Daily Archives: June 7, 2017

This Axios headline is problematic: Summers: Automation is the middle class worst enemy.

The accompanying piece doesnt actually quote economist Larry Summers making that declaration. Rather it summarizes an interview in which Summers indeed points out the challenge automation poses for workers. Hes right. Of course thats been the case for the past 200 years and will likely be the case for the next 200. But in exchange for a degree of instability and disruption, technological progress has dramatically raised living standards for workers.

Automation is kind of like alcohol, which, as Homer Simpson putsit,is the cause of, and solution to, all of lifes problems. Its the job of policymakers to make sure workers are ready to climb to the next footholdor ledge as the waters of automation continue to rise. Its also their job to make sure policy is as supportive as possible of innovation. Indeed, we need more tech progress, not less. The U.S. economy currently suffers not from too much automation, but rather from too little investment in the sort of technology that would raise the countrys lackluster productivity, writesDerek Thompson in an excellent new piece at the Atlantic.

Technology will erase jobs but also create them. Unfortunately, as Kevin Kelly writes, we cant see those jobs from here because we cant yet see the machines and technologies that will make them.

The piece also includes this chart, which shows lower US labor force participation than other advanced economies:

But I doubt whether Summers blames automation vs. the lack of USpolicies that center-left economists see as supporting workers, such as paid leave, and high USincarceration rates. And here is economist David Autor on the net impact of automation on jobs this century:

A final observation is that while much contemporary economic pessimism attributes the labor market woes of the past decade to the adverse impacts of computerization, I remain skeptical of this inference. Clearly, computerization has shaped the structure of occupational change and the evolution of skill demands. But it is harder to see the channel through which computerization could have dramatically reduced labor demand after 1999. My suspicion is that the deceleration of the U.S. labor market after 2000, and further after 2007, is more closely associated with two other macroeconomic events. A first is the bursting of the dot-com bubble, followed by the collapse of the housing market and the ensuing financial crisis, both of which curtailed investment and innovative activity. A second is the employment dislocations in the U.S. labor market brought about by rapid globalization, particularly the sharp rise of import penetration from China following its accession to the World Trade Organization in 2001.

Read more:

Is Automation Really the Worst Enemy of the Middle Class? - Ricochet.com

BERKELEY Advances in artificial intelligence and robotics are powering a new wave of automation, with machines matching or outperforming humans in a fast-growing range of tasks, including some that require complex cognitive capabilities and advanced degrees. This process has outpaced the expectations of experts; not surprisingly, its possible adverse effects on both the quantity and quality of employment have raised serious concerns.

To listen to President Donald Trumps administration, one might think that trade remains the primary reason for the loss of manufacturing jobs in the United States. Trumps treasury secretary, Steven Mnuchin, has declared that the possible technological displacement of workers is not even on [the administrations] radar screen.

Among economists, however, the consensus is that about 80% of the loss in US manufacturing jobs over the last three decades was a result of labor-saving and productivity-enhancing technological change, with trade coming a distant second. The question, then, is whether we are headed toward a jobless future, in which technology leaves many unemployed, or a good-jobless future, in which a growing number of workers can no longer earn a middle-class income, regardless of their education and skills.

The answer may be some of both. The most recent major study on the topic found that, from 1990 to 2007, the penetration of industrial robots defined as autonomous, automatically controlled, reprogrammable, and multipurpose machines undermined both employment and wages.

Based on the studys simulations, robots probably cost about 400,000 US jobs each year, many of them middle-income manufacturing jobs, especially in industries like automobiles, plastics, and pharmaceuticals. Of course, as a recent Economic Policy Institute report points out, these are not large numbers, relative to the overall size of the US labor market. But local job losses have had an impact: many of the most affected communities were in the Midwestern and southern states that voted for Trump, largely because of his protectionist, anti-trade promises.

As automation substitutes for labor in a growing number of occupations, the impact on the quantity and quality of jobs will intensify. And, as a recent McKinsey Global Institute study shows, there is plenty more room for such substitution. The study, which encompassed 46 countries and 80% of the global labor force, found that relatively few occupations less than 5% could be fully automated. But some 60% of all occupations could have at least 30% of their constitutive tasks or activities automated, based on current demonstrated technologies.

The activities most susceptible to automation in the near term are routine cognitive tasks like data collection and data processing, as well as routine manual and physical activities in structured, predictable environments. Such activities now account for 51% of US wages, and are most prevalent in sectors that employ large numbers of workers, including hotel and food services, manufacturing, and retail trade.

The McKinsey report also found a negative correlation between tasks wages and required skill levels on the one hand, and the potential for their automation on the other. On balance, automation reduces demand for low- and middle-skill labor in lower-paying routine tasks, while increasing demand for high-skill, high-earning labor performing abstract tasks that require technical and problem-solving skills. Simply put, technological change is skill-biased.

Over the last 30 years or so, skill-biased technological change has fueled the polarization of both employment and wages, with median workers facing real wage stagnation and non-college-educated workers suffering a significant decline in their real earnings. Such polarization fuels rising inequality in the distribution of labor income, which in turn drives growth in overall income inequality a dynamic that many economists, from David Autor to Thomas Piketty, have emphasized.

As Michael Spence and I argue in a recent paper, skill-biased and labor-displacing intelligent machines and automation drive income inequality in several other ways, including winner-take-all effects that bring massive benefits to superstars and the luckiest few, as well as rents from imperfect competition and first-mover advantages in networked systems. Returns to digital capital tend to exceed the returns to physical capital and reflect power-law distributions, with an outsize share of returns again accruing to relatively few actors.

Technological change, Spence and I point out, has also had another inequality-enhancing consequence: it has turbo-charged globalization by enabling companies to source, monitor, and coordinate production processes at far-flung locations quickly and cheaply, in order to take advantage of lower labor costs. Given this, it is difficult to distinguish between the effects of technology and the effects of globalization on employment, wages, and income inequality in developed countries.

Our analysis concludes that the two forces reinforce each other, and have helped to fuel the rise in capitals share of national income a key variable in Pikettys theory of wealth inequality. The April 2017 IMF World Economic Outlook reaches a similar conclusion, attributing about 50% of the 30-year decline in labors share of national income in the developed economies to the impact of technology. Globalization, the IMF estimates, contributed about half that much to the decline.

Mounting anxiety about the potential effects of increasingly intelligent tools on employment, wages, and income inequality has led to calls for policies to slow the pace of automation, such as a tax on robots. Such policies, however, would undermine innovation and productivity growth, the primary force behind rising living standards.

Rather than cage the golden goose of technological progress, policymakers should focus on measures that help those who are displaced, such as education and training programs, and income support and social safety nets, including wage insurance, lifetime retraining loans, and portable health and pension benefits. More progressive tax and transfer policies will also be needed, in order to ensure that the income and wealth gains from automation are more equitably shared.

Three years ago, I argued that whether the benefits of smart machines are distributed broadly will depend not on their design, but on the design of the policies surrounding them. Since then, I have not been alone. Unfortunately, Trumps team hasnt gotten the message.

Continued here:

Labor Markets in the Age of Automation by Laura Tyson - Project ... - Project Syndicate

The Digital Twin concept is steadily gaining groundin the product development worlda means of creating a virtual representation of physical assets, including modeling behaviorfor validation and test purposes. This process, which promises to reduce reliance on costly prototypes while accelerating time to market, is now starting to take root in the plant floor environment as a way to garner efficiencies for production and, in some cases, set the stage for predictive maintenance.

Unlike the product development space, where the definition is more universal, the concept of a digital twin varies among automation providers, depending on where their offerings fit in the automation stack. Some companies with deep roots in 3D CAD modeling like Dassault Systmes and Siemens see the digital twin as a way to define and optimize factory floor layout and production processes in a virtual world prior to putting physical assets in place and flipping the switch on production.

Other companies like Emerson Automation and Beckhoff consider the digital twin as a tool for validating and optimizing control systems and automation processes in the virtual worlda tactic that lends itself to a variety of use cases, including operator training and virtual commissioning. Other companies, like GE Digital, have a broad and ambitious game plan for the digital twin, leveraging it for everything from asset performance management to predictive and prescriptive maintenance, the latter combining a digital model with Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) connectivity, real-time operational and historical data, as well as machine learning and analytics.

In an entirely different interpretation, some players conflate the concept of a digital twin with virtualization, the now mainstream IT technology that abstracts operating systems, applications, networks and storage from the underlying hardware or software so the process is no longer dependent on a specific physical platform, allowing for greater flexibility and scale. For example, Wind River Titanium Control is an open standards-based, on-premise cloud infrastructure that creates a digital twin of a plants legacy equipment, allowing it to become a full participant in IIoT by creating a real-time data channel between the traditional physical controllers and automation systems and its virtual representation.

Despite the murkiness of the digital twin concept, one thing is clear: It doesnt constitute any one idea, any single set of simulations or analytics or even a specific product category. A digital twin is a whole set of analytics that look at different aspects of how an asset performs, says Matt Wells, general manager of automation software at GE Digital. What we found is not one analytics model has all the answers.

Twinning thesmart factory Currently, one of the more prominent use cases for the digital twin is validating plant floor layouts and simulating logistic processes as part of a digital manufacturing portfolio. At Dassault, the concept of a connected production digital twin is a virtual 3D replica of an actual physical structurerobots, conveyors, CNC machines and other plant floor assetsalong with a simulation of the actual production processes of a smart factory, according to Prashanth Mysore, portfolio technical director of digital manufacturing at Dassault.

Under pressure to improve quality and responsiveness, reduce costs and strive for continuous improvements, manufacturers have an opportunity with the production digital twin to react more responsively to various internal and external disruptive events driven by mass customization needs. Specifically, Mysore says, manufacturers embracing a digital twin strategy can increase productivity and manufacturing efficiency by reducing variability and synchronizing material. They can also improve quality and compliance by validating processes virtually to ensure they are right the first time in addition to running multiple what-if scenarios to analyze production options and ensure worker safety and productivity.

A 3D replica of the actual physical plant is not the end of the road for the digital twin, Mysore says. The digital twin is also used to connect production with materials management, quality processes, and labor and maintenance processes.

As part of its 3DExperience platform for global industrial operations, Dassault makes its version of the digital twin come to life through its Delmia digital manufacturing portfolio, which includes numerous simulation tools as well as manufacturing operations management (MOM) capabilities resulting from its Apriso acquisition and operations planning and optimization functionality from its buyout of Quintiq.

A digital twin or dynamic software representation of an entire plant or an offshore oil rig, for example, can serve a variety of use cases across an entire automation and process control project lifecycle, according to Ronnie Bains, business manager for dynamic simulation and process optimization at Emerson Automation Solutions. Emerson customers are leveraging digital twins to support the initial design of a facility, to build actual processes and control systems, and to understand whether what is being built can function at the proper throughput.

If youre doing something incorrectly and you dont have such simulation, you dont find out about the potential impact until much later in a projects process, Bains explains. With a digital twin, you can identify areas of concern and design flaws early on and fix them as opposed to when things are built out and its more expensive.

As part of its Multi-Purpose Dynamic Simulator systems, Emersons DeltaV Simulate capabilities allow companies to test control logic and operator graphics in a virtual commissioning scenario, minimizing potential errors and streamlining the startup process. The same technology can also be leveraged to assist in training operators in unique processes. The level to which the digital twin is applied varies from customer to customer, Bains says. For some, its just for training; for others, its the full lifecycle.

For its part, Beckhoff has assembled a set of tools for its TwinCAT automation suite that extends into the realm of digital twin, specifically for upfront virtual testing and commissioning. Via support for the vendor-neutral Functional Mock-up Interface (FMI), Beckhoff has created interfaces between its platform and popular model-based design and simulation tools like MathWorks Matlab and Simulink and Maplesofts MapleSim to allow for acquisition and visualization of real-time parameters while creating a closer connection between physical and digital models. The ability to import simulated code and run it directly on a physical system enables machine builders to test before setup, aiding in reliability and shortening time to market, according to Daymon Thompson, an automation specialist at Beckhoff.

At Rockwell Automation, the whole premise of the digital twin is to remove the need for the physical asset, whether its to test the actual hardware or control systems, notes Andy Stump, business manager for the companys design software portfolio. Rockwells Studio 5000 Logix Emulate software enables users to validate, test and optimize application code independent of physical hardware while also allowing connectivity to third-party simulation and operator training systems to help teams simulate processes and train operators in a virtual environment.

In this context, a digital twin can be employed to provide a safer, more contextualized training environment that focuses on situational experience. It helps with emergency situations, starting up and shutting downthings you dont encounter ever day, Stump explains.

A digital twin of a control system created in the Logix Emulate tool could also be tapped for throughput analysis, Stump adds, ensuring, for example, that a packaging machine could handle a new form factor without having to actually bring down the machine to test the new design. Any time you take a machine out of production, its expensive, he says. If you can estimate that a machine is going to be down 60 percent of the time running what-if scenarios in a digital twin, theres a lot of money to be saved.

Moving forward, Rockwell will leverage new technologies such as virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) to enhance its vision for a digital twin. At the Hannover Fair in April, the company demonstrated a next-generation, mixed-reality virtual design experience using its Studio 5000 development environment with the Microsoft HoloLens VR headset.

For Siemens, the concept of a digital twin straddles both product design and production. In a production capacity, the digital twin exists as a common database of everything in a physical plantinstrument data, logic diagrams, piping, among other sourcesalong with simulation capabilities that can support use cases like virtual commissioning and operator training. Comos, Siemens platform for mapping out a plant lifecycle on a single data platform, and Simit, simulation software used for system validation and operator training, now have tighter integration to support more efficient plant engineering and shorter commissioning phases, says Doug Ortiz, process automation simulation expert for Siemens. In addition, Comos Walkinside 3D Virtual Reality Viewer, now with connectivity to the Oculus Rift Virtual Reality 3D glasses, enables a more immersive experience, allowing plant personnel to engage in realistic training and virtual commissioning exercises, he says.

Customers want to get plants from the design stage to up and running in the shortest period of time and these tools are paramount for that, Ortiz says. The digital twin is great to use for any plant for the lifecycle of that unique plant.

Improvedmaintenanceopportunities While most companies in the automation space are settling in with the digital twin for roles in operator training, virtual commissioning and optimization, there is still not a lot of activity leveraging the concept for predictive and preventive maintenance opportunities. The exception might be GE Digital, which is clearly pushing this use case as its long-term vision.

GE Digital sees four stages of analytics that will be impacted by digital twin and IoT:

GE Digital showed off a digital twin representation of a steam turbine to showcase what is possible in the areas of predictive and prescriptive maintenance at its Minds + Machines conference last November.

A digital twin is a living model that drives a business outcome, and this model gets real-time operational and environmental data and constantly updates itself, said Colin J. Parris, vice president of software research at GE Globals research center, during the presentation. It can predict failuresreduce maintenance costs and unplanned outages, andoptimize and provide mitigation of events when we have these types of failures.

Though the digital twin is certainly making headway in production, its still in its early days. Digital twin is definitely hot right now, but it really depends on what the customer is trying to achieve and what they are trying to model, says Bryan Siafakas, marketing manager in Rockwell Automations controller and visualization business, adding that its just a matter of time. There is a huge upside in terms of productivity savings and shortened development cycles.

Go here to see the original:

Digital Twin Spawns Automation Efficiencies - Automation World

Intelligence analysts are swimming in data pouring in from an array of vehicles and platforms a problem that isnt new, but for which government leaders still seek the right solutions.

To help stem the deluge and better position analysts and key mission-critical data, intelligence community officials are targeting automation as a high priority, with a futuristic vision for applications down the road as well.

A significant chunk of my analytic workforce today, I will send them to a dark room to look at TV monitors to do national security-essential work but boy, is it inefficient, Robert Cardillo, director of the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency, told reporters at the annual GEOINT Symposium in San Antonio, Texas. The number of people needed to maintain awareness of, if not exploitation of, one sensor is really daunting. I suspect were going to get more of those sensors. I cant double my human population in those dark rooms.

The near-term goal particularly centers on analysis of full-motion video that streams in from unmanned aerial systemsthe wolf really close to the door, as Cardillo put it.But he and other officials also are looking toward future uses for different types of automation, including artificial intelligence. And Cardillo, among others, are looking to partner up for help.

As the commercial industry and academic think tanks and advanced science and engineering schools move to artificial intelligence and machine learning, theyre all desperate to get a hold of some data with [which] to train their algorithms and teach their machines to learn, Cardillo said. He added that intelligence community leaders, including those at the NGA, are looking at how to safely expose data sets to accelerate development in automated tools.

But the NGA isnt just looking outside for solutions. Internally, the agency has launched a new Office of Ventures and Innovation aimed at guiding emerging technology from incubation through the entire life cycle.

To get to this automated, augmented future that were talking about, we need to coordinate across a lot of different parts of the agency, Anthony Vinci, NGA director of plans and programs, told C4ISRNET. Its not just a technology issue, its bringing technology and [research and development] into the operational units, into analysis or into the business services units, human development or finance for business analytics.

Vinci said the NGA is working closely with other government agencies, including the Defense Department, to further automation and AI and get to a new level of intelligence and military operations.

How can we use automation to take some of that pressure off of the analysts who are putting together those products? How do we buy back some of their time by automating some of these processes so they can focus on the higher-end analysis that they need to be focusing on? Thats a fundamental thing were trying to do using all the tools at the agencys disposal, Vinci said.

On the higher endthe exquisite analysishow can we bring in modeling and AI and some of those tools that are on the high end of technology to support analysis and do missions that werent even possible until now because we didnt have the tools to analyze that amount of data, or because we couldnt analyze some complex phenomenonologies? How can we bring them those tools and those models?

In a future operational landscape where autonomous vehicles dominate and interact with adversaries, its easy to see where intelligence missions cross over to operational military missions, Vinci noted.

These tools are not just intelligence tools; theyre operational as well. Were not just an intelligence agency, were a combat support agency, so we help across the spectrum, he said. Were a support function to someone who has to make a decision.

"We have to be able to act faster and get as far left of boom as possible.

Read the original:

Intel officials pin high hopes on automation, artificial intelligence - C4ISR & Networks

First name *

Last name *

Email *

Job title *

Company name *

City *

Country * - Select - United States Canada Afghanistan Aland Islands Albania Algeria American Samoa Andorra Angola Anguilla Antarctica Antigua and Barbuda Argentina Armenia Aruba Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bahamas Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Benin Bermuda Bhutan Bolivia Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Bouvet Island Brazil British Indian Ocean Territory British Virgin Islands Brunei Bulgaria Burkina Faso Burundi Cambodia Cameroon Cape Verde Cayman Islands Central African Republic Chad Chile China Christmas Island Cocos (Keeling) Islands Colombia Comoros Congo (Brazzaville) Congo (Kinshasa) Cook Islands Costa Rica Croatia Cuba Curaao Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Djibouti Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Falkland Islands Faroe Islands Fiji Finland France French Guiana French Polynesia French Southern Territories Gabon Gambia Georgia Germany Ghana Gibraltar Greece Greenland Grenada Guadeloupe Guam Guatemala Guernsey Guinea Guinea-Bissau Guyana Haiti Heard Island and McDonald Islands Honduras Hong Kong S.A.R., China Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran Iraq Ireland Isle of Man Israel Italy Ivory Coast Jamaica Japan Jersey Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kiribati Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Laos Latvia Lebanon Lesotho Liberia Libya Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Macao S.A.R., China Macedonia Madagascar Malawi Malaysia Maldives Mali Malta Marshall Islands Martinique Mauritania Mauritius Mayotte Mexico Micronesia Moldova Monaco Mongolia Montenegro Montserrat Morocco Mozambique Myanmar Namibia Nauru Nepal Netherlands Netherlands Antilles New Caledonia New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria Niue Norfolk Island Northern Mariana Islands North Korea Norway Oman Pakistan Palau Palestinian Territory Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Pitcairn Poland Portugal Puerto Rico Qatar Reunion Romania Russia Rwanda Saint Barthlemy Saint Helena Saint Kitts and Nevis Saint Lucia Saint Martin (French part) Saint Pierre and Miquelon Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Samoa San Marino Sao Tome and Principe Saudi Arabia Senegal Serbia Seychelles Sierra Leone Singapore Slovakia Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia South Africa South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands South Korea Spain Sri Lanka Sudan Suriname Svalbard and Jan Mayen Swaziland Sweden Switzerland Syria Taiwan Tajikistan Tanzania Thailand Timor-Leste Togo Tokelau Tonga Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Turks and Caicos Islands Tuvalu U.S. Virgin Islands Uganda Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom United States Minor Outlying Islands Uruguay Uzbekistan Vanuatu Vatican Venezuela Vietnam Wallis and Futuna Western Sahara Yemen Zambia Zimbabwe

Phone

Industry * - Select - Packaging, Printing, Converting Machinery Fabricated Metals All Other Machinery (including material handling and conveying) Automotive, truck, rail and marine transportation Construction, agricultural and mining equipment Medical equipment and devices Instrumentation, control, measurement products Computers, electronics, semiconductors Communication devices and equipment Aerospace, aircraft and defense products Oil and gas including LNG Chemical Processing Water and wastewater Electrical Utilities/Power Generation Alternative Energy (Wind, hydro, solar, and bio fuels) Paper, Wood and Allied products Food and Beverage Consumer Packaged Goods (Everything other than Food/Beverage) Pharmaceuticals Plastics and rubber products Automation Supplier Other

Other industry (please specify): *

Job duties * Engineering Information technology Operations Procurement Integration or consulting Sales Other

Other job duties (please specify): *

Number of employees * - Select - 1 - 99 100 - 249 250 - 499 500 - 999 1000+

* indicates a required field

See the article here:

Automation Controllers With MQTT and Analytics Onboard Enable Lean IIoT Architectures - Automation World

New technologies are transforming our profession, and theyre also transforming the skills well need to stave off extinction.

In a paper titled The Future of Employment: How Susceptible are Jobs to Computerisation? University of Oxford researchers Carl Benedikt Frey and Michael Osborne tried to gauge the odds that certain occupations will be completely automated within the next 20 years. Among their predictions:

In fact, only seven occupationscargo and freight agents, watch repairers, insurance underwriters, mathematical technicians, hand sewers, title examiners, and telemarketersfared worse in the study than tax preparers.

The researchers admit that these estimates are rough and likely to be wrong, writes National Public Radios Quoctrung Bui. But consider this a snapshot of what some smart people think the future might look like. If it says your job will likely be replaced by a machine, youve been warned.

Other studies offer similar predictions:

One way or anothercomplete automation or partialour jobs are about to change. This type of disruption is coming. In one notable example, in fact, it has already arrived.

Perhaps the biggest disruption bearing down on the CPA profession is coming from IBM Watson, a cognitive learning system that is capable of answering questions asked in natural language. From health care and education to law and finance to food preparation and satellite imagery, Watson is redefining how work gets done in stunning ways.

Heres what:

This stuff isnt science fiction anymore. Its here and its impacting our profession as we speak.

How will CPAs react? Will they scramble to keep up, as usual? Or will they work to position themselves to move beyond that disruption and create future-focused value for their clients?

If theyre smart, theyll do the latterand that means learning the new skills theyll need to remain relevant in an age of automation.

Numerous studies conducted over the past several years are nearly unanimous: Going forward, CPAs must become proficient at skills that have little to do with the professions traditional data-driven core. These skills include the following:

The most important skill of all, though, might also be the most ambiguous. Its anticipationthe ability to identify future trends early and position your organization and your clients to take advantage of those trends before they arrive. Renowned futurist and New York Times best-selling author Daniel Burrus calls it the key missing competency in business today.

He might be right. A 2014 report from The Sleeter Group found that the most often-cited reason why small and midsized businesses leave their CPA firms is because those firms provide reactive advice instead of proactive services. In essence, clients say they leave because their CPAs arent future-ready enough.

It seems the age of automation has also given birth to the age of anticipation. The good news is this: Were starting to see more and more resources being developed specifically to deliver these types of competencies for accounting and finance professionals.

One is Burruss own Anticipatory Organization. The Business Learning Institute worked with Burrus to create a version of his Anticipatory Organization learning platform specifically for accounting and finance professionals. Thats available now and is becoming extremely popular among CPAs throughout the country.

Another is IBMs Big Data University. Its an online curriculum designed to help accounting and finance professionals learn key skills in artificial intelligence, big data, and cognitive computingskills that will be huge differentiators going forward, and will help CPAs play a bigger role in guiding digital transformation within their organizations. The Maryland Association of CPAs and the Business Learning Institute have entered into an exclusive partnership with IBM to deliver these skills to accounting and finance professionals throughout the world.

As this age of automation progresses, accounting and finance professionals would be wise to ask themselves a few key questions:

What can I become quite good at thats really difficult for a computer to do one day soon? Seth Godin writes. How can I become so resilient, so human and such a linchpin that shifts in technology wont be able to catch up? It was always important, but now its urgent.

Put another way, to paraphrase Fast Company Editor Robert Safian, the most important skill going forward will be the ability to learn new skills.

The learning must begin now.

See the article here:

Why Lifelong Learning is Our Competitive Advantage in the Automation Age - Accountingweb.com

BENGALURU: Mid-tier IT firm Mindtree says that the company has taken a more humane approach in its roadmap for automation by upskilling and reskilling its workforce, but the larger concern will be to find skilled professionals to fill new jobs.

Say there are five jobs that are lost (due to automation), but there are 10 more roles that are created. Preparing our students for the new roles is the challenge, said KM Madhusudhan, CTO, Mindtree. The bigger concern to me is lesser job creation and not job loss, he said.

Indian IT is currently going through a whirlwind because of rapid technological change with the advent of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML). Insecurity due to job losses of experienced employees has plagued the market fuelling concerns over new age technologies siphoning off traditional jobs. According to some estimates, the top four Indian IT services companies may let go 12,000 -15,000 employees in the coming months. Nasscom president R Chandrashekhar has pointed out that in the outsourcing industry 50-60% requirement will be new-age skills.

Companies are in fact, witnessing the early stages of new roles being created. For instance, technologies like Augmented Reality (AR) and Virtual Reality (VR) are increasingly being adopted by many enterprises for multiple business processes.

We have been working on VR/AR solutions. Though the mainstream adoption of AR/VR might not happen in the next three years, there are new roles like avatar designer a skilled professional who can create new avatars in virtual reality being created, Madhusudhan said.

The Bengaluru-based IT company prides itself on being born digital with close to 40% of their revenues coming from new generation technologies like cloud, automation, etc. or in business speak SMAC (Social, Mobile, Analytics and Cloud).

To tackle the problem of old jobs turning obsolete, Mindtree has developed a curriculum to find adjacent skills to the jobs that are fast eroding. For every competency and job portfolio, we are identifying adjacent skills and are defining the entire upskilling and reskilling roadmap for every role, Madhusudhan said.

For example, the job of an infrastructure engineer who monitors servers and runs codes when the server goes down is now being automated. The next level of adjacent skills for that person is writing scripts. So, we teach him scripting skills since the person may not have an engineering background to know code.

The software company counts the likes of Microsoft and US-based American International Group (AIG) amongst its top clients and employs close to 16,623 employees with a net addition of 320 people in the quarter ended march 2017. In the last three months alone 4,774 have completed certified courses in Mindtrees reskilling platform Yorbit. The skilling platform introduced in July 2016 has trained 10,463 at a project ready level covering 481skills from basic vocational training to high-end skills like Hadoop, data Science, ML, AI etc.

Sometimes this reskilling happens just in time before starting a new project. Say we are starting a new project which we need 10 skills out of which we only have six, then we train employees on the four new skills and then deploy them on project, Madhusudhan said, adding they have partnered with Coursera, Udemy, Simplilearn amongst others to support the skilling programme. While the strides to reskill employees are happening on one side, the company has been focused on leveraging automation. Eight months ago, Mindtree developed its in-house automation platform CAPE which has gained a lot of traction.

See the original post:

Mindtree finds humane fix to automation - Economic Times