Daily Archives: June 14, 2017

NFL’s gambling policy appears consistently inconsistent – USA Today – USA TODAY

Posted: June 14, 2017 at 4:44 am

USA TODAY Sports' Lindsay H. Jones looks at the division's big offseason changes. USA TODAY Sports

NFL policy prohibits team owners from having a stake in casinos, but two casino owners are on the governing board of the landlord that will own the Las Vegas stadium where the Raiders are scheduled to play in 2020.(Photo: Kirby Lee, USA TODAY Sports)

Now more than ever before, the NFLs public position on gambling has become quite an artful dance.

On one side of the ballroom, the league still opposes sports gambling and is against promoting casinos. The NFL even continues to fight a lawsuit that seeks payback from the league after it banned Tony Romo and other players from an event at a Las Vegas casino property in 2015.

On the other side of the room, the league increasingly has flirted with the gambling industry in recent years, including allowing advertising from casinos. In Arizona, a casino company called Gila River Gaming Enterprises confirmed to USA TODAY Sports this monththat it's been havingdiscussions with the Arizona Cardinals about buying naming rights to their stadium.

This pertains to thestadiumnaming rights, thecasino company said before recently noting it has entered anon-disclosure agreement with the team about these discussions. This is aresult of continued communications with the Arizona Cardinals through our strong existing relationship.

NFL fighting youth charity over gambling policy

The league's current gambling policystill prohibitsthe sale of primary stadium or field naming rights to gambling-related establishments. So why is this even a possibility in Arizona?The bigger question many have asked recently is why the league maintains this conflicted policy, especially after approving the relocation of the Oakland Raiders to the gambling capital of Las Vegas.

The simple answer is power and money to control players and personnel for the sake of appearances while making exceptions for the sake of revenue. The policy iseven atissue in federal court, where the NFL is fighting a charity organizationthat said the league forced it to move a youth bowling event with NFL players in 2015. The charitysaid the NFL made it relocate to a much smallerbowling alley in Las Vegasbecause thebigger bowling alley was part of a casino resort.

There is no reason for the NFL to alter its gambling policy if the only adverse ramifications are accusations of hypocrisy and negative media stories, said Daniel Wallach, a gaming and sports law attorney in Florida.

The only reason for the league to overhaul it, he said,would be for compelling legal or business reasons, which some predict could come within the next five years.

In the meantime, the Arizona discussions appear to be one of the most expensive examples yet of a rising NFL conflict a league policy rooted in old, negative perceptions against gambling vs. the demand for more lucrative ties between NFL teams and gambling businesses.

Stadium naming rights are lucrative sources of revenue for NFL teams. The Cardinals last stadium naming rights deal, with the University of Phoenix, paid the teaman average of $7.7 million per year.

But there are restrictions. No NFL stadium is named after a casino company, though Hard Rock Stadium in Miami Gardens is named after company that includes casinos in its portfolio.

Sale of naming rights for stadium lounges and other sections of the stadium is permitted by the NFL for certain casinos. For example, in 2015, the Detroit Lions unveiled the MGM Grand Detroit Tunnel Club lounge at Ford Field. But the policy specifically excludes gambling-relatednaming rights for the "field or primary building name, according to the league policy.

The NFL referred questions about the Cardinals stadium naming rights to the team, which declined comment.

Its possible the policy could change, like it did when the league allowed teams to accept limited casino advertising in 2012. Its also possible the team could try to thread the needle by selling naming rights to the casino company but not putting the casino companys brand in the stadium name.

Perhaps the stadium could be called "Gila River Stadium, just like the Gila River Arena next door, home of the Arizona Coyotes of the NHL, a league that has a more permissive stance about sponsorships with casino companies.

Gila River Gaming Enterprises is part of the Gila River Indian Community. The NFLs gambling policy says its permissible to have general advertising in the sovereign name of a Native American Nation, regardless of whether that Native American Nation operates or holds interests in a casino.

The problem is perception. Such nuanced exceptions make the NFLs policy increasingly easy for critics to lampoon and raise questions about the point of such contortions as gambling becomes more publicly accepted.

In November 2012, NFL commissioner Roger Goodell testified in a legal proceeding that gambling was No. 1 on his list of threats to the integrity of pro football in the U.S. In March, he also said the league doesnt envision changing its policies just because the Raiders are moving to Las Vegas.

Even social gambling among co-workers can lead to discord, violence and a loss of team cohesion, the NFL policy states.

Gila River Gaming Enterprises is behind the name of the NHL arena adjacent to the Arizona Cardinals' stadium. Will the stadium adopt the name of a gaming operation too?(Photo: Christian Petersen, Getty Images)

The leagues steadfast resistance to sports gambling stems from its fear that bettors might scandalize the NFL by bribing players or coaches to fix game scores to their benefit. Critics of this stance long have pointed out that legalized, regulated sports betting will reduce this risk, not add to it.

Yet the leagues opposition to sports gambling still doesnt seem to explain the leagues position on being against certain types of casino associations, but not others. Or why the NFL is against a team owner even partly owning a casino but not against two casino executives serving on the governing board of the landlord that will own the Las Vegas stadium where the Raiders are scheduled to move in 2020.

Its ban on certain types of gambling relationships stem from old public perceptions that associated gambling with organized crime and viewed gambling in very negative terms, according to a 1999 memo to NFL teams from then-NFL Commissioner Paul Tagliabue.

But as legalized gambling became more publicly accepted, parts of the leagues policy evolved, too, in ways that make it seem inconsistent and conflicted.

On the one hand, team owners have been allowed to hold stakes in daily fantasy sports companies, which are illegal in some states and cant operate in Nevada without gambling licenses.On the other, the NFL confirmed lastweek it is still reviewing whether to discipline players for appearing at an arm-wrestling event at a Las Vegas casino in April.

The NFLs opposition to gambling has always sort of been 'until they can make money on it,' said John Holden, an attorney and visiting scholar at Florida State who has studied sports league gambling policies. Its not totally clear where the line is, or even if the line is very firm.

A company affiliated with former Dallas Cowboys quarterback Tony Romo calls the NFL's gambling policy "disingenous."(Photo: LM Otero, AP)

Wallach notes the league is enormously successful and therefore not inclined to fix anything until feels it must.

It could be a court decision that causes the NFL to change, Wallach said. It could be a further decline in television ratings or a diminution of (media) rights deals.

The U.S. Supreme Court soon is expected to decide whether to hear the state of New Jerseys challenge to the federal ban on state-sponsored sports gambling, which is largely illegal outside of Nevada. The NFL is opposing New Jerseys challenge, but if the law changed and more states wantedto legalize sports gambling, the league could change its tune for acceptable regulations and financial considerations.

Meanwhile, a company affiliated with Romo, the former NFL quarterback, is still fighting the NFL in court over its gambling policy. The company sued the league in 2015, saying the league used its disingenuous policy to effectively shut down the companys fantasy football event in Las Vegas. The league prohibited players from appearing at the event because itspolicy forbids promotional appearances associated with casinos.

After a judge sided with the NFL last year and threw the case out, the company appealed, and the case is still pending in Texas court.

The reality is that when the NFL gets a piece of the pie, the NFL flagrantly and systematically violates its own supposed policy against casinos and gambling, the lawsuit states. Countless examples show the NFLs true attitude toward betting.

Autoplay

Show Thumbnails

Show Captions

View original post here:

NFL's gambling policy appears consistently inconsistent - USA Today - USA TODAY

Posted in Gambling | Comments Off on NFL’s gambling policy appears consistently inconsistent – USA Today – USA TODAY

Labor to vote on legalising euthanasia inquiry for WA Parliament – The West Australian

Posted: at 4:44 am

Premier Mark McGowan has thrown his support behind a push for a parliamentary inquiry into legalising euthanasia for terminally ill patients.

The West Australian can reveal the Labor caucus will vote next week on whether to launch a cross-party inquiry into voluntary euthanasia, with the aim of reporting after a year.

Mr McGowan said he would support the establishment of a special parliamentary committee. It is a suitable way forward for this matter to be carefully considered, he said.

Mr McGowan has supported calls for euthanasia reform in the past but indicated it was a conscience issue for Labor MPs.

A Labor source said the committee would allow for a widespread community debate.

(Euthanasia) came up during the election campaign a lot and the community expects us to have the conversation, the source said.

The West Australian understands if the caucus vote endorses the inquiry, it will be modelled on the one held in 2015 by the Victorian Parliament, which recommended legislation of assisted dying for people suffering from serious and incurable conditions.

The proposed committee comes after several government ministers flagged support for the issue in the past six months.

In December, Labor candidate and now Government frontbencher Alannah Mac-JUTiernan and Greens MP Robin Chapple led a push to have a private members Bill legalising euthanasia moved in Parliament before the end of this year.

In March, Health Minister Roger Cook said he supported voluntary euthanasia. He indicated the Government would not introduce legislation but would support individual MPs bids to introduce a private members Bill.

I support voluntary euthanasia and I think we need to legislate to enable people to take control of their lives in their final stages, he said.

The Victorian inquiry, which reported last year, received more than 1000 submissions from medical and legal experts. In its final report, the committee recommended the legalisation, in limited circumstances, of assisted dying.

Since the report and after advice from two medical professionals, the Government drafted legislation to offer euthanasia as an option for terminally ill patients who have less than a year left to live.

Continue reading here:

Labor to vote on legalising euthanasia inquiry for WA Parliament - The West Australian

Posted in Euthanasia | Comments Off on Labor to vote on legalising euthanasia inquiry for WA Parliament – The West Australian

Coronation Street star Claire King sacked as Smart Energy … – The Sun

Posted: at 4:44 am

The soap actress was axed after saying she's considered assisted suicide

CORONATION Street star Claire King has been sacked from her role as Smart Energy spokesperson and may even lose her fee after she claimed she would consider assisted suicide.

The 56-year-old, who plays Erica Holyroyd in the ITV soap, has been ditched from from the role after her remarks about euthanasia caused controversy.

Getty Images - WireImage

In a recent interview plugging the companys energy-saving Smart Meter, Claire told how she was considering ending her life should she become a burden to friends and family as she ages, after being diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis.

She said: I do worry about when Im older and becoming a burden on people around me.

I can understand why people choose assisted dying and its getting to the point where I would consider it myself.

Rex Features

But sources close to the company have said that her comments have upset bosses, leading to her being given the boot.

A source said: They couldnt believe her comments and definitely dont want to be associated with any of that.

This could even lead to her losing her fee entirely.

Claire is leaving Corrie this summer after three years, but the role is expected to be kept open for her to return in the future.

She said: Its been a dream come true to tread those famous cobbles. I was only meant to stay for six weeks initially, so for Erica to be so popular that she stayed for three years and even worked in The Rovers was a real compliment to me as an actress.

ITV

Ive had such a great time with the cast and crew, so its fabulous that they have left the door open for Erica to return in the future.

"Who knows what adventures shell be getting up to away from the Street? Shes certainly not boring.

As for me, Im ready for another challenge. Im not leaving the screens anytime soon, so watch this space.

A spokesperson for Smart Energy GB declined to comment.

Follow this link:

Coronation Street star Claire King sacked as Smart Energy ... - The Sun

Posted in Euthanasia | Comments Off on Coronation Street star Claire King sacked as Smart Energy … – The Sun

Rebel With a Cause: The One Conservative Who Voted For Legal Pot – Marijuana.com

Posted: at 4:43 am

The legalization of marijuana in Canada has brought about many questions throughout the process. What will the final age limit be? Where will marijuana be sold? And will there be restrictions on advertising for pot companies?

The only aspect of this enigmatic experience that we have been able to predict is where the political party lines have been drawn on the issue.

The Liberals, of course, want to pass their bill and make marijuana legal for all adults. The New Democrats (NDP) want to do the same, but also eliminate arrests and convictions for possession immediately. The Conservative Party has been historically predictable, not wanting to legalize at all.

That goes for all Conservatives except one.

During the second reading of Bill C-45, Conservative MP Scott Reid was the only outlier among the group, voting in favour of legalization. This change is a refreshing outlook amongst a sea of unsurprising dissension from Reids party on the issue.

We have a policy as a party that possession of marijuana should be a ticket offense, said Reid in an interview with Marijuana.com. Theres what the party supports, and there are my own views, which are two separate things.

Reid goes on to explain that he has been of the mind for quite some time that marijuana should be legal for adults. Ive been an advocate of marijuana legalization since before the beginning of my political career. My own view is based on being a libertarian and believing that we should not have victimless crimes. Also, having a safe supply and ending the existence of revenue sources for organized crime is a good thing.

Regardless of Reids difference in opinion with his party, he has never received any pressure from them to change his mind and join their ranks on the issue. This is not new for me, I published a paper in 2001. Within a year of my first election, it was widely known that I was an advocate of marijuana legalization. Not decriminalization but of full legalization. People have respectfully disagreed, but [other than that]it has never been a problem.

Now that the bill has passed the second reading with the help of Reid, he will be developing a questionnaire for his constituents to ask how they feel he should vote in what will be the third and final reading of the bill. In the third reading, you have the bill in its final form. That is the appropriate point at which to say to your constituents, is it what you want, is it good enough?

Even before posing the question to the citizens Reid represents, he is already unsatisfied with some points of the bill. Right now the contemplative legislation proposes the age of 18 as the age at which it will be legal to consume cannabis. Others have proposed a higher age, including myself. Ive proposed 21 as being preferable. Reid added that he also feels that liquor and cannabis should not be sold together, which was an option that Ontario Premier Kathleen Wynne supported. They are not products that should be sold [together]for public health reasons.

Despite the challenges Reid has with the bill, the Conservative Member voted for C-45 because he believes in the bigger picture. Seemingly, the most challenging part for Reid was not voting for what he believed in, but being applauded by the Liberals when doing so. Having voted against my party on a number of occasions, I never enjoy [applause from the opposition], he said. Ive talked to people from multiple parties who have voted against party lines and it is always an uncomfortable feeling when it happens, just because of the partisan nature of the House.

As the Trudeau government steamrolls forward with its plan to change the history of prohibition, its clear that the issue of pot legalization creates strange bedfellows. But amongst the exciting and chaotic times we Canadian pot lovers live in, one thing is clear. Marijuana is going to be legal in Canada thanks to the powers that be and people like MP Scott Reid, who stood up in a sea of Conservatives and voted against their collective mindset.

Well done Scott Reid, well done.

Cover Image Courtesy of CBC

Go here to see the original:

Rebel With a Cause: The One Conservative Who Voted For Legal Pot - Marijuana.com

Posted in Victimless Crimes | Comments Off on Rebel With a Cause: The One Conservative Who Voted For Legal Pot – Marijuana.com

Child porn, prostitution sting nets 4 | News, Sports, Jobs – Leader … – Gloversville Leader-Herald

Posted: at 4:43 am

Local News

Jun 13, 2017

Wilcox

The four arrests made June 6 culminated a joint state police and Fulton County Sheriffs Department operation.

Christopher L. Wilcox, 49, of Gloversville, was charged with one felony count of second-degree attempted rape, second-degree attempted criminal sexual act and felony first-degree disseminating indecent materials to a minor. A sheriffs news release indicated he allegedly attempted sexual intercourse with a 14-year-old female. The release said Wilcox was communicating with a member of state police, who he thought was a 14 years old girl.

Thomas Gordon, 59, of Fonda, was charged with second-degree attempted sexual act with a 14-year-old male. He communicated by electronic device with a person he believed was a 14-year-old boy, deputies said.

Both male suspects were arraigned before town Justice Wayne McNeil and sent to the Fulton County Jail.

Gordon

Bail was set at $15,000 cash or $30,000 insurance bond, as requested by Fulton County District Attorney Chad Brown.

Laura Law, 35, of Fort Plain, and Shitiqua Williams, 28, of Albany, were each charged with one misdemeanor count of prostitution.

The woman were also arraigned before McNeil, who set an unspecified amount of bail for each.

The operation was jointly conducted by state police members of the Fonda and Mayfield Bureaus of Criminal Investigation and the sheriffs office Investigative Unit. Members of both agencies uniform divisions participated, as well as the New York state Computer Crimes Unit, Investigations Unit and Electronics Unit.

Giardino and state police Sr. Inv. Walter Hadsell stated that from the standpoint of sharing resources and removing two alleged child predators from the street, the operation was a success.

Williams

The sheriff said anyone with information involving efforts by individuals trying to exploit children or reaching out to young children through social media should contact the sheriffs office at (518) 736-2100; or state police BCI.

Anyone with information about women being exploited by handlers, or pimps, to be used as prostitutes should report that as well, Giardino said.

The sheriff said in the release that while many consider prostitution a victimless crime, it is sometimes much worse.

Giardino said a trial currently going on in Schenectady County involves a pimp accused of murdering a prostitute because she wasnt making enough money for him.

Michael Anich covers Johnstown and Fulton County news. He can be reached at manich@leaderherald.com.

Law

JOHNSTOWN Students at the Hamilton-Fulton-Montgomery Board of Cooperative Educational Services Pathways in ...

JOHNSTOWN The Greater Johnstown School District is paying more for its election workers this year than ...

Read the rest here:

Child porn, prostitution sting nets 4 | News, Sports, Jobs - Leader ... - Gloversville Leader-Herald

Posted in Victimless Crimes | Comments Off on Child porn, prostitution sting nets 4 | News, Sports, Jobs – Leader … – Gloversville Leader-Herald

Ayn Rand’s Controversial Play Gets a Queer Makeover – ?

Posted: at 4:42 am

BY GENNA RIVIECCIO|The phrases Ayn Rand and sought after for a revival dont exactly go fit together naturally. Especially in the era of Trump, when Randian political extremism in art is more feared and frowned upon than ever. Nonetheless, the Lincoln Stegman Theater in North Hollywood dares to take on the polarizing figure through a medium shes less known for: Playwriting.

Starting June 3 and running through June 18, the authors seldom-staged Night of January 16th will present Darryl Maximilian Robinson in the role of District Attorney Flint. Originally produced in 1934 (under the title Woman on Trial,) the play garnered positive reviews in part due to its engagement with the audience as interactive participants in the jury of the aforementioned trial.

The play will be imbued with a fresh take by The Emmanuel Lutheran Actors Theater Ensemble (ELATE), featuring Robinson as a prosecutor heavily invested in the case of The People of The State of New York vs. Karen Andre. Karen Andre, of course, is the secretary to business magnate Bjorn Faulkner (on whom Match King Ivan Kreuger was based.) Rands murdered character is based less on a single real person as the overall ambitious and fatally appetitive nature of the businessman in American culture something that remains more resonant than ever in the current Reign of Orange Terror. Arguably the most detrimental character flaw in any man of power is his weakness for women, and Karen proves no exception, with her dual position as secretary and lover making her a force to be reckoned with in Faulkners life. Indeed, it rather sounds like Abel Ferraras Body of Evidence borrowed a lot of ideas from this play.

Directed by Jeff Zimmer, who also collaborated with Robinson for Tad Mosels Impromptu, the play will be given the revival it deserves after so long being forgotten in favor of some of Rands other, more controversial work (chiefly, The Fountainhead and Atlas Shrugged.) Plus, for good Shakespearean measure, actresses in roles traditionally played by males will include Gerrie Wilkowski as Judge Heath, Therese Hawes as the writing expert, Chandler, and Lisa Cicchetti as the medical examiner, Dr. Kirkland.

There would probably be no pleasing Rand with any reinvented version of her original work, as, at the time of the plays production, she ended up getting involved in a legal battle with the producer, Al Woods, who not only made numerous alterations Rand did not approve of, but also funneled a chunk of her royalties in order to compensate the very script doctor she never wanted. But ELATE might just have been able to bring a nod of approval from the stalwart playwright/author by intending to stage the play off of the definitive 1968 version of her script. And, best of all, they plan to keep intact the most inventive aspect of the play: the involvement of the audience as the jury.

See more here:

Ayn Rand's Controversial Play Gets a Queer Makeover - ?

Posted in Atlas Shrugged | Comments Off on Ayn Rand’s Controversial Play Gets a Queer Makeover – ?

Decentralizing The Hollywood Machine With Blockchain Tech And ‘Libertarian’ Filmmaking – Forbes

Posted: at 4:41 am


Forbes
Decentralizing The Hollywood Machine With Blockchain Tech And 'Libertarian' Filmmaking
Forbes
As with many industries that have emerged from a post industrial centralized system where power is held by the few and organizational structures were designed to control the people dividing the work into tasks that needed to be done, the film and ...

More here:

Decentralizing The Hollywood Machine With Blockchain Tech And 'Libertarian' Filmmaking - Forbes

Posted in Libertarian | Comments Off on Decentralizing The Hollywood Machine With Blockchain Tech And ‘Libertarian’ Filmmaking – Forbes

Ballot Law Commission Grants Libertarian Candidate a Spot in Grafton House Special Election – New Hampshire Public Radio

Posted: at 4:41 am

Last fall, the Libertarian Party of New Hampshire reached an important milestone: They managed to get 4 percent of the vote in the governors race, giving them official party status and a place on New Hampshire ballots. But a snag for one candidate seeking to run in the House special election highlights the fact that many of the state election laws were still built for a two-party system.

When a House seat opened up in Grafton, John Babiarz wanted to run as a Libertarian in the upcoming special election.The problem? When he went to register, he says the town clerk blocked him from changing his party registration from undeclared and filing necessary paperwork to be on the ballot.

In a normal election cycle, the law gives voters a chance to change their party affiliation before the filing period for a primary election.

Typically before an election season starts, there is an opportunity for voters to meet with the Supervisors of the Checklist and change their party affiliation before the filing period opens, Deputy Secretary of State Dave Scanlan explained. That gives the voter an opportunity to become a candidate in the party they want, but also any voters party affiliation is locked in from the filing period until after the primary election.

But Babiarzs case highlighted a gap in the state law for special elections: The window of time between when an elections called and when the filing period starts is much narrower and doesnt allow for the same flexibility for candidates like him to change party status.

In this case of the special election, the governor and council set the date of the special election, and its done on a Wednesday. The filing period starts the following Monday. So theres very little opportunity for the Supervisors of the Checklist to call a meeting together and properly advertise it.

And whats new about this process, both Scanlan and Babiarz noted, is the inclusion of another political party that wasnt previously recognized.

I think for too long, the two major parties had everything set. They were comfortable with it. But when you have a new party with special elections They didnt take that into consideration that a new party would just start ramping up new membership, people may have not changed over to have the valid thing to run like everybody else.

On Tuesday, the state ballot law commission sided with Babiarz, ordering election officials to allow him to add his name to the ballot for the July 18 primary.

The commission said the law needs to be updated to fix the gap this case illustrates something Babiarz hopes to have the chance to do, should he win his bid for the seat, as a Libertarian.

Here is the original post:

Ballot Law Commission Grants Libertarian Candidate a Spot in Grafton House Special Election - New Hampshire Public Radio

Posted in Libertarian | Comments Off on Ballot Law Commission Grants Libertarian Candidate a Spot in Grafton House Special Election – New Hampshire Public Radio

Arkansas Libertarians Submit Signatures To Be "New" Political Party – WKNO FM

Posted: at 4:41 am

The Libertarian Party of Arkansas submitted over 15,000 signatures on Monday to the Secretary of States office to try and qualify to be a new political party -- for the fourth election cycle in a row. The state has 30 days to certify at least 10,000 of the signatures are from registered Arkansas voters.

This initial hurdle, and the financial cost of signature drives, is often critiqued by Arkansas third parties. In order for a political party to retain Arkansas ballot access through the next election cycle a candidate for either governor or president has to garner at least three percent of the vote. Last year Libertarian nominee Gary Johnson fell just shy with 2.63 percent of the vote.

Despite falling short of that threshold in 2016, state Party Chair Michael Pakko said the Libertarian Party deserves to be thought of as competitive.

Last year the Libertarian Party was the only party to field candidates against incumbents in all four U.S. Congressional states. In state legislative races Libertarians provided the only opposition in nearly a third of all contested races, Pakko said at the Capitol, Moreover people are choosing to vote Libertarian. Across the four Congressional districts last year our candidates earned over 196,000 votes about 18.5 percent of the total.

The once all-powerful Democratic Party of Arkansas only fielded one Congressional candidate in the last election. But this year, bolstered by an impassioned base in the era of Trump, a growing number of Democrats are expressing interest in 2018 races.

Pakko said he expects Libertarians to be in more three-way races next election.

Its always nice to be the only opposition party. When the Democrats werent running in races last year that gave us a little bit bigger piece of the spotlight but we dont expect that to be the case, Pakko said, so well just take it as it comes.

No Arkansas Libertarians hold legislative, statewide, or federal offices. But that lack of experience isnt necessarily a negative to Pakko.

One of the things voters communicated in their election of Donald Trump was their willingness to pick someone for public office that didnt have previous experience, he said.

While certainly having experienced candidates would be helpful I dont think thats necessarily a handicap to have non-professional politicians, regular citizens running for office and I think voters will be receptive, said Pakko.

What matters most to voters, according to the Libertarian chair, is making government work.

The biggest issue that voters think about is the dysfunctional nature of government both at the state and national level, he said. Its a matter of the two political parties at loggerheads, constant gridlock, and wed like the voters in Arkansas to know there is another choice, another option.

For Pakko and most Libertarians making government work often means passing laws that peel back the role of government, If you believe that governments should protect the rights of the individual, that people should be able to live their lives however they see fit with minimal interference from the government, if you believe that freedom and prosperity flourish where markets are allowed to work and the U.S. is at peace with its neighbors in the world, then please consider joining the Libertarian Party.

Continue reading here:

Arkansas Libertarians Submit Signatures To Be "New" Political Party - WKNO FM

Posted in Libertarian | Comments Off on Arkansas Libertarians Submit Signatures To Be "New" Political Party – WKNO FM

Islamic Libertarian Harassed By Leftists After Starting a Fundraiser For Deceased Oathkeeper – The Liberty Conservative

Posted: at 4:41 am

When oathkeeping patriot Frank Morganthaler suffered a heart attack while protesting Sharia Law this past weekend, leftists laughed at him as his life slipped away. This inspired an Islamic libertarian to start a fundraiser for the deceased man despite their political disagreements. This show of unity was soundly rejected by the intolerant left, who have started a campaign of harassment against the compassionate Muslim.

Will Coleys idea was to raise funds to show mercy toward their enemies during the Islamic holy season of Ramadan. At a time when political tensions are reaching frightening highs, Coley hoped that this gesture would re-introduce a little bit of human dignity into the political sphere. After encountering vicious hate-filled leftists on social media, Coleys hopes were dashed.

We will not be deterred in our drive to do good for others, even those who see themselves as my enemy, Coley wrote on Facebook in defense of his cause. Despite the heavy flak he is taking, he is hoping to raise $10,000 to pay for the Oathkeepers funeral costs.

A hate campaign was started on social media to derail Coleys gesture, and it has been successful. Terror apologist Linda Sarsour led the way, and the mob mentality took over from there. Coley was derided for the color of his skin, and it was determined by leftists that his skin was just too white for him to deserve a say in Muslim affairs.

Coley was shaken by this news but is not particularly surprised. He and his group, Muslims for Liberty, have been shunned by mainstream Muslim organizations for many years. Because his ideas are libertarian, that has put him on the outside looking in. Now it is Coleys skin color that is causing him problems in the Muslim community.

However, his idea has not been a complete failure. He has raised more than 25 percent of his stated goal at this point, and will be able to offset some of Morganthalers funeral costs at the very least. He also received a favorable television profile on a local news program in his native Tennessee to explain his plans to bridge the massive gap between Muslims and their opposition.

I have my faith, and you have yours, but theres no reason we have to hate each other because we believe differently, Will Coley said in an interview with WVLT news.

Coley has his work cut out for him in this polarizing political climate, but he is intent upon building bridges even in the case of immense pushback. His fundraiser link can be accessed at this link.

Read more:

Islamic Libertarian Harassed By Leftists After Starting a Fundraiser For Deceased Oathkeeper - The Liberty Conservative

Posted in Libertarian | Comments Off on Islamic Libertarian Harassed By Leftists After Starting a Fundraiser For Deceased Oathkeeper – The Liberty Conservative