Monthly Archives: June 2017

As her show Morning Joe was ending, Mr. Trump taunted Ms. Brzezinski as low I.Q. Crazy Mika who had been bleeding badly from a face-lift at Mar-a-Lago in December. Ms. Brzezinski responded by posting a photograph of a box of Cheerios with the words, Made For Little Hands.

In other White House news, the presidents national security adviser said Mr. Trump would meet with President Vladimir Putin of Russia on the sidelines of the G-20 meeting in Hamburg next week.

_____

3. Speaking of the G-20, the German chancellor, Angela Merkel, is predicting very tough climate and trade talks with the U.S. there.

A new study in the journal Science explores the economic harm that climate change could inflict on the U.S. in the coming century. The greatest impact: a projected increase in heat wave deaths that would hit parts of the Midwest and Southeast especially hard. Above, a scene from Phoenix this month.

_____

4. Republican leaders, in retreat from the bruising battle over the health care bill, said they were considering proposals to keep one of the Affordable Care Acts taxes on high-income people.

Also under discussion: more money to combat the opioid epidemic and new incentives for people to establish tax-free savings accounts for medical expenses. Above, Mitch McConnell, the Senate majority leader, and the majority whip, John Cornyn.

The late-night host Samantha Bee saw a parallel between Washington and Hollywood. It turns out, 13 rich white guys alone in a room isnt how good legislation happens, she quipped. Its how Suicide Squad happens.

_____

5. Twice in the past month, N.S.A. cyberweapons stolen from its arsenal have been turned against American allies. The agency has kept quiet, not acknowledging its role in developing the weapons, and prompting criticism that its hoarding knowledge that could stop the attacks.

Many are asking if the U.S. intelligence agencies rushed to create digital weapons that they cannot keep safe.

_____

6. Pope Francis granted a leave of absence to Cardinal George Pell, a top Vatican official who has been charged with sexual assault, so that he could return to Australia to defend himself.

The Australian police have yet to reveal the details of the charges or the ages of the complainants. Cardinal Pell, above, said he is innocent and denounced what he called a relentless character assassination.

_____

7. President Xi Jinping of China arrived in Hong Kong for ceremonies marking the anniversary of the former British colonys return to Chinese rule. Thousands of police officers were deployed to keep protesters at bay.

Our correspondent says that Hong Kong was seen as a rare blend of East and West that China might seek to emulate. But now its racked by problems, like a dire lack of affordable housing, amid fighting over its political future.

_____

8. This is our moment, fellas. Now make me proud.

That was our columnist, Tyler Kepner, noting the proliferation of major league baseball players who share his first name. He counted 30 in the last two seasons, and the Yankees now have four.

_____

9. Seeing a movie over what many people are treating as a holiday weekend?

Our critic calls Baby Driver, the new action movie from the director Edgar Wright, a pop pastiche par excellence.

The film follows a getaway driver named Baby, played by Ansel Elgort, as a heist goes wrong. Jamie Foxx, Jon Hamm and other notable names join him on screen.

_____

10. Finally, in the name of service journalism, we taste-tested 10 hot dogs for your summertime cookouts.

The winners were Wellshire Farms (smoky, herby) and good old Hebrew National (the peoples hot dog). The losers evoked adjectives like funky and flaccid.

Have a great night.

_____

Photographs may appear out of order for some readers. Viewing this version of the briefing should help.

Your Evening Briefing is posted at 6 p.m. Eastern.

And dont miss Your Morning Briefing, posted weekdays at 6 a.m. Eastern, and Your Weekend Briefing, posted at 6 a.m. Sundays.

Want to look back? Heres last nights briefing.

What did you like? What do you want to see here? Let us know at briefing@nytimes.com.

Read the original here:

Donald Trump, Senate, George Pell: Your Evening Briefing - New York Times

Photo President Trump at a recent rally in Cedar Rapids, Iowa. Credit Stephen Crowley/The New York Times

To the Editor:

Re Trumps Lies, by David Leonhardt and Stuart A. Thompson (Op-Chart, Sunday Review, June 25):

I greatly appreciate the presentation of President Trumps lies over these last five months, but I doubt that their publication will deter this president from continuing his mendacious behavior. Simply put, lying works for him: It gets him lots of headlines, and his supporters seem pleased that the mainstream media appears to be quite frustrated.

The bigger problem is that printing and broadcasting Mr. Trumps lies isnt having much effect on his tens of millions of supporters. They still tell pollsters that Mr. Trump is their voice. If we want to peel away Trump supporters, we have to not just publicize his lies but also demonstrate how the presidents actions threaten or hurt them personally. And, above all, we have to present better policies for all Americans.

RIC STEINBERGER INCLINE VILLAGE, NEV.

To the Editor:

While we should not become inured to President Trumps lying, I believe that he doesnt mean to lie. It seems to me that Mr. Trump perceives any simple follow-up question about, say, a previously stated policy position as a confrontation, and he becomes extremely uncomfortable, if not panicked. His sole mission at that point becomes his extrication from that situation as quickly as possible. The truth doesnt play a role.

We have now reached the point where any definitive statement from Mr. Trump is meaningless. To the president, the truth is merely collateral damage.

Read more from the original source:

The Catalog of Donald Trump's Lies - New York Times

Donald Trump arrives to speak at the Energy Department in Washington, DC, on June 29, 2017.

NICHOLAS KAMM/AFP/Getty Images

In response to the Supreme Courts ruling earlier this week, Donald Trumps State Department sent a cable to the United States diplomatic posts explaining how officials should implement the presidents Muslim travel ban. The administrations new guidance pushes the court-sanctioned implementation to be as restrictive as possible. It was also issued in secret, which means the administration is doing its damnedest to prevent the legal challenges that will surely follow. The guidance makes clear, though, that this version of the travel ban will not affect nearly as many of people as the original ban did, nor will it be as severe as the second version of the ban would have been had the court allowed it to go into full effect.

On Monday, the Supreme Court limited the ban to individuals who do not have a connection to a U.S. entity or a close familial relationship with a person in the United States. That vague descriptionthe court cited only the example of a relationship with a mother-in-law and spouseallowed the State Department to craft its own rules. What they came up with is the most limited plausible definition that falls within those boundaries. From the State Departments guidance:

The agency acknowledges at another point in the guidance that most non-immigrant visas are exempt from review under the travel ban because their bona fide relationship to a person or entity is inherent in the visa classification. Familial relationships are also often required for immigrant visas; there are special visa categories for spouses, parents, and siblings that will also be exempted from the travel ban based on this new guidance.

Who isnt exempt from the travel ban?

Whats left, it seems are a small number of visas that visitors from the six countries in questionIran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, and Yemendont even use that often: independent media visas for those without a U.S. business connection (I visas), crewmen visas for air and sea companies that dont have some U.S. connection (C-1 and D visas), tourist visas (B visas), fiance visas (K visas), and refugee travel documents.

Its these last three categories that will affect the most people and face the most significant legal challenge. Say an Iranian woman wants to visit her American granddaughter in California on a tourist visa. Under this guidance she would be blocked. It seems possible that a court could decide a grandmother does in fact have a close familial relationship with her granddaughter. Its also possible, though, that a judge could decide that the government drew within the lines. I could see courts providing a lot of leeway to the agency to make that [familial] determination through the doctrines of deference to agency decisionmaking, Pratheepan Gulasekaram, a professor of immigration and constitutional law at Santa Clara University School of Law, told me via email.

Gulasekaram does think the government might run into trouble with its decision to exclude fiances. An entire visa category, K-1, already exists for people who are engaged to be married. Theres no sound rationale for excluding them while including in-laws, who dont have their own such visa category. I'm not sure why that makes sense, and certainly is something I would predict could and would be litigated, Gulasekaram wrote. It may not affect a huge number of people, but its an odd way to draw a line.

One final point: I wrote earlier this week that the administration might attempt to hide behind the doctrine of consular nonreviewability in order to obscure its decisionmaking around the issuance of individual visas. This State Department guidancealthough it was not issued publiclyis a tacit acknowledgement that there are now official guidelines in place regarding what does and doesnt qualify as a close family relationship. Gulasekaram said this guidance could allow the courts to review decisions that might otherwise have been hiddena district judge might issue a ruling on whether the State Departments interpretation of close family relationship is in fact the correct one. If courts decide a grandmother should get the same treatment as a mother-in-law, then Trumps feeble travel ban could become completely impotent.

See the rest here:

Donald Trump's State Department Is Acknowledging the Virtual Impotence of His Muslim Ban - Slate Magazine (blog)

President Trump(Photo: Pool, Getty Images)

WASHINGTON President Trump returned to the political stage Wednesday night, though there is no formal record of what he said or did.

Organizersbarred reportersfrom Trump's first campaign fundraiser since taking office, an event held at theTrump International Hotel just blocks from the White House.

Two attendees told the Associated Press that Republicans who paid $35,000 apiece listened as the president saluted GOP wins in four special House elections this year and attacked the media at the Republican National Committee fundraiser.

Donors heard a familiar message from the Trump, the AP reported: "The media, particularly CNN, keep trying to take him down, and yet Republicans just keep on winning elections," the APreported.

The White House initially said a pool of reporters would be allowed into Trump's speech. but officials closed the event just hours before it took place.

The fact that the president staged a fundraiser at aTrump hotel also drew criticism.

"Trump said he would drain the swamp, but instead he redeveloped the land and put up a new hotel," said Democratic National Committee spokeswoman Adrienne Watson. "He uses it to peddle the presidency and pad his own bank account."

Kathleen Clark, a law professor who specializes in government ethics at Washington University in St. Louis, told USA TODAYthis week that holding a fundraiser at aTrump hotel is not illegal, but does give the president another chance to "exploit his opportunities to promote Trump properties."

Wednesday's soiree also gave Trump a chance to build Republican support for next year's congressional elections and for his own not-so-secret reelection bid in 2020. Trump filed required paperwork required for reelectionon his ownInauguration Day, the earliest such filing for any president.

"Of course hes running for re-election," said White House spokeswoman Sarah Sanders. "But right now, hes focused on his agenda, focused on the midterms."

Read or Share this story: https://usat.ly/2tsBFKg

See the original post:

Donald Trump returns to political stage, off the record - USA TODAY

PROFILES IN COWARDICE House Speaker Paul Ryan, Senate majority leader Mitch McConnell, Vice President Mike Pence, Senators John McCain and Lindsey Graham, and White House chief of staff Reince Priebus.

Photo Illustration by Matt Chase.

Blame for the ongoing destruction wrought by the Trump administration will always attach to Donald Trump. But Trump cannot help himself. He is a pathogen, doing what pathogens do, and as surprised as anyone to have found himself replicating in the nations bloodstream. Equal blame will attach to a small group of experienced and seemingly rational politicians who knew exactly what Trump was like; who had cause to loathe and distrust him; who understood firsthand that he knew nothing about government and did not care to know anything; who could see clearly that he was dangerous, brutal, and corrupt; and who nonetheless decided, after occasional protests, to help him achieve and hold power. These are people who have been repeatedly belittled and mocked by Trump, who have sometimes been forced to voice their disgust at his words and actions, and whofor reasons that range from ambition and fear to denial and moral blindnessnot only have declined to stand in his way but continue to prop him up. One or more of them may ultimately decide to defy him, but nothing will absolve them of the damage already done.

The first time Donald Trump publicly criticized Paul Ryan was in March of 2012, shortly after Trump had decided not to run for president. Ryan had unveiled a Republican budget before Obama released the Democratic version. Trump thought it was a strategic mistake. Whether @RepPaulRyans plan is sound fiscal policy is not the relevant issue, Trump tweeted. The issue is strategic timing. Why release it now? The two men met personally early on during the next presidential campaign, and the relationship had already begun to curdle. Speaking in New Hampshire, and as a Republican presidential candidate, Trump let his disdain for Ryan be known. When I heard Paul Ryan, and I like Paul Ryan as a person, but when I heard Mitt Romney chose Paul RyanI mean, what hes known for is killing entitlementsI said that election is over. In July 2015, after Trump made his first comments about Mexicans sending their rapists to the U.S., Ryan said, He doesnt speak for the Republican Party, and I think his comments were extremely disrespectful, and I dont think thats the way to have an immigration conversation. When Trump leveled an accusation of bias against Judge Gonzalo Curiel because Curiels ancestors were Mexican, Ryan was quick to repudiate the comments: Claiming a person cant do their job because of their race is sort of like the textbook definition of a racist comment. (At the time, Curiel was presiding over a lawsuit which alleged fraud by Trump University, and which Trump eventually settled for $25 million.) When Trump first suggested a ban on Muslims entering the United Statesunconstitutional on its faceRyan said, What was proposed yesterday is not what this party stands for. And, more importantly, its not what this country stands for. After the Access Hollywood tape was made publicin which Trump bragged to host Billy Bush that he could do anything he wanted to women, including grab them by the pussy, because he was famousRyan maintained that he was sickened by what I heard today. Add all this up and you have a man who has said in public what he surely believes in private: that by every measure Trump is unfit for high office. And yet Ryanwhom Trump has called weak and ineffectivegave Trump his endorsement and has covered for him repeatedly. After the election, at a meeting of the House Republican caucus, Ryan responded to the assertion by one member that Trump was on the Russian payroll with a warning to everyone in the room: No leaks, he said, according to a recording of the exchange obtained by The Washington Post. This is how we know were a real family here. After former F.B.I. director James Comey described what he said was a request by Trump to drop a criminal investigation into former national-security adviser Michael Flynns Russia contacts, Ryan excused Trumps alleged behavior by noting simply, Hes just new to this. The bargain Ryan has made is clearits the one spelled out by Grover Norquist back in 2012, when Norquist defended the choice of Mitt Romney by saying hed also have endorsed a monkey, a plate of lasagna, or a potted plant. All Norquist wanted was a Republican with enough working digits to handle a pen to sign legislation. Ryan wants to gut the safety net for the poor and cut taxes for the wealthy, and believes that with Trump he can do that. He said recently that he had dreamed of cutting Medicaid since his keg-drinking days. Having Trumps digits on the Resolute Deskwhatever the existential risk to the principles of the country as a wholeis a small price to pay.

Mitch McConnell, a deft and mercurial Republican senator and the majority leader since 2015, is a creature of Washington. As Alec MacGillis has documented in his shrewd and doggedly reported book The Cynic, McConnell has never had any longstanding political values. He has allowed himself to be filledinitially by hired consultantswith whatever positions would keep money rolling in and ensure his continual election and, now, his supremacy in the Senate. That is his enduring principle. Maintaining this status requires fealty to die-hard Trump voters who make up the most active portion of the Republican base. So be it.

McConnells track record of disagreeing with Trump but continuing to support him is impressive. In 2015, when Trump called for a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States, McConnell told CNNs Jake Tapper, Were not going to follow that suggestion that this particular candidate made. It would prevent the president of Afghanistan from coming to the United States. The King of Jordan couldnt come to the United States. In early 2016, McConnell reportedly laid out a plan for congressional lawmakers to break with Trumpif he became the nomineein the general election. That effort failed, and McConnell quickly came around, arguing that Trump wouldnt have much impact one way or the other. Trump is not going to change the institution, McConnell said on Hugh Hewitts morning radio show, referring to the Republicans. Hes not going to change the basic philosophy of the party. When Trump hesitated before rejecting the support of former Ku Klux Klan leader David Duke, McConnell stated that Senate Republicans condemn David Duke, the K.K.K., and his racismbut he didnt mention Trump by name. In July, when Trump attacked the Gold Star parents of Captain Humayun Khan, who had been killed in the line of duty, McConnell called Captain Khan an American herobut again didnt mention Trump.

McConnells wife, Elaine Chao, is the secretary of transportation in the Trump administration, a prize that undoubtedly tilts McConnell in Trumps direction. But McConnell believes most fervently in his own longevity, nothing else. Channeling McConnells view of himself with respect to Trump, one Republican strategist, who knows McConnell well, put it this way: I was here long before he got here, and Ill be here long after. Im majority leader. Why do I give a damn about a president? McConnell has proven his worth in one key move, by holding off a vote on the Obama Supreme Court nominee Merrick Garland until Trump was elected. That allowed Trump to nominate Neil Gorsuch, whose confirmation represents the sole clear achievement of the Trump presidency thus far. For someone who doesnt care about presidents, Gorsuch alone makes Trump worth it. Like Ryan, McConnell seems to regard Trump as a man who he hopes can be manipulatedsigning the bills that others put before him. Nothing so far suggests the correctness of this view. But a Republican Senateand McConnells tenureis now inextricably yoked to Trumps fortunes, so McConnell plays along.

Speaking recently with another Republican strategist, I raised the subject of Reince Priebus, now the White House chief of staff, and was advised to think of him as not in the same category as a Ryan or McConnell. Nor is Priebus, the strategist went on, anyone who is ever going to stand up to Donald Trump. Priebus is a perfect symbol of the Republican Party as a whole, never imagining he would find himself where he is today. Throughout the primaries, the role he played was to keep the Republican Party together at any costthwarting defections by the Never Trump movement and delivering the party more or less intact to the ultimate nominee.

Priebus, a Wisconsin political apparatchik who had become head of the Republican National Committee, oversaw a G.O.P. election autopsy after Mitt Romneys defeat in 2012. The report concluded that it would be increasingly difficult for the Republicans to win another presidential election in the near future if the party did not reach out to ethnic minorities, women, and immigrants. When Trumpin the speech announcing his candidacy for presidentmade his comment about Mexican rapists, Priebus, after conferring with Republican donors about the possible damage to Latino outreach, privately urged Trump to tone it down, according to The Washington Post. Trump responded publicly after the Post story ran. Totally false reporting, he tweeted, even though a day later he conceded the main points of the story in an interview with The New York Times. Priebus, he said in that interview, knows better than to lecture me. He added that Priebus could be ignored because he was unworthy of respect: Were not dealing with a five-star Army general.

In September 2015, partly because of all the attention Trump had received over the summer, Priebus began asking Republican presidential candidates to sign a loyalty pledgeagreeing to support whoever the nominee might be. He visited Trump Tower in person to get Trump to sign. In April 2016, after Trump announced that he would abandon the loyalty pledge he had signed in September, Priebus responded lamely that actions like Trumps have consequences. When Trump criticized Judge Curiel, Priebus reportedly called Trump family members to try to make him stop. He did not. When Trump criticized the Khan family, Priebus told CNN the Khans should be off limits. He did not criticize or demand an apology from Trump.

A campaign staffer who worked for John Kasich told Politico, Every time Trump would do something dumb, Reince would be up in New York shining his shoes. Republicans inundated Priebus with requests to say somethinganythingto deter the bully who was clearing the field. Priebus did nothing. He later explained his strategy to The New York Times: I have encouraged him to constantly offer grace to people that he doesnt think are deserving of grace. Playing the grace card was a novel approach. It did not work.

By October, Priebus was justifying Trump at every turn, calling him a winner and acknowledging he could be considered a role modelbecause everyone is a role model in different waysjust days before the release of the Access Hollywood tape. In response to that episode, Priebus told Trump privately that he should consider dropping out of the race, a conversation Trump has never forgotten. He did not ask Trump to apologize for his comments, and he assured R.N.C. members on a conference call that he was coordinating with the Trump campaign and we have a great relationship with them. As Election Day neared, he told colleagues that if Trump lost the R.N.C. should not be blamed. And he was right: more than anyone else, Priebus held the G.O.P. together as a vehicle for Donald Trump. After Trumps victory, the president-elect named Priebus chief of staff. In that job, for which no previous experience had prepared him, and designed explicitly to be as weak as its occupant, Priebus must defend himself against both his White House colleagues and his boss. His role remains what it has been for years: to assuage differences, to keep as many people on board as he can, and to allow Trump to continue to be viable.

Perhaps no one has enabled Trump in his presidency more than Trumps vice president, former Indiana governor Mike Pence, and perhaps no one has paid a greater price in terms of personal humiliation. Pences role has been to serve as the genial presenter of what are already known to be lies or what are soon to be revealed as lies. How much can you look yourself in the mirror when your boss sends you out to say something in the media and within 24 hours he undercuts you? one of the Republican strategists noted. Pences personal agenda is a vaulting ambition somewhat masked by a placid half-smile and a demeanor of practiced sincerity. In his native Indiana he was seen by some as a rung climber.

Despite heavy wooing by Trump, Pence had endorsed Ted Cruz in Indianas 2016 Republican primaryin a radio interview with a local host he heaped so much praise on Trump that options were clearly being left open. Cruz lost and dropped out of the race. In early July, Pence and his wife visited Trump at his Bedminster, New Jersey, golf club. Trump had said he wanted a vice president who could navigate the corridors of power in Congress. In Pencea former congressman who once, back when he was a conservative radio host, described himself as Rush Limbaugh on decafhe saw a reliable link to conservative and evangelical Republicans: a dicey demographic for a thrice-married former Democrat and alleged serial harasser of women who faced ongoing allegations of fraud.

During the vice-presidential debate in October 2016, Pences cool demeanor carried the day. He shook his head sadly throughout but especially when Tim Kaine repeated Trumps most outrageous statements, including the bigoted and sexist remarks, responding that these were things Trump had never really meant or said. He dismissed Trumps comments about Mexicans being rapists as that Mexican thing. He calmly denied statements by Trump that were a matter of public record. When the Access Hollywood video became public, Pence professed himself to have been offended by the words and actions described by Donald Trump. But he got over it. When more women came forward to allege sexual harassment and assault by Trumpa dozen, all toldPence said he believed Trump, not the women.

In January 2017, Pence was called on to defend the national-security adviser, Michael Flynn, saying in interviews that the allegation, reported by The Washington Post, that Flynn had discussed sanctions with Russias ambassador to the United States, Sergey Kislyak, was false. Pence said he had spoken with Flynn, who had told him the subject of sanctions had never come up. Flynns account turned out to be untrue, as Trump and senior White House aides soon learned. But it was another 15 days before Pence himself was so informed, and he got the news not from his colleagues but from another story in the Post, according to Axios. When Flynn was fired, Trump and his surrogates used the fact that Flynn had misled Pence as the reason. But senior staff had left Pence in the dark for two weeks. Pence absorbed the disrespect and moved on.

In May, Trump fired F.B.I. director James Comey. The next day, Pence was sent out to defend his bossarguing, as he had been told, that the president was merely accepting the recommendation of the deputy attorney general and that the firing had nothing to do with the bureaus investigation of possible ties between the Russian government and the Trump campaign. The next day, in an interview with NBCs Lester Holt, Trump flatly contradicted Pence, stating that he had been planning to fire Comey regardless of any recommendation and that the Russia investigation was the reason he did it. Again, Pence was silent.

As William Saletan has pointed out in Slate, Pences behavior shows a pattern of being willing to vouch for people who say what is not true. Because Trump is a liar, he urgently needs a sidekick who possesses this genial capacityit has virtually become Pences job description. The payoff for Pence will come when Trump leaves office, whatever the circumstances.

In July 2015, after Donald Trump attacked Senator John McCains war record and insulted him as a non-hero for having been captured, his Senate colleague from South Carolina Lindsey Grahama presidential candidate and one of the most respected voices on foreign policy on Capitol Hillcalled Trump a jackass and declared that he shouldnt be commander in chief. The following day, during a rally in South Carolina, Trump claimed that Graham had called him three or four years earlier, begging Trump to put in a good word for him with the Fox News morning show Fox & Friends. Trump called Graham a lightweight and an idiot. In October of that year, when Graham was interviewed on CNNs New Day, he said of Trump, Hes the most unprepared person in the entire field to be commander in chief, and over time I think that will matter. Americans better wake up. In December 2015, Graham, again on CNN, called Trump a race-baiting, xenophobic religious bigot. As the primary season wore on, Grahams warnings grew more desperate. He said on MSNBC, I think Donald Trump is a con man. I think he would destroy the Republican Party.

In the end, as Trumps nomination became inevitable, Graham began to soften. He made a conciliatory call to Trump, who tweeted about the conversation: Senator Lindsey Graham called me yesterday, very much to my surprise, and we had a very interesting talk about national security, and more! On Election Day, Graham couldnt bring himself to pull the lever for his partys nominee, but the softening continued. Five days later, Graham conveyed his congratulations to the new president-elect on his choice of Reince Priebus as chief of staff, tweeting that the choice shows me he is serious about governing. In January 2017, after Trump needled Graham for how poorly he had done in the primaries, Graham responded, Let it go. He added, adopting Trumps campaign slogan in what seemed like a pep talk to himself, Lets move on. Were going to make America great again.

TRUMPS ENABLERS WILL BE TREATED WITH THE SPECIAL CONTEMPT RESERVED FOR THOSE WHO ACTED KNOWINGLY.

Lindsey Graham is what is known as an institutionalist. He cherishes his role as an minence grise in the Senatehe has said that he intended to stay long enough to make Strom Thurmond the second-longest-serving member of that body. (Thurmond served for 48 years, dying at the age of 100.) He has criticized President Trump on certain mattersthe travel ban, for instance. He favors a robust investigation into Russian interference in the presidential election. But he also promotes the projection of U.S. military might, as Trump does, and he has a deep-seated respect for the office of the president. Graham, along with John and Cindy McCain, had dinner with Trump at the White House in April. Graham still sometimes critiques Trump, but it is for his style or lack of organization, rather than his basic character, as used to be the case. The President has a hard time colluding with his staff, Graham commented after Comeys testimony, so he couldnt have been colluding with the Russians. After Trump lashed out at Comey on Twitter, calling him a leaker and describing his actions as cowardly, Graham appeared on CBSs Face the Nation and addressed Trump directly from the set: You may be the first president in history to go down because you cant stop inappropriately talking about an investigation that if you just were quiet, would clear you. Graham said Trumps continued outbursts were frustrating because he thought that Trump, if he didnt sabotage himself, might deliver us from a broken immigration system. Recalling Grahams earlier view of Trumpracist, jackass, bigot, con mansome have looked to Graham as a figure who might lead a form of opposition to Trump on Capitol Hill. Not a chance: Graham continues to protect Trumps foreign-policy flank, recently banishing hopes of rebellion with the blanket affirmation to Fox & Friends, Im all in. Keep it up, Donald.

Gone is the Lindsey Graham who, during the campaign, attacked Ted Cruz on CNN for not condemning Donald Trump and his lack of integrity: So what Ted Cruz did is ignore the moral imperative here to speak out . . . .This doesnt cut it for me. This is not a policy debate, Ted. This is about you and us and our character as a party. Up your game. Condemn it because it needs to be condemned. He concluded, You know how you make America great again? Tell Donald Trump to go to hell.

When Donald Trump descended the escalator in Trump Tower to announce his candidacyand, in the course of that speech, to declare Mexican immigrants to the United States to be rapistsMcCain called the comment offensive but added that Trump was entitled to say what he wants to say. Trump responded with an insult: Graduated last in his class at Annapolisdummy! Not long afterward, Trump encouraged a primary challenge to McCain, saying to conservative pollster Frank Luntz at the Family Leadership Summit in Ames, Iowa, Somebody should run against John McCain, whos been, in my opinion, not so hot. And I supported him for president. I raised a million dollars for himthats a lot of money. I supported him. He lost; he let us down. But he lost and I never liked him much after that cause I dont like losers . . . . Hes not a war hero. Trump then both managed to reverse himself and double down: Hes a war herohes a war hero because he was captured. I like people that werent captured, O.K.?

In March of 2016, McCain said he shared the concerns of Mitt Romney about TrumpRomney had delivered a blistering denunciationand he also put out a statement urging Republican voters to pay close attention to the open letter from Republican national-security leaders, which stated that Trumps vision of American influence and power in the world is wildly inconsistent and unmoored in principle. In April, McCain said he was not going to attend the Republican convention. In August, after Trump insulted the Khan family, McCain issued a statement: It is time for Donald Trump to set the example for our country and the future of the Republican Party. Trump eventually endorsed McCain in his Senate race, and McCain eventually endorsed Trumpbut pulled the endorsement after the Access Hollywood tape surfaced. Trump responded on Twitter, The very foul mouthed Sen. John McCain begged for my support during his primary (I gave, he won), then dropped me over locker room remarks! After Trump was elected, McCain said he would show deference to the president, but I am not a rubber stamp.

In February, when Trump called a deadly military strike in Yemen a success, McCain took issue with that characterization. In May, The New York Times reported that Trump had asked F.B.I. director James Comey to drop his investigation into N.S.C. director Michael Flynn, and McCain said on Face the Nation, I think we have seen this movie before. I think its reaching a point where its of Watergate size and scale. Yet when McCain had the opportunity to question Comey directly, despite his obvious confusion, he displayed a knee-jerk defense of Trump. McCain has not been a rubber stamp. What he has been is a gamblerhis default persona. McCain showed in 2008, when he selected Sarah Palin as his running mate, that he was willing to overlook deficiencies of character and stability in order to achieve his own ends. Taking dangerous risks has marked McCain throughout his career.

One Republican political strategist explained to me that what made Trump palatable to McCaindespite everything McCain dislikes about the manis that Trump lacks any true convictions of his own, making McCain feel Trump can be swayed. McCain, with Graham, respects the generals who make up the national-security apparatus in the Trump administration. According to a White House adviser who has spoken to McCain and Graham, both men are fired up about the tax reform that Trump promises. After Graham and the McCains dinner with Trump, the Daily Beast reported that Cindy McCain was set to join Trumps State Department as a U.S. ambassador-at-large for human rights. Like Paul Ryan, McCain seems willing to tolerate almost anything in return for the working digits that hold a pen.

The Trump administration may last for months or it may last for years. There will be crises and catastrophes. A corrosion of values and spirit has already set in. The outside world pulls away. John Boehner, the Republican former Speaker of the House, now retired and fortified with tobacco and Merlot, has called Trump a disaster. Donald Trump will suffer his own grim fate in the eyes of historians, but it will come with an asterisk: he is a profoundly damaged human being with no true understanding of his capacities, his emotions, his ignorance, his job, or the fundamentals of human decency.

His enablers will get no asterisk. They will be treated with the special contempt reserved for those who acted knowingly and cravenly, with eyes wide open.

The O.G. Never Trumper, Romney effectively renounced his past denunciations of the president-elect, whom he had previously called a con man, when Trump began publicly courting him for secretary of state. (He did not get the job.)

A long time ago, in the year 2016, the R.N.C. chairman threw everything he could to prevent Trump from becoming the partys nominee. Days after Trump won, Reince stood by his side as his chief of staff, possibly getting the least humiliating outcome for an erstwhile Trump foe.

The House Speaker spent months trying to maintain a safe distance from Trump, condemning his statements (even as he declined to renounce him) and at one point canceling a rally appearance with Trump after his past p****-grabbing comments came to light. Flash-forward two months, and Ryan was praising Trump in front of a cheering crowd in Wisconsin, thanking him for clinching the first Republican presidential win in the state in decades.

PreviousNext

The O.G. Never Trumper, Romney effectively renounced his past denunciations of the president-elect, whom he had previously called a con man, when Trump began publicly courting him for secretary of state. (He did not get the job.)

Digital Colorization by Ben Park; From Getty Images.

Digital Colorization by Ben Park; From Getty Images.

Digital Colorization by Ben Park.

A long time ago, in the year 2016, the R.N.C. chairman threw everything he could to prevent Trump from becoming the partys nominee. Days after Trump won, Reince stood by his side as his chief of staff, possibly getting the least humiliating outcome for an erstwhile Trump foe.

Digital Colorization by Ben Park; From Getty Images.

Digital Colorization by Ben Park; From PBS.

The House Speaker spent months trying to maintain a safe distance from Trump, condemning his statements (even as he declined to renounce him) and at one point canceling a rally appearance with Trump after his past p****-grabbing comments came to light. Flash-forward two months, and Ryan was praising Trump in front of a cheering crowd in Wisconsin, thanking him for clinching the first Republican presidential win in the state in decades.

Digital Colorization by Ben Park; From Getty Images.

Digital Colorization by Ben Park; From Getty Images.

Digital Colorization by Ben Park; From Getty Images.

Read more:

A Definitive Guide to the GOP Insiders Enabling Donald Trump - Vanity Fair