The Prometheus League
Breaking News and Updates
- Abolition Of Work
- Ai
- Alt-right
- Alternative Medicine
- Antifa
- Artificial General Intelligence
- Artificial Intelligence
- Artificial Super Intelligence
- Ascension
- Astronomy
- Atheism
- Atheist
- Atlas Shrugged
- Automation
- Ayn Rand
- Bahamas
- Bankruptcy
- Basic Income Guarantee
- Big Tech
- Bitcoin
- Black Lives Matter
- Blackjack
- Boca Chica Texas
- Brexit
- Caribbean
- Casino
- Casino Affiliate
- Cbd Oil
- Censorship
- Cf
- Chess Engines
- Childfree
- Cloning
- Cloud Computing
- Conscious Evolution
- Corona Virus
- Cosmic Heaven
- Covid-19
- Cryonics
- Cryptocurrency
- Cyberpunk
- Darwinism
- Democrat
- Designer Babies
- DNA
- Donald Trump
- Eczema
- Elon Musk
- Entheogens
- Ethical Egoism
- Eugenic Concepts
- Eugenics
- Euthanasia
- Evolution
- Extropian
- Extropianism
- Extropy
- Fake News
- Federalism
- Federalist
- Fifth Amendment
- Fifth Amendment
- Financial Independence
- First Amendment
- Fiscal Freedom
- Food Supplements
- Fourth Amendment
- Fourth Amendment
- Free Speech
- Freedom
- Freedom of Speech
- Futurism
- Futurist
- Gambling
- Gene Medicine
- Genetic Engineering
- Genome
- Germ Warfare
- Golden Rule
- Government Oppression
- Hedonism
- High Seas
- History
- Hubble Telescope
- Human Genetic Engineering
- Human Genetics
- Human Immortality
- Human Longevity
- Illuminati
- Immortality
- Immortality Medicine
- Intentional Communities
- Jacinda Ardern
- Jitsi
- Jordan Peterson
- Las Vegas
- Liberal
- Libertarian
- Libertarianism
- Liberty
- Life Extension
- Macau
- Marie Byrd Land
- Mars
- Mars Colonization
- Mars Colony
- Memetics
- Micronations
- Mind Uploading
- Minerva Reefs
- Modern Satanism
- Moon Colonization
- Nanotech
- National Vanguard
- NATO
- Neo-eugenics
- Neurohacking
- Neurotechnology
- New Utopia
- New Zealand
- Nihilism
- Nootropics
- NSA
- Oceania
- Offshore
- Olympics
- Online Casino
- Online Gambling
- Pantheism
- Personal Empowerment
- Poker
- Political Correctness
- Politically Incorrect
- Polygamy
- Populism
- Post Human
- Post Humanism
- Posthuman
- Posthumanism
- Private Islands
- Progress
- Proud Boys
- Psoriasis
- Psychedelics
- Putin
- Quantum Computing
- Quantum Physics
- Rationalism
- Republican
- Resource Based Economy
- Robotics
- Rockall
- Ron Paul
- Roulette
- Russia
- Sealand
- Seasteading
- Second Amendment
- Second Amendment
- Seychelles
- Singularitarianism
- Singularity
- Socio-economic Collapse
- Space Exploration
- Space Station
- Space Travel
- Spacex
- Sports Betting
- Sportsbook
- Superintelligence
- Survivalism
- Talmud
- Technology
- Teilhard De Charden
- Terraforming Mars
- The Singularity
- Tms
- Tor Browser
- Trance
- Transhuman
- Transhuman News
- Transhumanism
- Transhumanist
- Transtopian
- Transtopianism
- Ukraine
- Uncategorized
- Vaping
- Victimless Crimes
- Virtual Reality
- Wage Slavery
- War On Drugs
- Waveland
- Ww3
- Yahoo
- Zeitgeist Movement
-
Prometheism
-
Forbidden Fruit
-
The Evolutionary Perspective
Monthly Archives: February 2017
NATO looks to contract $3.2 billion over next three years on C4, IT – DefenseNews.com
Posted: February 11, 2017 at 7:59 am
WASHINGTONThe point agency for buying software and technological capabilities for NATO wants to increase the number of small companies that support the allianceand is prepared to put its money where its mouth is.
Peter Scaruppe, director of acquisition for the NATO Communications and Information Agency, told Defense News in a Feb. 2 interview that his office does about a billion euros worth of business in a good yearthats a small number from the U.S., but for Europe that is a major player here.
But that number is set to grow in the next two and a half years, during which Scaruppe says his agency plans to spend around 3 billion (U.S. $3.2 billion) on contracts for requirement ranging across a number of areas, including cybersecurity and IT, but predominantly for command and control capabilities.
Command and control systems for missile defense, for example, and for air command and control systems we will have about 500 million in business in this area alone. We have a lot of communication systems in the pipeline, for example, in the maritime area, in the land command and control area.
The single biggest contract being worked is for satellite communications, which Scaruppe said could come out to about 1.5 billion over the next three years.
Software has been procured for NATO through common-funded financing; that means all 28 nations chip into a project, then the nation can use the software for a national purpose without having to buy it again because its been paid for by NATO already, he said.
In order to broaden the pool of suppliers, the agency is hosting its annual conference outside Europe for the first time. The event will be hosted April 24-26 in Ottawa, Canada, a strategic decision made in part because Canada has a lot of small and medium enterprises, and not the big-ticket industries that tend to appear at shows in the United States.
Roughly 80 percent of the agencies contracts are given to prime contractors, so the conference will feature a challenge where smaller companies can compete to tackle a specific technological problem, which Scaruppe hopes will result in new voices arising.
We need to make it easy on the smaller companies. A lot of them dont want to deal with us because of too much red tape and administration, and an intergovernmental installation like we are tends to have more red tape than a national government, Scaruppe said, adding that many smaller firms dont want to have to share intellectual property rights with the NATO governments.
If those concerns sound familiar, it's because they are echoes of long-running concerns from U.S. defense officialsmost notably former Defense Secretary Ash Carter, who made bringing technological innovation into the Pentagon a key part of his time in office. And just as Carter encouraged smaller companies to raise their concerns with the Pentagon, Scaruppe hopes to leave his conference with a handful of suggestions for improvement.
If we want the best, we need to address this. Were addressing this through the conference, were holding workshops where we want to address this, he said. We want to hear from industry, what are the challenges, and we will have our own experts here, including my own staff, to discuss how we can make it easier for industry to be a part of the successful bid.
View original post here:
NATO looks to contract $3.2 billion over next three years on C4, IT - DefenseNews.com
Posted in NATO
Comments Off on NATO looks to contract $3.2 billion over next three years on C4, IT – DefenseNews.com
Article calls for NATO to move HQ from Norfolk to DC – 13newsnow.com
Posted: at 7:59 am
13News Now Mike Gooding has the story
Mike Gooding, WVEC 6:44 PM. EST February 10, 2017
nato_logo_.jpg (Photo: WVEC)
NORFOLK, Va. (WVEC) -- Could NATO be on its way out of Norfolk after 65 years here? A column in the publication, 'Defense News' suggested moving the 28-nation command to Washington, D.C.
One way or another, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization has ben a part of Norfolk since 1952. The facility at Naval Support Activity off Terminal boulevard is NATO's only permanent headquarters outside Europe
The organization's current iteration here, Allied Command Transformation, dates back to 2003. Its past commanders include current Secretary of Defense James Mattis, who served here from 2007 to 2009.
The 28 partner nations are responsible for promoting and overseeing the continuing transformation of Alliance forces and capabilities.
Hampton Roads citizens get a small glimpse of ACT every spring during the annual NATO festival downtown. But, if Defense News writers Magnus Nordenman and Henrick Breitenauch get their way, the five-decade-plus local partnership would come to an end.
They write that NATO should move to Washington "to be closer to American decision-makers."
Not everyone agrees with that assessment.
"This is the right place for NATO allied Command Transformation to be, period," said retired rear admiral Craig Quigley. He now serves as executive director of the Hampton Roads Military and Federal Facilities alliance. He says Norfolk and its many nearby military commands is the perfect place for NATO, and, it should stay put.
And as far as he know, Quigley says nobody in NATO thinks otherwise.
"I'm not aware that article by those two writers was anything more than an academic exercise," he said. "I have never, ever heard of substantive plans to move he headquarters away from where it is right now."
Such a move would be a blow to the Hampton Roads region, which in the last decade has lost United States Joint Forces Command, the Navy's Second Fleet, and the Army's For Monroe.
13News Now put in a call to Supreme Allied Command Transformation's public affairs office, for a comment.
So far, they have not called back.
( 2017 WVEC)
Follow this link:
Article calls for NATO to move HQ from Norfolk to DC - 13newsnow.com
Posted in NATO
Comments Off on Article calls for NATO to move HQ from Norfolk to DC – 13newsnow.com
Nato says viral news outlet is part of "Kremlin misinformation machine" – BBC News
Posted: at 7:59 am
BBC News | Nato says viral news outlet is part of "Kremlin misinformation machine" BBC News In the world of viral news, it's a relative baby - but it's already become so controversial that a Nato spokesperson told BBC Trending that Sputnik is an agent of Russian misinformation. Sputnik was set up in 2014 and puts out podcasts, radio shows and ... Nato accuses Sputnik News of distributing misinformation as part of 'Kremlin propaganda machine' Nato accuses pro-Kremlin site of pushing propaganda |
View original post here:
Nato says viral news outlet is part of "Kremlin misinformation machine" - BBC News
Posted in NATO
Comments Off on Nato says viral news outlet is part of "Kremlin misinformation machine" – BBC News
Former CIA Analyst Sues Defense Department to Vindicate NSA Whistleblowers – The Intercept
Posted: at 7:58 am
In 2010, Thomas Drake, a former senior employee at the National Security Agency, was charged with espionage for speaking to a reporter from the Baltimore Sun about a bloated, dysfunctional intelligence program he believed would violate Americans privacy. The case against him eventually fell apart, and he pled guilty to a single misdemeanor, but his career in the NSA was over.
Though Drake was largely vindicated, the central question he raised about technology and privacy has never been resolved. Almost seven years have passed now, but Pat Eddington, a former CIA analyst, is still trying to prove that Drake was right.
While working for Rep. Rush Holt, D-N.J., Eddington had the unique opportunity to comb through still-classified documents that outline the history of two competing NSA programs known as ThinThread and Trailblazer. Hes seen an unredacted version of the Pentagon inspector generals 2004 audit of the NSAs failures during that time, and has filed Freedom of Information Act requests.
In January, Eddington decided to take those efforts a step further by suing the Department of Defense to obtain the material, he tells The Intercept. Those documents completely vindicate those who advocated for ThinThread at personal risk, says Eddington.
The controversy dates back to 1996, whenEd Loomis, then a computer systems designer for the NSA, along with his team worked to move the NSAs collection capabilities from the analog to the digital world. The shift would allow the NSA to scoop up internet packets, stringing them together into legible communications, and automating a process to instantly decide which communications were most interesting, while masking anything from Americans. The prototype, called GrandMaster, would need to ingest vast amounts of data, but only spit out what was most valuable, deleting or encrypting everything else.
Then in the fall of 2001,four passenger airliners were hijacked by terrorists as part of a suicide plot against Washington, D.C., and New York City. The U.S. intelligence community faced a disturbing wakeup call: its vast collection systems had failed to prevent the attacks.
Yet, in response, the NSA simply started collecting more data.
The NSA sent out a bid to multiple defense contractors, seeking a program that could collect and analyze communications from phones and the internet. Science Applications Internal Corporation, or SAIC, won the contract, known as Trailblazer. Meanwhile, internally, NSA employees were developing a similar, less costly alternative called ThinThread, a follow-on to GrandMaster. ThinThread would collect online communications, sort them, and mask data belonging to Americans.
Those involved in ThinThread argue that their approach was better than a collect-it-all approach taken by NSA.
Bulk collection kills people, says Bill Binney, a former NSA analyst, who rose to be a senior technical official with a dream of automating the agencys espionage. You collect everything, dump it on the analyst, and they cant see the threat coming, cant stop it, he says.
Binney built a back-end system a processor that would draw on data collected by ThinThread, analyze it, look at whether or not the traffic was involves American citizens, and pass on what was valuable for foreign intelligence.
Bulk acquisition doesnt work, agrees Kirk Wiebe, a former NSA senior analyst, who was trying to help convince NSA of ThinThreads value at the time.
The analysts are drowning in data, and Binney and Wiebe believe ThinThread would have solved the problem by helping the NSA sort through the deluge automatically while protecting privacy using encryption.
But Binney and Wiebe say advocates of ThinThread hit every possible bureaucratic roadblock on the way, sitting in dozens of meetings with lawyers and lawmakers. In the meantime, Gen. Michael Hayden, the director of the NSA at the time, said he decided to fund an outside contract for a larger effort, focused on gathering all communications, not just those over the internet, as ThinThread was designed to do.
Additionally, while ThinThread masked American communications, Haydens legal and technical advisors were concerned the collection itself would be a problem. Some of Haydens senior officials at the NSA came from SAIC, the company that won contract to design a proof of concept for Trailblazer.
A tiny group of people at NSA had developed a capability for next to no money at all to give the government an unprecedented level of access to any number of foreign terrorists, Eddington says. Instead that system was shut down in favor of an SAIC boondoggle that cost taxpayers, by my last count, close to a billion dollars.
He argues the contract, and the incestuous relationship between the NSA chief and the contractor never received the scrutiny it deserved. It was clearly an ethical problem, Loomis said.
Ultimately, however, the NSA went with Trailblazer. Hayden rejected the ThinThread proposal because the intelligence communitys lawyers were concerned it wouldnt work on a global scale, and that it would vacuum up too much American data. Hayden has continued dismissing concerns years later as the grumblings of disgruntled employees. Hayden told PBS Frontline ThinThread was not the answer to the problems we were facing, with regard to the volume, variety and velocity of modern communications.
In 2002, Wiebe, Binney, Loomis, Drake, and Diane Roark, a Republican staffer on the House Intelligence Committee who had been advocating for ThinThread, united to complain to the Defense Departments inspector general, arguing that ThinThread, while still a prototype, would be the best surveillance system. The oversight body completed its report in 2004, which included major concerns about Trailblazer.
We talked about going for the nuclear option, Wiebe said, referring to discussions at the time about contacting the press.
But Drake went it alone, however, never telling his colleagues what he planned to do. Stories about the disagreements started showing up in news headlines based on leaks. The Bush administration in 2007 sent the FBI after the whistleblowers, raiding each of the whistleblowers homes who raised complaints to the Pentagon inspector general. Drake faced espionage charges after speaking to a reporter from the Baltimore Sun about the alleged mismanagement and waste in the NSA.
Though Drake wasnt sent to prison, he lost his career in government, and now works at an Apple store. The question of whether ThinThread would have provided a better capability than Trailblazer was never resolved.
While ThinThread never made it to production, some of the analytic elements, minus the privacy protections, made it into Fort Meade as part of a massive surveillance program now known as Stellar Wind.
But there may be a way to settle the debate. The watchdog agency tasked with oversight of the Department of Defense completed a full investigation into the battle between ThinThread and the Trailblazer. The Pentagon inspector general published a heavily redacted version of that investigation in 2011; that report is now the only public record available, aside from the account of the whistleblowers who exposed it.
Despite everything thats come out about its surveillance programs, the NSA still wont release the full ThinThread investigation. I dont really know what theyre trying to hide, said Loomis.
Loomis says he thinks those redactions were more for the sake of Haydens reputation than protecting real classified information. He eventually documented the saga in a self-published book called NSAs Transformation: An Executive Branch Black Eye.
Drake told The Intercept in an email that efforts to uncover the Pentagon inspector generals ThinThread investigation were a large part of his defense. Since then, the Office of Special Counsel concluded last March that the Department of Justice may have destroyed evidence that might have helped exonerate him.
In the meantime, however, hope is fading that the entire story of ThinThread will emerge from behind the government door of secrecy. Weve been trying for 15 or 16 years now to bring the U.S. government the technical solution to save lives, but they fight us left and right, said Wiebe.
Eddington says the ThinThread controversy demonstrates the lack of oversight of the intelligence community. The mentality that gave us this system is still in place, he says. We could see this become de facto permanent, he said.
Read more:
Former CIA Analyst Sues Defense Department to Vindicate NSA Whistleblowers - The Intercept
Posted in NSA
Comments Off on Former CIA Analyst Sues Defense Department to Vindicate NSA Whistleblowers – The Intercept
Microsoft Gets NSA Approval For Windows 10 And Surface – Tom’s Hardware
Posted: at 7:58 am
Microsoft announced that the NSA has cleared Windows 10 and the Surface tablet for classified use. The company also teased security improvements that will be discussed at the annual RSA Conference next week, where security experts from all over the world will gather.
Being cleared for classified use could help Microsoft do business with government agencies, independent contractors, and other groups that handle sensitive data. A place on the NSA's list of approved devices also gives Microsoft bragging rights--and the company put 'em to good use in its blog post:
Our customers are the most security-conscious in the world and demonstrating our commitment to meeting their needs is incredibly important to us. Today, Im excited to share that both Windows 10 and Surface devices including Surface Pro 3, Surface Pro 4 and Surface Book have been added to the NSAs Commercial Solutions for Classified Programs (CSfC) list. The CSfC program listing demonstrates Windows 10, as well as Surface devices (the only Windows 10 devices currently on the list), when used in a layered solution, can meet the highest security requirements for use in classified environments.
But that doesn't mean Microsoft is done battening down the hatches of its software and hardware. The company also teased a number of security improvements that have either recently debuted or are expected to be released this year. These include more control over devices via Surface Enterprise Management Mode (SEMM), expanded device management, and updates to Windows Defender Advanced Threat Protection (WDATP), among others.
Many of those updates share a common goal: letting businesses use Windows 10 to control end points and defend against common threats. Microsoft said updates to SEMM will let companies disable a tablet's camera or microphone, for example, whereas updated Windows Analytics will let them know if software updates are being installed like they should be. To abuse the obvious pun--Windows is getting some bars, locks, and other reinforcements.
Microsoft also touted some of the operating system's existing features, such as Windows Hello, which allows people to sign in to their PC via facial recognition or fingerprint scan instead of a password. Combine that with a feature that automatically locks a PC when a paired smartphone leaves its vicinity--which is already available to Windows Insider program members--and Microsoft can help prevent careless mistakes on Windows 10 devices.
More information about these updates is available from Microsoft's blog post, and still more will be revealed in the days leading up to the RSA Conference that will run February 13-17. The bottom line is this: Windows 10 and Surface got a vote of confidence from the NSA, and over the next couple months, Microsoft will make it easier for businesses to manage their own security instead of relying on their employees' competence.
Original post:
Microsoft Gets NSA Approval For Windows 10 And Surface - Tom's Hardware
Posted in NSA
Comments Off on Microsoft Gets NSA Approval For Windows 10 And Surface – Tom’s Hardware
New Russia revelations pose new problems for Trump’s NSA – MSNBC
Posted: at 7:58 am
MSNBC | New Russia revelations pose new problems for Trump's NSA MSNBC Michael Flynn, Donald Trump's National Security Advisor, has maintained close ties to Moscow in recent years, even getting paid by the Kremlin's propaganda outlet. It therefore caused quite a stir a month ago, when the Washington Post noted that Flynn ... CIA freezes out top Flynn aide Trump says he has 'full confidence' in Michael Flynn amid allegations over phone call with Russia National security adviser Flynn discussed sanctions with Russian ambassador, despite denials, officials say |
More here:
New Russia revelations pose new problems for Trump's NSA - MSNBC
Posted in NSA
Comments Off on New Russia revelations pose new problems for Trump’s NSA – MSNBC
Former NSA contractor indicted in theft of classified government information – JURIST
Posted: at 7:58 am
[JURIST] A former National Security Agency (NSA) [official website] contractor was indicted [indictment, PDF] on Wednesday by a federal grand jury on charges that he willfully retained national defense information. US officials are stating [press release] that the theft by Harold Thomas Martin may have been the largest heist of classified government information in history. Martin allegedly spent over 20 years stealing highly sensitive government material [CNN report] related to national defense. It is unclear what, if anything, Martin did with all the stolen data. Martin now faces 20 criminal counts, each of which is punishable by up to 10 years in prison. Martin worked for Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp, which also employed Edward Snowden. Martin was employed as a private contractor for at least seven different companies, beginning in 1993. His positions dealing with government computer systems, gave him various security clearances that routinely provided him access to top-secret information. The indictment alleges Martin stole documents from US Cyber Command, the CIA, the NSA and the National Reconnaissance Office [official websites]. Martin's initial appearance in the US District Court for the District of Maryland is scheduled for next Tuesday.
Governments around the world have re-examined their data privacy laws in the wake of a myriad of data leaks, including the Edward Snowden [JURIST backgrounder] leaks. National governments around the world have attempted [JURIST op-ed] to gain control over data transferred within their borders. On Tuesday the US House approved [JURIST report] a measure that would updat US privacy laws in regards to e-mails and cloud storage. In October 2015 the European Court of Justice ruled [JURIST report] that EU user data transferred to the US was not sufficiently protected. In June 2015 a court in The Hague struck down [JURIST report] a Dutch law that allowed the government to retain telephone and Internet data of Dutch citizens for up to 12 months in an effort to combat terrorism and organized crime.
More:
Former NSA contractor indicted in theft of classified government information - JURIST
Posted in NSA
Comments Off on Former NSA contractor indicted in theft of classified government information – JURIST
Celebrating the 50th of the 25th Amendment! | The Huffington Post – Huffington Post
Posted: at 7:58 am
Joel K. Goldstein VIncent C. Immel Professor of Law, Saint Louis University School of Law This post is hosted on the Huffington Post's Contributor platform. Contributors control their own work and post freely to our site. If you need to flag this entry as abusive, send us an email.
Fifty years ago today, Minnesota and Nevada ratified the proposed Twenty-fifth Amendment to the Constitution, providing the final support needed to make it part of our highest law. That Amendment was a significant accomplishment which created procedures to address some vexing problems regarding presidential continuity. And its enactment demonstrated how able and dedicated leadership can solve difficult problems, even those that had long resisted fixes.
Until 1967, the Constitution provided no means to fill a vice-presidential vacancy or to transfer power from a disabled president. Questions that Delawares John Dickinson asked at the Constitutional Convention (What is the extent of the term disability and who is to be the judge of it?) went unanswered for 175+ years. The problem was compounded after President William Henry Harrison died in April, 1841 and Vice President John Tyler claimed that he was president, not simply vice president acting as president as the founders intended. Tylers position was repeated seven times from 1841 to 1963 whenever a deceased president was replaced by his vice president. The Constitutions text treated the vice presidents status following a presidential inability the same as after a presidential death, removal or resignation. The Tyler Precedent inhibited vice presidents from exercising presidential responsibilities during presidential inabilities for fear of displacing the chief executive. So did the ideological, personal and constitutional distance between presidents and vice presidents for most of our history. No move was made to transfer power to Vice President Chester A. Arthur after President James Garfield was shot in 1881, even though the President was incapacitated during the last 80 days of his life. Similarly, Woodrow Wilson clung to power though incapacitated during much of the last 17 months of his presidency. First Lady Edith Bolling Wilson, not Vice President Thomas Marshall, essentially made executive decisions during this period. And presidential power remained with President Dwight D. Eisenhower during his three incapacities in the mid-1950s.
The Eisenhower disabilities amidst the Cold War and nuclear age prompted interest in addressing the problem of presidential inability. Eisenhower took important steps by entering into a letter agreement with Vice President Richard M. Nixon allowing either to initiate the temporary transfer of presidential powers and duties from Eisenhower to Nixon with Eisenhower retaining the right to reclaim them. Congress began considering constitutional amendments addressing presidential inability without reaching any consensus.
Following the assassination of President John F. Kennedy in November, 1963, Senator Birch Bayh, the newly-appointed chair of the Senate Subcommittee on Constitutional Amendments, proposed a constitutional amendment in December, 1963 which anticipated the eventual Amendment. So did principles suggested by a blue-ribbon American Bar Association group that included former Attorney General Herbert Brownell, future Supreme Court Justice Lewis Powell, iconic Harvard law professor Paul A. Freund, and John D. Feerick, a young New York lawyer, who had begun writing scholarly articles regarding presidential inability before the assassination.
The Amendment contains four sections. Section One adopted the Tyler Precedent following a presidential death, resignation or removal, but not after a presidential inability in which case the vice president simply acts as president. Section Two of the Amendment allowed the president to nominate a new vice president to fill a vice-presidential vacancy upon confirmation by each house of Congress. Section Three permitted the president to transfer presidential powers and duties to the vice president during a period of presidential inability and to reclaim them when the disability ends. Section four allowed the vice president and the majority of the Cabinet (or an alternative body should Congress create one) to transfer presidential powers and duties from the president during a presidential inability. The president can reclaim those powers upon a written declaration of his fitness to resume them unless the vice president and Cabinet contest his declaration in which case Congress decides the issue within a designated time.
Presidential succession and inability were not the sort of hot-button issues that attracted the engaged attention of many politicians. That was partly why longstanding problems persisted. Bayh was different. He pushed relentlessly and effectively for passage of the proposed amendment, involving colleagues on both sides of the aisle. Representatives Emanuel Celler and Richard Poff also played important roles. And Feericks scholarship informed legislative deliberations even while he worked with the ABA to achieve passage and ratification, the latter coming on February 10, 1967.
Three of the four sections of the Amendment have been utilized six times since its ratification. In October, 1973, Gerald R. Ford was nominated to fill a vice-presidential vacancy produced by the resignation of Spiro T. Agnew and confirmed less than two months later. In August, 1974, Ford succeeded to the presidency following Richard M. Nixons resignation. The following month, Ford nominated Nelson A. Rockefeller as vice president and Rockefeller was confirmed in December.
Two presidents have transferred presidential powers and duties to the vice president while they underwent surgery under general anesthesia on three occasions. In July, 1985, President Ronald Reagan transferred presidential powers to Vice President George H.W. Bush for eight hours while Reagan had a cancerous polyp removed. President George W. Bush briefly transferred powers to Vice President Dick Cheney in 2002 and 2007 while he underwent colonoscopies.
The early uses of the Amendment confirm its contributions to Americas system of assuring presidential continuity. The impeachment proceedings that forced Nixons resignation would have been complicated without the ability to install Republican Ford as vice president when Democratic Speaker of the House Carl Albert was otherwise next-in-line. Whereas the vice presidency was vacant for 21% of American history before the Twenty-fifth Amendment was ratified, since then it has been unoccupied for only 6 months or less than .1%, thereby diminishing the importance of the remainder of the line of succession where the solutions are less attractive. Section Three and Four encourage a transfer of power when a president is physically or mentally unable to perform by providing procedures, identifying decision-makers, and allowing the president to resume office upon the end of the incapacity.
The framers of the Twenty-fifth Amendment recognized other problems in Americas system for providing presidential continuity but deferred them to later legislatures after concluding that broadening their effort would prevent any progress. These problems include the following: the line of succession after the vice presidency currently runs through legislative leaders who might not belong to the presidents party; no provisions exist to declare a vice president disabled; the electoral system presents various vulnerable spots. Congress should address these and other gaps in the very near future.
That would be a fitting tribute to the great contributions of Bayh, Feerick and others that culminated fifty years ago with the ratification of the Twenty-fifth Amendment, and would continue their great work of improving our system of government.
Original post:
Celebrating the 50th of the 25th Amendment! | The Huffington Post - Huffington Post
Posted in Fifth Amendment
Comments Off on Celebrating the 50th of the 25th Amendment! | The Huffington Post – Huffington Post
Sixth Circuit slams the courthouse doors to takings case – Pacific Legal Foundation (PLF) (press release) (blog)
Posted: at 7:58 am
The Sixth Circuit todaydismissed Wayside Church v. Van Buren County, a case challenging Michigans unconstitutional tax foreclosure scheme. Judge Kethledge who dissented from the panels decision, summed up the case this way:
In this case the defendant Van Buren County took property worth $206,000 to satisfy a $16,750 debt, and then refused to refund any of the difference. In some legal precincts that sort of behavior is called theft. But under the Michigan General Property Tax Act, apparently, that behavior is called tax collection.
You read that right. When Wayside Church fell behind on its taxes on a piece of land it used for youth camp, Van Buren County took the property and sold it for $206,000 to satisfy $16,750 in tax debt, interest, penalties, and fees. The County kept all of the profit$189,250.
When the church couldnt get its equity back from the government, it filed a Fifth Amendment Takings Claim, along with two other individuals who similarly lost their property over relatively small tax debts. The Fifth Amendment prohibits government from taking private property without paying just compensation. As PLF explained in an amicus brieffiled last year in support of the church and other property owners, government can take property for taxes, costs, and penalties due, but it violates the Constitution when it takes and keeps more than that. Indeed, most states recognize that dispossessed property owners should be compensated the surplus proceeds from the sale of tax-foreclosed property.
Unfortunately, today the Sixth Circuit did not even decide whether the Fifth Amendments Takings Clause protects property owners. Instead, it dismissed the case, holding that it was not ripe under Williamson County Regional Planning Commn v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson City. The court held that Michigan courts offer reasonable, certain, and adequate remedy for Wayside Churchs constitutional claim. The court is wrong. As thedissenting opinion explains, Michigan law is unclear about whether state courts allow a takings challenge to the state tax law. And so far, Michigan courts have dismissed cases just like this one, claiming that the Constitution does not protect people from this kind of confiscation.
As the Liberty Blog has noted many times before, Williamson County hurts Americans ability to enforce their federally protected Constitutional rights. Usually when the local government violates constitutionally protected rights, citizens can seek protection from federal courts. But Williamson County creates a unique obstacle for Fifth Amendment takings claims. Justice Thomas recently urged the Supreme Court tofix the quagmire created byWilliamson County. For the sake of churches and landowners in Michigan, lets hope the rest of the Justices take that advicesoon.
Go here to read the rest:
Sixth Circuit slams the courthouse doors to takings case - Pacific Legal Foundation (PLF) (press release) (blog)
Posted in Fifth Amendment
Comments Off on Sixth Circuit slams the courthouse doors to takings case – Pacific Legal Foundation (PLF) (press release) (blog)
Tenn. Considers ‘Second Amendment Sales Tax Holiday’ – MRCTV (blog)
Posted: at 7:56 am
A bill introduced in Tennessee on Wednesday would make it cheaper to buy a gun for one weekend of the year in that state, with a special tax-free event.
Surprisingly - a county Democratic official opposes the idea.
WJHL reports, State Rep. Dennis Powers, introduced House Bill 744 or Second Amendment Sales Tax Holiday. The measure would remove the sales tax on guns and ammunition during the first weekend of September. The proposal is similar to the tax-free back-to-school holiday weekend Tennessee holds at the end of the summer.
Were ecstatic about it, it would be great for our business, Tri-Cities Gun Depot Co-Owner, Tommy Isaacs told WJHL.
Isaacs even said his shop would reduce prices for what hes calling back to school for hunters.
Nancy Fischman, Chair of the Washington County Democratic Party would like to see lawmakers focus on other issues.
Why doesnt he propose a sales tax holiday for groceries? You have to eat but you dont have to buy a gun, Fischman tells WJHL.
If the Second Amendment Sales Tax Holiday, were passed - it would take effect this September, joining similar Second Amendment Sales Tax Holidays in Louisiana and Mississippi.
Thank you for supporting MRCTV! As a tax-deductible, charitable organization, we rely on the support of our readers to keep us running!Keep MRCTV going with your gift here!
Read the original post:
Tenn. Considers 'Second Amendment Sales Tax Holiday' - MRCTV (blog)
Posted in Second Amendment
Comments Off on Tenn. Considers ‘Second Amendment Sales Tax Holiday’ – MRCTV (blog)







