Daily Archives: July 2, 2017

Parowan Canyon open; Brian Head blaze 65% contained – Deseret News

Posted: July 2, 2017 at 9:08 am

Jeffrey D. Allred, Deseret News

FILE - Homes that were spared from the Brian Head Fire are pictured on Friday, June 30, 2017.

BRIAN HEAD, Iron County Crews fighting the Brian Head Fire had contained 65 percent of the wildfire late Saturday.

The human-caused fire has burned more than 60,300 acres since it roared to life 14 days ago.

Parowan Canyon also opened Saturday. Brian Head and Dry Lakes residents and visitors can return via state Route 143 from Parowan to Brian Head or along state Route 14 through Cedar Breaks National Monument.

While evacuation orders have been lifted at Brian Head and the Dry Lake area, more than 1,800 firefighters continue to battle the blaze heading northeast.

Several areas remained under evacuation orders Saturday: Upper Bear Valley, Horse Valley, Beaver Dam, Clear Creek, Castle Valley, Blue Springs, Rainbow Meadows and Second Left Hand Canyon.

Fire officials said crews made "significant progress" toward containing the fire Friday.

"Thanks in large part to lighter winds, fire behavior has been reduced," fire officials said in a prepared statement. "Some isolated tree torching occurred, but crews had a successful day directly suppressing the fire perimeter and mopping up hot spots around the communities at risk."

Saturday, firefighters continued working on cleanup and planning on contingencies in case of any fire perimeter growth.

"Dozers have been used extensively in the northeastern flank of the fire where there is little containment," fire officials said. "Increasing containment has allowed numerous resources from the west side of the fire to be transferred to the northern perimeter, where most of the fire growth has occurred in the past three days."

Firefighters will continue to patrol the fire perimeter around the town of Brian Head and Second Hand Canyon.

The Dixie National Forest has also closed access to lands north of S.R. 14.

Fire officials encouraged visitors to check their route before planning any recreational activities for the Fourth of July weekend.

Maps of closed areas are posted on the federal fire incident website at http://www.inciweb.nwcg.gov.

Contributing: Ashley Stilson

View post:

Parowan Canyon open; Brian Head blaze 65% contained - Deseret News

Posted in Progress | Comments Off on Parowan Canyon open; Brian Head blaze 65% contained – Deseret News

Progress in Bay Cleanup, But Much Work Remains – Lynchburg News and Advance

Posted: at 9:08 am

The Chesapeake Bay almost died in the 1970s when pollution came close to killing it off. Sewage and deadly agricultural and urban chemical runoff were well on the way to it.

Today, however, the Bay is in better health than its been in for decades, largely because of a determination from the federal government down that this iconic and unique body of water must be saved. Progress thats been called incredible has been made in Virginia, but much work remains.

Last month, the Chesapeake Bay Foundation released a preliminary report detailing the progress thats been made, especially in the last six years, in the fight to restore the Bay to health. Today, there is a record high level of sea grass the foundation upon which a healthy Bay is built, a noticeable rise in the number of female blue crabs, an oyster stock thats coming back from record low levels in the past decade and an oxygen-less dead zone thats projected to be 60 percent smaller than in the mid-1980s.

Considering how close the Bay was to death in the 1970s and 1980s, this progress is nothing short of amazing, though its taken more than three decades of effort to get to this point. Early efforts by Virginia, Maryland, the District of Columbia and Delaware simply were too limited in scope to tackle the problem, and because of the voluntary nature of the pact between the parties, the work of one could be negated by the inactions of another.

It wasnt until former President Barack Obama, through an expanded reading of the Waters of the United States Act, directed the federal Environmental Protection Agency to take the lead in the cleanup efforts. At the same time, the states of West Virginia, Pennsylvania and New York, large portions of which are in the Bays watershed, were added to the group of states involved in the cleanup. With the EPAs lead, came federal dollars the compact members could leverage in efforts to implement a wide range of environmental steps to limit pollution inflows to the Bay; currently, the federal contribution is $78 million annually.

The Bay foundations report notes that Virginia has made noticeable progress incredible progress was the phrase the foundation used in upgrading sewage treatments in the Bay watershed. The progress made on this front was enough to offset shortcomings in state efforts to meet pollution reduction targets for farms and for curbing urban/suburban runoff.

According to foundation data, Virginia fell more than 10 percent shy of the goal to cut urban/suburban runoff pollution. Rain washes chemicals such as nitrogen and phosphorus chemicals that lead to deadly algae growth from lawns and chemicals from roadways, along with sediment itself, into the Bays watershed. Meeting the 2025 runoff goal the EPA has set for Virginia, the foundation says, will be difficult, if not impossible.

The success rate for meeting the goals set for the state agriculture sector is a more mixed picture. While phosphorus goals were met, nitrogen and sediment goals came up short by 10 percent or so. One highly successful program to tackle agricultural runoff has been working with farmers to fence off streams and their banks, preventing livestock from depositing nitrogen-laden waste in the waters. There are currently more than 300 conservation plans encompassing more than 65,000 acres, with farmers receiving cost-sharing dollars to protect their waterways, but again, unsteady funding and a backlog of cost-sharing applications have held back progress.

We have written many times over the years of the Bays environmental and economic importance, both for Virginia and the nation. We have also written in support of President Obamas federalization of the cleanup efforts, the reasoning being that the Bay is a national resource whose protection and restoration is beyond the capabilities of any one state or group of states. And we have also written in support of congressional efforts to restore the $78 million for Bay cleanup efforts to the federal budget on the grounds that the taxpayers return on investment more than justifies the expenditure.

This Chesapeake Bay Foundation report underscores the success, thus far, of the new approach to Bay restoration. The raw data alone argues for the continuation of this policy; we can only hope Congress is listening and restores the full $78 million in funding for the Bays cleanup.

More:

Progress in Bay Cleanup, But Much Work Remains - Lynchburg News and Advance

Posted in Progress | Comments Off on Progress in Bay Cleanup, But Much Work Remains – Lynchburg News and Advance

Jennings pleased with progress of wideouts – The Exponent Telegram (press release) (registration)

Posted: at 9:08 am

MORGANTOWN Gary Jennings sees West Virginias wide receiving corps as one with a ton of potential but one that also must prove itself.

Jennings listed several possible breakout players for the coming season, including Dominique Maiden, Reggie Roberson and Marcus Simms. The three add multiple skill set complements to the likes of Jennings, a sure-handed wideout and punt returner who tallied 10 receptions for 165 yards and two scores a season ago.

Factor in KaRaun White and his 48 catches for 583 yards and five touchdowns in 2016 and that the Mountaineers again secured the services of David Sills after a stint trying his hand at quarterback at El Camino College in Calif, and WVU has the breadth of ability to provide plenty of targets for new quarterback Will Grier.

The question, then, isnt one of if as much as whom. Can Jennings better his stats, and can White, coming off a season-ending leg injury suffered in November, at least duplicate his?

Will Jovon Durante bounce back as a big play threat to replace Shelton Gibson after a mild sophomore slump which saw his yardage production fall from 378 yards to 331 despite 11 more catches? Thats a difference of more than six yards per grab, which translated in Durante being far more of a true mid-range threat than the vertical one he was in his first year at WVU.

And what of Maiden and his 6-foot-5, 203-pound frame? Simms burst and increased playing time as his freshman season wore on last year, including a career-best 80 plays in the regular season finale versus Baylor, should be viewed as a positive. The coaching staff raves about Roberson, who is the most likely to see significant action as a true freshman.

Even William Crest, a former quarterback like Sills, is back at receiver after flirting with a transfer option during the spring.

Dominique Maiden, and Reggie Roberson, those guys are definitely stepping up, but as a group as a whole were all starting to gel and mesh together which I feel is very good, Jennings said. Marcus Simms, hes a different player as well with what he can bring to the table. He does the right things.

Jennings noted that the wideouts routinely run patterns and work on timing and other aspects with Grier, who showed flashes of his excellence as a freshman at Florida during the Gold-Blue spring game. Grier completed nine of his first 10 throws while also finding Ricky Rogers for a 60-yard catch-and-run in a 202-yard performance.

Hes great, Jennings said. Cant wait for this upcoming season. (The passes are) on point, a good ball. You have to be ready for certain passes. Thats a part of us just meshing together and making sure were all on the same page all the time. Thats what we have worked on. Every single chance we get, were working with the quarterbacks and trying to get timing down.

Thats a key, especially as the Mountaineers, under new offensive coordinator Jake Spavital, attempt to play at a faster pace. WVU ran 983 snaps a season ago actually a dozen fewer than its opponents for an average of 75.6 plays per game.

California, under Spavital, ran 1,035, and that was over just 12 games as opposed to West Virginias 13, translating to an average of more than 86 snaps per contest.

We can go pretty fast, Jennings said. Theres a lot of short game stuff and he uses the passing game as a run game as well. Theres a few things as far as tempo wise, but I guess well see.

Go here to see the original:

Jennings pleased with progress of wideouts - The Exponent Telegram (press release) (registration)

Posted in Progress | Comments Off on Jennings pleased with progress of wideouts – The Exponent Telegram (press release) (registration)

T&D Region lawmakers: Progress made on big issues – The Times and Democrat

Posted: at 9:08 am

They didnt get everything they wanted, but local lawmakers believe the General Assembly accomplished a lot this year.

This was a good session for the state, said Sen. John Matthews, D-Bowman.

Lawmakers approved a plan to fund roads, found additional money for poor school districts and addressed state pension problems.

I think that there were some very big issues that we had to tackle this year that certainly made the session very challenging, said Rep. Jerry Govan, D-Orangeburg.

Even though some of those issues we did not totally solve, I thought that we at least made some progress in trying to solve them, he said.

Lawmakers say one of their biggest accomplishments was the passage of the road-funding bill.

That was certainly an achievement well look back on in years to come, said Sen. Brad Hutto, D-Orangeburg.

The bill increases the state gas tax of 16.75 cents per gallon by 12 cents over a six-year period. The first two cents were added yesterday.

The state Department of Transportation reported that more than half of roadway pavement in South Carolina is considered in poor condition. Repairs would cost nearly $500 million annually to bring roadways into good condition.

That has been an issue that has continuously hung a cloud over the state, said Rep. Russell Ott, D-St. Matthews.

Road conditions present safety issues and negatively affect businesses and their transportation of goods, he said.

Ott said the increase will create a more sustainable and recurring funding source, which the state needs.

Rep. Justin Bamberg, D-Bamberg, agreed, saying, There is simply not enough money to go around to fulfill all the needs the state has.

We need new revenue streams, he said.

Govan said the gas tax is a fair way to raise the needed revenue, as the burden will not fall completely on South Carolinians. Travelers who use the roads will share the cost.

Its only fair that those persons driving through also share the burdens of the cost, he said. We have taken a positive step forward in terms of roads funding.

Area lawmakers were also glad to see pension reform advance.

Retirees, theyve worked for the state and served, and they ought not to be worried, said Rep. Gilda Cobb-Hunter, D-Orangeburg.

Currently, the pension plan is underfunded by roughly $24 billion because of low returns in past years.

The plan covers an estimated 550,000 government workers in the state and has collected around $2 billion annually from workers and employers but has paid out $3 billion in benefits.

This issue really got out of hand a number of years ago, Govan said. Im glad to say that we added money to the system and made some other adjustments that hopefully will begin to put us on the right track.

The proposed solution would increase most employees' contributions from 8.66 percent to 9 percent of their annual pay and cap those payments at that percentage.

Employer contributions would increase by 1 percent annually through 2022.

This also means an increase in the amount of money that school districts, local governments and state universities have to contribute.

Nobodys really happy with what had to be done, Ott said. Its never popular, but the worst thing you can do is stick your head in the sand.

In the area of education, the budget provides $55.8 million for capital improvements at high-poverty schools.

Cobb-Hunter said $100 million was originally proposed only for schools involved in the Abbeville lawsuit, which include Orangeburg County schools.

Govan said wishes there was more money for school improvements, especially since it will now be spread throughout the state.

Although the Legislature was not able to pass a bond bill to fund higher education building needs, local lawmakers hope one can be passed next year.

Higher education needs it to pass, Cobb-Hunter said.

Ott said it is needed to address the issues of deferred maintenance at college buildings.

Once you see a leak, you have to go ahead and replace it, he said. It makes sense to borrow the money.

Bamberg said he wants one to pass as well but, A bond bill wont solve the problem itself.

He encourages the Legislature to put politics aside and consider new, innovative ways of creating revenue streams.

Were at a point in South Carolina where we need to be more proactive, Bamberg said. He said the state could get left behind as other states continue to advance.

He was glad to see the governor sign into law the industrial hemp program.

The program will allow 20 farmers to grow and harvest industrial hemp, which can be made into oil, rope, clothing, paper, canvas, soap and even some food and drinks.

Farmers said the ability to diversify the crops they grow will not only benefit them, but the state as a whole.

That was a huge, Ott said. I think thats going to be a program were going to continue to see grow.

Bamberg added, We need to work on passing medical marijuana legislation.

He said it will be a benefit to patients with illnesses or conditions that are treated with medical marijuana.

Bamberg said legalizing gambling should also be considered.

If done correctly, we can strike the balance between those people who are against it and those people who recognize that when we talk about new revenue for education and new revenue for roads, a legalized gaming system is something that can bring in millions and millions of dollars, he said.

The increased revenue could also help the state lower taxes, he said.

It is a very difficult task to consistently lower taxes on industries and small business while at the same time the state fails to create new revenue streams to combat that, Bamberg said.

Lawmakers are looking forward to addressing several issues next year.

Hutto wants to come up with a plan to replace school buses.

Gov. Henry McMaster vetoed $20 million for school buses this year. He said he wants to come up with a plan to replace buses, but doesnt want to use lottery money that should go to scholarships.

Lawmakers arent expected to address the governors vetoes until they return in January.

Education Superintendent Molly Spearman says the state needs $73 million to replace all of the buses which go back to 1995.

Matthews will be pushing for his port enhancement zone proposal, which is still in the House.

The bill would give businesses tax credits for locating within a 35-mile radius of the intersection of interstates 95 and 26.

He says the location makes it an ideal distribution hub for cargo shipped to and from the port and the incentives would help lure jobs into the area.

Bamberg wants to address the Local Government Fund, which provides counties and towns with a share of the states revenue.

I am disappointed in our inability to fully fund the local government fund, he said. It puts them in a bind when we have unfunded state mandates.

He said the local governments deserve to be properly funded.

See the original post here:

T&D Region lawmakers: Progress made on big issues - The Times and Democrat

Posted in Progress | Comments Off on T&D Region lawmakers: Progress made on big issues – The Times and Democrat

Ukraine’s Downward Spiral – The Globalist

Posted: at 9:02 am

Kiev had an eventful week. On Wednesday, a global cyber attack, launched from Ukraine, spread like wildfire globally. While all of this was happening the head of the Kiev regimes counter-intelligence was blown to pieces as his car passed through an intersection in the center of the city.

The default reaction was that this was another episode in the Kiev-Moscow-US intrigue. Others on the ground say it was more likely linked to corruption related to arms sales. Will we ever know

The latest polls here show that the presidentwhom everyone here calls Porkyis at single-digit support. In comparison, Trump at 38% is doing rather well.

It is debatable, I suppose, and we likely will never know, but many here consider the current regime the most corrupt ever.

They are spending oodles on defense, and several persons have told me that it is common knowledge that the summit creams 7-10% off the top7-10% of a billion here, a billion there, another billion over thereafter a while it becomes real money!

They say that countries get the politicians they deserve. If that is true, you have to ask yourself, what the Ukrainians did to deserve what they have experienced for the last 27 years, indeed for much longer

A few weeks back, I re-read Bulgakovs White Guard. From 1917-1920, Kiev had no less than 18 governments.

Today, there is a vast sense of desolation, of resignation, among some of nihilism, and among others a view that there is nothing to do, no hope for anything, so live now, intensely, or leave.

At a museum of contemporary art, there is an exhibition which pretty much expresses these sentiments. A video that plays non-stop with the word FUTURE in big black capital letters across the screen.

Two of the letters of FUTURE have toppled over. What remains of the word is on fire. That sort of sums up how many here see their future.

In another room, there is an installation called Wasted Veteran. The room is entirely white, and empty, save for a few pieces of military gearso obviously obsoletestrewn about the floor, and a man, standing alone, wearing combat fatigues, and who is starring straight into the corner, into nothingness.

The sense of waste, of uselessness, of betrayal is crushing.

Then there is an entire room focused on Chernobyl; the photos and the texts are of pure desperation. The cyber attack earlier in the week, perhaps right on cue, shut down all of the monitoring equipment at Chernobyl

A few days back, the EU granted visa free travel to Ukrainian passport holders. Watch for a mass exodus of the young and the bright. And that cant be good for this place.

Meanwhile, the mob rules still over Odessa and its ports, distribution point to the West of some 90% of the heroin produced in Afghanistan.

After the United States has led the war there for a decade and a half, this year the poppy fields are at their most productive ever, with a record bumper crop on the cards. Odessa is also the plaque tournante of the illicit global arms trade

One has to feel for the Ukrainian people: The civil war, the vast corruption, the deep and ever more insurmountable divisions in the country, the flight of young people, the desperation of the armies of unemployed, the repeated devaluations, the crash of real income, the embezzlement of bank deposits, the fraudulent loans, the theft of state assets

It is estimated that over $1 trillion of state assets have been stolen, and there has not been one whimper out of the IMF, the EBRD, nor from the governments of Western Europe, the United States or Canada.

Not one peep, like setting a condition for IMF funding of recovering 20% of stolen assets.

It is said that a good place to start looking for the owners of some of these assets would be the Kiev government cabinet and parliamentary stand-ins for some of the coterie of vastly wealthy oligarchs who effectively run the country.

The cultural, political and social cauldron which is Russia-Ukraine is far beyond me to understand. A visit to the Bulgakov museum is expressive of this.

There is vast pride in the man and his work. Yet, he was Russian, wrote all of his books, plays, novellas in Russian, was born to an ethnic Russian family, was a descendant of a Russian orthodox priest.

Yet, none of that is mentioned, and only emerges when one probes the guide with questions

Yet spend but a little time, for example, in a Karaoke bar, or a caf, and virtually all of the songs which are belted out are Russian songs, or songs sung by Ukrainians in Russia. Complex, complex, complex.

Ukraines destiny would surely be very different it there was a mountain range somewhere between the Franco-German border and Moscow, and if Crimea did not offer the only all year ice free maritime port for the Russian navy.

One one hand, the geopolitics are what they are and point to a real politik resolution, similar to what Kissinger has several times suggested, and with which Moscow would likely be happy to accept.

On the other, there is a people, which have suffered so much, and continue to be trampled on by their own politico-economic oligarchic caste, as well as by their neighbours.

Today to some extent by Russia, yesterday with full military occupations by Germany, Sweden, Poland, France, Lithuania

But there is no doubt, Kiev is a European city, just as are Warsaw and Riga. The city continues to have one of the best ballet troops in the world, and a very active cultural life.

Kiev is such a pretty city, especially under the cloudless sky of today, as the dog days of summer begin.

Visit link:

Ukraine's Downward Spiral - The Globalist

Posted in Nihilism | Comments Off on Ukraine’s Downward Spiral – The Globalist

Why We Will Never Control Healthcare Costs – National Review

Posted: at 9:02 am

On one hand bioethicists bemoan the high costs of medical care and promote health care rationing forthe elderly, seriously disabled, and dying.

On the other, they promote expanding publicor insurance funding of health care to ensure that peoples desires are satisfied and to promote social justicemedicine harnessed in the service of hedonism,the ethical theory that pleasure (in the sense of the satisfaction of desires) is the highest good and proper aim of human life.

For example, California requires all group insurance plans to cover fertility treatments for gays and lesbians in the same way they do biologically infertile heterosexual couples. The Obama Administration promulgated a regulation so that Medicare now funds sex change surgeries.

Now this. Advocacy has commenced in the UK to have the socialized NHS fund uterus transplants so that men who identify as women can give birth. From the Daily Mail story:

Transgender women who were born male should be given womb transplants so that they can have children, leading NHS doctors have told The Mail on Sunday. And fertility experts say taxpayers should fund such transplants for those who identify as women, on the basis of equality enshrined in law.

Leading the debate on the controversial procedure is medical ethics lawyer Dr Amel Alghrani, who is pressing for a talks on whether womb transplants for trans-women should be publicly funded. Dr Alghrani, of Liverpool University, also predicts that a successful programme would lead to others demanding wombs including gay and straight men who wanted to experience the joys of carrying a child.

This would be wrong on so many levels, ranging from safety concerns for both patient and potential future baby, the prospect of doctors and hospitals being forced to participate even if it violates their religious or moral beliefsalready beginning to happento the question of whether going to such extremes to satisfy individual yearnings constitutes wise and public policy.

But make no mistake: Powerful political and cultural forces will bearepushing us hard in this direction.

This much is sure: If the current trends continue, there is no way we will ever be able to adequately control healthcare costs.

Read the original post:

Why We Will Never Control Healthcare Costs - National Review

Posted in Hedonism | Comments Off on Why We Will Never Control Healthcare Costs – National Review

Why Did a UCLA Instructor With a Popular Free-Speech Course … – The Chronicle of Higher Education

Posted: at 8:58 am

Keith Fink, an adjunct who teaches a UCLA course on campus free speech, says even though his students love him, top administrators couldnt stand the fact that he criticized them in the classroom. His department leaders say hes not as good a teacher as he thinks he is.

But according to Mr. Fink, the tale is far more troubling. Mr. Fink, a conservative, says he was pushed out in large part because of his political beliefs and because one of the courses he taught a popular class on campus free speech dared to criticize UCLAs own actions.

With campus free speech emerging as a hot-button national issue, Mr. Finks continuing struggle with his university has struck a chord. Campus Reform, the conservative news outlet, has championed him in a series of articles; Tucker Carlson, the Fox News host who regularly rails against campus liberalism, has made him a guest.

On Tuesday, June 27, Mr. Fink received a letter from Laura E. Gmez, interim dean of the College Division of Social Sciences, informing him that he would no longer be employed at UCLA once his contract ended, on June 30. "After a thoughtful and comprehensive academic review, it has been determined that your teaching does not meet the standard of excellence," Ms. Gmez wrote. (She did not respond to a request for comment from The Chronicle.)

The letter marked the latest development in a monthslong saga pitting Mr. Fink against several administrators: Ms. Gmez; Kerri L. Johnson, chair of the communication-studies department; and Greg Bryant, the departments vice chair.

Keith A. Fink and Associates

Keith Fink: "The fact that I use current events at UCLA as teaching examples to illustrate free-speech principles likely bothers the administration, often because their campuswide emails run afoul of the First Amendment and directly or indirectly trample on students free-speech rights."

"The fact that I use current events at UCLA as teaching examples to illustrate free-speech principles likely bothers the administration, often because their campuswide emails run afoul of the First Amendment and directly or indirectly trample on students free-speech rights," said Mr. Fink, who was out of the country and responded to questions by email.

He has drawn the ire of administrators in other ways, too, he said. According to Mr. Fink, his conservative political beliefs have always been at odds with those of most other people on the campus. And then there was his lawyerly campus activism: On occasion he has assisted UCLA students who faced campus disciplinary or legal proceedings.

Past department leaders had supported him and "thwarted off attempts by the school to undermine or fire me," Mr. Fink said.

In July 2016, Ms. Johnson became department chair. She said she couldnt speak for her predecessors, but stressed that "in no way has Mr. Finks politics been part of any classroom decision or any academic-personnel decision."

"As a top research university in the United States," she said, "we value and celebrate a diversity of opinion."

The trouble began in January, when Mr. Fink was scheduled to teach his campus free-speech course, a popular class that frequently filled up a large lecture hall. (UCLAs academic calendar is divided into four quarters, and January marked the start of the winter quarter.)

Ms. Johnson also told him his spring-term class had been moved into a smaller lecture hall, with only 170 seats, Mr. Fink said. She "offered no concrete explanation" for the changes, he said.

Ms. Johnson disputes all of that. She said the size of the free-speech class "was not changed from his prior enrollments." Mr. Fink had asked that his course be expanded, she said, but she had decided not to increase the size of any of the departments courses until she could review them individually.

Given that he had only one teaching assistant, 200 students was already more than ideal, Ms. Johnson said, adding that she wasnt involved in the decision to move his spring-quarter course to a different room.

In the meantime, starting during the winter term, Mr. Fink was subject to a review that all lecturers go through after theyve taught for 18 quarters. Faculty members who pass the review which involves an evaluation and a vote by their departments tenure-stream faculty members, and a final decision by the colleges dean are promoted to "continuing lecturer."

Mr. Fink had concerns about the process from the beginning. He said he had been asked to provide a list of people he believed should be excluded from the process because they couldnt objectively evaluate his teaching. He named Ms. Gmez and Ms. Johnson, his own chair, because they had tried "to arbitrarily reduce my class size." He added that Ms. Johnson disliked him and his political views.

He also named Mr. Bryant, the vice chair, as well as several other administrators and "all faculty members" in eight departments and programs across the university, including the departments of African-American studies, Asian-American studies, and gender studies.

The list was advisory, not binding, Ms. Johnson said. Also, she said, she didnt learn of Mr. Finks political affiliation until after she had decided not to increase the course size. Mr. Fink then wrote her an email saying he felt he was being targeted because of his conservative views. "Ive never told him what my politics are," she said.

He's never come to any meeting or any function that we've ever had. Nobody knows him.

Mr. Bryant sat in on Mr. Finks campus free-speech course nevertheless and wrote an evaluation. "I didnt want to write the letter," the professor said, "but a lot of people said no" to the task.

The evaluation "was riddled with lies and misrepresentations," according to Mr. Fink. He said Mr. Bryant had taken issue with his decision to single out particular students, saying that doing so created an unwelcoming learning environment.

Mr. Fink provided The Chronicle with declarations from two students in which they said they had developed close relationships with the faculty member and had no problem being identified one as a member of the campus Republican club, the other as a reporter and columnist for the student newspaper.

But thats not why the class was unwelcoming, Mr. Bryant said. "He makes students uncomfortable to talk because hes pretty aggressive back to them" if he disagrees with their point of view, he said. And Mr. Finks use of the discussion-based Socratic method in a large lecture hall "doesnt really work," Mr. Bryant said.

He was pushing his own views harder than I think he should.

"I believe Mr. Fink clearly has a right to express those views, especially in a class on the topic of free speech," he wrote in the evaluation, "but as a teaching technique, I feel like the more he belabors his points about UCLA in particular, the more he undermines his credibility and objectivity as an instructor."

Mr. Fink acknowledged that his provocative style might feel intimidating to some students. "But a university shouldnt be a safe space," he said.

Student evaluations of the free-speech course Mr. Fink taught this year provided by Andrew Litt, a recent UCLA School of Law graduate who served as Mr. Finks teaching assistant for two years and worked in his law firm mostly paint a picture of Mr. Fink as an engaging teacher and his course as stimulating and interesting.

This class was the best class I have taken at UCLA.

The departments final report, provided by Mr. Litt, stated that the review "skewed toward a favorable view of Mr. Finks teaching effectiveness," but said faculty members had raised concerns "about the climate fostered within the classroom" and the rigor of his assessments.

He's a good speaker, but that's not all it takes.

Ultimately, the nine voting faculty members deadlocked: Three voted to promote him to continuing lecturer, three voted not to, and three abstained. Ms. Gmez, the interim dean, then declined to promote him.

"The bar is incredibly high," Ms. Johnson said of the review. There is another lecturer in the department who is well qualified to teach a course on campus free speech and may do so in the future, she added.

Mr. Litt didnt believe the review process had been fair: "If you look at his record within the department, its very difficult, if not impossible, to make credible arguments that hes not excellent."

Mr. Fink said he may teach at another institution in the future, but in the meantime he is working with the universitys faculty union to file a grievance. He also plans to establish a nonprofit group that will provide free legal services to UCLA students and professors who feel their rights have been violated.

The spat illustrates what Mr. Fink describes as an intolerant culture at the university. "UCLA pays lip service to the notions of academic freedom and viewpoint diversity," he said, "but theres an implied understanding among the schools leaders that this really only applies if your views align with theirs."

That message has spread thanks to a steady stream of reports by Campus Reform, which has chronicled each step of the saga. A sample of the eight articles the website has published about Mr. Finks situation includes "UCLA still targeting conservative profs free speech course," "Conservative prof subject to biased review committee," and now "UCLA fires Fink with little explanation."

UCLAs administrators said the outrage is much ado about nothing. Mr. Finks case was "handled by the book," Mr. Bryant countered, and his views were not an issue. "My personal opinion about free speech is actually similar to his," he said.

"He just cant believe that people would not think hes an excellent teacher based on the reviews of students," Mr. Bryant added. "Theres more to it than what the students think."

Sarah Brown writes about a range of higher-education topics, including sexual assault, race on campus, and Greek life. Follow her on Twitter @Brown_e_Points, or email her at sarah.brown@chronicle.com.

Read more:
Why Did a UCLA Instructor With a Popular Free-Speech Course ... - The Chronicle of Higher Education

Posted in Free Speech | Comments Off on Why Did a UCLA Instructor With a Popular Free-Speech Course … – The Chronicle of Higher Education

Freedom of speech includes undesired and offensive – The Bozeman Daily Chronicle

Posted: at 8:58 am

The right to freedom of speech set forth in the First Amendment to the Constitution is being abridged by those who favor restricted speech, which allows one to say only that which they agree with.

We are experiencing a profound shift in our political culture, resulting in more and more persons with this view of the freedom of speech.

Since the Citizens United ruling by the Supreme Court, which restored free speech rights to millions of Americans by allowing non-profits and corporations to speak freely in the public arena, those who believe in restrictions now find it harder and harder to win policy arguments. Instead, they are beginning to operate under a new strategy, to threaten, harass and intimidate opponents to silence them, and to see that those who exercise their constitutional right to free speech will pay politically and personally.

Some examples are: The IRS targeting conservative non-profits; prosecutors abusing their powers to silence political opponents; activist groups using blackmail in the form of running campaigns against donors, corporations and businesses; and higher learning schools prohibiting conservative speakers.

This new strategy is not only generating a belief that those with a retrograde view have no rights, but is also turning those who exercise it from opponents into oppressors, who are more and more resorting to violence.

Undesired and offensive speech should be confronted with logic and better reasoning, without fear of retaliation or the need for societal sanction.

The liberty of freedom of speech can be better protected by more voices, not fewer.

Read the rest here:
Freedom of speech includes undesired and offensive - The Bozeman Daily Chronicle

Posted in Freedom of Speech | Comments Off on Freedom of speech includes undesired and offensive – The Bozeman Daily Chronicle

Rep. Dave Murphy: Free speech includes right to be heard | Column … – Madison.com

Posted: at 8:58 am

GREENVILLE After a lengthy debate, the state Assembly recently adopted the Campus Free Speech Act. The bill, which I co-authored with Rep. Jesse Kremer, R-Kewaskum, and Speaker Robin Vos, R-Rochester, will defend free speech on University of Wisconsin System campuses, and I hope the state Senate adopts it soon.

Defending free speech requires more of us than letting folks see who can shout the loudest. No freedom exists without responsibility. The freedom of speech is tied to the responsibility of letting others speak freely. Without the ability to be heard, without the ability to communicate, free speech is meaningless. Free speech includes the right to not be silenced not by the state, not by the state university, not by a mob, and not by an individual.

Nowhere is it more important to uphold the right to free speech than at our public universities. Nationally, we are witnessing disruptions in response to disagreeable speech. Some may say free speech isnt threatened here in Wisconsin. I say its never too early to preserve such an important right.

This is Wisconsin after all, and here in Wisconsin we dont wait until after a disaster to act. Wisconsin must continue to be on the forefront of protecting the right to speak, and the right to be heard.

Our public universities were established to discover and disseminate knowledge. This is only possible when controversial ideas can be freely expressed. College is not an extension of high school. A university is where truth is discovered and where decisions have real consequences.

A lot of people refer to college students as kids. But theyre not kids. Theyre adults. They used to be kids, and during that time they werent held responsible the way adults are. But college students are adults, and universities shouldnt coddle them. Its time that universities hold these adults responsible for their actions.

If someone is silenced on one of our campuses, Assembly Bill 299 provides them with clear legal recourse and clarity about how they can uphold their constitutional right to free speech. Everything in the bill is constitutional. In fact, it upholds the values of the First Amendment: allowing individuals to speak in a time, place, and manner where their voices can be heard.

Not only does a speaker have a right to be speak, but an audience has a right to hear the speech they came to see. This is especially true for students and their families who are paying so much for their time at a university.

Disrupting free speech is unconstitutional. Disruption is not speech. Disruption isnt protest. Disruption is theft. Its theft of another persons right to speak and be heard.

Im sure youll hear claims this bill protects so-called provocateurs. Well, this bill does protect them. Who decides who a provocateur is anyway? This bill protects provocateurs, professors, protesters and every other member of the public from being shut down by mob rule.

This bill sends the unmistakable message that Wisconsin values speech. Its a signal to people of all political leanings that they are welcome at our universities. The bill makes clear to students, faculty and visitors alike that silencing others is never an appropriate response to speech you dont like. Shouting down a person isnt the answer to speech you disagree with.

The free exchange of ideas must be at the core of a democratic society and a university education. Sunshine is the only disinfectant of bad ideas not silence, and not disruption. The process for enforcing speech policies on our college campuses will be dragged out into this light, ensuring fair and consistent application of the rules.

At orientation, students will learn about the importance of freedom of expression, which includes the right to speak and the responsibility to not silence others speech. New employees will receive information about freedom of expression. Instructors will receive an annual refresher on how to uphold free speech.

The bill protects the university from the type of mob thinking that has endangered so many other places. I dont know any elected officials who oppose free speech. How could we? Our jobs require us every day to enable speech, exercise speech, and honor free speech.

The UW Board of Regents has shown great leadership in adopting policies to protect freedom of expression. This bill backs up their initiative with the power of the law. It sends an important message that when university administrators take action to protect the free exercise of speech, those administrators will have the law squarely in their corner.

The enactment of this bill will ensure that Wisconsin citizens will never decline to speak up for fear of being shouted down on one of our college campuses.

Murphy, R-Greenville, represents the 56th Assembly District, including parts of Winneconne and Appleton: Rep.Murphy@legis.wisconsin.gov. This column was part of his Assembly floor speech on the Campus Free Speech Act he supports.

See the rest here:
Rep. Dave Murphy: Free speech includes right to be heard | Column ... - Madison.com

Posted in Freedom of Speech | Comments Off on Rep. Dave Murphy: Free speech includes right to be heard | Column … – Madison.com

John Hood: State universities advance free speech – Winston-Salem Journal

Posted: at 8:58 am

RALEIGH A couple of months ago, I wrote a column that outlined emerging threats to freedom of speech on college campuses and noted with alarm that few of North Carolinas public or private universities had taken the necessary steps to ensure even a basic level of protection for students, faculty and visiting speakers.

I am pleased to report that the situation has improved significantly since I wrote that earlier piece. The Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE) assesses the rules and procedures that protect, or fail to protect, free speech on campus. Just a few months ago, only one of the campuses in the University of North Carolina system Chapel Hill was given a green light in FIREs rating system. Most received yellow lights, while four campuses got red lights for failing to provide meaningful protections.

Several UNC campuses contacted FIRE to find out what they needed to do to address the problem, and then took action to remove their intrusive speech codes. As of late June, only one institution in the system, the UNC School of the Arts in Winston-Salem, still has a red-light designation.

Five campuses UNC-Chapel Hill, UNC-Greensboro, UNC-Charlotte, North Carolina Central, and East Carolina now have green lights. Thats fantastic! The other 10 universities are rated yellow, which in a couple of cases is still an improvement.

Among private campuses in North Carolina, the free-speech leader is Duke University, with a green light. On the other end of the spectrum, Wake Forest University and Davidson College are blinking red. While First Amendment protections of freedom of speech, press and assembly dont apply to private campuses, they should champion such practices as forming the core element of a truly liberal education.

North Carolina now leads the nation in the number of higher education institutions receiving FIREs top rating. North Carolinians who treasure free expression should be proud of this progress even as we continue to press other institutions to follow suit.

Why pay so much attention to this issue? Unless you are a professor, a student or a family member of either, you may not see free speech on campus as critical. But its related to a broader phenomenon that youve surely noticed and that may be affecting you more directly the decline of civil, constructive dialogue across political difference.

To recognize the right of someone else to express a controversial point of view is not necessarily to endorse that view. To place a high value on the free exchange of ideas is not necessarily to place a high value on all of the ideas being exchanged, or to place a high level of trust or confidence in the individuals expressing those ideas.

There are at least two core arguments for freedom of speech. One is that we all have inherent rights as human beings to say (and do) whatever we please as long as we dont violate the equal rights of others to say (and do) the same. The other, more consequentialist, argument is that if we allow and foster an unencumbered exchange of views, the marketplace of ideas will sort itself out over time and provide us with better answers to important questions than we could ever get by constraining the debate.

The first argument only applies to government policy. That is, in a free society no politician or bureaucrat has the legitimate power to suppress the views of others through such means as fines or imprisonment. If you come on my property and start yelling at me about Medicaid expansion or whatnot, I can have you ejected. But if you stand on your own property and yell at me, or use private means to communicate your views through spoken or printed word, my only recourses are to answer or ignore you.

The consequentialist argument, however, applies even in non-governmental settings such as private universities where the search for truth is integral to their missions. However messy or uncomfortable it may be in some circumstances, free speech is better than the alternative.

The John Locke Foundation

Original post:
John Hood: State universities advance free speech - Winston-Salem Journal

Posted in Freedom of Speech | Comments Off on John Hood: State universities advance free speech – Winston-Salem Journal