technology | Comments Off on Technology and Commuting: Ford’s 7000 bike launch in San Francisco; Espin is a new spin on eBikes… – ZDNet

3 ways dad limits technology use in his house – Omaha World-Herald

Posted: at 8:06 am

Unless you have lived in a fallout shelter for the last 20 years (it could happen), you are quite aware of the proliferation of technology into our lives.

Right now in our house, there are four laptops, three tablets and five cell phones. Add in the three strategically placed TVs and thats 15 screens for four people. Averaging nearly four screens per person, there is a lot of opportunity for screen time."

This is often what kids will default to.

It's not new information for most parents. I am as guilty as anyone of using the screen as a babysitter for a little while. But as our kids get older, they need to be taught how to manage their time, especially around screens. When we were kids, if our parents wanted us to stop the screen time, they would turn off the TV and tell us to go play. We couldnt carry a screen with us (unless you picked up the 40-pound TV and went looking for an outlet). Now, kids often have a choice of which screen they want. Do they grab the cell phone, the tablet or the laptop? Regardless, they just switch to something different and carry on staring.

Right now Im sure youre asking, Ben, what can I, as a responsible parent, do to thwart this menace to my childs social development? To which I answer, nice usage of the word thwart. But furthermore, there are a few solutions to make technology a useful tool but not the default thought process.

First, limit the time they use screens. That may seem like a blatantly obvious solution, but it can be challenging. Kids are sneaky. Once you go back to your daily routine, they will quickly be back on a screen. And this isnt really a malicious act, they just don't understand that when you tell them to get off the tablet or computer, you mean for the rest of the day. Not just until you look the other way.

Second, give them an alternative they will like (and by give, I mean make them do it). These can include going outside to play, reading a fun book or cleaning their room though that last one may not induce squeals of excitement. Presenting them with an alternative helps the under-developed planning part of their little brains get past what they cant do and see what else is possible.

And third, hide the screen device up someplace high. That one may not seem very fair, but the phrase out of sight, out of mind actually works sometimes. If they dont see the device around the house, they cant absentmindedly grab it. This tactic, by the way, works for us adult-types who may be a little too addicted to screens ourselves.

Ultimately, the best way to help kids recognize how much is too much screen time is to limit our own. Yeah, you may have to stare at one all day for your job, but do you really have to come home and immediately flip on the TV or answer that email on your phone? Dont think your kids arent taking cues from your actions. They watch you just as closely as they watch those screens.

Now go find a screen and turn it off. In the long run, everyone will be better off for it. Its what Im going to do.

Right after I finish this level of Candy Crush on my phone.

Ben Price, a 42-year-old married father of two from Kansas City, Missouri, wrote this guest blog for momaha.com. Outside of being anIT security professional, hespends much of his time in pursuits related to his family, including being a coach, scout leader and kid chauffeur.

See the rest here:

3 ways dad limits technology use in his house - Omaha World-Herald

Posted in Technology | Comments Off on 3 ways dad limits technology use in his house – Omaha World-Herald

Republican Voters Blame Congress, Not Trump, For a Lack of Progress – TIME

Posted: at 8:05 am

Speaker of the House Paul Ryan, R-Wisc., speaks during his weekly news conference in the Capitol on June, 29, 2017.Bill ClarkCQ-Roll Call/Getty Images

(NEW YORK) In firm control of the federal government, President Donald Trump and his Republican Party have so far failed to deliver on core campaign promises on health care, taxes and infrastructure. But in New York's Trump Tower cafe, the Gentry family blames Congress, not the president.

Like many Trump voters across America, the Alabama couple, vacationing last week with their three children, says they are deeply frustrated with the president's GOP allies, faulting them for derailing Trump's plans. As the family of five lunched in Trump Tower, Sheila Gentry offered a pointed message to those concerned with the GOP's ability to govern five months into the Trump presidency.

"Shut up. Get on board. And let's give President Trump the benefit of the doubt. It takes a while," said the 46-year-old nursing educator from Section, Alabama.

"They just need a good whoopin'," said her husband, Travis Gentry, a 48-year-old engineer, likening congressional infighting to unruly kids in the back seat of the car.

As Washington Republicans decry Trump's latest round of Twitter attacks , Republicans on the ground from New York to Louisiana to Iowa continue to stand by the president and his unorthodox leadership style. For now at least, rank-and-file Republicans are far more willing to blame the GOP-led Congress for their party's lack of progress, sending an early warning sign as the GOP looks to preserve its House and Senate majorities in next year's midterm elections.

Inside and outside the Beltway surrounding the nation's capital, Republicans worry their party could pay a steep political price unless they show significant progress on their years-long promise to repeal and replace Democrat Barack Obama's health care law . Even more disturbing, some say, is the Republican Party's nascent struggle to overhaul the nation's tax system, never mind Trump's unfulfilled vows to repair roads and bridges across America and build a massive border wall.

"It's a problem for Republicans, who were put in place to fix this stuff. If you can't fix it, I need someone who can," said Ernie Rudolph, a 72-year-old cybersecurity executive from suburban Des Moines, Iowa.

There is no easy path forward for the Republican Party.

The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office predicts that health care legislation backed by House and Senate Republican leaders and favored by Trump would ultimately leave more than 20 million additional Americans without health care, while enacting deep cuts to Medicaid and other programs that address the opioid epidemic. In some cases, the plans would most hurt Trump's most passionate supporters.

Just 17% of Americans support the Senate's health care plan, according to a poll released last week, making it one of the least popular major legislative proposals in history.

The president on Friday injected new uncertainty into the debate by urging congressional Republicans simply to repeal Obama's health care law "immediately" while crafting a replacement plan later, which would leave tens of millions of Americans without health care with no clear solution.

That shift came a day after several Republicans in Congress condemned Trump's personal Twitter attack against MSNBC hosts Mika Brzezinski and Joe Scarborough, which was viewed across Washington as an unwanted distraction in the midst of a sensitive policy debate.

Trump's nationwide approval rating hovered below 40% in Gallup's weekly tracking survey, even before the tweet. At the same time, just one in four voters approve of Republicans in Congress, Quinnipiac University found.

Democrats, meanwhile, report sustained energy on the ground in swing districts where Republicans face tough re-election challenges. Democrats need to flip 24 seats to win the House majority next fall, a goal that operatives in both parties see as increasingly possible as the GOP struggles to govern.

A former Obama administration national security aide, Andy Kim, is among a large class of fresh Democratic recruits.

"People are fired up," said Kim, who's challenging Rep. Tom MacArthur, R-N.J. "It's not just about the health care bill. It's not just about Trump. ... They're concerned about the ability of this government to put together any credible legislation going forward."

Republicans are also concerned.

In Iowa's Adair County, GOP Chairman Ryan Frederick fears that Republican voters will begin to lose confidence in their party's plans for taxes, infrastructure and immigration should the health care overhaul fail.

"Everyone I know looks at trying to get Obamacare repealed and says, 'If we're making this much of a pig's breakfast out of that, what are we going to do with tax reform?'" Frederick said.

"We've dreamed of killing Obamacare for seven years. And we have the House, the Senate and the presidency, and we can't do it?" he continued. "What's the deal, guys?"

Louisiana Republican Party Chairman Roger Villere bemoans "factionalism" in his party. Intraparty divisions are holding up health care, he says, which in turn keeps the GOP-led government from tackling other priorities.

He's looking to Trump for leadership.

"He's the ultimate negotiator," Villere said. "We'll see how good he is."

Back in Trump Tower, Sheila Gentry conceded that Trump's tweets sometimes make her cringe, but she still has confidence in her president. She can't say the same for congressional Republicans.

"The Republicans who are in there now that aren't being very supportive, they're going to find themselves without a job soon if they don't step it up," she said.

___

Associated Press writers Bill Barrow in Atlanta and Julie Carr Smyth in Columbus, Ohio contributed to this report.

Continued here:

Republican Voters Blame Congress, Not Trump, For a Lack of Progress - TIME

Posted in Progress | Comments Off on Republican Voters Blame Congress, Not Trump, For a Lack of Progress – TIME

Ford exec points to ‘great progress’ on driverless cars – USA Today – USA TODAY

Posted: at 8:05 am

Brent Snavely, Detroit Free Press Published 10:53 a.m. ET July 2, 2017 | Updated 10:56 a.m. ET July 2, 2017

Ford will make a driverless car for ride-sharing purposes by 2021, using its Ford Fusion Hybrid.(Photo: Ford Motor Company)

Ford is making "great progress" towards its goal of deploying its first fully self-driving car by 2021, says the automaker's top research executive.

But don't expect Ford to be first.

"We dont worry too much about where the competitors are," Ken Washington, Ford's vice president of research and advanced engineering and chief technology officer. "What we are worried about is how do we bring this technology to market in a way thats a fit (for customers). And thats what we are focused on,"

He spoke as Ford gave reportersrides in the company's self-driving Ford Fusion test car.

Ford is relying on Argo AI a company co-founded last year by Google car project veteran Bryan Salesky and Uber engineer Peter Rander to take the lead on the development of the brains of its self-driving car. Ford acquired a majority stake in Argo AI in February.

"I think we are extremely well-positioned because weve got a technology company working with us that understands how to build the robot," Washington said recently. "And weve got an automotive manufacturer underneath us ....with more than 100 years of experience of systems integration."

Washington has been a top executive at Ford since joining the automaker in 2014 who now is taking on even more responsibility under Ford CEO Jim Hackett. At Ford, Washington oversees the automaker's advanced research and engineering efforts and gained the additional title of chief technology officer in May.

That essentially gives Washington oversight of all of Ford's autonomous vehicle efforts as well as oversight of the development of a wide range of other new technology.

Before joining Ford, Washington was vice president of the Advanced Technology Center at Lockheed Martin and was one of the most prominent African-Americans in aerospace. Now he is one of eight top executives at Ford who reports directly to Hackett.

We spoke with Washington about his new role and Ford's autonomous vehicle programs. The following is edited for clarity and brevity, and includes some additional comments from Washington's recent blog post on Medium, which included an announcement that Ford is creating a new artificial intelligence research team.

Question: So, tell us about your new role, and what you will now be doing at Ford?

Answer: I kind of wear two hats for the company. I am the vice president of research and advanced engineering ... and that didn't change. And with Jim Hackett coming to our company as CEO, he really wants to put an emphasis on technology and its promise for enabling us to be a great business. And so he invited me to be the chief technology officer to help drive that vision. ... And so thats a new role. And in that new role, I am really just looking to do what naturally comes to any executive who oversees a group that does that kind of technology work."

Q: How do the various pieces of Ford's autonomous vehicle program fit together? You have Ford's own development team, Ford Smart Mobility and Argo AI. How does it all work?

A: We recently welcomed Sherif Marakby back to Ford (from Uber). Sherif owns autonomous vehicles at Ford, and so his job is to define for us where we are going to play in the market, and how we are going to bring autonomous vehicle technology to bear and put it into the market.

But building the autonomous vehicle has three parts three big parts. There is the virtual driver, and thats Argos job. Thats the part that replaces the driver with a robot. And that includes software and sensors.

Ford product development is building the vehicle and the autonomous vehicle team is part of that and we are working on the integration of the virtual driver into the vehicle.

Washington elaborated on the role of Ford's internal autonomous vehicle team in his Thursday blog post on Medium:

We are announcing the creation of the robotics and artificial intelligence research team as part of Ford research and advanced engineering. This move aligns multiple disciplines under one team for a more concerted effort as we increasingly come to understand the potential for robotics and artificial intelligence. The move also serves to further advance projects weve already presented such as our autonomous vehicle development program, and those we arent quite ready to reveal.

Q: It's only been a few months since Ford publicly stated its goal to commercially launch a fully autonomous vehicle by 2021 but can you tell us how that effort is going and how fast you are making progress?

A: They are going great, they are absolutely going great.... They have some fabulous momentum. Bryan Salesky and Peter Rander, the co-founders of Argo AI, have attracted a really great team already. Over 100 employees are already on board at Argo. So, I am excited about the path they are on. They are making great progress.

Q: It can be difficult from the outside to really know who is leading the race to develop driverless cars. Is Ford leading? Or have you fallen behind competitors like Waymo or even GM? And how much do you think it matters right now?

A: Well I would start by saying there is so much hype out there its hard to sort through it. And you said it well when you said it kind of doesnt matter. We dont worry too much about where the competitors are. What we are worried about is how do we bring this technology to market in a way thats fit. And thats what we are focused on.

Read or Share this story: https://usat.ly/2uyn1hl

Originally posted here:

Ford exec points to 'great progress' on driverless cars - USA Today - USA TODAY

Posted in Progress | Comments Off on Ford exec points to ‘great progress’ on driverless cars – USA Today – USA TODAY

The Justice Department is squandering progress in forensic science – Washington Post

Posted: at 8:05 am

By Rush D. Holt and Jed S. Rakoff By Rush D. Holt and Jed S. Rakoff July 2 at 7:51 PM

Rush D. Holt is chief executive officer at the American Association for the Advancement of Science. Jed S. Rakoff is a U.S. district judge for the Southern District of New York who served ex officio on the National Commission on Forensic Science.

Imagine this: A cop pulls you over and arrests you because you match the description of someone wanted for a heinous crime. You are innocent, but after being charged and brought to trial, you watch as experts testify with scientific certainty that hair and footprints at the scene match your own, and you are led from the courtroom in shackles.

This may seem like a scene straight out of a TV melodrama, but this scenario happens in real life far too often. A number of forensic techniques including hair- and footprint-matching, mark analysis, bloodstain-pattern analysis and others lack scientific validity and reliability yet are used frequently in our nations courtrooms.

According to the National Registry of Exonerations, no fewer than 490 people have been exonerated since 1989 after being convicted on the basis of false or misleading forensic techniques. Just last month, a Michigan man was freed from jail 41 years after his conviction after prosecutors agreed that evidence against him based on an analysis of a single hair didnt meet FBI standards. Another Michigan man was released in May after 25 years in prison following a faulty conviction based on bullets matched to a gun.

During the past decade, thanks largely to a 2009 report from the National Academy of Sciences, we have made important progress in ridding our nations courtrooms of such scenarios. But the Justice Departments recent decision to not renew the National Commission on Forensic Science the primary forum through which scientists, forensic lab technicians, lawyers and judges have worked together to guide the future of forensic science threatens to stall and even reverse that progress.

The NAS report found that too few forensic disciplines, other than DNA analysis, have adequate scientific basis. The report also found that experts often overstate their claims in testimony, invoking unscientific terms like scientific certainty and claiming 100 percent accuracy.

The Justice Department is the responsible agency for prosecuting federal crimes and, in this role, makes frequent use of forensic techniques. It is therefore not appropriate for the Justice Department to be the evaluator of forensic practices. In the 2009 report, the NAS strongly recommended that to avoid a conflict of interest, an entity independent of the Justice Department should oversee forensic standards.

While the Justice Department did not fully embrace this recommendation, it went ahead and, in collaboration with the National Institute of Standards and Technology, helped create the National Commission on Forensic Science. From 2013 until earlier this year, the commission provided a venue for all of the relevant stakeholders to discuss issues facing forensic labs and foundational science and to advance a path forward to strengthen forensic practices and research.

By building consensus among these diverse groups who all care deeply about the integrity of our justice system, the commission promoted important reforms, such as mandatory accreditation of crime labs used by the government and the immediate disclosure to defense counsels of a government forensic experts entire file relating to a defendant. Many of the commissions recommendations have been adopted not only by the Justice Department but also by state and local crime labs. They have also resulted in changes both to prosecutorial practices and to codes of professional conduct for those working in forensic laboratories. With these improvements in providing justice, it is not time to pull back from the forensic commission.

More than 250 individuals and groups, including leading legal scholars and scientific organizations such as the American Association for the Advancement of Science, recently submitted public comments to the Justice Department on how to proceed on forensic science. The overwhelming majority of comments urged the department to ensure that there be an independent and transparent oversight body for forensic science like the now-suspended commission.

For now, the Justice Department has taken the opposite view, that there is no conflict with having internal department evaluators oversee forensic science research that their prosecutors hope to use in the courtroom. We urge the attorney general and the department to take a thorough look at the many thoughtful comments from concerned citizens and quickly reconsider this approach. Forensic science requires conflict-free independent evaluation if it is to advance the truth. Peoples lives and our societys faith in the American justice system are at stake.

Go here to see the original:

The Justice Department is squandering progress in forensic science - Washington Post

Posted in Progress | Comments Off on The Justice Department is squandering progress in forensic science – Washington Post

Firefighters make progress on Brian Head fire; lake reopens – Las Vegas Review-Journal

Posted: at 8:05 am

A southern Utah fishing lake is reopening as firefighters gain more of a handle on a two-week old wildfire that has forced out 1,500 people from the area.

BRIAN HEAD, Utah A southern Utah fishing lake is reopening as firefighters gain more of a handle on a two-week old wildfire that has forced out 1,500 people from the area.

The U.S. Forest Service said Sunday that firefighters have made good progress on the blaze thats burned 93 square miles of land.

Its 65 percent contained, with full containment of the western portion expected by the time one of two crews of firefighters from Nevada, Idaho and Utah are relieved of duty Sunday.

Campers, fishers and swimmers can now visit Panguitch Lake.

Authorities are reopening roads but warned drivers to be alert for possible falling rocks and debris.

Multiple communities remain under evacuation orders.

The fire has burned 13 residences and prompted evacuation orders at Brian Head and the Dry Lake area. The orders for those areas have since been lifted, but more than 1,800 firefighters are continuing to battle the blaze.

Because of the fire, Brian Heads July Fourth celebration will be more subdued than in past years. The usual fireworks display is also off the schedule this year and Brian Head Resort spokesman Mark Wilder expects a smaller crowd than the 15,000 or so people who usually attend.

Brian Head town manager Bret Howser said people have been trickling back into town and good vibes are in the air.

Wilder said Friday that the resort areas residents are grateful to firefighters who kept the ski area largely untouched by the flames from the wildfire, which officials say was started June 17 by a man burning a pile of weeds.

Read the rest here:

Firefighters make progress on Brian Head fire; lake reopens - Las Vegas Review-Journal

Posted in Progress | Comments Off on Firefighters make progress on Brian Head fire; lake reopens – Las Vegas Review-Journal