Monthly Archives: June 2017

Nets Ignore India’s Recent Spike in Christian Persecution – NewsBusters (press release) (blog)

Posted: June 26, 2017 at 5:51 pm


NewsBusters (press release) (blog)
Nets Ignore India's Recent Spike in Christian Persecution
NewsBusters (press release) (blog)
According to Open Doors President David Curry, the Indian government is actually supportive of Christian oppression. Also, it has become increasingly hostile to American NGOs, including Christian ministry Compassion International, which was forced to ...

and more »

Go here to see the original:

Nets Ignore India's Recent Spike in Christian Persecution - NewsBusters (press release) (blog)

Posted in Government Oppression | Comments Off on Nets Ignore India’s Recent Spike in Christian Persecution – NewsBusters (press release) (blog)

This ruling allows councils to boycott Israel. It’s a crucial victory – The Guardian

Posted: at 5:51 pm

On 11 June Avigdor Lieberman proudly announced that Israel was planning its greatest expansion of settlement homes since 1992. Ramot in the occupied West Bank. Photograph: Ronen Zvulun/Reuters

Two weeks ago I found myself in a sweaty room in the Royal Courts of Justice, packed with fellow Palestine activists, listening to detailed and sometimes arcane legal arguments about pension law. The journey that ended in that courtroom began in September last year when the government announced new guidance intended to prohibit local government pension schemes from pursuing divestment and sanctions against foreign nations and UK defence industries other than where formal legal sanctions, embargoes and restrictions have been put in place by the government.

The key target of these new rules was made clear in the government press release about the decision. This was the government acting to place a ban on boycotting Israel. The regulations were introduced in November 2016 despite a public consultation indicating that 98% of respondents thought this was the wrong thing to do, and a wider public outcry.

The Palestine Solidarity Campaign, of which Im the director, decided to take the government on. We launched a judicial review supported with witness statements from War on Want, Campaign Against the Arms Trade and the Quakers. Finally, on 22 June, we got the verdict we won! Judge Sir Ross Cranston ruled the guidance was unlawful and that the government had acted for an improper purpose.

This is a victory for the rule of law, for local democracy and for freedom of expression. But it is also a crucial moment in the campaign for Boycott Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) against Israel until it complies with international law. This campaign emerged in 2005 in answer to a call from 170 Palestinian civil society organisations, frustrated by the decades in which international governments and bodies had issued condemnations of Israels oppression of the Palestinian people but refused to impose meaningful pressure.

The consequences of this failed policy were underlined in the last month, during which Israels illegal occupation of East Jerusalem, the West bank and Gaza entered its 50th year. On 11 June the countrys foreign minister, Avigdor Lieberman, proudly announced that Israel was planning its greatest expansion of settlement homes since 1992, one year before the Oslo accords launched the so-called peace process. During that time the number of illegal settlers occupying the West Bank and East Jerusalem has grown by nearly half a million. On 20 June ,as work started on the first illegal settlement to be built outside the existing settlement blocks in 25 years, Benjamin Netanyahu tweeted After decades, I have the privilege to be the prime minister who is building a new community in Judea and Samaria. Or to put it in clearer language , here is a prime minster who feels privileged to be violating international law.

The BDS movement is a response to Israels confidence that it can act with impunity. Modelled on the same tactics used so successfully against apartheid South Africa, it calls on all actors to end economic support for Israels illegal actions.

The UK governments attempts to force though the pension regulations were part and parcel of a wider attempt by Israel and its supporters to push back against the growing success of the BDS campaign. In April a leaked joint report from the Israeli thinktank the Reut Institute and the US Anti-Defamation League boasted of the success since 2010 in establishing a global pro-Israel network to suppress BDS activity, and the use of anti-BDS laws as a key tactic: 14 US states have introduced such legislation.

Theresa May must listen to the growing chorus of voices calling for an approach that truly holds Israel to account

Sir Ross Cranstons judgment last week draws a line in the sand against the attempts to introduce such measures in the UK. It upholds the basic right to invest money on ethical principles.

For BDS campaigners in the UK this gives a huge boost to our work. A recent YouGov poll showed that public opinion is on our side with 43% of the public seeing BDS as a reasonable response to Israels policies and only 13% opposed. This judgment tells us that the law is with us as well. With this legal impediment removed, we will take forward the campaign to persuade all relevant bodies, including pension-fund holders, not to invest money in supporting activities that are illegal and violate human rights.

Margaret Thatcher found herself on the wrong side of history in the 1980s when she tried to prevent boycotts of apartheid South Africa. Last week, Theresa May told us that her government recognised the need to be humble, to listen to public opinion and rethink its approach to a range of issues. Its time for her to acknowledge that current policy in the Middle East has failed and to listen to the growing chorus of voices calling for an approach that truly holds Israel to account.

View post:

This ruling allows councils to boycott Israel. It's a crucial victory - The Guardian

Posted in Government Oppression | Comments Off on This ruling allows councils to boycott Israel. It’s a crucial victory – The Guardian

Sally Yates Condemns Jeff Sessions for Reinstating Harsh Low-Level Drug Sentences – TIME

Posted: at 5:51 pm

Former Acting Attorney General Sally Yates has publicly criticized Attorney General Jeff Sessions for reinstating harsh mandatory minimum drug sentences aimed at curbing violent crime throughout the U.S.

In a Washington Post op-ed titled "Making America Scared Again Won't Make Us Safer" published Friday, Yates argued that incarcerating low-level drug couriers is counterproductive, expensive and damaging to American communities.

"Not only are violent crime rates still at historic lows nearly half of what they were when I became a federal prosecutor in 1989 but there is also no evidence that the increase in violent crime some cities have experienced is the result of drug offenders not serving enough time in prison," Yates wrote.

"Every dollar spent imprisoning a low-level nonviolent drug offender for longer than necessary is a dollar we dont have to investigate and prosecute serious threats, from child predators to terrorists," Yates continued. "Its a dollar we dont have to support state and local law enforcement for cops on the street, who are the first lines of defense against violent crime. And its a dollar we dont have for crime prevention or recidivism reduction within our prison system, essential components of building safe communities."

Last month, Sessions in a memorandum ordered federal prosecutors nationwide to pursue the "most serious, readily provable offense" in drug cases.

"It is a core principle that prosecutors should charge and pursue the most serious, readily provable offense," he wrote at the time.

Many were quick to label the directive as the new War on Drugs. Yates in her op-ed encouraged lawmakers to consider the "human costs" of the initiative.

"More than 2 million children are growing up with a parent behind bars, including 1 in 9 African American children," she wrote. "Huge numbers of Americans are being housed in prisons far from their home communities, creating precisely the sort of community instability where violent crime takes root."

Yates said that throughout her career as a prosecutor at the Justice Department, she charged high-level, international narcotics traffickers and had "no hesitation" asking judges to impose long prison sentences.

"While there is always room to debate the most effective approach to criminal justice, that debate should be based on facts, not fear. Its time to move past the campaign-style rhetoric of being 'tough' or 'soft' on crime," she concluded.

See more here:

Sally Yates Condemns Jeff Sessions for Reinstating Harsh Low-Level Drug Sentences - TIME

Posted in War On Drugs | Comments Off on Sally Yates Condemns Jeff Sessions for Reinstating Harsh Low-Level Drug Sentences – TIME

One year on: Has the Punisher fixed the crime? – NEWS.com.au

Posted: at 5:50 pm

President Rodrigo 'The Punisher' Duterte has a controversial, deadly take on stamping out drug crimes in the Philippines.

Philippine's President Rodrigo Duterte. Picture: AFP Photo/Noel Celis

LAUNCHED a year ago, Philippine President Rodrigo Dutertes brutal war on drugs has resulted in thousands of deaths, yet the street price of crystal methamphetamine in Manila has fallen and surveys show Filipinos are as anxious as ever about crime.

Duterte took power on June 30 last year, vowing to halt the drug abuse and lawlessness he saw as symptoms of virulent social disease.

Thanks to his campaign, government officials say, crime has dropped, thousands of drug dealers are behind bars, a million users have registered for treatment, and future generations of Filipinos are being protected from the scourge of drugs.

There are thousands of people who are being killed, yes, said Oscar Albayalde, Metro Manilas police chief told Reuters. But there are millions who live, see?

A growing chorus of critics, however, including human rights activists, lawyers and the countrys influential Catholic Church, dispute the authorities claims of success.

They say police have summarily executed drug suspects with impunity, terrorising poorer communities and exacerbating the very lawlessness they were meant to tackle.

This president behaves as if he is above the law that he is the law, wrote Amado Picardal, an outspoken Filipino priest, in a recent article for a Catholic Bishops Conference of the Philippines publication. He has ignored the rule of law and human rights.

The drug wars exact death toll is hotly disputed, with critics saying the toll is far above the 5,000 that police have identified as either drug-related killings, or suspects shot dead during police operations.

Most victims are small-time users and dealers, while the masterminds behind the lucrative drug trade are largely unknown and at large, say critics of Dutertes ruthless methods.

If the strategy was working the laws of economics suggest the price of crystal meth, the highly addictive drug also known as shabu, should be rising as less supply hits the streets.

But the Philippine Drug Enforcement Agencys own data suggests shabu has become even cheaper in Manila.

Drug suspects are rounded up during an anti-illegal drugs operation at an informal settlers community at the Manila Islamic Center in Manila on October 7, 2016. Picture: AFP Photo/Noel CelisSource:AFP

Shanty dwellers living inside the cemetery look at bodies being buried on January 24, 2017 in Manila, Philippines. Many bodies of victims of extrajudicial killings lay unclaimed in a morgue as funerals have had to deal with an upsurge in fatalities from the drug war. Picture: Getty Images/Dondi TawataoSource:Getty Images

In July 2016, a gram of shabu cost 1,200-11,000 pesos (A$88-$800), according to agencys figures. Last month, a gram cost 1,000-15,000 pesos ($73-$1100), it said.

The wide ranges reflect swings in availability and sharp regional variations. Officials say Manilas street prices are at the lowest end of the range. And that has come down, albeit by just a few dollars.

If prices have fallen, its an indication that enforcement actions have not been effective, said Gloria Lai of the International Drug Policy Consortium, a global network of non-governmental groups focused on narcotics.

The problem is, according to Derrick Carreon, the Philippine Drug Enforcement Agencys spokesman, that while nine domestic drug labs have been busted, shabu smuggled in from overseas has filled the market gap.

Demand needs to be addressed because there are still drug smugglers, Carreon said.

While smuggled shabu has kept the price down in the capital, the official data shows the price has gone up in the already substantially more expensive far-flung regions, like the insurgency-racked southern island of Mindanao.

Duterte declared martial law in Mindanao last month after militants inspired by Islamic State stormed Marawi City, and the armys failure to retake the city quickly has dented the presidents image as a law-and-order president.

A woman hugs her husband, who was shot dead by an unidentified gunman in Manila on July 23, 2016. Picture: AFP Photo/Noel CelisSource:AFP

An alleged drug dealer and victim of a summary execution lies dead on a main thoroughfare on July 23, 2016 in Manila, Philippines. The victim was an alleged drug peddler, a claim disputed by his wife. Picture: Getty Images/Dondi TawataoSource:Getty Images

AFRAID OF THE DARK

Surveys by Social Weather Stations (SWS), a leading Manila pollster, reveal a public broadly supportive of Dutertes anti-drug campaign, but troubled by its methods and dubious about its effectiveness.

SWS surveys in each of the first three quarters of Dutertes rule showed a very high satisfaction with the anti-drug campaign, said Leo Laroza, a senior SWS researcher.

In the most recent survey, published on April, 92 per cent said it was important that drug suspects be captured alive.

Respondents also reported a 6.3 per cent rise in street robberies and break-ins. More than half of those polled said they were afraid to venture out at night, a proportion that had barely changed since the drug war began, said Laroza.

People still have this fear when it comes to their neighbourhoods, he said. It has not gone down.

Public and police perceptions of crime levels seem to diverge.

The number of crimes committed in the first nine months of Dutertes rule has dropped by 30 per cent, according to police statistics cited by the presidents communications team.

Albayalde, the capitals police chief, said people, particularly in Manila, felt safer now, especially due to a crackdown on drug users who he said commit most of the crime.

In the first 11 months of Dutertes rule, police say 3,155 suspects were shot dead in anti-drug operations. Critics maintain that many of them were summarily executed.

Police say they have investigated a further 2,000 drug-related killings, and have yet to identify a motive in at least another 7,000 murders and homicides.

Human rights monitors believe many of these victims were killed by undercover police or their paid vigilantes, a charge the police deny.

For residents of Navotas fishport, a warren of shacks near Manilas docks, the body count is too high. There were nine killings in a single night in Navotas earlier this month, according to local media.

In mid-May, said resident Mary Joy Royo, a dozen gunmen arrived on motorbikes and abducted her mother and stepfather. Their corpses were found later with execution-style gunshots to the head and torso.

They should be targeting the drug lords, Royo told Reuters. The victims of the drug war are the poor people.

The dead body of Valien Mendoza, a suspected drug dealer, gunned down by unidentified assailants in Manila. Picture: AFP Photo/Noel CelisSource:AFP

Maria Espinosa crying outside the funeral parlour where the body of her dead 16-year-old son, Sonny Espinosa, was taken in Manila. Picture: AFP Photo/Noel CelisSource:AFP

RIPPLE EFFECT

As the death toll has risen, so has domestic and international outrage.

In October, the Hague-based International Criminal Court said it could investigate the killings if they were committed as part of a widespread or systematic attack against a civilian population.

Police operations were halted for much of February after it emerged that anti-drug police abducted and killed a South Korean businessman last year, but the outcry over the rising body count has rarely slowed the killing or led to prosecutions.

The Philippine Commission on Human Rights is investigating 680 drug-war killings.

In this country the basic problem is impunity, Chito Gascon, the commissions chairman, said. No one is ever held to account for the worst violations. Ever.

Police chief Albayalde says that the forces Internal Affairs Service (IAS) investigates all allegations of abuse by his officers.

We do not tolerate senseless killings, he said. We do not just kill anybody.

IAS told Reuters it had investigated 1,912 drug-related cases and recommended 159 officers for dismissal due to misconduct during anti-drug operations, although it didnt know whether any had yet been dismissed.

Earlier this month, 19 police officers charged with murdering two drug suspects in their jail cell in November were released on bail and now face trial for the lesser crime of homicide.

Duterte, who has repeatedly urged police to kill drug suspects, had already vowed to pardon the officers if they were convicted.

You have a head of state who says, Kill, kill, kill, a head of state who says, Ive got your back, said CHRs Gascon. That has a ripple effect.

Marawi, on the southern island of Mindanao,has become the latest victim of Islamic State linked attacks beyond the Middle East. Since declaring martial law on the city, Philippines President Rodrigo Duterte has apologised for the military offensive that has left Marawi in ruins.

Follow this link:

One year on: Has the Punisher fixed the crime? - NEWS.com.au

Posted in War On Drugs | Comments Off on One year on: Has the Punisher fixed the crime? – NEWS.com.au

Koch network to Trump administration: You are never going to win the war on drugs. Drugs won. – The Denver Post

Posted: at 5:50 pm

COLORADO SPRINGS The Trump administrations tough talk on marijuana is creating an unusual alliance: pot smokers and the conservative Koch political network.

Mark Holden, one of the influential networks top leaders, decried President Donald Trumps administration for returning to the harsh sentencing era of the war on drugs.

You are never going to win the war on drugs. Drugs won, he told reporters as the network opened a three-day retreat Saturday at The Broadmoor resort in Colorado Springs.

Attorney General Jeff Sessions directive to re-evaluate marijuana policies is a particular problem. Even though it remains a federal crime to possess and use marijuana, he said, its legal in a number of states, so we have to come to grips with that somehow.

Earlier this month, Sessions asked Congress to repeal federal protections for medical marijuana, citing a historic drug epidemic related to opiates. The 2014 policy prohibits the Justice Department from using federal dollars to block states from legalizing the use, distribution, possession or cultivation of medical marijuana.

When it comes to medical marijuana, Holden argued it should be off-limits to a federal law enforcement crackdown.

Holden, the general counsel for Koch Industries who leads a network-backed effort to address overcriminalization and criminal justice reform, was cautious about reading too much into his stance.

Im not here to say our position is legalize drugs or anything else, he said, adding: But I dont think that we should criminalize those types of things and we should let the states decide.

The approach fits with the conservative philosophies advanced by Charles and David Koch as part of their policy and political work. Holden suggested Sessions position represents a failed big government top-down approach.

Its based on fear and emotion in my opinion, he added.

Follow this link:

Koch network to Trump administration: You are never going to win the war on drugs. Drugs won. - The Denver Post

Posted in War On Drugs | Comments Off on Koch network to Trump administration: You are never going to win the war on drugs. Drugs won. – The Denver Post

Euthanasia survey hints at support from doctors, nurses and division – Cootamundra Herald

Posted: at 5:48 pm

25 Jun 2017, 3 p.m.

NSW: Fewer than 30 per cent of doctors oppose the Voluntary Assisted Dying Bill, according to a survey.

Most NSW doctors and nurses support a controversial medical euthanasia bill headed for Parliament, according to research that could prompt new debateabout the medical fraternity's willingness to accept changes to assisted suicide laws.

A bill, to allow patients to apply for medically assisted euthanasia in specific circumstances when older than 25 (an age when informed consent is deemed reached), will be introduced to the NSW upper house in August for a conscience vote.

Dr Anne Jaumees, an anaesthetist based in western Sydney. A poll of doctors and nurses into what they think about euthanasia has just been conducted. Photo: Dominic Lorrimer

About 60 per cent of doctors support the Voluntary Assisted Dying Bill and fewer than 30 per cent oppose it, according to a surveyby market research company Ekas emailed to a database of 4000 NSW doctors it deemed "opinion leaders" and returned by about 500.

A smaller sample of about 100 nurses had support running at 80 per cent in favour of the law reform and opposition at fewer than 10 per cent.

A crowd-funding campaign forAnnie Gabrielides,a motor neurone disease suffererwho has progressively lost her ability to speak and is a euthanasia advocate, paid for the research.

"I'mconsistently hearing from doctors and medical expertsexpressing their sincere support of my campaign, but they're reluctant to speak out," she said.

The results suggest the medical profession and its famously powerful unions, not just Parliament, will be divided when debate on the bill kicks off.

The Australian Medical Association, which opposes changes to euthanasia law, warnedthe research could overstate doctors' support.

"It is likely that doctors with more strongly held opinions are responding to these surveys so caution must be used," AMA NSW president Brad Frankum said.

A national AMA poll of 4000 doctors last year found 50 per cent of doctors believed medical professionals should not be involved in assisted suicide, a spokesman emphasised.

But only slightly less than four in ten said they should, according to a news report.Combined with 12 per cent who neither agreed nor disagreed that left physicians close to evenly splitin some respects.

And anAustralian Doctorpoll of about 370 medicoslast year found about 65 per cent of doctors supported a change to the law on physician-assisted suicide ifstrict conditions, such as patients nearing the end of their lives and suffering "intolerable pain", some of which are mirrored in the NSW proposal, were met. About half told the journal they would be willing to help perform aprocedure.

NSW Nurses and Midwives Association general secretary Brett Holmes said: "The vast majority of nurses support change that enables medically assisted dying. Nurses know patients often choose more drastic means [to medically ending their life] in fear they cannot choose later."

A parliamentary report cited polls from the '90s that found nurses' support for euthanasia reform reached as high as about 75 per cent.

A dozen polls in the past decade hadfound between 75 to 80 per cent of Australians backed medically assisted euthanasia.

Western Sydney anaesthetistAnneJaumeesdoes too after working in palliative care for 15 years: "All their lives they want dignity and patients want that up until the end, too."

The bill is the product of cross-party collaboration and will only allow for applications frompatients expected to die within the coming year and experiencing extreme pain, suffering or incapacitation.

Safeguards proposed included allowing relatives to challenge applications in the Supreme Court,assessmentsby independent doctors and being subject to a 48-hour cooling-off period.

But Maria Cigolionisaid, while proponents arguedthe bill came laden with safeguards, it required no review of what palliative care patients had first sought before applying to end their lives or for alternatives to be suggested.

Overseas safeguards had been loosened so euthanasia could be applied forby people also suffering from psychosocial problems, Dr Cigolioni said.

"Instead of spending money on euthanasia reforms, we should be investing in psychosocial support programs to address suffering."

"People [will hasten the solution of death] when so many other things need to be looked at as the potential cause of that suffering," she said. "Once you change a criminal law [to allow] people to be killed, then [its conditions] can be extended beyond just being terminally ill, [and expand to include] the disabled and the aged and children, as it has in the Netherlands and Belgium."

The state budget last week announced a $100 million increase in funding for palliative care, something experts said would bring levels of NSW services into line with other states.

AMA policy recognises a divergence in doctors' views on euthanasia but it states doctors should not be involved in dispensing treatment that shortens a patient's life.

The Sydney Morning Herald

See the original post:

Euthanasia survey hints at support from doctors, nurses and division - Cootamundra Herald

Posted in Euthanasia | Comments Off on Euthanasia survey hints at support from doctors, nurses and division – Cootamundra Herald

ACT’s euthanasia bill ‘dangerous’ – professor | Radio New Zealand … – Radio New Zealand

Posted: at 5:48 pm

A Welsh professor of palliative medicine and cross-bench member of the House of Lords has arrived in New Zealand to challenge David Seymour's End of Life Choice Bill.

Ilora Finlay says that the End of Life Choice Bill is dangerous because it isn't at all restrictive. Photo: RBZ

The ACT leader's euthanasia bill was pulled from the members' ballot earlier this month to go before Parliament.

The End of Life Choice Bill would allow for assisted dying in cases where people are terminally ill but still mentally sound.

Ilora Finlay said that going by what had happened in Oregon and Belgium, the legalisation of assisted suicide in New Zealand would lead to 120 cases a year, while legalising euthanasia would lead to around 1200.

Baroness Finlay said Mr Seymour's bill was dangerous.

"It isn't restrictive at all, it also goes beyond physician-assisted suicide and it goes to euthanasia, but you do fundamentally change the relationship between the doctor and the patient when you go down that road."

Ilora Finlay will take part in a public panel discussion at Parliament on Wednesday.

See the rest here:

ACT's euthanasia bill 'dangerous' - professor | Radio New Zealand ... - Radio New Zealand

Posted in Euthanasia | Comments Off on ACT’s euthanasia bill ‘dangerous’ – professor | Radio New Zealand … – Radio New Zealand

The time has come for euthanasia | Stuff.co.nz – Waikato Times

Posted: at 5:48 pm

PETER DORNAUF

Last updated05:00, June 26 2017

Mario Anzuoni

The documentary Autopsy focuses on the sudden and tragic end to Robin Williams' life.

OPINION: Recently I watched a television documentary called Autopsy, about the actor/comedianRobin Williams. It focused on the suddenand tragic end to his life, probing the events of his last days to unpick the reasons behind the man's shocking suicide.

It was revealed that Williams was suffering from Parkinson's disease, but that debilitating illness wasn't the thing which had brought him to the brink and pushed him over. There was something much darker going on deep in his mind which the autopsy finally exposed. He was suffering from early onset Alzheimer's, a humiliating and cruel death sentence for a man whose sharp mind was his identity as well as his bread and butter.

Williams was obviously aware that something was seriously amiss and intuited what it was early in the piece. In someone still with years ahead of him, it must have come as a devastating blow.

But what was most distressing for the viewerwas the re-enactment of what transpired as Robin Williams, the man who had brought so much wit, insight and laughter to the world, attempted to bring his life to a close, alone, without goodbyes, clumsily, painfully, violently.

Afterward, I thought how things could have been so much different in a more civilised society where assisted suicide was legal.

Currently, Parliament is to debate and vote on the issue of euthanasia. We've had to fight tooth and nail just to get some relaxation of the use of medical marijuana for suffering and terminally ill patients, so I can just imagine, in a society of roughneckswhere "suck it up"is the prevailing attitude among some, how difficult any move toward liberalisation is going to be.

Someone made the comment recently that the trouble lies with the fact that many of our rule-makers are religious, our prime minister leading the pack. It was expressed crudely and bluntly by Catholic adherentJohn Collier, who responded to the issue by saying, "Thou shalt not kill, and that's the end of it."

Such closed-mindedness demonstrates both a supreme lack of empathy for suffersas well as a denial of the right to choose for others. But more significantly it is a classic oversimplification of the matter. Reducing complex ethical questions to parroting some rote and formulaic code is lazy moral thinking. It is something the philosopher Jean Paul Sartre would have called"bad faith", a kind of moral sloth that attempts to escape from the burden of ethical responsibility on hard questions.

It also conveniently overlooks the fact that the god who is touted with issuing such a commandordered the wholesale slaughter of communities involving men, women and children. Obviously there is some wiggle room here.

Here in Hamilton, my own family is no stranger to the terrible suffering surrounding dementia and suicide. I cannot bear to think what must have been going through my grandmother's tortured mind as she took herself down to the edge of the Waikato River one morning and threw herself in.

It happened when I was 10 and all of it was rightly kept from us children to be discovered later in life. But how shockingly monstrous for my father, who never spoke of it once - about a mother, forced by the law of the land, to take such desperate measures at the end of her life.

Imagine an alternative in another time and place where she would have been able to tell her children she had had enough of life and they'd all been able to gather in a room and spend the last days together, hugged, kissed, said lovely things and said goodbye, and then quietly, with dignity, she, a doctor in attendance, could have gone to sleep.

But not here. You have to suffer to the bitter end here, albeit drugged to the eyeballs, or alternatively, hang, drown or shoot yourself, alone, forlorn and forsaken.

Some may want to cling on to the last remaining days or painful stupefying minutes of life. That is happily their choice. But others may not. At the moment, these people have other civilised options blocked off to them.

We have many rights, but the most profound one is legally denied us and so people, suffering, tired of life, have to resort to terrible means, by themselves, to terminate it. It seems quite barbarous.

What is legal already in eightcountries around the world should be made so here, surrounded with all the important and necessary safeguards.

A little boy of 10 would not have been able to handle those tragic events so many years ago. But my arms go out to you now, Grandma, wishing for a better place where I could have walked back with you, up and away from that river, holding your hand.

-Stuff

Read more:

The time has come for euthanasia | Stuff.co.nz - Waikato Times

Posted in Euthanasia | Comments Off on The time has come for euthanasia | Stuff.co.nz – Waikato Times

Congress Proposes Outlawing Drugs Before Knowing What They Are – Observer

Posted: at 5:48 pm

Sens. Chuck Grassley and Dianne Feinstein recentlyintroduced the Stop the Importation and Trafficking of Synthetic Analogues (SITSA) Act of 2017. This act would create a Schedule A classification, banning importing new synthetic drugs deemed substantially similar to existing illegal drugs before testing their safety. If passed, the SITSA Act will be another step down the unfruitful path of prohibition.

Prohibiting a drug causes more problems than it solves. When a substance is banned, people can no longer rely on the government to enforce contracts for the sale and transport of the substance. This means that the only way to protect property and selling rights is through violence. Drugs dont cause violent crimeprohibition does.

Two years after Colorado legalized marijuana, the stateexperienced a 12.8 percent decrease in homicide rates. Colorado prosecutors charged 11,000 people with marijuana-related crimes in 2011 and charged only 2,100 people for marijuana crimes from January to October of 2015. It seems obvious that the number of charges would decrease when the drug became legal. What is less obvious, though, is the time, energy, and money saved when police arent wasting time on victimless crimes.

Prohibition often makes drugs stronger and more dangerous. In 1971, just before President Richard Nixon started the official War on Drugs, overdose deaths rates in the United States were slightly above one in 100,000. By 2008, this number jumped to 12 in 100,000.

If possession of a substance is a federal crime, many dealers and users cease using the drug in low concentrations. The more potent the drug, the more worthwhile the risk, versus potential profit. This is why we saw aspike in hard alcohol consumption during prohibition while beer and wine consumption dropped significantlyand why all these consumption rates returned to normal after the 21st Amendment was ratified. The War on Drugs makes drugs deadlier.

The SITSA Act is an attempt by Congress to ban substances before the government can even identify them. Substances could be banned for a predicted physiological effect on the human body. Grassley and Feinstein want to restrict drugs that they think might have an adverse effect on human health with no substantiated evidence.

The governments role is not that of an overprotective babysitter or frightened parent. Americans should be able to decide for themselves what substances to use if no federal testing has found them to be harmful.

This is reminiscent of the hilariously frightening pass it to see whats in it Obamacare debacle. Government officials want the power to ban substances without even knowing what they are. Dont worry, though, the government will figure out how harmful the drug is after its off-limits for an indefinite amount of time. Federal regulation has stopped U.S. scientists from researching medical uses for marijuana, MDMA, LSD and other illicit substances. Prematurely banning the transport of new drugs will keep them unavailable for private medical testing.

Attorney General Jeff Sessions, the man who just asked Congress to let him prosecute medical marijuana companies, claims the U.S. is in the throes of a historic epidemic of drug use. He predicts more violent crime and a huge public safety risk if medical marijuana operations arent shut down. Sessions doesnt understand that the danger, violence, and public health crises caused by drugs is not in their use but in their prohibition.

Portugal faced a similar situation in the late 1980s. At first, the country tried a rigorous conservative approach to drug use including social vilification and harsh legal penalties. It didnt work. By 1999, almost one percent of the population was addicted to heroin.

In 2001, the country decided to tackle the problem in a different way. Portugal decriminalized all drugs and focused on harm reduction measures. Since then, drug-induced deaths, AIDS diagnoses, and overall drug use have fallen significantly.

The U.S. government is actively harming its citizens with its predatory drug policy. The SITSA Act insults Americans, implying that the government knows what we should and shouldnt put into our bodies without any research to back up its claims. To curb the drug problems in America, we need to realize that prohibition invariably makes things worse.

Dylan Moore is currently a Young Voices Advocate.

Read more:

Congress Proposes Outlawing Drugs Before Knowing What They Are - Observer

Posted in Victimless Crimes | Comments Off on Congress Proposes Outlawing Drugs Before Knowing What They Are – Observer

Borders joins national campaign to stop child sex abuse | Border … – ITV News

Posted: at 5:48 pm

The Scottish Borders has joined a national two-month campaign to help prevent child sex abuse.

Police Scotland and local authorities have launched the initiative with the charity Stop It Now! Scotland.

The charity provides confidential support to people who are having sexual thoughts about children and young people, supporting them manage these and control any associated behaviour.

1,600

people sought help to stop looking at sexual images of children online in 2016.

14

crimes of possessing indecent images of children in Scottish Borders between 2015/16.

The campaign is being supported by the City of Edinburgh Council, West Lothian Council, Scottish Borders Council, East Lothian Council and Midlothian Council with partners in NHS Lothian and NHS Borders.

Stop it Now! Scotland has worked with hundreds of men arrested for viewing sexual images of children.

For many, being arrested was a real wake-up call. Many knew what they were doing was wrong, but struggled to change their behaviour on their own. Thats where our work comes in.

We make sure these men understand the harm they have caused the children in these images, and also the serious consequences for them and their families if they dont get to grips with their online behaviour. Once they understand this, they become far less likely to reoffend.

But there are thousands of men out there viewing sexual images of under 18s. We need to get to them too, to help them understand what they are doing is illegal and incredibly harmful to the children and young people in the images and to get them to stop."

Stuart Allardyce, National Manager of Stop it Now! in Scotland

Our ultimate goal here is to protect children.

Accessing these images is not a victimless crime. A child is re-victimised every time an image of them is viewed and this creates further demand for these appalling materials.

We have a highly experienced and dedicated Cyber Crime Unit with access to extensive investigative techniques to pursue perpetrators of these crimes.

The consequences of this behaviour for an individual are life-changing and can include losing your job, being imprisoned and registered as a sex offender.

Id urge anyone who is having inappropriate thoughts about children to seek help from Stop It Now! Scotland. Otherwise, expect a visit from officers.

Detective Chief Inspector Brian Stuart of Police Scotlands Cyber Crime Unit

To get help, call Stop It Now! Scotland confidentially on 0131 556 3535 or visit get-help.stopitnow.org.uk where further advice, including a self-help section, is available.

Last updated Mon 26 Jun 2017

Read the original post:

Borders joins national campaign to stop child sex abuse | Border ... - ITV News

Posted in Victimless Crimes | Comments Off on Borders joins national campaign to stop child sex abuse | Border … – ITV News