The Prometheus League
Breaking News and Updates
- Abolition Of Work
- Ai
- Alt-right
- Alternative Medicine
- Antifa
- Artificial General Intelligence
- Artificial Intelligence
- Artificial Super Intelligence
- Ascension
- Astronomy
- Atheism
- Atheist
- Atlas Shrugged
- Automation
- Ayn Rand
- Bahamas
- Bankruptcy
- Basic Income Guarantee
- Big Tech
- Bitcoin
- Black Lives Matter
- Blackjack
- Boca Chica Texas
- Brexit
- Caribbean
- Casino
- Casino Affiliate
- Cbd Oil
- Censorship
- Cf
- Chess Engines
- Childfree
- Cloning
- Cloud Computing
- Conscious Evolution
- Corona Virus
- Cosmic Heaven
- Covid-19
- Cryonics
- Cryptocurrency
- Cyberpunk
- Darwinism
- Democrat
- Designer Babies
- DNA
- Donald Trump
- Eczema
- Elon Musk
- Entheogens
- Ethical Egoism
- Eugenic Concepts
- Eugenics
- Euthanasia
- Evolution
- Extropian
- Extropianism
- Extropy
- Fake News
- Federalism
- Federalist
- Fifth Amendment
- Fifth Amendment
- Financial Independence
- First Amendment
- Fiscal Freedom
- Food Supplements
- Fourth Amendment
- Fourth Amendment
- Free Speech
- Freedom
- Freedom of Speech
- Futurism
- Futurist
- Gambling
- Gene Medicine
- Genetic Engineering
- Genome
- Germ Warfare
- Golden Rule
- Government Oppression
- Hedonism
- High Seas
- History
- Hubble Telescope
- Human Genetic Engineering
- Human Genetics
- Human Immortality
- Human Longevity
- Illuminati
- Immortality
- Immortality Medicine
- Intentional Communities
- Jacinda Ardern
- Jitsi
- Jordan Peterson
- Las Vegas
- Liberal
- Libertarian
- Libertarianism
- Liberty
- Life Extension
- Macau
- Marie Byrd Land
- Mars
- Mars Colonization
- Mars Colony
- Memetics
- Micronations
- Mind Uploading
- Minerva Reefs
- Modern Satanism
- Moon Colonization
- Nanotech
- National Vanguard
- NATO
- Neo-eugenics
- Neurohacking
- Neurotechnology
- New Utopia
- New Zealand
- Nihilism
- Nootropics
- NSA
- Oceania
- Offshore
- Olympics
- Online Casino
- Online Gambling
- Pantheism
- Personal Empowerment
- Poker
- Political Correctness
- Politically Incorrect
- Polygamy
- Populism
- Post Human
- Post Humanism
- Posthuman
- Posthumanism
- Private Islands
- Progress
- Proud Boys
- Psoriasis
- Psychedelics
- Putin
- Quantum Computing
- Quantum Physics
- Rationalism
- Republican
- Resource Based Economy
- Robotics
- Rockall
- Ron Paul
- Roulette
- Russia
- Sealand
- Seasteading
- Second Amendment
- Second Amendment
- Seychelles
- Singularitarianism
- Singularity
- Socio-economic Collapse
- Space Exploration
- Space Station
- Space Travel
- Spacex
- Sports Betting
- Sportsbook
- Superintelligence
- Survivalism
- Talmud
- Technology
- Teilhard De Charden
- Terraforming Mars
- The Singularity
- Tms
- Tor Browser
- Trance
- Transhuman
- Transhuman News
- Transhumanism
- Transhumanist
- Transtopian
- Transtopianism
- Ukraine
- Uncategorized
- Vaping
- Victimless Crimes
- Virtual Reality
- Wage Slavery
- War On Drugs
- Waveland
- Ww3
- Yahoo
- Zeitgeist Movement
-
Prometheism
-
Forbidden Fruit
-
The Evolutionary Perspective
Monthly Archives: June 2017
Watchpoints: Progress noted in Zunino’s work in progress – The News Tribune (blog)
Posted: June 15, 2017 at 9:05 pm
The News Tribune (blog) | Watchpoints: Progress noted in Zunino's work in progress The News Tribune (blog) The numbers speak for themselves and are beginning to inch past the characterization of a small sample size. Catcher Mike Zunino is batting .319 in 20 games for the Mariners since his May 22 recall from Triple-A Tacoma with six homers and 21 RBIs. |
Here is the original post:
Watchpoints: Progress noted in Zunino's work in progress - The News Tribune (blog)
Posted in Progress
Comments Off on Watchpoints: Progress noted in Zunino’s work in progress – The News Tribune (blog)
Map reveals where billionaires are stockpiling land that could be used in the apocalypse – SFGate
Posted: at 9:03 pm
Photo: Evan Vucci, Associated Press
In this Dec. 14, 2016, file photo, Amazon founder Jeff Bezos speaks during a meeting with President-elect Donald Trump and technology industry leaders at Trump Tower in New York.
In this Dec. 14, 2016, file photo, Amazon founder Jeff Bezos speaks during a meeting with President-elect Donald Trump and technology industry leaders at Trump Tower in New York.
Forbes ranks the world's billionaires.
Forbes ranks the world's billionaires.
Name: David Koch - 10
This year's net worth: $39.6
Source: Koch Industries
Country: U.S.
Name: David Koch - 10
This year's net worth: $39.6
Source: Koch Industries
Country: U.S.
Name: Charles Koch - 9
This year's net worth: $39.6
Source: Koch Industries
Country: U.S.
Name: Charles Koch - 9
This year's net worth: $39.6
Source: Koch Industries
Country: U.S.
Name: Michael Bloomberg - 8
This year's net worth: $40 billion
Source: Bloomberg LP
Country: U.S.
Name: Michael Bloomberg - 8
This year's net worth: $40 billion
Source: Bloomberg LP
Country: U.S.
Name: Larry Ellison - 7
This year's net worth: $43.6 billion
Source: Oracle
Country: U.S.
Name: Larry Ellison - 7
This year's net worth: $43.6 billion
Source: Oracle
Country: U.S.
Name: Mark Zuckerberg - 6
This year's net worth: $44.6 billion
Source: Facebook
Country: U.S.
Name: Mark Zuckerberg - 6
This year's net worth: $44.6 billion
Source: Facebook
Country: U.S.
Name: Jeff Bezos - 5
This year's net worth: $45.2 billion
Source: Amazon.com
Country: U.S.
Name: Jeff Bezos - 5
This year's net worth: $45.2 billion
Source: Amazon.com
Country: U.S.
Name: Carlos Slim - 4
This year's net worth: $50 billion
Source: Telecom
Country: Mexico
Name: Carlos Slim - 4
This year's net worth: $50 billion
Source: Telecom
Country: Mexico
Name: Warren Buffett - 3
This year's net worth: $60.8 billion
Source: Berkshire Hathaway
Country: U.S.
Name: Warren Buffett - 3
This year's net worth: $60.8 billion
Source: Berkshire Hathaway
Country: U.S.
Name: Amancio Ortega - 2
This year's net worth: $67
Source: Retail
Country: Spain
Name: Amancio Ortega - 2
This year's net worth: $67
Source: Retail
Country: Spain
Name: Bill Gates - 1
This year's net worth: $75 billion
Source: Microsoft
Country: U.S.
Name: Bill Gates - 1
This year's net worth: $75 billion
Source: Microsoft
Country: U.S.
Map reveals where billionaires are stockpiling land that could be used in the apocalypse
When the apocalypse arrives, life goes on. That's the possibility some are preparing for, at least.
A new article in Forbes suggests the USbillionairesare making significant land grabs in America's heartland, where the climate is mild and the locations are conducive to survivalism and living on the land. The Midwest ishome to several fortified shelters and vacation homes where the super-richcould happily live out their post-doomsday (or retirement) days.
Reid Hoffman, the cofounder of LinkedIn and a notable investor,told The New Yorker earlier this year he estimated more than 50% of Silicon Valley billionaires had bought some level of "apocalypse insurance," like a bunker.
Fortified shelters, built to withstand catastrophic events from viral epidemic to nuclear war, seem to be experiencing a wave of interest in general as hints of a nuclear conflict ramp up.
Real estate developersare capitalizing on the moment with luxuryunderground doomsday shelters that cost as much as$3 million. These post-apocalyptic homes, often built onretired military bases or in missile silos, includeluxury amenities and safety featureslike nuclear blast doors, armored trucks, and massive storesof food and water.
The map below reveals where American billionaires are stockpiling land that could be used in the apocalypse.
Skye Gould/Business Insider
Join the conversation about this story
NOW WATCH: These doomsday shelters for the 1% make up the largest private bunker community on earth
See Also:
SEE ALSO:This 15-story underground doomsday shelter for the super-rich has luxury homes, guns, and armored trucks
Read the original post:
Map reveals where billionaires are stockpiling land that could be used in the apocalypse - SFGate
Posted in Survivalism
Comments Off on Map reveals where billionaires are stockpiling land that could be used in the apocalypse – SFGate
Billionaires are stockpiling land that could be used in the apocalypse here’s where they’re going – The Advocate
Posted: at 9:03 pm
Melia Robinson, provided by
Kim Kyung Hoon/Reuters
A rising number of Americanbillionaires are channeling their inner Bear Grylls, and some are doing it in preparation for an apocalyptic event be it viral epidemic, nuclear war, or cataclysmic pole shift.
Reid Hoffman, the cofounder of LinkedIn and a notable investor, told The New Yorker earlier this year he estimates more than 50% of Silicon Valley billionaires have bought some level of "apocalypse insurance," like an underground bunker.
A new article in Forbes suggests the super-rich are making serious land grabs in America's heartland, where the climate is mild and the locations are conducive to survivalism, farming, and living on the land. States like Colorado, Montana, Nebraska, New Mexico, North Dakota, Texas, and Wyoming are home to a number of fortified shelters and vacation homes where wealthy billionaires could happily live out theirpost-doomsday (or retirement) days.
According to Forbes contributor Jim Dobson, lots of billionaires have private planes "ready to depart at a moment's notice." They also own motorcycles, weaponry, and generators.
None of the billionaires named by Forbes have said publicly that their vast amounts of land will be used for apocalypse preparations though they certainly would make good hide-outs.
John Malone, who made his fortune in cable and communications, is the nation's biggest individual landowner. Malone owns 2.2 million acres across six states including huge swaths of Maine and New Hampshire. The cable king told Forbes in 2011 that he made the land grabs as an investment. He said he loves to fish and occasionally bird-hunt on his properties.
Media mogul Ted Turner, the second biggest individual landowner in the US, owns 2 million acres across Colorado, Kansas, Montana, Nebraska, New Mexico, South Dakota.
Philip Anschulze, a railroad and oil magnate, locked down 434,000 acres in Wyoming. Amazon's Jeff Bezos has 400,000 acres in Texas. And Stan Kroenke, owner of a massive sports and entertainment holding company, bought 225,000 acres in Montana.
One of the more surprising real estate tycoons is David Hall, a Mormon engineer, who has been snapping up farmland in Vermont. He wants to build sustainable, high-density communities based on the writings of religious figure Joseph Smith.
In the event of the end of the world, the world's financial leaders may be the most prepared.
Join the conversation about this story
NOW WATCH: Look inside the Arctic 'doomsday' seed vault built to protect millions of crops from any disaster
See Also:
SEE ALSO:This 15-story underground doomsday shelter for the 1% has luxury homes, guns, and armored trucks
Continue reading here:
Posted in Survivalism
Comments Off on Billionaires are stockpiling land that could be used in the apocalypse here’s where they’re going – The Advocate
Film Review: ‘All Eyez on Me’ – Variety
Posted: at 9:02 pm
Sleekly shaven-headed, with a pirate bandana, a gangstas dripped-in-death tattoos, and the liquid stare of an Arabian prince, Tupac Shakur was the matinee idol of hip-hop superstars: not the fiercest rapper, not the most virtuosic or visionary, but a figure of hard ferocity who elevated street nihilism by fusing it with a certain lovesexy bravura. For a while, he was as much a movie star as he was a rap star (and he would have been a bigger one had his legal troubles not scared off the Hollywood establishment). On some level, Tupacs life always seemed like a movie playing out in front of you not just the hair triggers of bloodshed, but his whole contradictory dance of activism and thuggery, commitment and celebrity.
All Eyez on Me, the messy, hugely flawed, but fascinating biographical drama that has now been made about him, channels those contradictions, even if it doesnt always know what to do with them. Comprehensive but sketchy, richly atmospheric but often under-dramatized, it is not, in the end, a very good movie (there are a few scenes, like Tupacs initial meeting with Ted Field of Interscope Records, that are embarrassingly bad). Yet its highly worth seeing, because in its volatility and hunger, and the desperation of its violence, it captures something about the space in which Tupac Shakur lived: a place that wanted to be all about pride and power, but was really about flying over the abyss.
The film is 2 hours and 20 minutes long, and considering that Tupac was only 25 years old when he was gunned down in a drive-by shooting in Las Vegas on Sept. 7, 1996, that should be enough time to tell his story with intimacy and flow. Yet All Eyez on Me, directed by the music-video veteran Benny Boom, is an old-school biopic that reminds you why old-school biopics faded: It has that overly sprawling, one-thing-after-another quality that can make you feel like youre seeing the cinematic version of a Wikipedia entry.
That said, Demetrius Shipp Jr., who plays Tupac, carries you through. He looks astonishingly like the rap star, but Shipp also fills out Tupac emotionally, showing us the smiley high-school student who prided himself on his success in the theater we see him cast as the lead in Hamlet as well as the surly, neglected adolescent who was raised by his mother, the former Black Panther Afeni Shakur, to take a never-ending stance of defiance. Afeni is played by Danai Gurura (who would have been perfect as Nina Simone), and Gurura makes her a ruthlessly intelligent analyst of the white power structure who is nevertheless consumed by a rage that has no outlet (at one point, she turns to crack).
Its no wonder that Tupac grows up to be a militant without a cause. He can see the injustice around him, and when hes arrested in Oakland for jaywalking (when was the last time a white person got arrested for jaywalking? Answer: never), the sadism of the police is like a nightstick to the soul. Yet each new way that he chooses to define his manhood as a rap star; as a fighter with thug-life cred who will walk, lips snarled, into any confrontation; as a stud; as an activist leader in the new era of rap-as-racial-politics becomes, for him, a highly self-conscious performance. He turns into a badass outlaw hip-hop demigod who is playing the role of a badass outlaw hip-hop demigod.
Theres a facile framing device, with Tupac explaining (and defending) his life in a prison interview that takes place during the nine months he spent at the Clinton Correctional Facility in 1995. The movie than flashes back to his New York childhood, his jarring moves to Baltimore and Oakland, the close friendship he formed in his teens with Jada Pinkett (Kat Graham), his shot at stardom when he was asked to join Digital Underground, his 1992 role as a stone-cold sociopath in Juice (a role he acted brilliantly, and that was said by some to have had an influence on his off-screen behavior), and his mesmerizing early solo videos for tracks like Same Song (his first lead with Digital Underground) and the scabrous social-protest rap Brendas Got a Baby. But its only after he goes to jail that the movie finds its footing.
All Eyez on Me presents the incident that resulted in rape charges that were brought against Tupac and members of his entourage (he was convicted of first-degree sexual abuse) in a way that completely exonerates him; the truth may have been murkier. Once hes in prison, however, his life and career look like theyre in ruins. Tosave himself, he signs a record deal with the devil: Marion Suge Knight, the fearsome 350-pound giant-cigar-chomping entrepreneur of Death Row Records, who enjoys a supreme distinction among the rappers and producers he employs and lords it over hes the only one among them who isnt playing at being a gangsta.
Dominic L. Santana, who plays Knight, captures the underworld moguls self-righteous menace, and the second half of the movie, in which Shakur finds his greatest success, records his greatest song (the momentous California Love), and experiences his greatest existential confusion while at Death Row, is the ominous heart of All Eyez on Me. Its not just hes surrounded by back-stabbers and glad-handers, as well as musicians like Dr. Dre (Harold House Moore, in an underwritten role) and Snoop Dogg (Jarrett Ellis, who gets the voice but not the snakish cunning). In essence, Tupac is still in prison, trapped not just in a three-album contract but in a stance of outlaw brutishness thats become, in his own mind, political: the only stance the white man will allow him.
But his mother said it best: This is really the systems way of handing him the tools to destroy himself. Once his friendship with Biggie Smalls (Jamal Woolard) breaks down, the fabled East CoastWest Coast rap war becomes, in the movies view, a violent form of tap-dancing, with Tupac and Biggie deluded into thinking that their taunts and boasts mean something.
Who killed Tupac Shakur? All Eyez on Me doesnt say, but it least it spares us the soul-sapping diversion of conspiracy theory. In all likelihood, Tupac was killed in a tit-for-tat piece of gang violence that had nothing to do with the rap wars. What the movie captures is that Tupacs absorption through showbiz, then through the empire of Suge Knight into the role of gangsta sociopath was the insidious illusion that sealed his fate. It was a role he relished playing, and he did it brilliantly; he convinced the toughest audience there was himself. But the only thing about the role that was entirely real was his death.
Reviewed at Magno, New York, June 14, 2017. MPAA Rating: R. Running time: 140 MIN.
A Summit Entertainment/Lionsgate release of a Morgan Creek Productions, Program Pictures, Codeblack Films production. Producers: David T. Robinson, L.T. Hutton, James G. Robinson. Executive producer: Wayne Morris.
Director: Benny Boom. Screenplay: Jeremy Haft, Eddie Gonzalez, Steven Bagatourian. Camera (color, widescreen): Peter Menzies Jr. Editor: Joel Cox.
Demetrius Shipp Jr., Danai Gurira, Kat Graham, Dominic L. Santana, Jamal Woolard, Jarrett Ellis, Brandon Suave, Harold House Moore, Lauren Cohan, Hill Harper.
See more here:
Posted in Nihilism
Comments Off on Film Review: ‘All Eyez on Me’ – Variety
If the choice is hard-right or hard-left, I choose Lib Dem futility – Jewish Chronicle
Posted: at 9:02 pm
Jewish Chronicle | If the choice is hard-right or hard-left, I choose Lib Dem futility Jewish Chronicle In our nihilism, we have tended to vote Liberal Democrat but with as much enthusiasm as a supermarket cashier greeting their 1,000th customer of the day. Our depression dates back to the accession of Ed Miliband to the Labour leadership. It was he ... |
View post:
If the choice is hard-right or hard-left, I choose Lib Dem futility - Jewish Chronicle
Posted in Nihilism
Comments Off on If the choice is hard-right or hard-left, I choose Lib Dem futility – Jewish Chronicle
Honey-glazed, hedonistic, and hyper-real – Cherwell Online
Posted: at 9:01 pm
In the summer of 2013, I hadnt yet been kissed or gotten drunk, I could count the friends I had on one hand with several fingers to spare, and I spent most of my time visiting my beloved grandpa in hospital. But whilst my reality was filled with NHS wards, tea from paper cups and religiously completed Times crossword puzzles, my imaginary life was lines of coke off a dashboard, sitting in the lap of a sugar daddy, Californian sunsets, gambling and sweeps of silky straight hair. I had discovered Lana Del Rey, and she was giving me the gift that she continues to reliably provide: the summer you would have, were your moral standards and instinct for self-preservation several notches lower, if you had never heard of feminism and if, crucially, her brand of honey-glazed hedonism could actually exist as a reality.
Sceptics will say that Lana Del Rey produces the same album every two years, and fans agree, yet continue to glug it down like the Diet Mountain Dew she immortalises in Born To Die: it may not be nourishing or good for you, but its teeth-rotting sweetness cannot be resisted. She cherry-picks motifs from hip hop and rock, siphoning off the best of superficial cool from both genres to feed her persona. Breathy, slow vocals, building over rich soundscapes, sing of manicured degeneracy where Rey again and again stars as the wronged heroine, devoted only to her bad-boy lover and the wild American road. She presents the 18-rated version of a Disney story, as she plays the role of the adored princess. Although she has candy necklaces sticking to the skin instead of a tiara, and her Prince Charming arrives on a motorbike rather than a white horse, the fantasy of feminine passivity lives on. If I get a little prettier can I be your baby?; I can be your china doll if you want to see me fall; Im your jazz singer and youre my cult leader: Beyonces Flawless is certainly not playing on Reys speakers on the beach, as she instead decides to hark back to an age where womens liberation was as far off as heathaze over the sea, and similarly impalpable.
Related Preview: Accidental Death of an Anarchist
However, even as a seasoned, strident Angry Feminist, I cannot drag myself away from her mythic world, where submission is glamour and pain is beauty. In the long, indulgent, spoken-word piece of the Ride video, Rey proclaims I believe in the country America used to be. As problematic and rage-inducing as this isremember segregation, Lana? Where does that fit into your rose-tinted view of the past?what she really means is, I believe in the country America never was. It is a hand-clapping, I do believe in fairies, I do, I do moment, as her will to live in this romanticised American dream creates and keeps alive a version of it in her music.
She is the master of creating a fantasy, as vivid settings spring into life from a few choice words: Glass room, perfume, cognac, lilac fumes creates the heady casino of Off to the Races, whilst blue hydrangeas, cold cash divine, cashmere, cologne and white sunshine conjures a picket-fenced, Gatsbyesque mansion for Old Money.
This talent for visuals comes across in her distinctive aesthetic. Her fashion is predominately 1960s prom queen, but with an edge of trailer-park princess. Gucci shoes encrusted with lacquer cherries will be downplayed by loose cotton dresses, the leather jackets and band t-shirts may be Chanel and Yves St Laurent, but whos to know she didnt pick them up from WalMartthe key is making her low-fi, lazy summer vibe seem effortless. Instagram videos seem to capture moments when she is off-guard, singing along to her own music in the car or simply blinking languidly, listening to Joni Mitchell: the implication is that she drives to the shops in extravagant old Hollywood fake eyelashes, and never snaps out of moody, melancholic nostalgia. On winning the Brit Award for International Solo Artist in 2013, she used her acceptance speech to thank her managers and her label for helping her turn her life into a work of art, and it does seem as if her every move consolidates the image of herself presented in her songs: if there are edges to her persona, they are safely out of public sight.
Related Kate is no oil painting
In a recent interview for Elle, Rey ominously claimed that her new album would be more political. That, combined with a recent Instagram speech about North Korea, suggests that she might be finally waking from her opiated dreams and dipping a tentative, kitten-heeled toe into the real world. I cant help but be suspicious of the prospectas the world rolls to hell in a handcart, she provides a much needed summer holiday from real life.
See the original post:
Posted in Hedonism
Comments Off on Honey-glazed, hedonistic, and hyper-real – Cherwell Online
New President for new India – The Indian Express
Posted: at 9:01 pm
Written by Dr Rakesh Sinha | Updated: June 16, 2017 1:13 am No one knows who the next President will be, but the likelihood of a contest based on entrenched positions certainly undermines the prestige of Rashtrapati Bhavan. (Illustration: C R Sasikumar)
The BJP has formed a three-member committee consisting of senior cabinet ministers, Rajnath Singh, Arun Jaitley and M Venkaiah Naidu to examine the possibility of a consensus candidate for the President of India. This marks a moral victory for the ruling party against forces in the Opposition, which include political parties and the predominantly left- liberal intelligentsia. Their quest for a presidential nominee is not based on the moral significance of this august office, but rather, on vendetta politics. It is no secret that they see the presidential election as an opportunity to fix both Narendra Modi and Hindutva politics.
No one knows who the next President will be, but the likelihood of a contest based on entrenched positions certainly undermines the prestige of Rashtrapati Bhavan. It is a truism that no presidential election has been without contest. But political binaries have led to the devaluation of the office. The 1969 election between Neelam Sanjiva Reddy and V.V. Giri was not merely a face-off between two individuals, but between two ideologies on the one hand, and the claim to be genuine heirs of the Indian National Congress, on the other. The election witnessed fierce public debate and unprecedented polarisation in the media. Giris victory vindicated Indira Gandhi and her ideology. But it did not add value to the presidency. Rather, it heralded the notion of a rubber stamp president. Since then, the choice of a candidate became a matter of political permutations and combinations, and the election, a game of dice.
This goes against the vision of the founding fathers of the Indian Constitution, who espoused that the President should not be a symbol of partisan politics. The first President of India, Rajendra Prasad, reaffirmed that the office ought not to be a reason for instability in our parliamentary democracy. During the political confrontations between the communist government in Kerala and the Congress party, Prasad made it clear in his letter to Gyanvati Darbar on July 10, 1959, that there had been a certain misunderstanding regarding the position of the President. Probably, many people feel that the President can intervene and exert influence on one side or the other. That is an incorrect view I cannot take sides I have to act on advice and cannot act on my own. Let me keep myself above all these differences I cannot have any viewpoint which is not for the country as a whole but for any group or party only.
Whomsoever becomes President, he or she cannot alter the requirements and prerequisites of the office, or the essential features of Indias parliamentary democracy. The office does, however, have the potential to circumvent unnecessary controversies, particularly so in the present context: The rise of an alternative ideology and leadership have yet to be reconciled to by the elites which enjoyed status and privileges and considered themselves authors of the destiny of modern India.
The current situation is a replica of 1922, when, for the first time, nationalists became ministers in the provinces under the Government of India Act 1919. The colonial bureaucracy, along with governors of the provinces, were not merely unsympathetic but also contemptuous of them. In contemporary India, secularist forces are not prepared to relate Hindutva with secular, liberal and democratic principles. They unfailingly cling to their self-made belief that it is communal, intolerant and fascist. They are victims of the ossification which has set in within Left-liberal ideologies, a solidification of the mind which keeps them dogmatic and unable to re-examine their own position.
Therefore, the presidential election assumes significance for more than one reason: The office is not merely a constitutional head. It becomes a decisive player in democratic causality. There are instances of such situations the fall of the Janata Party government in 1979 made the role of Rashtrapati Bhavan crucial. Yet, there is a definite limit of presidential adventurism, even in times of political crises. Its importance lies in appealing beyond conventional politics or constitutional morality. Free from political compulsions or executive burdens, the President can act as an agent of redefining the idea of India, which is essential to restore the post-colonial identity of the Indian people.
This process was initiated by Rajendra Prasad, which led to a great confrontation with the then-Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru. Prasad, who confirmed the President should not intervene in executive and legislative business, also unfolded his role in discovering the soul of India. His confrontation with Nehru was not a battle for power, but a battle of ideas to rebuild India.
In his letter to chief ministers on August 1, 1951, Nehru stated that: It is little realised here what great injuries to our credit abroad is done by the communal organisations of India because they represent just the things which a Western mind dislikes intensely and can not understand. The recent inauguration of [the] Somnath temple with pomp and ceremony created a very bad impression abroad about India and her professions.
Prasad, differing outright with the PM, wrote to him, saying, By rising from its ashes again, this temple of Somnath is proclaiming to the world that no man and no power in the world can destroy that for which people have boundless faith and love in their hearts. Today, our attempt is not to rectify history. Our only aim is to proclaim anew our attachment to the faith, convictions and the values on which our religion has rested since immemorial ages India being a civilisational nation cant be provincialised, its roots go to hundreds and thousands of years celebrating umpteen diversities. The present challenge is to regain Indias identity through contextualising her age-old past.
Prasads letter to Gyanvati Darbar on March 26, 1959, unravels the civilisational role of the President of India: In the age of rationalism, where everything smacking of anything like religion and spiritualism is looked at askance, and when a wave of scepticism is carrying everything before it, at any rate, in the so-called educated and advanced and progressive people, it will be no small service if anything could be done to catch up with the spirit which made greater India, of which we are all proud, and of which we could get a glimpse in Cambodia, in Japan and even in Indonesia in ceremonies not in India but someday, we shall certainly regain and recover our balance.
A new President of India has to begin where Prasad left his great ideological legacies. In this regard, the election is not merely a political game of dice, but also a battle of ideologies. The office should be filled not with sectarian or other narrow considerations, but with an intent to privilege it with a philosopher-king. He must represent the soul of India, not a secularist soul. She should address not merely the present but posterity too. Besides constitutional requirements, his words and actions should be indicative of civilisational imperatives.
Rajendra Prasad aptly said, the country may throw out the ministry, not the president, for views. It is essential that the presidential candidate is not compromised, or used for the rehabilitation of a tired politician, but rather, is a positive mind who embraces the arduous task of the decolonisation of the Indian mind.The opposition parties and their intellectuals have lost their gravity and are
The opposition parties and their intellectuals have lost their gravity and are now defined more by what they oppose than what they support. Prime Minister Modi has combined the spirit of cultural legacies in his speeches, which are an assertion of a genuine idea of India, in the midst of ceaseless opposition from secularist forces. Therefore, the Presidents election would be far more than merely a defeat of the Opposition; it would be the resurrection of the spirit of Rajendra Prasad.
For all the latest Opinion News, download Indian Express App
Read more:
Posted in Rationalism
Comments Off on New President for new India – The Indian Express
Free speech heated on campuses – Investigate reporting workshop (blog)
Posted: at 9:00 pm
By: Clairissa Baker
Posted: June 15, 2017 | Tags: First Amendment
Free speech controversies on college campuses nationwide show some experts that students need education about First Amendment protections earlier and often, according to a panel of academic and free speech authorities who spoke Wednesday afternoon at the Newseum.
Panelists said many American college students overwhelmingly support the First Amendment but feel campus leaders should create policies that limit or restrict offensive speech. That shows a tension over what free speech is meant to do.
"They support the First Amendment, but with significant exceptions, Newseum CEO Jeffrey Herbst, who was a panelist, said of college students.
Photo by Clairissa Baker, IRW
Panelists talk about campus press issues Wednesday at the Newseum.
A Knight Foundation study in 2016 found that 91 percent of high school students agreed people should be allowed to express unpopular opinions, but only 45 percent agreed people should be able to say what they want in public, even if it is offensive to others.
Similarly, a recent survey found college students prefer an open environment, but 69 percent say colleges should be allowed to restrict language that is intentionally offensive to certain groups, according to a Knight Foundation and Newseum Institute study on college students.
Speakers at the Knight TV Studio on Wednesday included John K. Wilson, co-editor of American Association of University Professors blog, and Catherine Ross, a George Washington University law professor. Gene Policinski, chief operating officer of the Newseum Institute, moderated the panel.
Herbst began by talking about speakers being turned down by college campuses because of political tension. But he said the college bubble in which many students find themselves is not the problem. Instead, the real problem to address is the attitude of students, Herbst said, because students arent a blank slate when they cross into college on the first day.
Incidents, such as the one in which the University of California, Berkeley disinvited Ann Coulter after threats of violence, according to reports by the Southern Poverty Law Center, have expanded debates about free speech on college campuses.
Wilson, who wrote a book on academic freedom, provided a critique of the summary of the state of free speech.
The First Amendment has always been in a terrible state, he said, and theres nothing special about millennials.
Hypocrisies are everywhere, and pretending one generation is the source, Wilson said, is misguided. Things are bad, and we need to deal with them because thats the norm.
Among those in the audience was LaMonte Summers, a media law and ethics professor at Morgan State Universitys School of Global Journalism and Communication.
Summers asked the panel if society needed to revisit how the First Amendment handles hate speech, mentioning a U.S. Supreme Court case in which a teenager burned a cross on the lawn of an African-American family.
Summers attended the event because many of his students work in media and his classes have discussions about similar issues.
I thought that critique was an excellent part of the panel, Summers said.
The panel raised concerns with students willingness to set limitations on free speech, even if it was to avoid hateful and offensive language. The way to address this issue with students, Herbst and Ross said, is to look at how society teaches the First Amendment in grades K-12.
The panel agreed teachers and students need more robust lessons on the First Amendment, but Ross said the only way to combat offensive speech was more and better speech.
If you seek change, the First Amendment is your ally, Herbst said.
Read more:
Free speech heated on campuses - Investigate reporting workshop (blog)
Posted in Free Speech
Comments Off on Free speech heated on campuses – Investigate reporting workshop (blog)
How the ‘Ear Hustle’ podcast tests the limits of free speech – The Daily Dot
Posted: at 9:00 pm
Earlonne Woods is serving 31 years to life for an attempted second-degree robbery. Antwaan Williams is serving a 15-year sentence for armed robbery. Theyre also terrific behind the mic as the co-hosts of the Ear Hustle podcast.
The series, which launches this week, won the first Podquest contest put on by Radiotopia to try and find new talent and diversify the network. The show had to beat 1,537 people from 53 different countries to secure the gig. This is hardly the toughest challenge the creators have had to face, though.
Ear Hustle is brought to us by a unique partnership between Woods and Williams, incarcerated at San Quentin State Prison in California, and Nigel Poor, a free woman.
Each episode has a different topic, Poor tells the Daily Dot. And what were trying to do is just cover different emotions.
Poor, a Bay Area college professor, first showed up to San Quentin Prison in 2011 as a volunteer teaching a history of photography class. After realizing the power of photography to bridge the gap between all kinds of issues and shed light on inmates lives, Poor began to explore other storytelling methods inside the prison and tapped Woods and Williams.
After an initial film project fell through, the team landed on a podcast. Poor tells the Daily Dot she didnt know what that would entail, but the genesis of the idea five years ago was to record these inmates talking. Eventually the Hustle team decided to try and create a podcast so they could experiment with form and length without having to commit to stringent radio standards.
The audience would be the listeners of a closed circuit station within San Quentin, though soon Bay Area radio station KALW heard about the project and offered to help train the group.KALWs Crosscurrents is still airing segments, though theyre unaffiliated with Ear Hustle.
For its part, Radiotopia is among the best artist colonies around. The podcast network was founded by Roman Mars of 99% Invisible and is run by the Public Radio Exchange (PRX). Its grown from a 2014 launch with seven shows to 18, and according to its website the network brings in 17 million downloads per month.
But the networks latest endeavor grapples with tricky ethics. The idea of creating Ear Hustle in the first place was meant as a kind of rehabilitation for the inmates; it would teach them a new skill set, new perspectives, theyd be able to dig deep into stories that theoretically shed light on their own situations. But these men are all in San Quentin because they are being held responsible for their crimes. There are real victims who have been hurt.
Though only one episode is available, Poor tells me that the show will deal with topics covering everything from roommates, pets, sex, race, celebrations, and other seemingly normal issues. But the show will also deal with the memory of an inmates last day on the outside, the three-strikes law, escaping from prison, and dealing with the consequences of being in a gang.
The range of topics the show covers in the first seasonthe contest winner locked in a 10-episode run for 2017shed the inmates in a human light. Listening to them deal with getting sick and going to work anyway is relatable. Even deciding to use episode 1 to discuss prison roommates (cellies) was a conscious decision to not turn off listeners by beginning with something too hard to hear.
Although Poor says the show is also meant to explorethe factthat these men did terrible things, and are dealing with the consequences.
Photo via Ear Hustle
As much as this has been a positive experience for Poor, making a podcast with two inmates at a state prison is no walk in the park. Each time the team has a new cut of the show, or any new audio in general, or a written request, they need to run through a small series of administrative gymnastics that include burning CDs, asking San Quentin Prison public information officer Lt. Sam Robinson to listen to and approve the content, and asking for permission to bring their recording gear outside.
Poor has taken to writing transcripts of the show to bring to Radiotopias consulting editor Curtis Fox, who makes his edits with a pen and paper. And when it comes to edits with Woods and Williams, if Poor wakes up in the middle of the night with an urgent or brilliant idea, she isnt able to email, text, or call her creative partners.
One of Poors goals is to bring the show to all California state prisons and play it on each closed circuit station, but those same administrative tasks apply for each of the states 33 prisons.
Radiotopias Podquest has been vital, signing the showas the network begins flexing its reach with a cross-promotion campaign. Each of the other Radiotopia shows will release an episode about doing time over the next two weeks. The show has already been as high as No. 2 on the iTunescharts.
Episode 1 was sponsored by Mail Chimp, but landing ad partners for a show with two-thirds of its cast behind bars seems like an uphill climb. Radiotopia seems unconcerned, however, telling the Dot that the high brand trust the network brings to the table supersedes the sensitive material when it comes to finding sponsors.
But Poor is concerned with making sure the show doesnt romanticize life in prison, or ignore the real-world damage caused by these men.
Someone suggested we do a story about this, and we havent yet, but what do guys think is an appropriate punishment for a crime?And how do you deal with violence in society?And how do you deal with somebody who cant respect another persons life or another persons property? How do we repent and how do we reform? says Poor. I do want to be sensitive to people who are really going to disagree with what were doing. Inevitably there are going to be people who hate this. Just hate it. And I want to be able to figure out how we can, if theyre willing to, talk to them about that.
The conversations already started, if nothing else.
Jeff Umbrohosts theWriters Who Dont Writepodcast, whichinterviews creatives about the one story theyve always struggled to tell.
See the rest here:
How the 'Ear Hustle' podcast tests the limits of free speech - The Daily Dot
Posted in Free Speech
Comments Off on How the ‘Ear Hustle’ podcast tests the limits of free speech – The Daily Dot
Michael Savage thinks there’s too much freedom of speech going on – Salon
Posted: at 9:00 pm
In the wake of Wednesdays shooting of a Republican congressman, conservative talk-radio host Michael Savage on Wednesday suggested something he wouldnt have dreamed of doing a few months ago. He saidthe government should take control of the media.
In between references to Rachel Maddow (whom he mockingly referred to as Rachel Madcow), Savage wondered ifthe haters [should] be removed from the airwaves by the federal government for their constant drumbeat of hatred against [Donald] Trump and Republicans. Turns out, he thought, Yes, they should be, because of their constant drumbeat of hatred against Trump and Republicans, calling for, amongst other things resistance, with theirsneers every night.
Savages theory came at the end of a long monologue in which he sprinkled in his hatred of liberals while coming to the conclusion that angry liberals are going to kill everyone. Watch the segment viaMedia Matters:
We know that the coming civil war that Nancy Pelosi, Bernie Sanders, Barack Obama, Eric Holder I would even say Rachel Maddow have been screaming for. You know the words like resist.You know resist means something. It means kill, it means shoot, doesnt it?
Am I allowed to ask the question: Who do you blame for this? We know that the baseball gunman was a Trump-hating, white, male Bernie supporter.
And communism has consequences. Socialism has consequences. Screaming about hatred, hatred, hatred and hate and hate and hate, like that sneering, creature on MSNBC does every night, with that filthy sneer on her face. Every night hating Trump. Every night calling for resistance.
Well, he (James Hodgkinson) went off like a rocket, as I feared would happen. James T. Hodgkinson from Belleville, Illinois, went on a rampage. Staunch Democrat threatened to destroy Trump and company on social media before the shooting, coinciding with President Trumps 71stBirthday. He campaigned of course for the communist Bernie Sanders who says he is not a communist but he is a communist. Communism is violence and death. Well he opened fired on a group of guys playing baseball.
I predicted this would happen, but its not about me; its about you.
This message would come as a shock to none other than conservative radio host Michael Savage, who, in the late 1990s, created a manifesto of sorts called Beware the government-media complex, which is pretty popular in right-wing circles. Savage said at thattime the relationship between the government and media wastoo cozy,adding thatin order to keep the government relatively honest, you need a media thats constantly poking at them.
Until Wednesday Savage has been consistent inadhering to the idea that free speech should be protected.
In 2009 he criticized British Home Secretary Jacqui Smith, who banned Savage from entering the U.K. because he was fomenting hatred.
Savage fired back at Smith, saying, She wanted communications gathered by the government. She wanted emails and phone calls guarded by the government. . . including those from social networking sites such as Facebook. He added thatany liberal listening to the show should be quite alarmed by this movement in England because perhaps you will be next.
In Savages book, Trumps War,publishedin March, he declared, The First Amendment will be safe under Trump. No matter what else he does or does not do.
But theres one pointSavage made on Wednesday that may not be completely off base:
Should Trump take control of Twitter for not monitoring haters?You heard me. Is it time for the government to take control of the out of control pirates on social media like Facebook and Twitter.
That would be quite a feat, assuming the government would be able to silence the biggest Twitter troll of them all.
See the rest here:
Michael Savage thinks there's too much freedom of speech going on - Salon
Posted in Freedom of Speech
Comments Off on Michael Savage thinks there’s too much freedom of speech going on – Salon







