Monthly Archives: February 2017

Harry Hamlin Just Gave a TED Talk (Yes, *That* Harry Hamlin) – Bravo (blog)

Posted: February 7, 2017 at 9:45 pm

Harry Hamlin is an Emmy-nominated actor, loving husband and father, and as we just learned on The Real Housewives of Beverly Hills,he's a master in the kitchen, cooking up some mean meat and taking on Cindy Crawford in a pie-making competition. So Erika Girardi was correct to ponder if there's anything that Harry can't do.

And now we have undeniable proof that Harry can, in fact, do everything. The RHOBH husband spoke at TEDx LA in December. The talk wasn't about acting, his meat, or about how amazing his wife is, all of which he is an expert in, but about how anyone can be a futurist, even PEOPLE's Sexiest Man Alive.

During the talk, Harry spoke about how he came to actively think about the future, especially when it came to finding sources of renewable energy. He shared how, though he is not a rocket scientist (but his father, Chauncey Jerome Hamlin Jr., actually was), being in the right place at the right time, keeping an open mind, and remaining curious led to him eventually co-founding the private fusion company Tri Alpha Energy in 1998. "I think most important is to listen, to pay attention to the sites and sounds in the present moment because they always give us the clue to the story of our future," Harry said during the talk. "Obviously, you don't have to be a rocket scientist to be a futurist. If I can do it, anybody can."

Harry's TED Talk is also filled with kracken jokes as a nod to his iconic role in Clash of the Titans. So yeah, it's pretty amazing.

Of course, Harry's wife, Lisa Rinna, gave Harry's TED Talk some major love on Twitter, echoing the sentiment that no, there really isn't much that he can't do.

Get even more Harry, below.

Go here to read the rest:
Harry Hamlin Just Gave a TED Talk (Yes, *That* Harry Hamlin) - Bravo (blog)

Posted in Futurist | Comments Off on Harry Hamlin Just Gave a TED Talk (Yes, *That* Harry Hamlin) – Bravo (blog)

Germ warfare: the battle for the key to modern vaccines – The Guardian

Posted: at 8:51 am

On 9 October 1964, a baby girl was born at Philadelphia general hospital. She arrived early, when her mother was about 32 weeks pregnant. The baby weighed 3.2lb and was noted to be blue, floppy and not breathing. The only sign of life was her slow heartbeat. Nonetheless, she clung on, and her 17-year-old mother named her.

One month later, the baby was still in the hospital, and a doctor listening with a stethoscope heard a harsh heart murmur. A chest X-ray showed that she had a massively enlarged heart because a hole in the organ was preventing it from pumping blood efficiently. It also emerged that the baby had cataracts blinding both eyes. Later, other signs indicated that she was profoundly deaf.

The baby also suffered from recurring respiratory infections and had trouble gaining weight. A psychologist who assessed her in July 1965 judged the nine-month-old to be the size of a two- or three-month-old infant and at about that stage of development, too. She needed heart surgery if she was going to survive. Just before her first birthday, surgeons made an incision in her chest wall and repaired her heart. After the operation, she remained in hospital. The chronic respiratory infections continued. The baby was 16 months old and weighed just 11lb when she died of pneumonia on 18 February 1966.

The young mother had told the doctors that when she was one month pregnant, she had contracted German measles, also known as rubella.

The early 1960s marked a coming of age for the study of viruses such as the one that causes rubella tiny infectious agents that invade cells and hijack their machinery in order to reproduce themselves. Biologists, with new tools in hand, were racing to capture viruses in throat swabs or urine or even snippets of organs from infected people and to grow them in lab dishes. Isolating a virus in the lab made it possible to make a vaccine against it. And making antiviral vaccines promised huge inroads against common childhood diseases such as measles, mumps and rubella, along with less common killers including hepatitis. The principle of vaccination is simple: if a person is injected with, or swallows, a tiny amount of a virus either a killed virus or a weakened live virus that person will develop antibodies against the virus. Then, if he or she is exposed in the future to the naturally occurring, disease-causing form of the virus, those antibodies will attack the invader and prevent it from causing disease.

But if the concept is simple, making effective vaccines is anything but. In the early 1960s, that reality was all too evident. In 1942, as many as 330,000 US servicemen were exposed to the hepatitis B virus in a yellow fever vaccine that was contaminated with blood plasma from infected donors (the plasma was used to stabilise the vaccine). Around 50,000 of the vaccinated servicemen contracted the liver disease and up to 150 died.

In 1955, a California-based company named Cutter Laboratories made a polio vaccine with the live, disease-causing virus in it. As a result, 192 people were paralysed many of them children and 10 died. Every senior US government employee involved in the Cutter incident lost his or her job, right up to the director of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the secretary for health, education and welfare.

Then, in the summer of 1961, Americans learned that cells used to manufacture the widely used Salk polio vaccine, harvested from monkey kidneys, harboured a virus named SV40. Tens of millions of American children had already received contaminated injections, and while the jury was still out on the tainted vaccines long-term health consequences, the risks were of great concern to regulators in the US and further afield.

It was against this backdrop that, on a drizzly June morning in 1962, a 34-year-old scientist named Leonard Hayflick went to work in his lab at the Wistar Institute of Anatomy and Biology an elegant 1890s brownstone tucked in the heart of the University of Pennsylvanias campus.

A serious, slight man with close-cropped dark hair, Hayflick was a product of working-class Philadelphia and hungry to make his name. He was in love with biology and had come to believe that he was extremely smart a fact that was far from appreciated. Hayflicks boss, the polio-vaccine pioneer Hilary Koprowski, saw him as a mere technician, hired to serve up bottles of lab-grown cells to the institutes scientists.

The ambitious Hayflick was undeterred. That day, he planned to launch a group of human cells that would revolutionise vaccine-making. He was convinced that, compared with monkey cells, which were often laden with viruses, human cells would serve as cleaner, safer vehicles for producing antiviral vaccines.

Several days earlier, a woman living near Stockholm had had an abortion. The eight-inch-long female foetus was wrapped in a sterile green cloth and delivered to a yellow brick outbuilding on the grounds of the National Biological Laboratory in north-west Stockholm. The lungs were removed, packed in ice and flown to the Wistar Institute.

Hayflick had been waiting months for this opportunity. These lungs would be the source of the new cells he needed to make antiviral vaccines. Viruses cant multiply outside living cells, and huge quantities of virus were needed to produce vaccines.

Now, at last, the lungs were here in his bustling second-floor lab, two purplish things floating in clear pink fluid in a glass bottle. They had been sent to Hayflick by a top virologist at the prestigious Karolinska Institute in Stockholm.

Hayflick knew that he was uniquely positioned to produce a long-lasting supply of these cells. He had spent the previous three years perfecting the procedure that would do it.

Hayflick took the lungs into a tiny room just off his lab what passed for a sterile area in 1962. He picked up a pair of tweezers, dipped them in alcohol and passed them through the flame of a Bunsen burner. He waited for them to cool and then, gently, one at a time, lifted the organs and placed them on a petri dish. Each was no larger than his thumb above the knuckle. He began carefully slicing them into innumerable pieces, each smaller than a pinhead.

Hayflick nudged the minute pieces of tissue into a wide-mouthed glass flask. The translucent pink fluid was full of digestive enzymes from slaughtered pigs. These biological jackhammers broke up the mortar between the lung cells, separating millions upon millions of them. Later, he transferred those cells into several flat-sided glass bottles and poured a nutritious solution over them. Hayflick then loaded the bottles on to a tray, and carried them into an incubation room where the temperature was a cosy 36C. He laid the bottles on their sides on a wooden shelf and closed the door carefully behind him. There the cells began to divide. He already had a name for them: WI-38.

The WI-38 cells that Hayflick launched that day were used to make vaccines that have been given to more than 300 million people half of them preschool children in the US. A copycat group of cells, developed using the method that Hayflick pioneered, has been used to make an additional 6bn doses of various vaccines.

Together these vaccines have protected people the world over from the gamut of viral illnesses: rubella, rabies, chickenpox, measles, polio, hepatitis A, shingles and adenovirus a respiratory infection that flourishes in situations where people live in close quarters. (Every US military recruit more than nine million of them since 1971 is given an adenovirus vaccine made using WI-38 cells.) In the US, a vaccine made in WI-38 cells that is still given to young children has wiped out homegrown rubella. It was developed at the Wistar Institute by Hayflicks colleague Stanley Plotkin, during a rubella epidemic that swept the country in 1964 and 1965.

The WI-38 cells Hayflick launched that day made vaccines that have been given to more than 300 million people

The WI-38 cells are still in use today partly because Hayflick made such a large initial stock of them: some 800 tiny, wine-bottleshaped ampoules were frozen in the summer of 1962. When frozen, cells stop dividing, but then gamely begin replicating when they are thawed. Each glass vial that Hayflick froze contained between 1.5m and 2m cells. The cells in those vials had, on average, the capacity to divide about 40 more times. Early on, Hayflick determined that the newly derived cells in just one of his small glass lab bottles, if allowed to replicate until they died, would produce 20m tonnes of cells. In those 800 vials, he had created a supply of cells that for practical purposes was almost infinite.

In addition to their use in vaccine making, the WI-38 cells became the first normal cells available in virtually unlimited quantities to scientists probing the mysteries of cell biology. Because they were easily infected with human viruses, they became important to disease detectives tracking viruses in the 1960s, before more sophisticated technology came along. Biologists still reach for WI-38 cells when they need a normal cell to compare against a cancerous one, or to test the toxicity of new drugs. They are a workhorse of research into ageing, because they so reliably age and die in laboratory conditions. Original ampoules of WI-38 cells, and of polio vaccine made using them, are now part of the collection of the National Museum of American History.

But in the 1960s and 70s, a bitter feud broke out between Hayflick and the US government over who owned the cells.

As the importance of the WI-38 cells grew, Hayflick was only too happy to promote them. Human Cells Given Role in Vaccines, the New York Times proclaimed after the scientist spoke at a vaccine conference in 1966. The article quoted Hayflick explaining that his cells were cheaper, cleaner and safer than the animal cells then used in vaccine manufacture.

As his profile rose, Hayflick ran out of patience with Koprowski. The disconnect between his contributions and his treatment by the Wistar Institutes director had become too much to bear. Nine years after Koprowski hired him, Hayflick remained stuck as an associate member of the institute, in sharp contrast to many colleagues who had been made full members despite, to his mind, making contributions no greater than his own.

Hayflick began looking around. He applied for a position as a full professor of medical microbiology at Stanford University in Palo Alto, California. His application for the job was backed by a recommendation from a senior virologist who regarded his work as reliable, trustworthy and original. He was offered the post.

As Hayflicks departure approached, there was probably only one thing that concerned Koprowski: the fate of the hundreds of ampoules of WI-38 cells that were still stored in liquid nitrogen in the Wistar Institutes basement, under Hayflicks watchful eye. Hayflicks proprietary feelings about the cells were well known he once described them as like my children.

Koprowski had designs on the cells from the beginning. Nancy Pleibel, a lab technician who worked for Hayflick, recalls that more than once Koprowski had turned up in the lab within a day or two of Hayflick leaving on a trip, smiling and asking her for an ampoule of WI-38 cells. Politely but firmly, she refused his requests, explaining that only her boss could hand out WI-38 ampoules. After a while, Koprowski stopped asking.

Minutes from meetings of the Wistar Institutes board of managers in the early and mid-60s make clear that Koprowski tried repeatedly to cash in on Hayflicks human diploid cells (defined as cells that carry the normal complement of 46 chromosomes). The institute sought payment not only from Norden, a Missouri company that was interested in using WI-38 to develop a rabies vaccine, but also from Pfizer for the use of Hayflicks cells to make a measles vaccine, and from Wyeth, another Philadelphia-based drug manufacturer that by 1965 had used the WI-38 cells to make an adenovirus vaccine to protect US army recruits during basic training.

Koprowskis attempts to turn a profit with the WI-38 cells were far from successful. By 1965, the board of managers had appointed a special committee of lawyers and scientists to deal with problems in selling the Hayflick cells to industry. The only backing that the institute landed, according to budget documents from 1965 to 1967, was $5,000 in each of those years from Norden.

Today it seems incredible that an institution like the Wistar, full of eminent scientists, was so at sea when it came to profiting from unique and desirable cells produced under its roof. But in that era living things, such as the WI-38 cells, could not be patented. It would take a landmark supreme court decision in 1980 to change that.

However, what could be patented was a method of using the cells to produce a novel vaccine. Koprowski had already applied, back in 1964, for such a patent for another, improved rabies vaccine that he was developing using the WI-38 cells. Soon the Wistar Institute would apply for a patent on a method of making a rubella vaccine with the WI-38s, devised by another of its scientists, Stanley Plotkin.

If and when the rabies and rubella vaccine patents were granted, Koprowski would need access to at least some of the original ampoules of WI-38 frozen in the Wistar Institute basement. Vaccine companies would want original ampoules full of the youngest cells, which could be expanded into a nearly endless supply.

By the autumn of 1967, Hayflick vaguely suspected that Koprowski intended the WI-38 cells to serve something more than the good of mankind. Hayflick believed that his boss hoped to turn any vaccines made with the cells into sources of cash, boosting the Wistar Institutes income and freeing him from fundraising duties that he detested and considered beneath him.

Hayflicks instincts were right. As 1967 drew to a close, a financial vice was tightening on Koprowski. While the Wistar Institute had remained solvent, it had never been flush with funds, especially after Koprowski blew through $271,506 to fund major renovations that were completed in 1959. By the mid-60s, his struggle to find cash not tied to specific grants was becoming desperate. Badly needed repairs to the roof and the air conditioning system were deferred.

In the autumn of 1967, when officials at the NIHs National Cancer Institute (NCI) learned that Hayflick would be moving to Stanford, they decided to take the production, storage, study and distribution to researchers of human diploid cells out of his hands. The NCI had been paying the Wistar Institute hundreds of thousands of dollars for Hayflick to produce and distribute the cells since 1962, shortly after his paper announcing his human diploid cell strains to the world had sent demand soaring. The agencys contract with the Wistar Institute had specified that the government would take ownership of the cells when the contract was terminated. Now, NIH officials set 1 January 1968 as the end date. The timing seemed right, and not only because of Hayflicks impending move. The sense at the NCI was that the demand for the WI-38 cells had been sated. Those scientists who wanted them, it seemed, had them by now, more than five years after Hayflick had first produced them. They were being used widely and had already been cited in scores of papers.

On 18 January 1968, several men travelled to the Wistar Institute to sort out the physical disposition of the WI-38 cells now that the contract had ended. Koprowski summoned Hayflick to meet with them. Also present were senior scientists from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC). This independent, nonprofit organisation was the countrys highest-profile cell bank, and was often where biologists turned when they needed a particular type of cell for an experiment. According to records, the assembled men agreed that all but 20 of the roughly 375 remaining original ampoules of WI-38 cells would be transferred to the ATCC, which would maintain them, deeply frozen, on behalf of the NIH. Hayflick would be permitted to take 10 ampoules with him to Stanford, and the Wistar Institute would also be allowed to keep 10.

The group also decided that any use of the 355 original ampoules being transferred to the ATCC they were precious because the WI-38 cell populations in them had divided only eight times, and so could be expanded into untold billions of cells for vaccine making should be totally arrested. By this, they meant that there was to be no more thawing of the ampoules, no more planting of these young cells into lab bottles, and no more splitting of those bottles over and over to generate multitudes of cells at higher doubling levels for scientists to use. Scientists could use the older cells that were already in circulation. The remaining 355 original ampoules needed to be kept safely frozen at the ATCC until such time as companies began winning US licences to make WI-38based vaccines.

Some time during his last months at the Wistar Institute, Hayflick was working in one of the tiny sterile rooms that adjoined his lab. Plotkin squeezed through the door and pulled up the only chair. The two chatted for a while, then Plotkin showed Hayflick a document. It was a letter, on Wistar-headed paper, from Koprowski, written to a senior official at Burroughs Wellcome, the British pharmaceutical company. Koprowski was offering to provide to the company ample supplies of WI-38 cells, along with the recipe for making a vaccine with the cells and the virus itself, all in exchange for royalties.

'To have the vultures descend on whatIhad struggled to give value to most people would understand why I was upset'

Hayflicks suspicions had been confirmed. He was profoundly upset. He had spent the previous decade deriving the cells and opened up a new, important field in the study of cellular ageing. He had derived enough WI-38 cells to serve vaccine makers into the distant future and worked as hard as was humanly possible to win acceptance of the cells for vaccine making. In the process of all of this, he had been ridiculed and been forced to struggle for respect and validation.

This letter signalled that not only was he not valued but that he was also being sidelined in major decision-making and likely profit-making connected to the WI-38 cells. As Hayflick said, to have the vultures descend on what I had struggled so hard to give value to and [for them to] try to take it for their benefit I think that an average person would understand why I was, to put it mildly, concerned.

On or around 1 March when, under the January agreement, the ampoules were to have been moved from the Wistar Institute to the ATCC a specially outfitted station wagon arrived from Maryland, carrying the NIH project officer, Charles Boone, and John Shannon, the ATCCs curator of cell lines. Hayflick turned them away, saying he wasnt ready to hand over the cells because he had not prepared an inventory of them.

Not long after this, Hayflick, unobserved, visited the Wistar Institutes basement. There he packed every single one of the remaining original WI-38 ampoules 375 frozen vials: the largest stock of young WI-38 cells on earth into one or more portable liquid-nitrogen refrigerators and departed the premises. He left nothing behind not even the 10 ampoules that Koprowskis institute had been promised in the January agreement.

Hayflick stored the frozen cells temporarily with a friend, a vaccinologist at the nearby Wyeth Laboratories who, from time to time, topped up the liquid nitrogen that kept the cells frozen. Hayflick says that he took the ampoules with the intention of keeping them only until the ownership of the cells could be properly sorted out. He believed that there were several potential stakeholders who might reasonably claim ownership: himself and his early collaborator at the Wistar Institute, the chromosome expert Paul Moorhead; the estate of the WI-38 foetus, by which he meant the WI-38 foetuss parents; the Wistar Institute; and, just possibly, the NIH. But he was not going to be so naive as to leave the cells in the NIHs possession while these matters were decided. If he did that, he was sure that he would never see them again.

In mid-1968, Hayflick left for his new job in California. Moving a family of seven 2,900 miles was no small undertaking. The Hayflicks split the travel. Ruth flew out to the San Francisco Bay Area with their two youngest daughters. Hayflick drove the three older children cross-country in their dark green Buick sedan. They drove west through Pittsburgh, stopped to see drag races in Joplin, Missouri, and then headed on to Arizona, where they gazed at the worlds best-preserved meteor crater and marvelled at the Grand Canyon. All along the way, some extra cargo travelled with them. Carefully strapped on the backseat beside his children was a liquid-nitrogen refrigerator stuffed with ampoules of WI-38.

Hayflicks flight with the cells would make him the target of a career-derailing investigation by the National Institutes of Health. Hayflick counter-sued eventually, in 1981, settling with the government. He was allowed to keep six original ampoules of the cells, along with $90,000 that he had earned by charging researchers and companies for them after he left the Wistar Institute. A letter from supporters published in the journal Science, described the happy outcome of Dr Hayflicks courageous, sometimes lonely, emotionally damaging and professionally destructive ordeal.

But just as the tug-of-war over ownership of the WI-38 cells peaked, profound changes occurred in attitudes and laws governing who could make money from biological inventions. In the space of a few years, biologists went from being expected to work only for their salaries and the greater good to being encouraged by universities and the government to commercialise their innovations for the benefit of the institutions, the US economy and themselves.

Although the WI-38 cells were launched long before these changes took place and 18 years before the supreme court decreed that a living entity, such as a WI-38 cell, could be patented a lot of money has been made from them. The drug company Merck, in particular, has made billions of dollars by using the WI-38 cells to make the rubella vaccine given to more than seven million American children each year. The Wistar Institute too enjoyed a handsome royalty stream from vaccines made by its scientists using the cells including a much-improved rabies vaccine that replaced sometimes dangerous injections. Cell banks today charge several hundred dollars for a tiny vial of the cells.

During the long battle for ownership of the WI-38 cells, Koprowski sent a Wistar scientist across the country to collect them from Hayflicks Stanford lab. But Hayflick refused to part with them. A second emissary was more successful, returning with the 10 ampoules originally allocated to the institute. But later, while the NIH was still asserting its title to WI-38, Koprowski seems to have given up. Perhaps this was because Hayflick was now so far away. Maybe it was because, despite his propensity for it, Koprowski actually disliked direct conflict. Possibly, it was because several companies already appeared to have adequate supplies of the youngest WI-38 ampoules. On the other hand, though, it might have been because Koprowski had finally realised just how persistent, obdurate and dedicated Hayflick could be.

This is an adapted extract from The Vaccine Race by Meredith Wadman, published by Doubleday on 9 February in the UK and in the US by Viking.

Follow the Long Read on Twitter at @gdnlongread, or sign up to the long read weekly email

Go here to see the original:

Germ warfare: the battle for the key to modern vaccines - The Guardian

Posted in Germ Warfare | Comments Off on Germ warfare: the battle for the key to modern vaccines – The Guardian

Centrelink bogus debts: How far can the vulnerable be pushed before they break? – Independent Australia

Posted: at 8:51 am

The Centrelink #notmydebt fiasco is simply ongoing government oppression of society's most vulnerable, writes Jade Manson.

I AM ONE of the lucky people who have received a false debt notice from Centrelink.

The letter states:

We have completed our review of your employment income details and made a decision to change the amount you were entitled to receive.

You might notice it does not say I received more than I was entitled to. Rather, the Government has changed their mind about how much to pay me after the fact.

The debt notices scandal, or should I say scam, has been blamed on faulty government technology. When I received the notice, I was not surprised. It just seems typical of the Government, with its expertise in combining bullying and incompetence. The notice refers to a period over five years ago, when I was working casually as a checkout operator at Coles and I diligently reported my income at the time on a fortnightly basis.

Over the past six months, almost 200,000 debt notices have been delivered. They continue to be sent out at up to 20,000 per week, which is approximately the same amount that were sent for the whole of 2015. Meanwhile, Centrelink seems to be in no hurry to rectify the problem. There are plans to send out 1.7 million debt notices, in order to grab back $4 billion from welfare recipients. Pressure on the Government to do something about it is high, however. A national day of action, which I attended, was held against the false debt notices on the 31January.

These notices could be sent to anyone who has been on welfare sometime in the past sevenyears. The stress caused to thousands of Australians constitutes serious harassment by the Government. It is extremely concerning that vulnerable people, such as those suffering from mental illnesses or disabilities, are being targetedand could be driven to suicide. An estimated 20 per centof people on Newstart have a recorded illness or a disability with a partial capacity to work.

One financially struggling student who has anxiety and depression said about their $1,400 debt notice:

Christmas time is already very hard for me and before I saw that it was a widespread issue I felt so alone I was contemplating suicide my mental health has spiraled since and I feel like this is hanging over me like a cloud.

It is a likely outcome that people in receipt of the notices will be unmotivated to fix the problem, due to a reduced capacity for work and dealing with stressful bureaucratic systems. Instead, many people are likely to pay this falsely incurred debt.

Perhaps this was the Governments plan all along. It seems like an experiment in how far the government can push people before there is public outcry. The fact that the number of debt notices sent seems to have slowly increased since 2016 is an indication of this. It is further supported by the fact that after people began to speak out, they have reduced the rate of debt notices being sent out but not cancelled the automated system entirely. If the people behind this system are not fired, then it is further indication that the false debt notices were sent out intentionally in order to raise revenue.

These debt notices amount to the government stealing money from Australian citizens. Not only that but this situation further oppresses people on welfare and contributes to the public stigma toward us. An anonymous Centrelink whistleblower has reported that workers have been ordered not to correct the debt notices, or look into debts unless the client submits a formal request for review, while Alan Tudge insists that "the system is working". The whistleblower also reported that only 20 out of hundreds of reviewed cases turned out to be legitimate debts.

The debts come with an attached ten per cent recovery feeand the government plans to charge interest on debtsand remove the six year limit for debt repayments. As well as this, they are threatening gaol for those who do not pay their debts.

The flawed debt recovery system uses Australian Tax Office data, which averages out earnings over a year. Then if there is a discrepancy between the payment based on average earnings and the total payments for the year, a debt will be incurred. Over 1 million people have been reported to have a "discrepancy" in their payments. If someone works casually or takes leave, they are more likely to receive a debt notice.

This is blatantly wrong, as any person who works casually may be paid more one fortnight and less the next, resulting in their needing to rely on welfare for the fortnight they are not paid enough to live on. This is why the current welfare system is set up to pay people based on their fortnightly income.

The mistakes in the debt system could have been avoided with a basic knowledge of math and begs the question of whether the government is employing the right people to set up these systems. It follows a similar failure with the 2016 Census, when the system crashed, as it did not have the capacity for everyone in Australia to log in to fill out the online form on the same day. This resulted in at least $30 million in unexpected costs and an incomplete census.

Online tools such Centrelink Online Accounts and the NDIS Participant Portal have been subject to frequent crashes and "technical difficulties". The NDIS portal crashed for over a month last year, leaving people with disabilities unable to claim the payments to which they were entitled.

Online tools can increase efficiency when they function correctly but wreak havoc when they dont. It seems that there is a lack of funding and effort put into government online systems. Additionally, they dont take into account people who struggle with technology, who need to be able to submit claims and personal information with paper forms, such as the elderly or the intellectually disabled. This makes obvious sense if what you are interested in is consumer satisfaction. If a supermarket entirely got rid of people who work on checkouts, there would be outragebut the government creates havoc and people remain silent.

Department of Human Services clients have many complex circumstancesand need someone with empathy to understand their situation, which a machine is incapable of doing. Technology has not yet progressed to a stage where the algorithms used can take into account the complexity of personal circumstances. Even if it had, I dont believe we can trust the people currently in power to create these systems to judge how much people get paid. This latest incident proves that the current Coalition Government is incapable of creating a fair and just society and, instead, they would like to further punish vulnerable people.

The Government needs to understand that the poverty cycle leads to deteriorating health and mental health, which leads to a reduced capacity to work and reduced income. It means people cannot afford things which help in finding work such as a car, or even stable accommodation. The demeaning treatment by job agencies and the Coalition Government, the public stigma, along with the isolation of poverty, leads to reduced self-esteem and mental health. Perhaps if people didnt have to spend as long dealing with Centrelink, they would have more time and energy to look for work. Bullying by the Government only further drains their time and energy, leading to a reduced capacity to find and hold employment.

Unfortunately, it seems that the Turnbull Governments priority is not to provide services to the public, particularly when it comes to people on welfare. Instead, its policy appears to be to frustrate people into submission. From the faulty online portals, to the much complained about telephone on-hold music, the long wait times and poor customer service, it seems obvious their aim is to make the lives of welfare recipients as difficult as possible.

Meanwhile, they intend to make life as easy as possible for large corporationsby refusing to crack down on tax-dodging, which could bring in over $50 billion per year. This would well and truly cancel out our already relatively small budget deficit and remove the need for the government to hassle people in the poorest sections of society for extra money although I suspect they would do this anyway.

For anyone in a similar situation, even if you dont think its worth your time to fight the debt notice, do it for everyone else who the Government oppresses. Show them they cant get away with money grabbing and service slashing. As well as fighting these debt notices individually, I think there needs to be a class action lawsuit, to have the system that is sending out these debt notices cancelled as soon as possible, before irreversible harm is done to those in the poorest sections of society.

If you would like information on how to fight your debt notice, go to GetUp!s FraudStop website. To read more peoples stories about wrongly issued debts, visit the #NotMyDebt website.

You can follow Jade on Twitter @JadeAlanaM.

Centrelink Bogus Debts Clawback Fiasco (image via@VCOSS).

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Australia License

Get the facts.Subscribe to IA for just $5.

Originally posted here:

Centrelink bogus debts: How far can the vulnerable be pushed before they break? - Independent Australia

Posted in Government Oppression | Comments Off on Centrelink bogus debts: How far can the vulnerable be pushed before they break? – Independent Australia

Congressmen: Let’s take a new look at the war on drugs – AZCentral.com

Posted: at 8:50 am

Eliot L. Engel and Matt Salmon, AZ We See It 5:32 p.m. MT Feb. 6, 2017

A narcotics-detection canine led border patrol agents to discover heroin, cocaine and methamphetamine in a front wheel well.(Photo: U.S. Customs and Border Protection)

In 2015, opioid deaths in the United States exceeded 30,000 for the first time in recent history. As both parents and members of Congress, we find this unacceptable.

Our first duty as lawmakers confronting this epidemic is to ensure that Americans have access to the drug treatment services that they need. At the same time, we have a responsibility to take a fresh look at our international efforts to fight the drug trade in Latin America and the Caribbean.

AZCENTRAL

It'll take some pain to solve America's opiate epidemic

By doing so, we can ensure that we have the best strategy moving forward. That is why we authored the Western Hemisphere Drug Policy Commission Act, which passed the House and Senate last month.

As former chairmen of the House Western Hemisphere Subcommittee from opposite ends of the political spectrum, we have supported U.S. efforts over the years to enhance citizen security and fight drug trafficking in Latin America and the Caribbean. Billions of dollars later, some of those efforts have been successful while others have not brought about the results we hoped.

As American lives continue to be lost to the scourge of drug abuse, it is only fair to make an honest assessment of how we spend our counter-narcotics dollars abroad. Our families deserve no less.

The Western Hemisphere Drug Policy Commission will be an independent U.S. government commission that will evaluate our drug policies in Latin America and the Caribbean and make recommendations to the president and Congress on which of our policies need to be scaled up and which need to be scaled back.

So why focus on the Western Hemisphere? Nearly all cocaine consumed in our country originates in South America, while most heroin consumed here is from Colombia and Mexico. And Central America and the Caribbean are key transit regions for drugs entering the United States.

As just one example, poppy cultivation in Mexico is on the rise. Poppiesarebeing used to produce the heroin that is flooding our streets.

AZCENTRAL

Data: Arizona heroin, prescription drug overdoses escalate

AZCENTRAL

Police: Heroin use among youth on the rise in Gilbert

As we look to support our friends in Mexico in moving away from poppy production and into more viable economic sectors, it would serve the United States well to learn from our multi-year investment in Colombia. Specifically, we must ask what worked and what did not work when it came to coca eradication and alternative development programs over the past 20 years.

Drug consumption in the United States has wreaked havoc on our communities and impacted countless lives. Butit has also fueled violence throughout Latin America and the Caribbean.

We can and must do better, and the Western Hemisphere Drug Policy Commission will help us to take the next steps towards a better future for all of us in the Americas.

Rep. Eliot Engel (D-NY) is theranking member onthe House Committee on Foreign Affairs. Former Rep. Matt Salmon (R-AZ) was the chairman of the House Subcommittee on Asia and the Pacific. Bothpreviously served as chairmen of the House Subcommittee on the Western Hemisphere. Follow them on Twitter,@repeliotengeland@repmattsalmon.

Read or Share this story: http://azc.cc/2kGFOWg

Original post:

Congressmen: Let's take a new look at the war on drugs - AZCentral.com

Posted in War On Drugs | Comments Off on Congressmen: Let’s take a new look at the war on drugs – AZCentral.com

Tanzania: Magufuli Adds Weight to War On Drugs – AllAfrica.com

Posted: at 8:50 am

By Alvar Mwakyusa

President John Magufuli yesterday added weight on the crackdown on narcotics, directing the national security and defence forces to apprehend all suspects irrespective of their status.

"Nobody should be spared in this war against illicit drugs; no matter how famous or what status that person has in the society," Dr Magufuli ordered. He stressed further, "Be it a politician, minister, a police officer, a son or daughter of a big wig, the law should follow its course.

Even if it is my wife dealing in drugs she should face the music." The Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces commended Inspector General of Police (IGP) Ernest Mangu for his bold move to suspend police officers who were recently accused by Dar es Salaam Regional Commissioner (RC) Paul Makonda of cooperating with drugs dealers.

"I know there was a lot of pressure on you from some people who made phone calls but you stood firm, otherwise you wouldn't be here today as the IGP. The drugs have effects on the young workforce but are still being sold like groundnuts.

"I usually get very upset when law enforcement agencies are accused for wrongdoing but I am happy that you took actions. The war on drugs is tough but we must fight it," Dr Magufuli told the IGP. He directed security and defence forces to act tough on the whole chain involved in the illicit drugs, starting with the 'underdogs' and eventually drug barons.

"Those using and peddling the narcotics will have to mention the whole supply chain," he stated. Dr Magufuli also tasked the Acting Chief Justice, Prof Ibrahim Juma, to expedite the trials of drug-related cases currently pending at courts.

"There is a suspected drug kingpin currently being detained in Lindi but I wonder why he is not produced in courts for prosecution," wondered the president. Although Dr Magufuli did not mention the suspect he was apparently referring to Ali Khatib Haji, alias Shkuba, (46), a suspected drug baron who was arrested in 2014 and is currently remanded in the Lindi prison.

President Magufuli disclosed as well that he had agreed to hand over the MV Dar es Salaam ship, initially meant to carry passengers between Dar es Salaam and Bagamoyo, to the TPDF to enable the army to intercept drugs and smuggled goods in the Indian Ocean.

"As per request by the former Chief of Defence Force General Davis Mwamunyange, I decided to hand over the ship to the army to intensify patrols against drug traffickers and smugglers in the Indian Ocean," President Magufuli noted.

The President was speaking at the swearing-in of the newly appointed Chief of Defence Forces (CDF) General Venance Mabeyo and Chief of Staff Lieutenant General James Mwakibolwa at State House in Dar es Salaam.

Dr Magufuli also swore in the Commissioner General of the Prisons Department, Dr Ally Malewa, Secretary of the Public Service Commission, Mr Nyakimura Muhoji and two ambassadors, Paul Mella and Samuel Shelukindo.

Last Friday, IGP Mangu suspended 12 police officers, pending investigations, over their alleged links to drugs dealers in Dar es Salaam. The suspension came only few days after the Dar es Salaam RC had issued a list of suspects of drug dealers and facilitators, including the law enforcers and local celebrities in the music and movie industries.

The officers who were suspended are former Kinondoni Regional Police Commander (RPC) Christopher Fuime; Inspector Jackob Swai; D 3499 D/SGT Steven Ndasha; E8431 D/SGT Mohamed Haima and E5204 D/SGT Steven Shanga.

Others are E5860 D/ CPL Dotto Mwandambo; E1090 D/CPL Tausen Mwambalangani; E9652 D/CPL Benatus Luhaza; D8278 D/CPL James Salala; E9503 D/CPL Noel Mwalukuta; WP 5103 D /C Gloria Massawe and F5885 D/C Fadhili Mazengo.

The list of celebrities who have been summoned for grilling include Vanesa Mdee, Tunda Sabasita alias Video Queen, Wema Sepetu, Khaleed Mohamed (TID), Winfrida Josephat (Recho), Khery Sameer (Mr Blue), Hamidu Chambuso (Dogo Hamidu) and Rashid Makwiro (Chid Benz).

More:

Tanzania: Magufuli Adds Weight to War On Drugs - AllAfrica.com

Posted in War On Drugs | Comments Off on Tanzania: Magufuli Adds Weight to War On Drugs – AllAfrica.com

Words won’t win war on drugs – The West Australian

Posted: at 8:50 am

U2 nailed it back in 1988 when they talked about the scourge drug of that era being the promise in the year of election.

Bono was singing about heroin back then and compared to todays manic methamphetamine menace and the misery it brings, heroin was a cakewalk.

Junkies flaked out after a rush of smack were far more manageable than people pulsating in and out of a meth-induced psychosis while posing a serious threat to anyone around them including those they love.

Unfortunately we cant turn back the clock.

So, in the past few days weve seen what the major political parties plan to do about the ongoing ice epidemic in the year of election.

The simple answer would be to say that Liberal and Labor try to outdo one another to win the tough on drugs, tough on crime trophy.

It could also be argued that what ever they do to fight meth in the community its too little too late and more should have been done a decade ago.

But to establish such a cynical position, you need to travel back with me to 2007, when the then Labor government announced an ice summit because the drug posed a significant problem.

In WA, the use of these drugs, particularly crystalline methamphetamine, or ice as it is more commonly known, is higher than the national average, premier Alan Carpenter said at the time. This puts enormous pressure on the services required to manage the issue, including our police force, hospital emergency departments, child protection agencies and mental health system.

Very true. However, the summit prompted a health, law and order and punishment response that didnt even go close to barricading us against the threat. What followed was the equivalent of parking a Mini Minor in the path of a Mack truck.

Here we are a decade on and WA has been blighted by so much ice-related murder, domestic violence, child neglect and all-round crime and dysfunction.

Given the stranglehold this drug seems to have on those it lures in and the multi-billion dollar organised crime syndicates pulling the levers on supply and demand some might argue its unreasonable to assess whether our governments could have done more in the fight against ice. But if our politicians claim to have waged a war on ice since the 2007 summit, then the suite of new measures announced on Sunday by the Barnett Government suggests victory will be hard to come by.

Anyone deemed to be in possession with intent to sell or supply any amount of ice is going to jail for at least a year as part of the mandatory sentencing package.

Having 200g of the drug will put you behind bars for a minimum of 15 years. No ifs, buts or maybes. WA would have the toughest anti-drug jail sentences in the country. And both Labor and Liberal agree that a new sentence of life in prison should be available to judges dealing with meth traffickers, regardless of who wins the election on March 11.

A reasonable question to ponder is why now rather than 2007, or soon after the ice summit warned of the impending doom?

How come the politicians didnt go as tough then as they are now just weeks away from wanting your vote?

Almost 10 years on from when Labor premier Alan Carpenter spoke before the ice summit about the pressures the drug was putting on hospitals, police and the justice system, the Liberal leader who beat him at the 2008 election said virtually the same thing on the weekend.

Meth, or ice, as its more commonly known, is destroying young lives, tearing families apart, Premier Barnett said.

Its putting enormous pressure on our police resources, our public health system, particularly emergency departments, mental health and care for those addicted.

The mirror image rhetoric is why people have a right to be cynical.

The tough, no-nonsense strategy should have been introduced a decade ago.

People are always cynical about election campaigns, Attorney-General Michael Mischin conceded at the policy launch on Sunday.

This is not simply opportunistic.

This is an evolutionary strategy based on the work weve been doing over the last eight years.

The government has a responsibility to take action in respect of major social issues that are threatening our community.

For many years weve known WA has had an extraordinarily dangerous liaison with this drug, but for too long weve seen lip service and then another election comes along.

Its taken all this time for a government to pull out the really heavy armoury against the drug dealers at any level of the distribution chain.

Youve been dealing out misery to thousands of West Australian families and if re-elected, this Liberal Government will deal out misery to you, Police Minister Liza Harvey said on the weekend.

Those words might win the tough on crime political battle, but they wont win the war against a drug thats been able to advance too far for too long.

Read the original:

Words won't win war on drugs - The West Australian

Posted in War On Drugs | Comments Off on Words won’t win war on drugs – The West Australian

Letter: The failed ‘war on drugs’ divides country – Rockford Register Star

Posted: at 8:50 am

The failed war on drugs is another major factor in dividing the country, even though opinion on the issue is not particularly divided along party lines.

The illegal drug trade makes gangsters rich and powerful. The resulting damage to peoples lives, crime, gang violence and other related misconduct fuels conservatives anger and their general dissatisfaction with the state of the world.

Many conservatives, as well as liberals, do realize the war on drugs has been a catastrophic failure. Steps to legalize marijuana are baby steps in the right direction. But, support for the solution ending the prohibition and legalizing all those currently illegal drugs is not sufficiently widespread in either party.

One reason I vehemently oppose the promotion and spread of legal gambling (e.g. as a source of tax revenue) is that one of the main goals, and potential benefits, of legalization is supposed to be getting rid of the pushers and pimps.

Street gangs, biker gangs, mobsters, drug cartels and terrorists are all often financed by the illegal drug trade, increasing their power and influence. And, they all tend to be racist organizations, each gang usually being of a single race which feeds the racial prejudice of others.

Mark Holmboe, Rockford

Original post:

Letter: The failed 'war on drugs' divides country - Rockford Register Star

Posted in War On Drugs | Comments Off on Letter: The failed ‘war on drugs’ divides country – Rockford Register Star

Where Is Death Penalty Legal? Duterte’s War On Drugs In Philippines Would Mean More Executions If Capital … – International Business Times

Posted: at 8:50 am

The Senate of the Philippines suspended a hearing into a bill for reinstating death penalty Tuesday after officials expressed concerns over an international treaty that bars the country from reimposing the capital punishment.

"We are suspending because there is a supervening event the treaty of international convention on civil and political rights [of the United Nations Human Rights Office] which states that all executions should not be continued, was ratified," said Sen. Richard Gordon, chair of the Senate Committee on Justice and Human Rights.

However, Senate President Pro-Tempore Franklin Drilon said that the Philippines should first withdraw from the treaty before the discussing about reimposing the punishment, which was abolished on June 24, 2006, by the then-President Gloria Arroyo.

"We have ratified the treaty and we have concurred in ratification with the treaty. If you're saying we can withdraw from this, shouldn't we withdraw from the treaty first before we discuss any matter related to the reimposition of death penalty? So that we will not be in violation of international law?" Drilon said.

In December, Human Rights Watch urged the Philippines to not reinstate death penalty.

The Philippine government should acknowledge the death penaltys barbarity and reject any moves to reinstate it, Phelim Kine, deputy Asia director, said in a statement at the time. The failure of the death penalty as a crime deterrent is globally recognized and the government should maintain the prohibition on its use.

Meanwhile, President Rodrigo Duterte who assumed office last June has launched the so-called war on drug dealers in the country. The possibility of the reimposition of death penalty has raised concerns that his government will be able to execute more people in the drug war.

Within six months of taking office, Dutertes drug war killed nearly 6,000 people, according to a December report by Al Jazeera. Of those, 2,041 drug suspects were killed during police operations from July 1 to Dec. 6, while another 3,841 were reportedly killed by unidentified gunmen from July 1 to Nov. 30.

List of countries where death penalty is legal:

More:

Where Is Death Penalty Legal? Duterte's War On Drugs In Philippines Would Mean More Executions If Capital ... - International Business Times

Posted in War On Drugs | Comments Off on Where Is Death Penalty Legal? Duterte’s War On Drugs In Philippines Would Mean More Executions If Capital … – International Business Times

California Is Wondering If Trump and Sessions Will Relaunch the War on Drugs – New York Magazine

Posted: at 8:50 am

Ad will collapse in seconds CLOSE February 3, 2017 02/03/2017 6:19 p.m. By Ed Kilgore

Share

California and the Trump administration are developing a relationship of mutual hostility that is growing more intense each day. Golden State lawmakers are bristling at the new administrations immigration policies and pledging defiance in the face of Trumps attacks on sanctuary cities. The states climate-change activists are equally determined to fight the new boss in Washington and his oily friends. Silicon Valley is potentially an important source of corporate resistance to Trumpism. Talk of a Calexit from the U.S. is no longer just a gag.

Trump himself is bringing back memories of 1960s Cali-centric culture wars with threats against the University of California, Berkeley, for failing to use force against protesters who stopped an appearance by Daddys little provocateur, Milo Yiannopoulos.

But all this friction could get a lot worse if Trumps likely-to-soon-be-confirmed Attorney General, the unrepentant Warrior on Drugs Jeff Sessions, decides to aggressively prosecute federal laws in conflict with the legalized cannabis regime California voters approved by a landslide the same day they rejected Trumps candidacy.

Sessions dodged questions about his intentions toward jurisdictions with legal marijuana sales and/or consumption during his Senate confirmation hearings. And the issue could come to a test first in the states where legal cannabis is already up and running, like Colorado. Californias new legalized marijuana regime wont take effect until the beginning of 2018, and snarls over licensing and tax arrangements could make that deadline slip. But already, cannabis industry leaders in what will soon be a huge market are nervous about what those California-haters in Trumpland might do, as the L.A. Times reports:

But those who have been in the business since the early days of medical marijuana caution the legions of newcomers that federal busts and seizures could quickly make a comeback.

There are people in this administration who will crush this industry if they see the opportunity, said Steve DeAngelo, who is considered a guru among pot entrepreneurs.

For the time being, though, this is one industry and in general one whole state where the prospect of lower taxes and less regulation are not arousing much business enthusiasm. At the moment, odds are, taking on the growing majority of Americans with no taste for drug wars is such a political nonstarter that the feds will continue to let states that legalize weed go their own ways. But the temptation for Trump and Sessions to punch hippies may be just too strong for them to resist.

Trump Not Fully Briefed on Order That Gave Bannon NSC Role: Report

A Brief History of Cash Me Outside, Howbow Dah?

Trump Just Declared the Court System a Threat to National Security

Lady Gaga Added a Hint of Subversiveness to Her Hits During Super Bowl LIs Halftime Show

White House Denies Report That Bannon Had to Be Reminded He Wasnt President Amidst Travel-Ban Chaos

Every Super Bowl Halftime Show Since 1993, Ranked From Worst to Best

Sean Spicer Chews and Swallows 35 Pieces of Gum Every Day Before Noon

We Must Free This Dog

Ivanka Trumps Brand Issues an Even Longer Response to Nordstrom News

Wall Street Remembers Why It Was Afraid of President Trump

Most Popular Video On Daily Intelligencer

At the current trajectory, sometime next week, a Republican congressional staffer will Google What is health care?

A race to the bottom.

Qassim al-Rimi is considered the third most dangerous terrorist in the world.

A list of 78 ostensibly underreported incidents including the attacks in Orlando and San Bernardino kept everyone talking about national security.

And now Rosie ODonnell wants to play Steve Bannon.

It could misrepresent the causes for terrorist acts, and justify steps that endanger our security and civil liberties even further.

The House of Commons wont let the American president address it, while Germanys top newspaper calls on the free world to mobilize against Trump.

Thanks in no small part to grassroots anger, the party is adopting some aggressive tactics including pulling an all-nighter in the Senate.

Goldman Sachs is starting to wonder if having an incompetent nativist as president might have its downsides.

In the too-early edition, the headline was A Bitter End.

The Kremlin didnt like how Bill OReilly called Vladimir Putin a killer in an interview with Donald Trump.

He is quite literally saying he is the only legitimate source of information on what the American people want.

Not content to attack individual judges and judicial decisions, the president is now disparaging the court system itself.

Twenty-year-old Chanel Lewis has been charged with second-degree murder.

Weve got a lot of killers, Trump said. What do you think? Our countrys so innocent?

The president is said to be more angry about the NSC restructuring than the travel ban.

The game was steeped in political controversy even before New Englands record-breaking rally in the fourth quarter.

The Trump administration is vowing to do everything in its legal power to reinstate the ban. Heres how that will play out.

A culture war sold through the rhetoric of jobs and security.

Rukmini Callimachi discusses the travel ban, her refugee past, and extremists reactions to Trump.

See the article here:

California Is Wondering If Trump and Sessions Will Relaunch the War on Drugs - New York Magazine

Posted in War On Drugs | Comments Off on California Is Wondering If Trump and Sessions Will Relaunch the War on Drugs – New York Magazine

Bill introduced to lower age for legal gambling in Nevada – Las Vegas Review-Journal

Posted: at 8:49 am

Buying cigarettes. Going off to war. Voting. They are things you can do at 18 years old in America.

A Nevada lawmaker wants to add gambling to that list.

Assembly Bill 86, sponsored by Assemblyman Jim Wheeler, R-Minden, would drop the legal gambling threshold from 21 to 18 years of age.

Back in 2008, the idea to lower the legal gambling age to 18 was floated by some state gaming regulators after the question was raised by a lawyer during a gaming law conference in Las Vegas. But the idea was quickly shot down by state lawmakers and never made it beyond an idea.

Wheelers bill, along with more than 200 others, were introduced in their respective houses on Mondays first day of the legislative session.

Contact reporter Colton Lochhead at clochhead@reviewjournal.com or 702-383-4638. Follow @ColtonLochhead on Twitter.

View original post here:

Bill introduced to lower age for legal gambling in Nevada - Las Vegas Review-Journal

Posted in Gambling | Comments Off on Bill introduced to lower age for legal gambling in Nevada – Las Vegas Review-Journal