Daily Archives: June 17, 2017

Cuba Says President Trump’s Speech Was ‘Loaded With Hostile Rhetoric’ – TIME

Posted: June 17, 2017 at 2:36 pm

(WASHINGTON) The Cuban government is rejecting what it calls the "hostile rhetoric" of President Donald Trump's speech announcing a new U.S. policy toward the island, but says it is willing to continue "respectful dialogue" with the U.S. on topics of mutual interest.

In a statement released on government-run websites and television Friday evening, President Raul Castro's administration says Trump's speech was "loaded with hostile rhetoric that recalls the times of open confrontation."

The lengthy statement goes on to strike a conciliatory tone, saying Cuba wants to continue negotiations with the U.S. on a variety of subjects.

Cuba says "the last two years have shown that the two countries can cooperate and coexist in a civilized way."

Trump announced a series of changes to the Obama-era Cuba policy and is challenging the Cuban government to negotiate a better deal.

Trump said in a speech in Miami that the U.S. will not lift sanctions on Cuba until it releases all political prisoners and respects the Cuban people's right to freedom of assembly and expression.

Trump is also calling for the legalization of all political parties, and free and internationally supervised elections.

The president says his new policy will also restrict the flow of American dollars to the military, security and intelligence services that are the core of the government led by Raul Castro.

He has challenged Cuba to "come to the table" to strike a deal that serves both country's interests.

Go here to see the original:

Cuba Says President Trump's Speech Was 'Loaded With Hostile Rhetoric' - TIME

Posted in Donald Trump | Comments Off on Cuba Says President Trump’s Speech Was ‘Loaded With Hostile Rhetoric’ – TIME

Donald Trump’s Financial Disclosure Has Hollywood Starpower – Deadline

Posted: at 2:36 pm

President Donald Trumps financial disclosure released today by the U.S. Office of Government Ethics has provided the greatest detail yet of the CEO-turned-Commander-in-Chief since he ran and became President of the United States. The 98-page filing dropped today doesnt include his much-discussed still-private tax returns, but it does show Trumps income related to his Hollywood interests, including his annual SAG pension totaling $84,292, and monies from his production businesses that co-produced The Apprentice and The Celebrity Apprentice.

In the filing (read it in full here) submitted by Trump on June 14, Trump reported assets totaling around $1.4 billion, with $596.3 million in total for the reporting period through April 15. His debts totaled more than $300 million.

Among his Hollywood assets, Trump reported income from Miss Universe LLP of $10,973,722, and his Trump Productions LLC noted as the television production and entertainment business arm of the privately held Trump Organization brought in income of $1,103,161 and is valued between $1 million-$5 million.

He also received stock dividends during the period that included from such entertainment-industry related companies as Comcast, 21st Century Fox, NBCUniversal Media LLC, Apple, Yahoo, Alphabet, Verizon and Microsoft.

Among the 12 books listed in the filing, royalties for 1987s The Art Of The Deal grew to as much as $1 million as his profile rose during the GOP primaries and general election. Crippled America, published in 2015 the year he announced his POTUS run, netted royalties as high as $5 million.

Among his numerous golf holdings is Trump National Golf Club in Rancho Palos Verdes, which was valued at more than $50 million, earning $14,982,417 in golf-related income and $12,035,000 in land sales.

Continued here:

Donald Trump's Financial Disclosure Has Hollywood Starpower - Deadline

Posted in Donald Trump | Comments Off on Donald Trump’s Financial Disclosure Has Hollywood Starpower – Deadline

Trump threatens to break the glass on DOJ succession plan – Politico

Posted: at 2:36 pm

An abstract, in-case-of-emergency-break-glass executive order drafted by the Trump administration in March may become real-world applicable as the president, raging publicly at his Justice Department, mulls firing special counsel Robert Mueller.

Since taking office, the Trump administration has twice rewritten an executive order that outlines the order of succession at the Justice Department once after President Donald Trump fired acting Attorney General Sally Yates for refusing to defend his travel ban, and then again two months later. The executive order outlines a list of who would be elevated to the position of acting attorney general if the person up the food chain recuses himself, resigns, gets fired or is no longer in a position to serve.

Story Continued Below

In the past, former Justice Department officials and legal experts said, the order of succession is no more than an academic exercise a chain of command applicable only in the event of an attack or crisis when government officials are killed and it is not clear who should be in charge.

But Trump and the Russia investigation that is tightening around him have changed the game.

Attorney General Jeff Sessions has already recused himself from overseeing the investigation into possible collusion between Trump campaign aides and Russian operatives, after it was revealed that he failed to disclose meetings with the Russian ambassador during the campaign. And Trump started his morning on Friday by appearing to take a public shot at his deputy attorney general, Rod Rosenstein, who has increasingly become the target of his impulsive anger.

I am being investigated for firing the FBI Director by the man who told me to fire the FBI Director! Witch Hunt, the president tweeted.

The Justice Department said in a statement on Friday that there are no current plans for a recusal, but Rosenstein has said in the past that he would back away from overseeing Muellers investigation if his role in the ouster of former FBI Director James Comey becomes a conflict.

That has legal experts closely examining the dry executive order to figure out who might be next up to bat, or, as Democratic lawyers and consultants view it, who might serve as Trumps next sacrificial lamb.

Sign up for POLITICO Playbook and get the latest news, every morning in your inbox.

By signing up you agree to receive email newsletters or alerts from POLITICO. You can unsubscribe at any time.

We know Rachel Brand is the next victim, said Benjamin Wittes, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution and the editor-in-chief of Lawfare, referring to the former George W. Bush official who was recently confirmed as associate attorney general, the third-highest position in the Justice Department.

For those of us who have high confidence in Rachel the more confidence you have in someone in this role, the less long you think theyll last, said Wittes, who said he considers Brand a friend. That does put a very high premium on the question of who is next.

That question, however, has become more complicated because the Trump administration has been slow to fill government positions and get those officials confirmed. Typically, the solicitor general would be next in line after the associate attorney general, followed by the list of five assistant U.S. attorneys, the order of which would be determined by the attorney general. But none of those individuals have been confirmed by the Senate, and they would be unable to serve as acting attorney general without Senate confirmation.

Because of that, the executive order comes into play one that puts next in line after Brand the U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia, Dana Boente. Boente, a career federal prosecutor and an appointee of former President Barack Obama, was tapped last April to serve as the interim head of the Justice Departments national security division, which oversees the FBIs Russia investigation.

Boente, who was briefly thrust into the no. 2 spot at the Justice Department after Yates was fired, was also tasked with phoning Preet Bharara, then U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, to deliver the unexpected news that he was fired. At the time, Boente also vowed to defend Trumps travel ban in the future.

Boente is followed, on the succession list, by the U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of North Carolina, John Stuart Bruce; and the U.S. attorney for the Northern District of Texas, John Parker. Both are career prosecutors who are serving in their posts on an interim basis, until a presidential appointment is made. But they would not need to be Senate confirmed to take over.

It was not clear why the Trump administration chose those three U.S. attorneys to be in the succession line. During the Obama administration, sources familiar with the drafting of the old executive order said, the positions were chosen based on geographic diversity, and purposely included big cities where officials assumed there would be a talented attorney capable of stepping in: The U.S. attorneys on the succession list were from Washington, D.C., Chicago and Los Angeles.

Some former Justice Department officials said they would find it inconceivable for Trump to clean house, or to fire Mueller even taking into account the sometimes erratic behavior of the commander in chief.

This president is so unpredictable, its hard to say, said Emily Pierce, a former Justice Department official in the Obama administration. It would be the craziest thing hes done to date if he were to start firing the special counsel or Rosenstein. Im trying to give him the benefit of the doubt that he realizes how much trouble he may be in and that with the firing of Comey, he wouldnt do that.

Deputy U.S. Attorney General nominee Rod Rosenstein and Rachel Brand, then a nominee for associate attorney general, testify before the Senate Judiciary Committee on March 7. Brand is considered the next person in the executive order at the Justice Department. | Getty

But others were less willing to predict the actions of a president who prides himself on being unpredictable. At the rate we're going, it's clearly possible, because you could go through a number of people in one go depending on the things that are asked of them, said Jane Chong, a national security and law associate at the Hoover Institution. If Rosenstein had refused to write the memo [laying out the case for Comeys firing], you can imagine him being fired, and you can imagine Brand doing the same thing. Its not difficult to see a scenario like that playing out down the line, Chong said.

In Washington circles, the comparison being made is between Trumps desire to rid himself of Mueller, at potentially any cost, and the Saturday Night Massacre during Watergate, in 1973, when the attorney general and the deputy attorney general both resigned after refusing to obey President Richard Nixons order to fire special prosecutor Archibald Cox. It fell to the solicitor general at the time, Robert Bork, to do the deed.

I think the Watergate scenario would make most self-respecting lawyers loath to put themselves in the role that Bork ended up playing, said Brian Fallon, a former Obama Justice Department and Hillary Clinton spokesman. Most career-minded independent lawyers that have high regard for the Justice Department as an institution would be loath to be the modern-day equivalent to Bork.

But Trump, too, is cognizant of the comparison to Nixon, according to one adviser. The president, who friends said does not enjoy living in Washington and is strained by the demanding hours of the job, is motivated to carry on because he doesnt want to go down in history as a guy who tried and failed, said the adviser. He doesnt want to be the second president in history to resign.

A White House spokeswoman referred queries to the Justice Department. A Justice Department spokesman declined to comment.

Darren Samuelsohn contributed to this report.

Missing out on the latest scoops? Sign up for POLITICO Playbook and get the latest news, every morning in your inbox.

Here is the original post:

Trump threatens to break the glass on DOJ succession plan - Politico

Posted in Donald Trump | Comments Off on Trump threatens to break the glass on DOJ succession plan – Politico

Gay Teacher Of The Year Fans LGBTQ Pride In Viral Photo With Donald Trump – HuffPost

Posted: at 2:36 pm

Gay teacher Nikos Giannopoulos displayed his LGBTQ pride as he sported a rainbow pin and clutched a lacy fan in an official photo with President Donald Trumpand first lady Melania Trump.And now the Rhode Island teacher of the years bold stand for LGBTQ rights has gotten global attention after the image went viral on Facebook.

Giannopoulos, who teaches 11th and 12th graders at Beacon Charter High School for the Arts in Woonsocket, visited the White House with other teacher of the year winners in April. He received the photo of his moment with Trump this week and immediately posted itto Facebook.

Though Trump has previously pledged to protect LGBTQ citizens, but members of the communityhave expressed concern that his administration is rolling backtheir civil rights in areas such as education.

Giannopoulos said he wore the pin to represent my gratitude for the LGBTQ community that has taught me to be proud, bold, and empowered by my identity even when circumstances make that difficult. He brought the fan that day tocelebrate the joy and freedom of gender nonconformity.

When I met the president as Rhode Islands state teacher of the year, I did not know what to expect, he wrote in the Facebook post. After a lengthy security process, we were welcomed into the Roosevelt Room where we each met Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos. Shortly thereafter, we walked into the Oval Office. The man seated at the desk read prepared remarks from a sheet of paper and made some comments about CEOs and which states he loved, based on electoral votes that he had secured. He did not rise from his seat to present the national teacher of the year with her much-deserved award, nor did he allow her to speak.

He wanted to speak to the president, but none of the teachers got the chance.

The teacher had wanted to tell Trump that queer lives matter and anti-LGBTQ policies have a body count. He also wanted to tell the president how the LGBTQ community is hurt by politicians callously attacking our right to love or merely exist,Giannopoulos added.

But herevealed to NPR that Trump was happy for him to pose with the fan for the official photo.Absolutely go for it, he recalled the president saying. Trump said that he looked very stylish with his fan as the teachers gathered around the president, Giannopoulos told Yahoo.

Giannopoulos said when he thinks of the day he met the president, he will not remember the person seated at the desk. Hell remember the students he has taught and the other teachers with him that day, Giannopoulos added including one who presented Trump with letters from her refugee student, pleading with him to hear their voices.

CORRECTION: An earlier version of this article suggested incorrectly that Trump was unaware the teacher wanted to pose with the fan.

Originally posted here:

Gay Teacher Of The Year Fans LGBTQ Pride In Viral Photo With Donald Trump - HuffPost

Posted in Donald Trump | Comments Off on Gay Teacher Of The Year Fans LGBTQ Pride In Viral Photo With Donald Trump – HuffPost

Pawnbroker A-OK cites embezzlement in multimillion-dollar bankruptcy – Wichita Eagle

Posted: at 2:35 pm


Wichita Eagle
Pawnbroker A-OK cites embezzlement in multimillion-dollar bankruptcy
Wichita Eagle
Wichita's largest pawnbroker, A-OK, has filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy because of embezzlement, said owner Bruce Harris. In the bankruptcy filing last week, A-OK says that it has about $9.5 million in assets and $11 million in liabilities $4 ...

Continued here:

Pawnbroker A-OK cites embezzlement in multimillion-dollar bankruptcy - Wichita Eagle

Posted in Bankruptcy | Comments Off on Pawnbroker A-OK cites embezzlement in multimillion-dollar bankruptcy – Wichita Eagle

Climate, social equality also behind collapse of govt formation talks: Green leader – NL Times

Posted: at 2:35 pm

While the topic of a was the final straw for GroenLinks, it was not the only reason behind the party's decision to from the with VVD, D66 and CDA, GroenLinks leader Jesse Klaver said in an interview with the Volkskrant. The party also saw no room for negotiations on climate and social inequality.

After the decision to withdraw, Klaver was flooded with reactions from his followers. According to him, they split into two rough groups. "One: great that you stick to your principles and stand straight. Two: why did it break on immigration, while you could maybe win a lot on other files?" Klaver said to the Volkskrant.

"Then my question is: what files? When it comes to climate: we did not reach the final stage of negotiations, but I did not feel at any moment that we would reach the goals of the Paris Agreement. Not by a long shot." Klaver said. "I also did not see a compromise in the socio-economic field."

According to Klaver, they negotiations focused a lot on dropping the bonus limit on bans so that post-Brexit banks would like to move from London to the Netherlands. "That's the exact opposite of what we want. So we said, we won't do that. The others found that strange." They felt it logical that the Netherlands wants to attract the business of the banks. "But that's not logical! You want to deal with the discontent in the country and the first thing you do is give bankers more rewarding bonuses. We don't want this kind of bank boys and girls."

"Ultimately the formation revolved around the question: are you making the policy a bid less bad or a bit better? It threatened to be the first."

More here:

Climate, social equality also behind collapse of govt formation talks: Green leader - NL Times

Posted in Socio-economic Collapse | Comments Off on Climate, social equality also behind collapse of govt formation talks: Green leader – NL Times

Country needs USDA Rural Development – Iowa Farmer Today

Posted: at 2:35 pm

We write to express our opposition to the USDA Fiscal Year 2018 budget for Rural Development. This budget, if enacted, along with the ill-advised recommendation to eliminate the position of Under Secretary for Rural Development, will substantially diminish resources dedicated to improving rural communities and the lives of rural people.

We believe a better choice for rural America is to continue USDA Rural Development programs at no less than the FY 2017 levels included in Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2017 (115-31). This will allow USDA Rural Development to continue its important mission of providing technical and financial assistance aimed at improving the living and economic conditions in rural America.

For more than 50 years, USDA rural development programs have improved housing, utilities and community facilities, and economic opportunity for rural America.

In FY 2016 alone USDA made available over $29 billion in loans, guarantees, grants, and related assistance to over 157,000 individuals, businesses, non-profit corporations, cooperatives and governments. USDAs total loan portfolio includes over 1.3 million loans that amount to over $215 billion.

Yet, there is still more to be done: According to an analysis of socio-economic well-being prepared by the Wall Street Journal, rural counties in America are in worse condition than big cities, suburbs and small or medium metro areas. Rural communities, and the people who live in them, have higher poverty and unemployment rates as well as a higher incidence of substandard housing and rent overburden when compared to metropolitan areas.

Virtually every community in the country with inadequate drinking water has a population of 3,300 or less. Although much of the country has seen recovery from the financial crisis, rural America still lags behind.

The decades long trend of community bank closure and consolidation has hit rural areas particularly hard. The number of community banks in the United States has declined by an average of 300 per year over the past 30 years, according to data from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, and a collapse in the price of agricultural commodities has added stress on many small towns and farming communities.

The administrations response to the problems facing rural America can only be described as a wholesale retreat. The FY 2018 budget eliminates funding for two dozen housing and rural development programs. The rescissions proposed for FY 17 and eliminations and reductions proposed for FY 18 total over $1 billion and well over $3 billion in program financing.

If approved, USDA will no longer provide direct rural housing loans, grants for mutual and self-help housing, financing for water and waste disposal systems, or loans and grants to small rural businesses, cooperatives and value added producers. Many other programs are reduced well below the current rate. What will be left is a hollowed-out Rural Development function, degraded within the department with far fewer resources to help rural America.

We urge the committee to reject the administrations FY 18 budget and reorganization proposals for Rural Development and instead provide appropriations at no less than the current rate and maintain the Rural Development mission area and position of Under Secretary for Rural Development.

The National Rural Housing Coalition campaigns to improve housing and community facilities for low-income rural families. These comments are from a sign-on letter to the House and Senate appropriations committees; full text is at http://bit.ly/2qJALEc.

More:

Country needs USDA Rural Development - Iowa Farmer Today

Posted in Socio-economic Collapse | Comments Off on Country needs USDA Rural Development – Iowa Farmer Today

Donald Trump announces new Cuba restrictions: ‘We will not be silenced in the face of communist oppression’ – The Independent

Posted: at 2:34 pm

President Donald Trump has announced that his administration will be tightening regulations on Cuba in order to help the Cuban people, calling former President Barack Obama's deal to thaw relations with the country's government "terrible".

"We will not be silenced in the face of communist oppression any longer", Mr Trump said in front of an excited crowd in the Little Havana neighbourhood of Miami, Florida.

The President pledged to help the people of Cuba, and to ensure that American money spent in Cuba will go to the Cuban people instead of the Cuban government. He characterised the administration of Raul Castro as a "brutal, brutal regime", and spoke with a flourish describing the brutal crackdown and imprisonment of religious worshippers in the island country.

"Effective immediately, I am cancelling the last Administration's completely one sided deal with Cuba", Mr Trump said.

Mr Trump also described Cuba as a major security threat to the United States, saying that the country had shipped weapons to North Korea while allowing "cop killers" to seek refuge within its borders.

The cop killer Mr Trump was referring to is Joanne Chesimard, a former Black Panther who fled to Cuba in 1984 after escaping from a New Jersey prison, where she was serving a life sentence for murdering a state trooper.

Before signing the Cuba policy rollback, Mr Trump brought several Cuban dissidents onto the stage and allowed some of them to speak. One played the Star Spangled Banner on a violin as the president and crowd saluted or placed their hands over their hearts.

Florida Senator Marco Rubio, a one-time political foe who engaged in a heated primary run against the President last year for the Republican nomination, praised the Presidents efforts to reform policy toward Cuba before he took the stage. Mr Rubio flew down to Miami with the President on Air Force One, and is said to have played a leading role in advising the White House on the new policies. Mr Rubio, a Cuban American, riled up the crowd with anti-communist rhetoric in both English and Spanish.

But, in a sense Mr Trump's policy changes are more rhetoric than action few immediate changes, and they are not intended to completely end the diplomatic relationship that former President Barack Obama established. That thaw was aimed at bringing to a close five decades of hostility.

Instead, Mr Trump has instructed his government to begin reviewing how they might change policy in order to meet the administrations goals. Those policy reviews will focus on how to best eliminate individual travel to Cuba that the White House says is being abused (technically tourism to Cuba is not currently legal for Americans), and on how to ensure that American money spent in Cuba or on Cuban goods gets into the hands of the Cuban people and not the government. American investment in Cuba is likely to see more restrictions than what is already in place.

The new policies wont change family travel allowances, and will leave other forms of travel to Cuba open, including trips for journalistic purposes. The new policies wont affect the current wet foot dry foot policy that seeks to shelter Cubans who land on American soil seeking refuge.

Commercial flights will not be stopped from servicing Havana, nor will cruise lines. The administration, according to one White House official, has no intention of "disrupting" existing business ventures such as one struck under Mr Obama by Starwood Hotels Inc, which is owned by Marriott International Inc, to manage a historic Havana hotel.

Nor does Trump plan to reinstate limits that Mr Obama lifted on the amount of the island's coveted rum and cigars that Americans can bring home for personal use.

But, Mr Trump has long promised to pull back on his predecessors landmark Cuba policy changes, and secured the first endorsement in decades from the Bay of Pigs Veteran Association in Miami thanks to that policy. Senior White House officials said during a conference call before the Presidents announcement that his promise to the group to hold the Cuban government accountable was a major factor in his decision in February to instruct his staff to begin reviewing the policy.

Critics of the President's decision, however, note that the US has a relatively friendly relationship with other countries with poor civil rights records, including Saudi Arabia, where Mr Trump travelled to during his first foreign trip in office in May.

Mr Obamas 2015 announcement that travel restrictions to Cuba would be loosened resulted in a flash of excitement from Americans who were eager to travel to Havana to get a glimpse of a country that sits just 100 miles off the coast of Florida, but has been behind a veil for American tourists. Since then, however, interest in travelling to the country has waned somewhat in the US, with roughly 76 per cent of Americans saying they arent planning on a trip there this year compared to 70 per cent last year.

Trump aides say Mr Obama's efforts amounted to appeasement and have done nothing to advance political freedoms in Cuba, while benefiting the Cuban government financially.

It's hard to think of a policy that makes less sense than the prior administration's terrible and misguided deal with the Castro regime, Mr Trump said in Miami, citing the lack of human rights concessions from Cuba in the detente negotiated by Mr Obama.

Critics say that Mr Trumps plans wont actually push the Cuban government to strive for better human rights record, and will likely hurt the Cuban people. Thats because many Cubans are self employed in retail and other services that serve tourists.

Sarah Stephens, an expert on US-Cuba policy who works to secure diplomatic changes like the ones made by the Obama administration, told The Independent that the lack of substance in Mr Trumps changes doesnt amount to substantial policy, and is instead a political ploy to secure conservative Cuban votes in Florida.

This is not a serious policy. This is a policy that has no achievable goal, it imagines no process, and it offers no end game, she said. By choosing to make the announcement before the diehards in Miami, the White House isnt even looking for window dressing, but admitting that this is simply about their game of politics.

Still, it will be the latest attempt by MrTrump to overturn parts of MrObama's presidential legacy. He has already pulled the United States out of a major international climate treaty and is trying to scrap his predecessor's landmark healthcare program.

International human rights groups say that renewed US efforts to isolate the island could worsen the situation by empowering Cuban hard-liners. The Cuban government has made clear it will not be pressured into reforms in exchange for engagement.

The Cuban government had no immediate comment, but ordinary Cubans said they were crestfallen to be returning to an era of frostier relations with the United States with potential economic fallout for them.

It's going to really hurt me because the majority of my clients are from the United States, Enrique Montoto, 61, who rents rooms on US online home-rental marketplace Airbnb, told Reuters. Airbnb expanded into Cuba in 2015.

"I have trust in Trump to do the right thing when it comes to Cuba, Jorge Saurez, 66, a retired physician, said in Little Havana. That's why I voted for him.

Mexico has urged the governments of the United States and Cuba to find points of agreement and resolve their differences via dialogue.

Venezuelan Foreign Minister Delcy Rodriguez, whose government is a close ally to Cuba, tweeted that his country has "undeniable solidarity with our sister republic Cuba against the aggressions of @realDonaldTrump".

At least one of Mr Trump's fellow Republicans has pushed back against isolating Cuba. Arizona Senator Jeff Flake, one of the most vocal advocates for easing rules for American companies looking to make deals in Cuba, called for a vote on legislation to lift restrictions on American travel to the island nation. It is unlikely that other Republicans in the Senate will allow that vote to happen, and has repeatedly blocked that move.

The rest is here:

Donald Trump announces new Cuba restrictions: 'We will not be silenced in the face of communist oppression' - The Independent

Posted in Government Oppression | Comments Off on Donald Trump announces new Cuba restrictions: ‘We will not be silenced in the face of communist oppression’ – The Independent

Monumental Oppression – KRWG

Posted: at 2:34 pm

Commentary: Critics claim that creating the Organ Mountains Desert Peaks National Monument amounted to a massive overreach of federal power. When signing the executive order to re-evaluate the Monument, President Trump said that it would end another egregious abuse of federal power and give back that power to the states and to the people, where it belongs.

Sounds catchy, but the suggestion that the feds imposed the OMDP Monument on Dona Ana County in an act of oppression turns history on its head. In fact, the feds created the monument at the communitys request. When Congress failed to heed popular proposals to protect Dona Ana Countys most notable natural and cultural assets, our community organized to ask the President to do it instead. This was not an abuse of authority. It was government at its best - effectively responding to the peoples wishes.

Local advocates, sportsmens groups, businesses, environmental groups and individual citizens all pitched in to help design a monument that would best preserve our unique treasures. Both the city of Las Cruces and the Dona Ana Board of County Commissioners endorsed the proposal.

New Mexicos US Senate offices, the Department of the Interior, and the State Land Office worked closely with stakeholders to ensure that ranching, border patrol and national security activities could continue unimpeded by the new designation.

By the time the Secretary of the Interior Sally Jewel visited to inspect the proposed monument, the proposal enjoyed overwhelming support in polling, from stakeholder groups throughout Dona Ana County, and at a massive event held for the community at large.

It is an outrage for the Trump administration to second guess such a fully articulated expression the will of Dona Ana Countys citizens.

Meanwhile, our local Congressman Steve Pearce derides the monument by inventing a new elite and falsely claiming the monument tramples them. In the West, Pearce says the custom and culture is ranching. Its something that the law was not supposed to change, our custom and culture, and it is.

The assertion that the custom and culture of the twenty some odd Dona Ana County ranchers is more important than the desires of two hundred thousand other residents is downright insulting. And there is not one shred of evidence that the monument has created new burdens on ranchers, or changed their culture, or that it ever will. There is only an abiding ranchers paranoia that anything federal must be bad except for their subsidized grazing rights of course.

So lets set the record straight. The federal government acted according to the will of our community by creating the Organ Mountains Desert Peaks National Monument. The only federal officials disregarding the publics wishes are office holders bent on lopping off 90% of the lands Dona Ana County residents successfully fought to include.

Those egregious abusers of power would be Donald Trump and Steve Pearce.

Steve Fischmann is a former state senator and one of the many Dona Ana County residents who helped shape and support the Organ Mountains Desert Peaks National Monument.

Read the rest here:

Monumental Oppression - KRWG

Posted in Government Oppression | Comments Off on Monumental Oppression – KRWG

Tell the truth about failed leadership before August 8 – The Star, Kenya

Posted: at 2:34 pm


The Star, Kenya
Tell the truth about failed leadership before August 8
The Star, Kenya
I am just wondering if leaders cannot tell the truth, who will tell Kenyans the truth! Who will talk about the Jubilee government oppression! When you tell the truth, you mess with someone who committed injustices on Kenyans. When you tell the truth ...

and more »

Go here to read the rest:

Tell the truth about failed leadership before August 8 - The Star, Kenya

Posted in Government Oppression | Comments Off on Tell the truth about failed leadership before August 8 – The Star, Kenya