Daily Archives: June 15, 2017

St. Pete could soon add ShotSpotter Technology – ABC Action News

Posted: June 15, 2017 at 9:05 pm

ST. PETERSBURG, Fla. - Tracking gunshots. Thursday, St. Petersburg took the first steps towards adding new technology to pinpoint every time someone pulls a trigger. St. Pete's Public Safety Committee decided to move forward with discussions on adding ShotSpotter technology.

ShotSpotter is already being used in Hillsborough County to reduce gun violence.

Heres how it works: Microphone like sensors are installed around town. They're used to pick up sound waves. Within 30 seconds, officers are sent the exact location of the gunshot.

Marvin Mitchell says its much needed. Hes often kept up at night hearing gunshots. Wednesday night he heard sounds so loud, he was forced to get on his stomach on the floor of his living room. I heard it go boom! Boom! Boom! Boom! Boom! I said oh man! all I can do is hit the ground.

He often hears gunshots in his Midtown St Pete neighborhood.

Calvin Brown of the Pinellas County Urban League agrees, It will help a lot of people sleep better at night.

The only drawback: ShotSpotter will cost the city $350,000 a year plus the cost to upgrade cameras and add license plate scanners.

City leaders plan to bring ShotSpotter back up during the upcoming budget workshops for the city.

Original post:

St. Pete could soon add ShotSpotter Technology - ABC Action News

Posted in Technology | Comments Off

Ron Colone: A closer look at technology and jobs – Santa Ynez Valley News

Posted: at 9:05 pm

A TV commercial said, Get the car without the car salesman! It was an ad for some new car-buying app enabling people to buy cars online.

It kinda made me sick, to tell you the truth. I dont see whats so great about eliminating people and eliminating jobs, but I realize thats what technology does. Its nothing new. Its been that way since the invention of the wheel.

We can blame job loss on the global economy or on outsourcing or trade policies, but as big if not a bigger reason than any of those for the loss of jobs is technological advance.

The examples are all around us the rise in online sales resulting in a reduction of sales people, voicemail systems that eliminate the need for an actual human to answer phones, ATMs and online banking that get rid of bank tellers, self-checkout stands that replace cashiers, online travel sites that have supplanted the need for travel agents, hotel desk clerks, airlines and rental car agents, and more.

In 1962, President Kennedy said if we have the talent to invent machines that put people out of work, we also have the talent to put people back to work, but a report released earlier this year by PricewaterhouseCoopers predicts that four out of 10 U.S. jobs will be replaced by robots and artificial intelligence over the next 12 years.

The tendency is to think its only unskilled blue-collar jobs that are threatened by technology, but as Jerry Kaplan, author of Humans Need Not Apply and a longtime Silicon Valley veteran who now teaches at Stanford Law, notes that technology is blind to the color of your collar.

Medical doctors have long been regarded as one of the most specialized, highly skilled and prestigious of professions, but even they are being replaced. To date, more than 2 million surgical procedures have been performed by ultraprecise robotic surgeons, for everything from knee replacements to vision correction. Computers can now diagnose cancers more reliably than humans, an increasing number of hospitals are utilizing automated, robotics-controlled pharmacies and the FDA approved a device that delivers anesthesia automatically, no anesthesiologist required.

Other professions threatened by technology include: financial services in which 61 percent of the jobs are likely to be lost to computers, according to PricewaterhouseCoopers, the insurance industry, architecture, journalism, marketing and advertising, teaching, lawyers and paralegals, and even law enforcement.

The Boston Consulting Group predicts by 2025 a quarter of the jobs currently available in the U.S. will be replaced by software or robots, while an Oxford University study, The Future of Employment, declared 47 percent of American workers are in jobs that are at high risk of being replaced by automation and computerization.

Im not frightened by the prospect. I think it would be amazing if we could spend more of our time and energy on our lives, loved ones, health, communities, passions and our bliss. It would entail a major philosophical shift and some sort of basic means of sustenance.

Technology giants like Bill Gates, Elon Musk and Mark Cuban all agree if computers replace humans who are taxed on the work they do and the earnings they generate, the owners of those computers must also be taxed on the work they do and the earnings they generate, and that money should be distributed to people as a basic living wage.

In this country, living wage are fighting words, and it brings us to the basic division between liberals and conservatives.

Regardless of your views, its time to ask what are we going to do when the jobs go away, knowing that in any technological shift, the first generation is always left out in the cold.

Original post:

Ron Colone: A closer look at technology and jobs - Santa Ynez Valley News

Posted in Technology | Comments Off

Let’s make real progress on welfare reform – Washington Examiner

Posted: at 9:05 pm

The recent passage of the American Health Care Act through the House of Representatives, though contentious, proves one point definitively: This government is fully capable of making progress when it puts its mind to it.

Now, with meaningful strides being made in such fields as healthcare and tax reform, it's high time lawmakers look ahead to the next major legislative task. And to my mind, there is no system in greater need of reform than the welfare system.

The welfare system has remained largely unchanged since the sweeping bipartisan reforms of 1996 made under former President Bill Clinton, but in the intervening years, we seem to have lost sight of why those reforms were enacted. The Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act was meant to transform welfare programs into a temporary safety net that gave impoverished families the help they needed to become self-sufficient again by incentivizing full-time employment and financial literacy.

However, the reality is that our current system discourages, prevents, and blocks any attempt at upward mobility. In the 20 years since the Clinton reforms, federal spending on welfare has tripled, yet poverty rates are almost unchanged. The Bureau of Labor Statistics reports that there are 5.7 million job openings around the country, yet 6.9 million people remain unemployed. The number of food stamp recipients has ballooned astronomically from 17.2 million in 2000 to 44.2 million in 2016. The nation is spending more than $1 trillion a year on more than 90 federal welfare programs, yet these policies clearly continue to fail the most vulnerable members of our society, leading them into cycles of unemployment and government dependency.

We must take a comprehensive look at means-tested welfare expenditures to figure out what works and what doesn't. Just throwing money at the problem won't solve anything. We need vocational training and job search programs that enable welfare recipients to develop and apply the skills necessary to succeed and thrive in professional environments.

Most importantly, we need to strengthen and reinforce work requirements that get people out of the house and into the labor force. A 2014 study by the American Enterprise Institute found that "Having a job is the surest way out of poverty Welfare programs that incentivize work have been far more successful in boosting incomes and mobility than simple cash assistance programs."

Such solutions work not just in theory but in practice. In Maine, Republican Gov. Paul LePage enacted in 2014 a series of reforms that required all able-bodied adults without dependents (ABAWDs) to hold a job, participate in state-sponsored vocational training, or do community service in order to receive food stamp benefits.

The results were immediate and exemplary: Just three months after the work policy went into effect, the ABAWD caseload in Maine had dropped by a staggering 80 percent, from 13,332 in December to 2,678 in March. This is just one of the many significant successes state governments have seen with their welfare reform initiatives, and there is no reason to believe similar federal policies wouldn't pay the same dividends for the 4.7 million ABAWDs on food stamps nationwide.

It is imperative that our legislators seize this critical moment and do not allow complacency to erode the dedication that has brought them to this point. Congress needs to push forward on legislation like that proposed by Rep. Warren Davidson, R-Ohio, and deliver substantive reform on the national level. The road ahead certainly isn't easy, but lawmakers are now in a prime position to strike while the iron is hot and craft a welfare system that actually raises helpless citizens out of the depths of poverty. The sooner they can start, the better for the poor, for the economy, and for the country.

Adam Brandon (@adam_brandon) is a contributor to the Washington Examiner's Beltway Confidential blog. He is president and CEO of FreedomWorks.

If you would like to write an op-ed for the Washington Examiner, please read ourguidelines on submissions here.

See more here:

Let's make real progress on welfare reform - Washington Examiner

Posted in Progress | Comments Off

Medicaid progress at risk as cuts to program loom – Arizona Capitol Times

Posted: at 9:05 pm

Ive been in public service long enough to know theres a time to play politics and a time to rise above it.

As our elected leaders in Washington chart a new course on health care and Medicaid coverage for tens of millions of Americans hangs in the balance consider this a clarion call for statesmanship.

Look, Obamacare has real flaws. There is bipartisan agreement the state health exchanges are broken and, for far too many Arizonans, health insurance remains unaffordable and out of reach.

But in the course of addressing these shortcomings, it makes no sense to cripple a separate health care program with a 50-year track record of success: Medicaid.

First, a little backstory: I was elected to the Arizona Legislature in 2010, during the depths of the Great Recession. More than one-third of Arizonas General Fund revenue evaporated in the wake of the housing collapse, resulting in a series of tremendously difficult cuts to state programs and services.

One of those decisions was to freeze enrollment in Medicaid for adults without children. Over the course of 18 months, more than 160,000 Arizonans fell off the Medicaid rolls. Some were in the middle of receiving lifesaving treatment. Many others began turning up in hospital emergency rooms as their last and only option to receive medical care.

The personal and economic toll from these Medicaid cuts was immense and heartbreaking.

Thats why, a couple years later, I was proud to stand with then-Gov. Jan Brewer and a bipartisan coalition of legislators as we lifted the enrollment freeze and restored Medicaid coverage for Arizonas working poor.

Today, its clear we made the right decision. The number of Arizonans with health coverage is up; care provided by Arizona hospitals to the uninsured is down 60 percent statewide; and billions of federal dollars our own tax dollars are flowing into the local economy.

I now fear all of this progress is at risk. Congress has proposed slashing $880 billion from Medicaid over the next decade. It is simply not realistic for the state of Arizona to make up for this loss of federal funding. If enacted, these Medicaid cuts threaten a return to the bad-old-days of enrollment freezes, increasing numbers of uninsured and growing cost shifts in the form of higher health premiums, not to mention ER waiting rooms clogged with non-emergencies.

No government program is perfect, but Arizonas Medicaid program known as AHCCCS is the gold standard when it comes to delivering quality, affordable health care. Our states Medicaid program uses an integrated, managed-care model that promotes competition and patient choice, controls costs and incentivizes preventative care. Gov. Doug Ducey continues to thoughtfully reform the program to ensure it is taxpayer-friendly, most significantly by preparing enrollees for the day theyll transition off Medicaid and onto private coverage.

I look forward to working with the governor and Washington officials to ensure Medicaid remains viable for the more than 1 in 4 Arizonans who depend upon it.

Rep. Heather Carter, R-Cave Creek, is chairwoman of the House Health Committee.

___________________________________________________________

The views expressed in guest commentaries are those of the author and are not the views of the Arizona Capitol Times.

Visit link:

Medicaid progress at risk as cuts to program loom - Arizona Capitol Times

Posted in Progress | Comments Off

Cities Can Jump-start Climate Progress by Plugging in Their Vehicles – DeSmog (blog)

Posted: at 9:05 pm

DeSmog (blog)

Cities Can Jump-start Climate Progress by Plugging in Their Vehicles
DeSmog (blog)
President Donald Trump's decision to exit the Paris climate agreement reaffirmed what was already clear: The federal government is no longer leading American efforts to shrink our carbon footprint. But many state and local governments along with ...

and more »

Watchpoints: Progress noted in Zunino’s work in progress – The News Tribune (blog)

Posted: at 9:05 pm

The News Tribune (blog)

Watchpoints: Progress noted in Zunino's work in progress
The News Tribune (blog)
The numbers speak for themselves and are beginning to inch past the characterization of a small sample size. Catcher Mike Zunino is batting .319 in 20 games for the Mariners since his May 22 recall from Triple-A Tacoma with six homers and 21 RBIs.

and more »

Here is the original post:

Watchpoints: Progress noted in Zunino's work in progress - The News Tribune (blog)

Posted in Progress | Comments Off

Map reveals where billionaires are stockpiling land that could be used in the apocalypse – SFGate

Posted: at 9:03 pm

Photo: Evan Vucci, Associated Press

In this Dec. 14, 2016, file photo, Amazon founder Jeff Bezos speaks during a meeting with President-elect Donald Trump and technology industry leaders at Trump Tower in New York.

Forbes ranks the world's billionaires.

Name: David Koch - 10

This year's net worth: $39.6

Source: Koch Industries

Country: U.S.

Name: David Koch - 10

This year's net worth: $39.6

Source: Koch Industries

Country: U.S.

Name: Charles Koch - 9

This year's net worth: $39.6

Source: Koch Industries

Country: U.S.

Name: Charles Koch - 9

This year's net worth: $39.6

Source: Koch Industries

Country: U.S.

Name: Michael Bloomberg - 8

This year's net worth: $40 billion

Source: Bloomberg LP

Country: U.S.

Name: Michael Bloomberg - 8

This year's net worth: $40 billion

Source: Bloomberg LP

Country: U.S.

Name: Larry Ellison - 7

This year's net worth: $43.6 billion

Source: Oracle

Country: U.S.

Name: Larry Ellison - 7

This year's net worth: $43.6 billion

Source: Oracle

Country: U.S.

Name: Mark Zuckerberg - 6

This year's net worth: $44.6 billion

Source: Facebook

Country: U.S.

Name: Mark Zuckerberg - 6

This year's net worth: $44.6 billion

Source: Facebook

Country: U.S.

Name: Jeff Bezos - 5

This year's net worth: $45.2 billion

Source: Amazon.com

Country: U.S.

Name: Jeff Bezos - 5

This year's net worth: $45.2 billion

Source: Amazon.com

Country: U.S.

Name: Carlos Slim - 4

This year's net worth: $50 billion

Source: Telecom

Country: Mexico

Name: Carlos Slim - 4

This year's net worth: $50 billion

Source: Telecom

Country: Mexico

Name: Warren Buffett - 3

This year's net worth: $60.8 billion

Source: Berkshire Hathaway

Country: U.S.

Name: Warren Buffett - 3

This year's net worth: $60.8 billion

Source: Berkshire Hathaway

Country: U.S.

Name: Amancio Ortega - 2

This year's net worth: $67

Source: Retail

Country: Spain

Name: Amancio Ortega - 2

This year's net worth: $67

Source: Retail

Country: Spain

Name: Bill Gates - 1

This year's net worth: $75 billion

Source: Microsoft

Country: U.S.

Name: Bill Gates - 1

This year's net worth: $75 billion

Source: Microsoft

Country: U.S.

Map reveals where billionaires are stockpiling land that could be used in the apocalypse

When the apocalypse arrives, life goes on. That's the possibility some are preparing for, at least.

A new article in Forbes suggests the USbillionairesare making significant land grabs in America's heartland, where the climate is mild and the locations are conducive to survivalism and living on the land. The Midwest ishome to several fortified shelters and vacation homes where the super-richcould happily live out their post-doomsday (or retirement) days.

Reid Hoffman, the cofounder of LinkedIn and a notable investor,told The New Yorker earlier this year he estimated more than 50% of Silicon Valley billionaires had bought some level of "apocalypse insurance," like a bunker.

Fortified shelters, built to withstand catastrophic events from viral epidemic to nuclear war, seem to be experiencing a wave of interest in general as hints of a nuclear conflict ramp up.

Real estate developersare capitalizing on the moment with luxuryunderground doomsday shelters that cost as much as$3 million. These post-apocalyptic homes, often built onretired military bases or in missile silos, includeluxury amenities and safety featureslike nuclear blast doors, armored trucks, and massive storesof food and water.

The map below reveals where American billionaires are stockpiling land that could be used in the apocalypse.

Skye Gould/Business Insider

Join the conversation about this story

NOW WATCH: These doomsday shelters for the 1% make up the largest private bunker community on earth

Billionaires are stockpiling land that could be used in the apocalypse here’s where they’re going – The Advocate

Posted: at 9:03 pm

Melia Robinson, provided by

Kim Kyung Hoon/Reuters

A rising number of Americanbillionaires are channeling their inner Bear Grylls, and some are doing it in preparation for an apocalyptic event be it viral epidemic, nuclear war, or cataclysmic pole shift.

Reid Hoffman, the cofounder of LinkedIn and a notable investor, told The New Yorker earlier this year he estimates more than 50% of Silicon Valley billionaires have bought some level of "apocalypse insurance," like an underground bunker.

A new article in Forbes suggests the super-rich are making serious land grabs in America's heartland, where the climate is mild and the locations are conducive to survivalism, farming, and living on the land. States like Colorado, Montana, Nebraska, New Mexico, North Dakota, Texas, and Wyoming are home to a number of fortified shelters and vacation homes where wealthy billionaires could happily live out theirpost-doomsday (or retirement) days.

According to Forbes contributor Jim Dobson, lots of billionaires have private planes "ready to depart at a moment's notice." They also own motorcycles, weaponry, and generators.

None of the billionaires named by Forbes have said publicly that their vast amounts of land will be used for apocalypse preparations though they certainly would make good hide-outs.

John Malone, who made his fortune in cable and communications, is the nation's biggest individual landowner. Malone owns 2.2 million acres across six states including huge swaths of Maine and New Hampshire. The cable king told Forbes in 2011 that he made the land grabs as an investment. He said he loves to fish and occasionally bird-hunt on his properties.

Media mogul Ted Turner, the second biggest individual landowner in the US, owns 2 million acres across Colorado, Kansas, Montana, Nebraska, New Mexico, South Dakota.

Philip Anschulze, a railroad and oil magnate, locked down 434,000 acres in Wyoming. Amazon's Jeff Bezos has 400,000 acres in Texas. And Stan Kroenke, owner of a massive sports and entertainment holding company, bought 225,000 acres in Montana.

One of the more surprising real estate tycoons is David Hall, a Mormon engineer, who has been snapping up farmland in Vermont. He wants to build sustainable, high-density communities based on the writings of religious figure Joseph Smith.

In the event of the end of the world, the world's financial leaders may be the most prepared.

Join the conversation about this story

NOW WATCH: Look inside the Arctic 'doomsday' seed vault built to protect millions of crops from any disaster

Film Review: ‘All Eyez on Me’ – Variety

Posted: at 9:02 pm

Sleekly shaven-headed, with a pirate bandana, a gangstas dripped-in-death tattoos, and the liquid stare of an Arabian prince, Tupac Shakur was the matinee idol of hip-hop superstars: not the fiercest rapper, not the most virtuosic or visionary, but a figure of hard ferocity who elevated street nihilism by fusing it with a certain lovesexy bravura. For a while, he was as much a movie star as he was a rap star (and he would have been a bigger one had his legal troubles not scared off the Hollywood establishment). On some level, Tupacs life always seemed like a movie playing out in front of you not just the hair triggers of bloodshed, but his whole contradictory dance of activism and thuggery, commitment and celebrity.

All Eyez on Me, the messy, hugely flawed, but fascinating biographical drama that has now been made about him, channels those contradictions, even if it doesnt always know what to do with them. Comprehensive but sketchy, richly atmospheric but often under-dramatized, it is not, in the end, a very good movie (there are a few scenes, like Tupacs initial meeting with Ted Field of Interscope Records, that are embarrassingly bad). Yet its highly worth seeing, because in its volatility and hunger, and the desperation of its violence, it captures something about the space in which Tupac Shakur lived: a place that wanted to be all about pride and power, but was really about flying over the abyss.

The film is 2 hours and 20 minutes long, and considering that Tupac was only 25 years old when he was gunned down in a drive-by shooting in Las Vegas on Sept. 7, 1996, that should be enough time to tell his story with intimacy and flow. Yet All Eyez on Me, directed by the music-video veteran Benny Boom, is an old-school biopic that reminds you why old-school biopics faded: It has that overly sprawling, one-thing-after-another quality that can make you feel like youre seeing the cinematic version of a Wikipedia entry.

That said, Demetrius Shipp Jr., who plays Tupac, carries you through. He looks astonishingly like the rap star, but Shipp also fills out Tupac emotionally, showing us the smiley high-school student who prided himself on his success in the theater we see him cast as the lead in Hamlet as well as the surly, neglected adolescent who was raised by his mother, the former Black Panther Afeni Shakur, to take a never-ending stance of defiance. Afeni is played by Danai Gurura (who would have been perfect as Nina Simone), and Gurura makes her a ruthlessly intelligent analyst of the white power structure who is nevertheless consumed by a rage that has no outlet (at one point, she turns to crack).

Its no wonder that Tupac grows up to be a militant without a cause. He can see the injustice around him, and when hes arrested in Oakland for jaywalking (when was the last time a white person got arrested for jaywalking? Answer: never), the sadism of the police is like a nightstick to the soul. Yet each new way that he chooses to define his manhood as a rap star; as a fighter with thug-life cred who will walk, lips snarled, into any confrontation; as a stud; as an activist leader in the new era of rap-as-racial-politics becomes, for him, a highly self-conscious performance. He turns into a badass outlaw hip-hop demigod who is playing the role of a badass outlaw hip-hop demigod.

Theres a facile framing device, with Tupac explaining (and defending) his life in a prison interview that takes place during the nine months he spent at the Clinton Correctional Facility in 1995. The movie than flashes back to his New York childhood, his jarring moves to Baltimore and Oakland, the close friendship he formed in his teens with Jada Pinkett (Kat Graham), his shot at stardom when he was asked to join Digital Underground, his 1992 role as a stone-cold sociopath in Juice (a role he acted brilliantly, and that was said by some to have had an influence on his off-screen behavior), and his mesmerizing early solo videos for tracks like Same Song (his first lead with Digital Underground) and the scabrous social-protest rap Brendas Got a Baby. But its only after he goes to jail that the movie finds its footing.

All Eyez on Me presents the incident that resulted in rape charges that were brought against Tupac and members of his entourage (he was convicted of first-degree sexual abuse) in a way that completely exonerates him; the truth may have been murkier. Once hes in prison, however, his life and career look like theyre in ruins. Tosave himself, he signs a record deal with the devil: Marion Suge Knight, the fearsome 350-pound giant-cigar-chomping entrepreneur of Death Row Records, who enjoys a supreme distinction among the rappers and producers he employs and lords it over hes the only one among them who isnt playing at being a gangsta.

Dominic L. Santana, who plays Knight, captures the underworld moguls self-righteous menace, and the second half of the movie, in which Shakur finds his greatest success, records his greatest song (the momentous California Love), and experiences his greatest existential confusion while at Death Row, is the ominous heart of All Eyez on Me. Its not just hes surrounded by back-stabbers and glad-handers, as well as musicians like Dr. Dre (Harold House Moore, in an underwritten role) and Snoop Dogg (Jarrett Ellis, who gets the voice but not the snakish cunning). In essence, Tupac is still in prison, trapped not just in a three-album contract but in a stance of outlaw brutishness thats become, in his own mind, political: the only stance the white man will allow him.

But his mother said it best: This is really the systems way of handing him the tools to destroy himself. Once his friendship with Biggie Smalls (Jamal Woolard) breaks down, the fabled East CoastWest Coast rap war becomes, in the movies view, a violent form of tap-dancing, with Tupac and Biggie deluded into thinking that their taunts and boasts mean something.

Who killed Tupac Shakur? All Eyez on Me doesnt say, but it least it spares us the soul-sapping diversion of conspiracy theory. In all likelihood, Tupac was killed in a tit-for-tat piece of gang violence that had nothing to do with the rap wars. What the movie captures is that Tupacs absorption through showbiz, then through the empire of Suge Knight into the role of gangsta sociopath was the insidious illusion that sealed his fate. It was a role he relished playing, and he did it brilliantly; he convinced the toughest audience there was himself. But the only thing about the role that was entirely real was his death.

Reviewed at Magno, New York, June 14, 2017. MPAA Rating: R. Running time: 140 MIN.

A Summit Entertainment/Lionsgate release of a Morgan Creek Productions, Program Pictures, Codeblack Films production. Producers: David T. Robinson, L.T. Hutton, James G. Robinson. Executive producer: Wayne Morris.

Director: Benny Boom. Screenplay: Jeremy Haft, Eddie Gonzalez, Steven Bagatourian. Camera (color, widescreen): Peter Menzies Jr. Editor: Joel Cox.

Demetrius Shipp Jr., Danai Gurira, Kat Graham, Dominic L. Santana, Jamal Woolard, Jarrett Ellis, Brandon Suave, Harold House Moore, Lauren Cohan, Hill Harper.

See more here:

Film Review: 'All Eyez on Me' - Variety

Posted in Nihilism | Comments Off

If the choice is hard-right or hard-left, I choose Lib Dem futility – Jewish Chronicle

Posted: at 9:02 pm

Jewish Chronicle

If the choice is hard-right or hard-left, I choose Lib Dem futility
Jewish Chronicle
In our nihilism, we have tended to vote Liberal Democrat but with as much enthusiasm as a supermarket cashier greeting their 1,000th customer of the day. Our depression dates back to the accession of Ed Miliband to the Labour leadership. It was he ...

and more »

View post:

If the choice is hard-right or hard-left, I choose Lib Dem futility - Jewish Chronicle

Posted in Nihilism | Comments Off

Daily Archives: June 15, 2017

St. Pete could soon add ShotSpotter Technology – ABC Action News

Ron Colone: A closer look at technology and jobs – Santa Ynez Valley News

Let’s make real progress on welfare reform – Washington Examiner

Medicaid progress at risk as cuts to program loom – Arizona Capitol Times

Cities Can Jump-start Climate Progress by Plugging in Their Vehicles – DeSmog (blog)

Watchpoints: Progress noted in Zunino’s work in progress – The News Tribune (blog)

Map reveals where billionaires are stockpiling land that could be used in the apocalypse – SFGate

Billionaires are stockpiling land that could be used in the apocalypse here’s where they’re going – The Advocate

Film Review: ‘All Eyez on Me’ – Variety

If the choice is hard-right or hard-left, I choose Lib Dem futility – Jewish Chronicle

The Prometheus League

Breaking News and Updates

Prometheism

Forbidden Fruit

The Evolutionary Perspective

Transtopia Menu

Library Updates

Library Books

Future Euvolution

Lucid Dreams from Childhood

Genetic Revolution

Speciation + Self-Directed Evolution