The Prometheus League
Breaking News and Updates
- Abolition Of Work
- Ai
- Alt-right
- Alternative Medicine
- Antifa
- Artificial General Intelligence
- Artificial Intelligence
- Artificial Super Intelligence
- Ascension
- Astronomy
- Atheism
- Atheist
- Atlas Shrugged
- Automation
- Ayn Rand
- Bahamas
- Bankruptcy
- Basic Income Guarantee
- Big Tech
- Bitcoin
- Black Lives Matter
- Blackjack
- Boca Chica Texas
- Brexit
- Caribbean
- Casino
- Casino Affiliate
- Cbd Oil
- Censorship
- Cf
- Chess Engines
- Childfree
- Cloning
- Cloud Computing
- Conscious Evolution
- Corona Virus
- Cosmic Heaven
- Covid-19
- Cryonics
- Cryptocurrency
- Cyberpunk
- Darwinism
- Democrat
- Designer Babies
- DNA
- Donald Trump
- Eczema
- Elon Musk
- Entheogens
- Ethical Egoism
- Eugenic Concepts
- Eugenics
- Euthanasia
- Evolution
- Extropian
- Extropianism
- Extropy
- Fake News
- Federalism
- Federalist
- Fifth Amendment
- Fifth Amendment
- Financial Independence
- First Amendment
- Fiscal Freedom
- Food Supplements
- Fourth Amendment
- Fourth Amendment
- Free Speech
- Freedom
- Freedom of Speech
- Futurism
- Futurist
- Gambling
- Gene Medicine
- Genetic Engineering
- Genome
- Germ Warfare
- Golden Rule
- Government Oppression
- Hedonism
- High Seas
- History
- Hubble Telescope
- Human Genetic Engineering
- Human Genetics
- Human Immortality
- Human Longevity
- Illuminati
- Immortality
- Immortality Medicine
- Intentional Communities
- Jacinda Ardern
- Jitsi
- Jordan Peterson
- Las Vegas
- Liberal
- Libertarian
- Libertarianism
- Liberty
- Life Extension
- Macau
- Marie Byrd Land
- Mars
- Mars Colonization
- Mars Colony
- Memetics
- Micronations
- Mind Uploading
- Minerva Reefs
- Modern Satanism
- Moon Colonization
- Nanotech
- National Vanguard
- NATO
- Neo-eugenics
- Neurohacking
- Neurotechnology
- New Utopia
- New Zealand
- Nihilism
- Nootropics
- NSA
- Oceania
- Offshore
- Olympics
- Online Casino
- Online Gambling
- Pantheism
- Personal Empowerment
- Poker
- Political Correctness
- Politically Incorrect
- Polygamy
- Populism
- Post Human
- Post Humanism
- Posthuman
- Posthumanism
- Private Islands
- Progress
- Proud Boys
- Psoriasis
- Psychedelics
- Putin
- Quantum Computing
- Quantum Physics
- Rationalism
- Republican
- Resource Based Economy
- Robotics
- Rockall
- Ron Paul
- Roulette
- Russia
- Sealand
- Seasteading
- Second Amendment
- Second Amendment
- Seychelles
- Singularitarianism
- Singularity
- Socio-economic Collapse
- Space Exploration
- Space Station
- Space Travel
- Spacex
- Sports Betting
- Sportsbook
- Superintelligence
- Survivalism
- Talmud
- Technology
- Teilhard De Charden
- Terraforming Mars
- The Singularity
- Tms
- Tor Browser
- Trance
- Transhuman
- Transhuman News
- Transhumanism
- Transhumanist
- Transtopian
- Transtopianism
- Ukraine
- Uncategorized
- Vaping
- Victimless Crimes
- Virtual Reality
- Wage Slavery
- War On Drugs
- Waveland
- Ww3
- Yahoo
- Zeitgeist Movement
-
Prometheism
-
Forbidden Fruit
-
The Evolutionary Perspective
Monthly Archives: June 2017
Should the Libertarian Party Even Bother Existing Anymore? – Being Libertarian (satire)
Posted: June 1, 2017 at 11:03 pm
This discussion has come up quite a bit recently and its just the question to ask for the future of the liberty movement.
Should the Libertarian Party (LP) bother to continue whatever it is they do?
In 2016, they had the best ticket by far in their history. Two people who were actually credible were at the top of the ticket, but despite national attention and more, they flopped.
Hell, even the LP primary had a blogger (who has been on the news before) bragging about how often he was getting laid on the campaign and a wanted murder suspect.
It made the primary something to note, but still brought in only a whopping 3%.
Looking at LP history, despite them having been in every race since 1976, they have bombed in every one.
Theyve bombed despite having a Koch and a Paul on former tickets. Theyve nominated for president, people who were wanted in several states, and had at least one guy hoping for a presidential bid who was living in a car.
With every decent name who offers to join in, they have about two dozen total nut cases, and the decent names tend to just be self promoters whose mouths water at the thought of running for congress so it can get them on local TV, or a Wikipedia page.
Looking at the future of the LP, things dont really get much better.
The best option for 2020 is Justin Amash, who cant win.
After that, the field fills with people such as Adam Kokesh, Larry Sharpe and others who, if given the nomination, are so bad that Im stuck thinking Why even bother.
Im just wondering if the LP will even continue to be a thing. I think the answer to that is yes, and no.
The LP should remain an entity, but the focus of just nominating people needs to die.
If you are running in the LP, you just dont win. The focus needs to be changing politics to actually win.
For that, the future is ranked voting, similar to what is being done in Maine.
Having the line I dont want to waste my vote be meaningless is ideal. So, the LP should take their time to get ranked voting ballot initiatives, to get the half of the country where its feasible to do so and bring the LP to life.
After that, market the LP as a path to obtaining a place on the final voting ballot, without the major party primary hell, and the LP will see a sea of better candidates.
Unless a major voting reform is done, the LP will never become a thing unless someone like Mark Cuban or Jeff Bezos ran as a Libertarian, in which case I doubt the party would even nominate them to begin with.
What should the liberty movement do in the meantime?
The key is a man named Neel Kashkari.
For those who dont know him, Neel Kashkari is a well spoken Republican who ran for governor against Jerry Brown in 2014. He ran as a fiscal conservative who was liberal on social issues, he also mentioned he hated the Iraq War.
If Kashkari ran in Texas, he would never get to be the pro-pot, pro-abortion and pro-gay republican he was.
So what does this all mean?
Libertarians should run for the nominations of the second largest parties in their state. The reason is the Republican partys in states such as Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Hawaii etc., are just as dead as the Democrats in Texas, Kansas, and pretty much any place Ruby Tuesdays is called fine dining.
So what do those platforms look like?
Libertarians running in the GOP
For this, be like Bill Weld. Be the pro-choice and pro-gay republican in a liberal state which cant be called a racist.
Talk about real economic reform which involves free markets, but promise a stronger social safety net.
However, try to one up the democrat on issues a liberal likes. Be more anti war, more for criminal justice reform and more likely to go out and talk about negative externalities to help the environment.
Libertarians running in the Democratic Party
For this, be a democrat who isnt an idiot on economics.
Show a more free market plan and brag about stances such as support for gun rights.
Also, talk about an issue such as the Federal Reserve or corporate subsidies, and use that as a friendly way to reach Republicans while maintaining a Democrat base of support.
This is a model for conquering the Democratic Party and GOP in dead states.
The next part is the moderate states like Ohio, Florida, and New Hampshire etc.
I would say the liberty movement should likely just handle it on a candidate by candidate basis and select their representatives based on incumbents.
An example being how, in 2014, John Kasich was impossible to beat. A libertarian Democrat would be very strong moving forward. Another would be Marco Rubio in 2016, who easily won reelection, but having a more centrist type democrat might have pulled the election away from him.
Conclusion
Yes, be part of the Libertarian Party and encourage them.
Also make it so every state has ranked voting and the two-party system gets destroyed.
That way, strong candidates can run easily on libertarian ideals without bowing to the right or left.
However, run as Republicans or Democrats when the race means something.
This post was written by Charles Peralo.
The views expressed here belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect our views and opinions.
Like Loading...
Link:
Should the Libertarian Party Even Bother Existing Anymore? - Being Libertarian (satire)
Posted in Libertarian
Comments Off on Should the Libertarian Party Even Bother Existing Anymore? – Being Libertarian (satire)
The Red Dirt Liberty Report: Cryptomania – Being Libertarian
Posted: at 11:03 pm
As I write this, the value of Bitcoin has risen to over $2,500, and the value of Ethereum has come up to nearly $200. There are also the other various cryptocurrencies that have experienced dramatic rises in the past couple of weeks. Its a sort of crypto-mania right now. There seems to be many unprecedented things going on here, and like the all new paradigms these alt currencies are creating, these valuations seem to be breaking all kinds of rules and traditional trading rationale. The valuations dont seem to be following the sorts of trends and measures that usually offer indicators on securities or commodities. Neither do they seem to follow traditional indicators on currencies. So, this isnt an article about the potential direction of these valuations. These mechanisms of how these currencies are valued seem to elude me. Rather, this is an article about the likelihood of common usage of cryptocurrencies.
Like the majority of libertarians, I watch these cryptocurrencies with interest and cheer on climbing valuations in hopes that it might mean broad acceptance of these currencies, at some point, as a replacement to traditional currencies. I see the benefits of a decentralized currency far outside the control of any one person or group of people. These are currencies for which no government can rest control away from the people. And, while the notion of the usage of such currencies is enticing, it isnt very practical in terms of wide usage at this time. Using cryptocurrencies is clunky, at best.
To use one of these cryptocurrencies, I have to open a wallet out of thin air, then I have do something that feels like sending off my money to a distressed prince in desperate, but profitable circumstances in my email inbox. I have to send my money off into a dark cyber world that is unfamiliar and contains operations with which I have no experience whatsoever, and I am not sure whether it will exist only in my mind or I will someday be able to retrieve it. While logically, I assume that there will be no problems, it is hard to trust such an unfamiliar process. There are also limited options for the use of the cryptocurrencies, primarily limited to private transactions with other people I might have a hard time finding or with a handful of online marketplaces with a very limited stock of merchandise.
While it is certain that options for using cryptocurrencies will increase over time, I believe it is going to take more time than most crypto-optimists realize. I believe that cryptocurrencies overtaking the currencies we all now know is inevitable at some point, but it is going to be quite some time before it happens. I dont like being such a pessimist, but there are enormous hurdles to these things, the chief of which is the governments and the central banking systems that have cornered the market on currencies. They arent just going to throw all that power away because weve decided we like decentralized authority better. Neither are people ready to accept an entirely new way of thinking about their money that changes the very foundations of their understandings of how they live from day to day.
As a practical example, Oklahoma passed a law making gold legal tender three years ago, meaning that people can use gold to buy and sell things without any trouble from government. However, having operated a business in all that time in Oklahoma, I have never had anyone offer up gold to buy anything. I would love it if they would, but theres just never been any talk of it. I have a little bit of gold myself, but I still dont view it as money. To me, its still a way to guard against inflation and poses an alternative investment. People really just dont feel pressed to use gold as currency, even though it has become legal here.
As another practical example, I once began offering to sell my goods for Bitcoin, trying to do something different and offer a service competitors werent offering. About a year and a half later, there had been only one customer that even so much as mentioned it, and said he was shopping at my store solely because I offered to transact in Bitcoin, but he paid with old fashioned American dollars. My credit and debit card processor suddenly halted all activity on my merchant account while holding several days worth of transactions, because they had discovered my acceptance of Bitcoin. They were refusing to pay the deposits I had due until I removed any sign of accepting Bitcoin and sign a statement stating such refusal. I had no choice but to do so, or face losing an enormous amount of money that I could not afford to lose. When I inquired as to why and what business it was of theirs what currencies I accept, they replied that they did not want to be anywhere near businesses transacting in cryptocurrencies out of fear of being accused by the government of money laundering. There was no way I could afford to stand on principles and lose such a large quantity of money, so I caved to their demands.
Government agencies around the world use the banking systems to keep tabs on people and to follow cash to spot criminal activity and to make sure nobody is hiding income from taxation. If you take money out of that system, especially in any noticeable way, these government agencies become highly suspicious and assume you must be a criminal yourself. There are very negative consequences, up to as negative as the seizing of property and potential prison time. With hammering threats like this, nobody wants to risk legitimate transactions being taken for criminal ones.
Full acceptance of cryptocurrencies also means the end of banks as we know them. There is no need for a bank, in the current way they exist, to store your cryptocurrencies. This means undoing a means of transacting business and borrowing money that has become so entrenched into society for hundreds of years that it has become a symbol of what creates a civil society in the minds of the vast majority of people. The banking system has been at the very center of every major improvement in society for the past few hundred years. Want to see true civil unrest and panic? Just put closed for business signs on your local banks and see how quickly people freak out at the thought of losing access to capital, even if their money could be obtained through different means.
It took hard currency millennia to develop into the way we know and use it, and the banking system took several centuries to become entrenched into the fabric of society. All of that doesnt change in the blink of an eye. While I will continue to cheer on the rise in crypto valuations, I am not going to assume that these cryptocurrencies will be in full use any time soon. I love the idea of them. I want their full usage, but I am enough of a realist not to bank on it.
This post was written by Danny Chabino.
The views expressed here belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect our views and opinions.
Like Loading...
See more here:
The Red Dirt Liberty Report: Cryptomania - Being Libertarian
Posted in Libertarian
Comments Off on The Red Dirt Liberty Report: Cryptomania – Being Libertarian
Freedom Philosophy: Free Market Environmentalism – Being Libertarian
Posted: at 11:03 pm
The environment isnt very popular with libertarians. My suspicion is that support for the environment is viewed as a vessel for regulation and taxes (specifically a carbon tax) an anathema to liberation. There are, however, very libertarian considerations when it comes to environmental pollution.
The first and most serious is the violation of the non-aggression principle. Polluters emit poisonous gas into the air. Chemical runoff from fertilizers, carbon monoxide, sulfur dioxide, chlorofluorocarbons, and nitrogen oxides all negatively impact society. Producers of goods that cause air, soil, and water pollution profit while other individuals suffer the consequences; this is hardly a non-aggression ideal.
To further establish fossil fuels anti-liberty credentials, they do this with government assistance.
The Overseas Development Institute, and Oil Change International, commissioned a study which concluded that global subsidies for fossil fuel producers stood at $775 billion, while green energy subsidies received a humbler $101 billion.
Fossil fuels receive an unfair competitive advantage. Libertarians desperately need to stop pretending this is a free market it is big government.
Environmentalism ought not to be a platform for the left. There is no stronger empirical argument for liberty than the horrifying reality of governments actually stealing our money and giving it to people to poison the air we breathe and destroy the life-permitting chemical balance of our atmosphere. Big government interfering with the free market system is the height of corruption.
Ronald Reagan famously quipped that government is not the solution to our problem, government is the problem. When it comes to the environment, truer words were never spoken.
Free market environmentalists advocate internalizing the costs of production. If there is a cost of producing a product then this should be factored into the cost of production rather than it being paid by a bystanding individual.
There is no shortage of arguments libertarians have ready to dispense (if the topic of environmentalism is brought up) regarding anthropogenic causes to our planets warming; some are more intelligent than others.
I would like to remind all true libertarians that none of these serve as sufficient justifications for overlooking the violation of the non-aggression principle with poisonous air or the big government-style subsidies that individuals have to pay.
On the opposite end of the political spectrum, we find leftists who urge me on to the conclusion that government is necessary for the protection of our environment. The empirical evidence suggests that governments are not only unlikely to be able to accomplish this but are even more likely to be an accomplice for the opposite.
Leftists urge me to support a system thats statistically, and therefore empirically, likely to oppose environmentalism due to the enormous politicking power of the fossil fuel industry.
The only pragmatic solution to human-caused degradation of our environment is the idealism of liberty.
Only through the elimination of subsidies can we create a fair market for green energy. Only through the non-aggression principle can we reasonably argue for additional costs imposed on fossil fuel production in the absence of that, its mere capriciousness.
At the heart of environmentalism is liberty; not a big government with all its corruption-potential, but liberty for the individual and justice for society.
This post was written by Brandon Kirby.
The views expressed here belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect our views and opinions.
Brandon Kirby is a philosopher, financial adviser, a founder of a local investment club, and he hosts regular symposiums in philosophy. He is also a member of Canadas Libertarian Party.
Like Loading...
View original post here:
Freedom Philosophy: Free Market Environmentalism - Being Libertarian
Posted in Libertarian
Comments Off on Freedom Philosophy: Free Market Environmentalism – Being Libertarian
A new Golden Rule for leadership – MultiBriefs Exclusive (blog)
Posted: at 11:02 pm
Leaders and managers seeking to engage, motivate and retain employees should consider adopting a slightly revised version of the Golden Rule.
"Manage others as you want to be managed" is the lesson that can be drawn from a recent study of the relationship between varying degrees of work autonomy and levels of employee satisfaction and perceived well-being. The findings indicate that a traditional top-down, command-and-control management style still widely in use is counterproductive in many of today's businesses.
Researchers at the University of Birmingham Business School compared data collected in two separate years from some 20,000 employees in the United Kingdom in order to examine employees' reported changes in well-being relative to levels of work autonomy.
Their analysis found that those in management reported the highest level of autonomy, with 90 percent saying they experienced "some" or "a lot" of autonomy, along with high levels of perceived well-being and job satisfaction. Professionals reported having lower levels of autonomy than managers. Around 40 to 50 percent of mid-level employees reported they had little autonomy, and half of those in lower skilled jobs reported no autonomy in how they carried out their work.
The researchers found corresponding declines in job satisfaction and perceived well-being as levels of work autonomy decreased.
In particular, the study found, employees want greater control over their work tasks and schedule. The study also found that the types of autonomy employees prized varied by position and gender.
Professionals, for example, wanted more flexibility in the pace of work and work hours. For women to whom the duties of family and informal caregiving most often fall flexibility over the timing and location of their work, including the ability to work from home, allowed them to better manage their work/life balance. Men, on the other hand, value having more control over how they carry out their work, such as determining job tasks, pace of work and task order.
"Greater levels of control over work tasks and schedule have the potential to generate significant benefits for the employee, which was found to be evident in the levels of reported well-being," project director Dr. Daniel Wheatley observed.
Autonomy is closely related with self-esteem and sense of purpose, which are prime drivers of productivity, creativity, engagement, satisfaction and well-being. Employees who reported higher levels of autonomy especially schedule control were more likely to say they "enjoyed" their work.
That may seem like a rather minor consideration until one compares the findings of this study with other related studies that have shown lack of job autonomy increases stress and the incidence of health issues related to stress, hastens employee burnout, and has a negative impact on employee morale, retention and productivity. Similarly, research has shown a strong correlation between employees' control of their physical environment (e.g., lighting, space arrangement, temperature) and job satisfaction, productivity and sense of well-being.
Why do so many employees dream of being their own boss? Surely it is not because they want the headaches, stress and risk that come with running one's own business. No, it is for the same reason people strive to become managers and leaders in their organization. They want more control over their lives and how to do their job.
Yet, Wheatley notes, "Despite the reported increased levels of well-being, in many cases managers remain unwilling to offer employees greater levels of autonomy and the associated benefits, because their primary role remains one of 'control and effort extraction.'"
Giving employees more autonomy requires not an abdication of management but a different approach to management. It involves shifting focus from how, where and when to what and why, from outputs to outcomes, and from directing to coaching.
Autonomy is not license. Employees are still held accountable for their results, their hours worked and level of effort, and their use of company resources.
Holding them to a different standard than that which leaders and managers apply to themselves one which, it deserves noting, implies a lack of trust and respect only perpetuates an outmoded business paradigm that is proving increasingly dysfunctional in today's knowledge- and innovation-driven global economy.
See the original post:
A new Golden Rule for leadership - MultiBriefs Exclusive (blog)
Posted in Golden Rule
Comments Off on A new Golden Rule for leadership – MultiBriefs Exclusive (blog)
Jessica Chastain’s Stylist Shares Her Golden Rule of Styling – Vanity Fair
Posted: at 11:02 pm
Day 10: Diane Kruger
At the photocall for In The Fade (Aus Dem Nichts).
By Andreas Rentz/Getty Images.
Going to the Mayors Aioli.
From Iconic/GC Images.
At the premiere of Amant Double (LAmant Double).
By Antonio de Moraes Barros Filho/FilmMagic.
At the premiere of Amant Double (LAmant Double).
By Antonio de Moraes Barros Filho/FilmMagic.
At the premiere of Amant Double (LAmant Double).
By Kristina Nikishina/Getty Images.
At the photocall for Posoki.
By Andreas Rentz/Getty Images.
At the Jury Cinefondation.
By Matthias Nareyek/Getty Images.
At the amfAR Gala.
By Gisela Schober/Getty Images.
At the amfAR Gala.
By Anthony Harvey/FilmMagic.
At the amfAR Gala.
By Dominique Charriau/WireImage.
At the amfAR Gala.
From Venturelli/WireImage.
At the amfAR Gala.
By Mike Marsland/WireImage.
At the amfAR Gala.
By Andreas Rentz/French Select.
At the amfAR Gala.
By Andreas Rentz/French Select.
At the amfAR Gala.
By Andreas Rentz/French Select.
At the amfAR Gala.
By Gisela Schober/Getty Images.
At the premiere of The Beguiled.
By Dominique Charriau/WireImage.
At the premiere of The Beguiled.
By Loic Venance/AFP/Getty Images.
At the premiere of The Beguiled.
By Pascal Le Segretain/Getty Images.
Left: Walking around town; Right: At the premiere of The Beguiled.
Left; by Iconic/GC Images, Right; by Antonio de Moraes Barros Filho/FilmMagic.
At the premiere of The Beguiled.
By Neilson Barnard/Getty Images.
At the premiere of The Beguiled.
By Antonio de Moraes Barros Filho/FilmMagic.
At the premiere of The Beguiled.
By Neilson Barnard/Getty Images.
At the premiere of The Beguiled.
By Chris Jackson/Getty Images.
At the Cannes 70th Anniversary Celebration.
By Matt Baron/REX/Shutterstock.
At the Cannes 70th Anniversary Celebration.
By Pascal Le Segretain/Getty Images.
At the Cannes 70th Anniversary Celebration.
By Dominique Charriau/WireImage.
At the Cannes 70th Anniversary Celebration.
From Venturelli/WireImage.
At the Cannes 70th Anniversary Celebration.
By Pascal Le Segretain/Getty Images.
Left: At the photocall for Top of the Lake: China Girl. Right: At the Cannes 70th Anniversary Celebration.
Left; by Dominique Charriau/WireImage, Right; by Valery HacheAFP/Getty Images.
At the Cannes 70th Anniversary Celebration.
By Dominique Charriau/WireImage.
At the Cannes 70th Anniversary Celebration.
By Stephane Cardinale/Corbis/Getty Images.
At the Cannes 70th Anniversary Celebration.
By Vittorio Zunino Celotto/Getty Images.
At the photocall for Jeune Femme.
Venturelli
At the photocall for Happy End.
By Andreas Rentz/Getty Images.
At the photocall for Our Crazy Years (Nos Annees Folles)
By Venturelli/WireImage.
At the premiere of The Killing Of A Sacred Deer.
By Venturelli/WireImage.
At the premiere of The Killing Of A Sacred Deer.
By Venturelli/WireImage.
At the premiere of The Killing Of A Sacred Deer.
By Gisela Schober/Getty Images.
At the premiere of The Killing Of A Sacred Deer.
By Dominique Charriau/WireImage.
At the Women in Motion Awards Dinner.
By Venturelli/Getty Images.
At the Women in Motion Awards Dinner.
By Venturelli/Getty Images.
At the premiere of The Meyerowitz Stories.
By Pascal Le Segretain/Getty Images.
At the premiere of How to talk to Girls at Parties.
Photo by George Pimentel/WireImage.
At the premiere of How to talk to Girls at Parties.
By George Pimentel/WireImage.
At the premiere of How to talk to Girls at Parties.
By Venturelli/WireImage.
Walking around town.
By Venturelli/GC Images.
Walking around town.
By Jacopo Raule/GC Images.
Walking around town.
By Venturelli/GC Images.
At the premiere of The Square.
Go here to read the rest:
Jessica Chastain's Stylist Shares Her Golden Rule of Styling - Vanity Fair
Posted in Golden Rule
Comments Off on Jessica Chastain’s Stylist Shares Her Golden Rule of Styling – Vanity Fair
Texas Freedom Network head says using religion to discriminate violates the Golden Rule – Baptist News Global
Posted: at 11:02 pm
The leader of a Texas civil-liberties organization formed to counter the Religious Right speculated in a radio interview May 27 that the states child welfare crisis helped boost a controversial bill headed to the governors desk allowing state-funded providers of child welfare to refuse service if it violates the agencys religious beliefs.
Kathy Miller
Kathy Miller, president of the Texas Freedom Network, criticized the Freedom to Serve Children Act passed by both the House and Senate as part of a piecemeal agenda this legislative session. Its aim is to radically redefine our centuries old understanding of religious freedom and allow it to mean that religion can be used to harm people and be used as an excuse for discrimination.
The Golden Rule has been thrown out the window, Miller said. Shedescribed the new plan to use religion to discriminate in an interview with host Welton Gaddy on State of Belief Radio.
Because Texas does have a child welfare crisis, I think that that crisis kind of pushed people to swallow using religion as a license to discriminate, said Miller, head of the Austin-based organization which supports issues including religious freedom, individual liberties and public education while monitoring the Religious Right.
Miller said the measure sets terrible precedent for other states and encouraged citizens across the country to take note of more than two dozen pieces of legislation introduced this term trying to roll back gains for LGBT persons living in Texas.
Miller said in the two years since the U.S. Supreme Court ruling that legalized same-sex marriage in all 50 states there has been a kind of fevered pitch from the far right to take away any sense of equality that LGBT Texans might have, to almost make the marriage equality as meaningless as possible.
[Its] almost to say, We may have to give you a marriage license, but we dont have to recognize your marriage in all of these other ways. We need the nation to speak up, and we need people of faith to speak up and to really say thats not what my faith taught me.
The Freedom to Serve Children Act would allow child welfare providers receiving taxpayer funds to be exempted from any negative actions by the state if they refuse to provide services.
That means a license for an adoption agency cant be rescinded, Miller said. It means that children cant be taken from a foster home. It means that they can do nothing to intervene if a child welfare provider says that what they are doing is acting on their sincerely held religious beliefs.
That includes refusing to allow same-sex couples to be part of their adoption process [or] to become foster families, she said. It also includes foster families that refuse hormone therapy for a transgender child or birth control or even emergency contraception for a child in their care.
Its quite bad. It covers virtually every aspect of child welfare.
While the legislations primary aim is to prevent faith-based adoption and foster-care agencies from being sued if they turn away same-sex couples, Miller said potential harms run the gamut from discrimination based on religion.
A Christian organization can refuse to allow a Jewish couple to participate or a Muslim family to participate. It can be based on sex, so you can discriminate against girls. It runs the gamut, and the harms are real and theyre tragic, because the kids in child welfare are already in incredibly vulnerable situations.
The bill authored by State Rep. James Frank (R-Wichita Falls), a deacon at First Baptist Church in Wichita Falls, Texas, is designed to avoid situations faced in other states where groups like Catholic Charities stopped adoption services entirely instead of allowing adoptions to gay couples.
Both the Baptist General Convention of Texas Convention Christian Life Commission and Southern Baptists of Texas Convention backed the measure.
Randy Daniels, a vice president at Buckner International, told lawmakers during hearings on the bill that trustees of the Baptist-affiliated agency had placed a moratorium on expansion of foster care and adoption, and in the future might move our resources into other kinds of ministries without protections offered in the law.
Gus Reyes, head of the Texas Baptist Christian Life Commission, responded to the license to discriminate charge by calling the measure a license to participate for faith-based agencies that account for 25 percent of the child-placing capacity in Texas.
We believe it is possible to respect sincerely held religious beliefs and work for the best interest of the child, Reyes said during the hearing in March.
The Texas Freedom Network was founded in 1995 by Cecile Richards, now president of Planned Parenthood and daughter of former Gov. Ann Richards.
Miller, who has led the organization since 2009, said infusing religion into to the child-welfare debate makes it even more troubling.
We spend a lot of time talking about how awful this is as public policy, but I also think its really damaging for faith to have people asserting in the name of religion and in this case its almost always in the name of Christianity that discrimination is a goal, she said. I think that harms peoples understanding that faith is about bringing communities together, not dividing us.
Gaddy, an ordained Baptist minister and former Interfaith Alliance head who recently retired as pastor of Northminster Church in Monroe, La., said recent actions including a proposed bathroom bill by the Texas state legislature threaten LGBT families to a degree we havent seen elsewhere.
They say everything is bigger in Texas, and I guess that goes for attacks on minority communities, too, said Gaddy, who served in Texas as pastor of Broadway Baptist Church in Fort Worth from 1977 to 1984.
Previous stories:
Baptist pastor says faith-based adoption agencies shouldnt discriminate against gays
Orphan care takes center stage in LGBT/religious liberty debate
Continued here:
Posted in Golden Rule
Comments Off on Texas Freedom Network head says using religion to discriminate violates the Golden Rule – Baptist News Global
Civil discourse and the Golden Rule – Casper Star-Tribune Online
Posted: at 11:02 pm
Weve heard all about it repeatedly: our current society thrives on incivility. The public opinion du jour seems to be that the more extreme the speech, the more likely our message will be noticed. And if we disagree with one persons or groups opinion, the only way our opinion or message will be heard is to attack, vilify or silence that person or group.
Is this really what our society has come to? I personally have much greater faith in humanity than to believe incivility is the norm. We can all be an influence for good, and perhaps a groundswell of civility and kindness in our part of the world can influence others to follow suit. At the very core of our interactions with others, whether in person or in other formats, we can simply follow the Golden Rule: do unto others as you would have them do unto you. So, how do we apply this age-old axiom when we come across a message we disagree with?
Resist the urge to silence an opposing view.
Have you ever felt like your opinion was dismissed or ignored, perhaps because others disagreed with you? At a meeting I recently attended, I heard some people voice concerns about the negative impact social media has had on our societys incivility. Some blamed the anonymity and distance of these mass media forums, and others spoke of biased reporting in the media and the need to control these venues more.
Media is not the enemy. These mass media venues are merely a place for messages to be disseminated. In a day when more people have a voice, more people can have an audience. This opportunity to be heard is used by people of all views and beliefs. Stifling various views is not only ineffective; it goes against the Golden Rule. No one likes to be silenced, and if we allow opposing views to be expressed, we are more likely to have our own views heard.
Work to understand the other perspective.
As we work to allow all voices to be heard, its important to treat differing opinions with respect. Quentin Cook said, How we disagree is a real measure of who we are and whether we truly follow the Savior. It is appropriate to disagree, but it is not appropriate to be disagreeable.
Its easy to have civil conversations with those who have similar views as our own, but the true test of the Golden Rule comes when we are faced with an opposing view. Just as we want our views to be respected and understood, we must respect and try to understand the views of others.
Counter ignorance and fear with knowledge and compassion.
Sometimes incivility towards a view or group comes from ignorance. Perhaps a group acts or believes differently than those we normally associate with. Or perhaps we have no experience with a specific group. Its easier to understand when we know more about who they are and their perspectives. As we seek to know more, civility and compassion automatically follow.
Supreme Court Justices Antonin Scalia and Ruth Bader Ginsberg were excellent examples of this. Despite being on opposite ends of the political spectrum, they were close friends whose families spent holidays together and traveled together. They never let their differing views get in the way of that friendship.
Ultimately, when we seek civility in our discourse and interactions with others, we can never go wrong when we follow the Golden Rule. It will lead to greater understanding, compassion, and perhaps even friendship.
Read more:
Civil discourse and the Golden Rule - Casper Star-Tribune Online
Posted in Golden Rule
Comments Off on Civil discourse and the Golden Rule – Casper Star-Tribune Online
What blew up the liberal and conservative media bubbles this week – USA TODAY
Posted: at 11:02 pm
Kathy Griffin is under fire for a photo shoot where she held a mock severed head of President Trump.(Photo: Dan MacMedan, USA TODAY)
Media bubbles. Everybody's got one and everybody thinks the other side's stinks. For those of you who may lean liberal and not know what's trending on your conservative brother-in-law's Facebook page or vice-versahere's a look at what was hot from both right and left-leaning media and commentators this week.
And here's what had everyone fired up last week:
What really fired up conservatives this week?
What really fired up liberals this week?
Of all the posts about comedian Kathy Griffin'soffensive photo shoot with decapitated Trump head,this one from Fox News Entertainment, about Griffin losing her new Squatty Potty gig, made the biggest social media splash.
"We were shocked and disappointed to learn about the image Ms. Griffin shared today, it was deeply inappropriate and runs contrary to the core values our company stands for," Squatty Potty CEO Bobby Edwards in a statement, according to Fox News. "In response, Squatty Potty has suspended its ad campaign featuring Ms. Griffin. We have acted swiftly and decisively to demonstrate our commitment to a culture of decency, civility, and tolerance."
Not familiar withthe Squatty Potty? I'll just leave this here ...
"I know its theoretically wrong for a Republican candidate to smack around an annoying liberal journalist, but that still doesnt mean that I care," writes Townhall columnist Kurt Schlichter about Greg Gianforte's alleged assault of Guardian reporter Ben Jacobs on the eve of Montana's special election for its open House seat. The fact that he and other conservatives don't care about the assault is the fault of liberals who "have chosen to coarsen our culture,"Schlichter says.
Their validation and encouragement of raw hate, their flouting of laws (Hi leakers! Hi Hillary!) and their utter refusal to accept democratic outcomes they disapprove of have consequences. What is itself so surprising is how liberals and their media rentboyz are so surprised to find that we normals are beginning to feel about them the way they feel about us and that were starting to act on it. If you hate us, guess what?
Were going to start hating you right back.
National Review critic Kyle Smith was less than kind in his assessment of a recent New York Magazine interview with Hillary Clinton:
The funniest episode in the protective yet revealing new Hillary Clinton profile arrives when we learn that this sad, unemployed, 69-year-old lady is so desperate to keep her self-image alive that she still employs flunkies and retainers to treat her as though she actually were the president, or the secretary of state, or a president in waiting, or at very least the leader of the opposition.
Smith was particularly disgusted with what he says is Clinton's refusal to accept any blame for the election outcome.
"Every time she draws attention to the Trumpian flaws that were conspicuous to all during the campaign, she doesnt hear the obvious rejoinder echoing in every Americans mind: Then why couldnt you trounce him?" Smith concludes.
Autoplay
Show Thumbnails
Show Captions
And in other Hillary Clinton news:
"Hillary Clinton said Wednesday that her loss to Donald Trump might suggest that Democrats have to start learning how to twist the truth if they're going to start winning elections," the Washington Examiner'sPete Kasperowicz writes. Kasperowicz refers to remarks Clinton made at a tech conference in California, where she attributed part of her loss in the 2016election to what she considers the Trump team's open embrace of "falsehoods, fake news" and "lies."
"The other side was using content that was just flat-out false and delivering it in a very personalized way, both above the radar screen and below," Clinton said.
Kasperowicz said at one point Clinton appeared to reconsider the wisdom of not using the same tactics against her opponent. He said she implied that future candidates might have to resort to lying if they want to win when she said, "I'm not rethinking it, but everybody else better rethink it, because we have to figure out how to combat this."
Citing CNBC, this post on Sean Hannity's website celebrates the private sector jobs report for May, which came in at a robust 253,000 after forecasts of 180,000.
"The Trump administration has made job creation the cornerstone of its economic plan, slashing regulations and rescinding burdensome government policies that inhibit growth," the Hannity post reports.
"Many economists believe its now possible to achieve the White Houses goal of 3% GDP growth per year," the report concludes, without providing specific examples.
President Trump dealt a "devastating setback to international efforts to curb global warming" when he announced Thursday that the US. was pulling out of the Paris climate change agreement, which the Obama administration had taken a big role in brokering, the Huffington Post reported.
The move is a particularly egregious repudiation of the international community because the Trump administration could have negotiated for lower emissions targets under the Paris Agreement, officials and the pacts advocates said. Because of that, the diplomatic fallout will likely be harsher than when President George W. Bush rejected the 1997 Kyoto climate agreement.
President Donald Trump has announced the United States will withdraw from the Paris climate agreement. USA TODAY
"We don't need additional information about the Russian covert scheme to undermine the 2016 campaign, or about the curiousinteractions between Team Trump and Russia, or about Trumppressuring and then firingFBI Director James Comey, to reach the judgment that the president of the United States engaged in wrongdoing," David Corn writes forMother Jones.
Explicit collusion may yet be proved by the FBI investigation overseen byspecial counsel Robert Muelleror by other ongoing probes. But even if it is not, a harsh verdict can be pronounced: Trump actively and enthusiastically aided and abetted Russian President Vladimir Putin's plot against America. This is the scandal. It already exists in plain sight.
The newly elected president of France, Emmanuel Macron, promised to be "demanding" in his dealings with Russia and denounced state news organizations like Russia Today as "fake news" and "propaganda" during a news conference alongside Putin on Monday. "Two weeks into his term, the 39-year-old Macron struck an assertive, principled tone that you would have expected from an American president meeting with an increasingly assertive adversary," wrote Elliot Hannon for Slate.
Macrons assertiveness is noticeably absent in American interactions with Russia, which have melted into a bizarre sycophancy. Macron, like an increasing number of European leaders, seems to have sensed the softening in Washington and has indicated he will strike an equally tough pose in his dealings with the Trump White House.
French President Emmanuel Macron hosted Russia's Vladimir Putin at the sumptuous royal palace in Versailles on Monday to talk about cooperating on fighting terror. Time
There is "glaring hypocrisy" in the Trump family's outcry over Kathy Griffin's photo shoot because of their embrace of right-wing rock star Ted Nugent, writes Aaron Rupar for Think Progress.
"Just last month, Trump invited rock star Ted Nugent to the White House for dinner, despite Nugents repeated calls for the deaths of then-President Obama and Hillary Clinton," Rupar writes.
During Trumps presidential campaign, Nugents well-documented history of racism and violent threats didnt deter Trump fromfeaturing him in his campaign adsand at his rallies.
Pink Floyd co-founder Roger Waters could not be more clear on his 2017 U.S. tour: He does not like President Trump. At his shows, images played on a massive screen above the stage show Trump wearing lipstick, a wig, in dominatrix leather and naked, the Daily Kos reported. There are also anti-Trump messages that flashon the screen and agiant inflatable pig with Trump's face on it that hovers over the audience. Some fans at were not thrilled at the opening show in Kansas City, according to the Daily Kos.
The fans who didnt like the anti-Trump message must have beensuper bummed out to see children on stage, sporting Resist t-shirts during Waters rendition ofAnother Brick in the Wall. I mean, the guy wrote"The Wall" for Christ sakes. What did you think that was about?
Roger Waters dedicated some of his performance to ridiculing Donald Trump at Desert Trip in Indio, Calif., Oct. 9, 2016.(Photo: Jay Calderon, The Desert Sun)
In case you missed it:
What really fired up conservatives this week?
What really fired up liberals this week?
Read or Share this story: https://usat.ly/2sux6KT
See the original post:
What blew up the liberal and conservative media bubbles this week - USA TODAY
Posted in Liberal
Comments Off on What blew up the liberal and conservative media bubbles this week – USA TODAY
Liberal governors team up to fight climate change – The Hill
Posted: at 11:02 pm
Three liberal states are teaming up to fight climate change in response to President Trumpwithdrawingfrom the Paris climate agreement.
California, Washington and New York, which together account for a fifth of the countrys economy, say theyre committed to upholding the goals of Paris despite Trumps pullout.
The president has already said climate change is a hoax, which is the exact opposite of virtually all scientific and worldwide opinion, California Gov. Jerry Brown (D) said in a joint statement from himself and the other two states governors.
The three states are already some of the most progressive in policies regarding greenhouse gas emissions and aim to lead the world on fighting climate change.
Brown and Washington Gov. Jay Inslee (D) attended the Paris climate conference in 2015, where nearly 200 nations wrote the pact to limit greenhouse gas emissions.
The coalition, which the governors are dubbing the U.S. Climate Alliance, is launching without specific goals, except to do their own parts to abide by the original United States commitment.
I am proud to stand with other governors as we make sure that the inaction in D.C. is met by an equal force of action from the states," said Inslee. "Todays announcement by the president leaves the full responsibility of climate action on states and cities throughout our nation.
New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo (D) accused the Trump administration of abdicating its leadership and taking a backseat to other countries.
Cuomo said he is signing an executive order on climate change, which he said would confirm New Yorks leadership role in protecting our citizens, our environment, and our planet.
Read more:
Liberal governors team up to fight climate change - The Hill
Posted in Liberal
Comments Off on Liberal governors team up to fight climate change – The Hill
Portland’s liberal image tempered by history as ‘Skinhead City … – CNN
Posted: at 11:02 pm
Christian is accused of fatally stabbing two men who tried to protect two African-American girls, including one wearing a hijab, on a Portland light-rail train.
"Go home, we need American here!" Christian shouted at the girls, according to a probable cause affidavit. "I don't care if you are ISIS."
On Tuesday, Christian had barely entered the courtroom when he started shouting in his blue jail uniform.
"Free speech or die, Portland!" Christian bellowed. "... Death to the enemies of America. ... You call it terrorism, I call it patriotism. You hear me? Die."
Portland attack survivor feels 'very fortunate' 01:08
Just outside the courtroom, vitriol flew from the other direction.
One man identified himself as a friend of Christian's and was instantly met with profanity from some supporters of the victims.
"F*cking Nazi, you're a fascist!" one person shouted at the man.
"I bled for my race," he replied, as he tightened the red shoelaces on his boots.
It's not clear what the man meant when he said he bled for his race. Sheriff's deputies escorted him out before any more trouble erupted.
It's far from the first time Portland has been linked to Nazi extremism.
At the Portland metro station where bloody victims emerged last week, mourners wrote messages in chalk to honor those killed.
One message stirred memories of another gruesome murder: "Remember Mulugeta Seraw."
A message in front of Portland's Hollywood metro station honors murder victim Mulugeta Seraw.
"The murder of Mulugeta Seraw really put Portland on the map for all the wrong reasons," said Blazak, who is also chairman of the Oregon Coalition Against Hate Crimes.
Seraw, an Ethiopian immigrant, was bludgeoned to death with a baseball bat by a group of Portland skinheads in 1988.
"This city had a wake-up call," Blazak said. "It was kind of a sleepy, progressive city where we recycled everything. And then all of a sudden we had these roving gangs with Nazi skinheads attacking -- and in this case killing -- an immigrant."
And in the years following Seraw's death, Portland gained the unsavory nickname of "Skinhead City."
"We became famous in the 1990s as 'Skinhead City' because of the rival gangs of right-wing racist skinheads and anti-racist skinheads who are doing physical battle in the streets," Blazak said.
Last week's deadly train incident "is kind of the latest manifestation of that," he said.
But conflicts have escalated in recent months, Portland Police Chief Mike Marshman said.
Girl targeted on Portland train speaks out 01:22
"With the election of President Trump, I think our protest activity -- the number of events we have -- has increased," he said.
"That's problematic for me only because that takes more money to have those events go safely. I have to pull officers and detectives from their normal day-to-day activity, so certain crimes just now aren't getting investigated, or the investigations that are being worked on just take longer to work through the investigative process."
In the two days after Trump's inauguration, protesters caused about $1 million in damage, Marshman said.
Blazak, the Oregon criminology professor, said Portlanders are known to be passionate about politics.
"There is kind of a radical history in this town and in this region on both sides of the political spectrum," he said.
The terms are relatively new, but the concepts are not.
For years, the alt-right has existed in the cyberworld, "but now they're kind of spilling over into the streets," Blazek said.
Suspect ranted on train one day before attack 00:45
"They're disaffected with mainstream conservative speech, (but) they don't want to be associated with overt white supremacist neo-Nazi groups, and they want to express anti-immigration views, anti-multicultural views, economic protectionism."
He said alt-right protesters are typically "moderate-income working-class white males who are left out of the globalization and ... feel left out of all the progress that's happening," the professor said.
"And they want to assert their voice because they feel like the tendency is to defer to the minority voice, and they feel like they're not part of the conversation."
By contrast, the alt-left -- also known as the Antifa -- is bent on stopping the rise of right-wing groups.
He cited a 2012 case in which alt-left activists "walked into a high-end restaurant in Chicago where a white supremacist group was eating and literally beat them up with baseball bats."
Blazak said the recent train killings, combined with political rhetoric, portends "a long, hot summer in Portland as these groups kind of line up against each other."
It might seem self-defeating for right-wing activists, and especially alt-right activists, to try to make headway in traditionally liberal hot spots like Portland and Berkeley, California.
Blazak said he's not surprised alt-right members are trying to raise their profiles in such cities.
"There's this mantle of free speech that they're hanging their hats on," he said.
"Under the first amendment, they have a right to express themselves ... but it's used in a very provocative way to bring out the opposition and essentially martyr themselves in these street battles between the left and the right and to show themselves as almost the victims of the oppressive left-wing regime."
Alt-right leader punched during interview 00:42
But Joey Gibson, organizer of the group Patriot Prayer USA, said his group's planned rally in Portland on Sunday is "really not about provoking, it's about fighting for your right to assembly and to show what you believe in."
Gibson said he's libertarian and not alt-right. He said one of his goals is to help "turn a blue state into a red state."
That could be a huge challenge.
"Portland is as left as you can get," said Lenz of the Southern Poverty Law Center.
He said what's happening with the alt-right in Portland is actually reflective of what's happening across the country.
"What the alt-right is trying to do is they are going into these bastions of liberalism and hoping and willing to engage in physical conflict with counterprotesters," he said.
"The story isn't an Oregon thing. It's a national story."
Paul Vercammen and Stephanie Becker reported from Portland, and Holly Yan reported and wrote from Atlanta. CNN's Carma Hassan also contributed to this report.
Read the original post:
Portland's liberal image tempered by history as 'Skinhead City ... - CNN
Posted in Liberal
Comments Off on Portland’s liberal image tempered by history as ‘Skinhead City … – CNN







