Daily Archives: June 7, 2017

A deadly substance called PCP (politically correct person) is spreading through American college campuses once again, but this time at even higher rate. This phenomenon hasnt been an issue since the 1960s where American socialists within their communist party line began to be egalitarian with their politics.

Pretty much that is when far left principles began the course for an equal society. Opening the doors for those who follow the phrase all men (and women) are created equal and interpreting it as a law.

The Declaration of Independence was written to separate from Great Britain; it is not a law. The law we do follow is the Bill of Rights, democracy, a republic for which we stand not for communism or for socialism.

All in all, the politically correct party would soon fully grasp America and find its way into the universities during the late 80s and follow through in the 90s.

Fast forward to 2017, ever not-funny comedian Stephen Colbert was trending on twitter for his hysterical rant towards President Donald Trump, leaving many on both sides of the political platform to yell out political correctness. However, most people arent familiar with the phrases history or the effect its had today.

Within America, the term PCP kept coming up, where it had turned radicals into socialist and communist groups. Debra Schultz, outspoken author of To Reclaim a Legacy of Diversity, said in her book, throughout the 1970s and 1980s, the New Left, feminists, and progressives used their term politically correct ironically, as a guard against their own orthodoxy in social change efforts.

The New Left in Schultz time was the result of some of the 1960 radical students that had become professors and brought new agenda in mind.

NY Times reporter Richard Bernstein gave spotlight to the term PCP that hit universities, and said, the P.C.Ps themselves, there is a large body of belief in academia and elsewhere that a cluster of opinions about race, ecology, feminism, culture and foreign policy defines a kind of correct attitude toward the problems of the world, a sort of unofficial ideology of the university.

Bernstein went on to describe how conservatives and classical liberals took the phrase as a satirical jab. They believed the PC agenda would only pressure those who wouldnt conform to the new curriculum and close debate at whatever cost, thus, hurt students along the process.

A thin line was made between being politically correct and being an extremist.

The University of Texas executed the politically correct process with a Writing on Difference program that would highlight real-life concerns about students. Unsurprisingly, UC Berkeley also followed suit, at the time, where they held a Political Correctness and Cultural Studies conference on changing up their scholarships for non-white students.

Changes that seemed as a great step towards creating bonds with all cultures were the gravestone of academic orthodoxy.

In a different case in Stanford University, a student named Amanda Kemp campaigned to eliminate a Western Civilization course. Kemp stated, We, the non-Western-Europeans, have no greatness, no culture, no explanations, no beauty, perhaps no humanity.

Triggered, Kemp believed the Western Civilization course was unfair to minorities, women, and the LGBTQ community.

One can argue, that at the time those three groups werent really represented and she was fighting for their voice; however, wanting to remove a course just because it seemed unfair was a ridiculous thing to campaign against.

In spite of the PC Culture appearing compelling to students, administrators, and faculty (many of whom were ex 1960s radicals), political correctness took a petrifying turn. In late December 1990 the Chicago Tribunereported, Groups of PCPs have disrupted classes, prevented speakers from being heard, burned controversial publications, bullied professors into changing course content.

Wow, what a coincidence. The report from that year reminds me of other college campuses shutting down events in this day and age.

Chicago Tribune reporter Joan Beck, was giving insight about President Bushs U.S. Secretary of Education Assistant, Michael Williams. Williams accused college scholarships of violating the 1964 Civil Rights Act towards minorities, in which PC student and faculty agreed with his outrageous claim.

On some campuses, charges of being politically incorrect can get a professor dismissed, endanger a college newspaper editor`s job, force a student out of university housing or sentence an offender to attend sensitivity training seminars suggestive of Red China, Beck said. Fears of such charges have made it virtually impossible to talk about some issues altogether.

The fear of backlash that Beck reported in the 90s still stands to this day.

A report in 1991 from NY Times writer Robert McFadden, stated, After a racial incident on campus two years ago, Stanford University adopted a code prohibiting racially offensive speech. Since then, 100 colleges and universities have passed similar codes

The article went on to explain that the debate over political correctness will grow because of advocates of change and advocates of tradition who have evenly risen. McFadden believed American education along with free speech and equal opportunity were at risk.

And so, isnt free speech and American education under attack now?

Furthermore, the Chicago Tribune in 1991 reported on another PC concern. Chairman of the National Endowment for the Humanities (at the time) Lynne Cheney was concerned with many professors using arts and humanities as political tools. A case she cited was of a professor in the University of Texas who abused their power by indoctrinating their freshman students with their feminist beliefs.

The course was supposed to be a required basic writing skills class for freshman.

Cheney stated, intolerance in the form of political correctness is most rampant on the campuses of major resource universities, which have become increasingly insulated against the rest of the society the best way to counter the problem is through increased media attention and public awareness of the debate over the issue.

Well, PCPs of the past, meet the PC Police of today.

In 2015 at the University of Missouri, protests broke out after alleged melodramatic hate crimes in campus. The result was ugly.

Heat Street and National Review reviewed 7, 400 emails that revealed an overwhelming loss of support from deep-rooted sports fans, donors, and alumni. The emails werent deleted nor were the computers sabotaged. However, most emails mentioned parents/family members of UM students wanted nothing to do with Mizzou, including talks of transferring them to other schools.

In other emails students felt they were left high and dry.

The protests led to the resignation of University of Missouri President Tim Wolfe, Chancellor Bowen Loftin stepped down from his position, in May of 2016 athletic donations fell 72 percent, and since the events of 2015 freshmen enrollment decreased 35 percent.

Other hyperbolic examples are:

Mayhem erupted as those groups violently attacked fans of Yiannopoulos and vandalized local shops. Some students claimed he was going to spew his hate speech towards Berkeley students.

They have kept protesting towards speakers of different opinions.

Yet, isnt sharing different ideas what the college experience is all about? Even veteran free speech advocate who was a legit free speech advocate of the 1960s, Lynne Hollander Savio, was saddened to see Berkeley affiliated with violence and denying free speech instead of promoting it.

Above all, political correctness doesnt correct anything. It has been an atrocious issue for the past 27 years. The PC culture has only harmed college campuses and society by dividing us. It has undone any progress of unity to get along with one another, despite their personal beliefs. From college campus to your close friends, to my beloved satirical comedy, being a preposterous censoring puerile doesnt create awareness or harmony.

Modern Educayshun is a vision of what hypersensitivity would look like in the near future, written and directed by Neel Kolhatkur.

Modern Educayshun or Education? You choose.

The rest is here:

Triggered: Political-correctness hurts free speech - PCC Courier

We keep arguing about a proposed travel ban, but in checking our own history, we knew how to manage immigration.

In the 1800s, we had massive immigration. We screened people on Ellis Island from health to their politics. Undesirables were sent back.

Our policy then was more common sense. In 1921, we put a moratorium on all immigration. We had to stem the tide of the flood of immigrants to allow the others to assimilate.

We had enclaves of various ethnicities like "Little Italy," but these people saw the opportunity America offered and they were eager to learn our language, culture, and way of life. People were ashamed to be on welfare, but now they come here and expect it. None of the immigrants coming here today cares to assimilate. Muslims have been at war with the United States since President Thomas Jefferson fought the pirates at Tripoli.

Political correctness is our downfall. Like Europe, we will commit national suicide just to prove we are not prejudiced. How dumb; how sad.

Dale Lauffer

Columbus

Continue reading here:

Letter: Political correctness is our downfall - The Columbus Dispatch

SIGN UP FOR OUR NEWSLETTER

I hope youre taking to heart, Raheem, Mayor Siddiq Khans admonition not to be alarmed by what youre seeing, Gaffney sarcastically told SiriusXM host Raheem Kassam.

This is, unfortunately, a situation in which youre right to be alarmed, he said in a more serious tone. I think most Brits have the good sense to know that what theyre doing what their government is doing, what their law enforcement agencies have been doing, and frankly what the British public itself has been doing mostly has been contributing to the danger that theyre now confronting.

Gaffney warned against the danger of pretending that what he prefers to call sharia supremacism the aggressive desire to impose Islamic law on Western nations is not a problem, or is at worst a manageable challenge.

What I really believe has happened now, and what I think this most recent attack bears out and more to the point, the information that has come out subsequent to it is that there are something on the order of 23,000 jihadists that are now being monitored in some form or fashion by Her Majestys government, he said.

This is not a terrorism problem. These certainly arent incidents involving lone wolves, as theyre called. This is an insurgency, Gaffney declared. I think the British people need to be alive to that danger and alarmed by it.

Kassam praised British intelligence and law enforcement for their work but said it was disturbing that some very obvious signs of trouble such as a fitness center used by one of the London Bridge attackers that is actually named after the ummah, or global community of Islam seem to be overlooked in the name of political correctness.

The problem on both sides of the pond, Im sorry to say, is that our governments have for most of the years since 9/11, especially been in engaged in a practice that Andy McCarthy has called willful blindness, Gaffney said, referring to the former prosecutor who worked on the first World Trade Center bombing, and now writes for National Review. Its actually gotten to the point hes upped it to compulsory blindness.

I think thats a very apt term because if you are obliged by government policy to look the other way at red flags and the Ummah gym might be one of them, but certainly mosques that are incubating jihadism every day, that are associated with the Muslim Brotherhood, that are funded by the Saudis and the Qataris, that are known patrons of this sharia supremacist phenomenon if youre not allowed to understand those, let alone contend with them effectively in what a counterinsurgency strategy requires, which is action at the local level, well, guess what: this is going to continue to metastasize, he warned.

When our enemies and Im talking here most especially about enemies within perceive us behaving this way, they dont think of it as, Oh, there they go being politically correct! or diversity sensitive or multiculturally minded. They see it as submission. And what submission induces them to do, doctrinally under sharia, is to become more aggressive to make us feel subdued, as the Koran says, which means much more violence, and Im afraid more insurgency of the worst kind, said Gaffney.

When our enemies witness us submitting, they know it is Gods will being realized, which means they must engage in more jihad, he said.

Breitbart News Daily airs on SiriusXM Patriot 125 weekdays from 6:00 a.m.to 9:00 a.m.Eastern.

Continue reading here:

Frank Gaffney: Islamist Enemy Sees Political Correctness as 'Submission' - Breitbart News