Monthly Archives: March 2016

Blogs | The Tor Blog

Posted: March 10, 2016 at 1:43 pm

We are pleased to announce another public beta release of Tor Messenger. This release features important security updates to libotr, and addresses a number of stability and usability issues. All users are highly encouraged to upgrade.

The initial public release was a success in that it garnered a lot of useful feedback. We tried to respond to all your concerns in the comments of the blog post but also collected and aggregated a FAQ of the most common questions.

Tor Messenger now supports OTR conversations over Twitter DMs (direct messages). Simply configure your Twitter account with Tor Messenger and add the Twitter account you want as a contact. Any (direct) message you send to another Twitter contact will be sent over OTR provided that both contacts are running Tor Messenger (or another client that supports Twitter DMs and OTR).

Facebook has long officially deprecated their XMPP gateway, and it doesn't appear to work anymore. We had multiple reports from users about this issue and decided that it was best to remove support for Facebook from Tor Messenger.

We hear that an implementation of the new mqtt based protocol is in the works, so we hope to restore this functionality in the future.

Before upgrading to the new release, you will need to back up your OTR keys or simply generate new ones. Please see the following steps to back them up.

In the future, we plan to port Tor Browser's updater patches (#14388) so that keeping Tor Messenger up to date is seamless and automatic. We also plan to add a UI to make importing OTR keys and accounts from Pidgin, and other clients, as easy as possible (#16526).

The secure updater will likely be a part of the next release of Tor Messenger.

Please note that Tor Messenger is still in beta. The purpose of this release is to help test the application and provide feedback. At-risk users should not depend on it for their privacy and safety.

Linux (32-bit)

Linux (64-bit)

Windows

OS X (Mac)

sha256sums.txt sha256sums.txt.asc

The sha256sums.txt file containing hashes of the bundles is signed with the key 0x6887935AB297B391 (fingerprint: 3A0B 3D84 3708 9613 6B84 5E82 6887 935A B297 B391).

Here is the complete changelog since v0.1.0b4:

Tor Messenger 0.1.0b5 -- March 09, 2016

Read more from the original source:
Blogs | The Tor Blog

Posted in Tor Browser | Comments Off

Tor Browser Download | Rocky Bytes

Posted: at 1:43 pm

Dont want people snooping on your browsing habits? Would you like to visit web sites anonymously? I don't blame you. Sometimes I sit back and think about all the information that I've put on the internet over the course of just my short lifetime this far. With only about 8 years of accessing the internet so far, I've put enough information to write about 10 autobiographies where each one would be different from the first. And that's just from my search results alone. Information that I've posted to social media, now that's a big book. My solution,Tor Browser; and itmay just be for you too if youre the kind of person that sees trouble lurking behind every web and ip address.

Originally developed as a 3rd generation onion routing project for the US Navy, Tors main goal, its job was to protect government communications. For years, it protected government information and it is now publicly available and publically used. People can use Tor to keep websites from tracking them and their loved ones. Tor browser can be used by your children too. Advertisers are studying everyone on the internet. If your child can access the internet, they can be targeted for ads and products that can lead to kids not feeling secure about themselves. Users are able to anonymously post to websites, social media, messengers, and other services even if they are blocked by their internet service provider.

How does it work? TorBrowser utilizes a network of virtual tunnels that result in improved security on the web. These virtual tunnels render your information near untraceable. Of course what you search for will still be recorded on the internet, however the connection between you and the information will be completely severed. Advertisers and malicious programs on the internet will be unable to locate the origin of the information. Can the government trace that information? Probably, but software developers can create communication tools that will help to protect privacy.

People use Tor for thousands of reasons. Many use it for to be able to access chat rooms for sensitive topics. When information is private, people want to feel secure about posting the information truly anonymously. You are not truly anonymous if you're using a web browser that stores and shares your information, purposely, with advertisers, government, and other miscellaneous requests. A journalist may use it to communicate more safely with whistle blowers and dissidents. Coming out with potentially harmful, dangerous information can be life threatening if you leave this information available to be obtained by anyone at anytime. Tor Onion Browser can prevent the connection between you and the information so that you feel secure because you are secure.

A branch of the U.S. Navy utilizes Tor for open source intelligence gathering. Oddly enough, the different type of people who use Tor for different reasons are what make Tor browser download even more secure, because information is being tossed around more and more. When information is scrambled amongst other information, it makes it very hard to pinpoint what information belongs with what person.

Continued here:
Tor Browser Download | Rocky Bytes

Posted in Tor Browser | Comments Off

Genetics Conferences | Human Genetics Conferences | Europe …

Posted: at 1:42 pm

Track 1:Cellular and Molecular Genetics

The study of genetics at the level of the basic building blocks of cells and at the DNA level. Cells are as complex as they are tiny and much is still unknown about the inner workings of these building blocks of life. If you'd like to log hours in a lab and use advanced equipment to help advance the understanding of how cells work, studies in cellular and molecular biology could be for you. Biology is the study of living things, and cellular or molecular biology studies living things on the smallest possible scale. To prepare for a career in cellular or molecular biology, individuals must have a strong understanding of chemistry, statistics and physics. The research of cellular and molecular biologists is integral to things like the development of new medications, the protection of aquatic ecosystems and the improvement of agricultural products. A student pursuing an undergraduate or graduate degree in cellular and molecular Genetics spends time divided between classroom lectures and practical laboratory instruction. Research is an important part of this field, and students must be comfortable using highly advanced pieces of equipment to conduct experiments. In addition, cellular and molecular biology programs teach students about cellular structures and their functions, how cells make and use things like proteins and enzymes and much more. Courses covered in a molecular or cellular biology degree program may include microbiology, epidemiology, microscopy and molecular genetics. The following Study.com articles offer more details about this field of study.

Related Genetics Conferences | Human Genetics Conferences | Conference Series LLC

International Conference on Clinical AndMolecular Genetics, 28-30 November 2016 (Chicago, USA); 6thInternational Conference on Genomics &Pharmacogenomics, 22-24 September 2016 (Berlin, Germany); World Congress onHuman Genetics, 31October 02November 2016 (Valencia, Spain); International Conference on Genetic Counselling AndGenomic Medicine, 11-12 August, 2016 (Birmingham, UK); Cell &Gene TherapyCongress, 19-21 May 2016 ( San Antonio, USA); 2015 Midwest Conference onCell Therapy& Regenerative Medicine September 18-19 2015 (Kansas City, Missouri); 2nd Cell &Gene TherapyConference 9-10 September 2015 (Philadelphia, United States); Cell &Gene TherapyEurope 29-30 September 2015 (Barcelona, Spain); Cell Manufacturing andGene TherapyCongress 2015 2-3 December 2015 (Brussels, Belgium).

Track 2:Clinical Genetics

Clinical Genetics is the medical specialty which provides a diagnostic service and "genetic counselling" for individuals or families with, or at risk of, conditions which may have a genetic basis. Genetic disorders can affect any body system and any age group. The aim of Genetic Services is to help those affected by, or at risk of, a genetic disorder to live and reproduce as normally as possible. In addition a large number of individuals with birth defects and/or learning disabilities are referred and investigated for genetic factors. Individuals identified through childhood or pregnancy screening programmes also require genetic services. In the future, as the genetic contributions to common later-onset disorders such as diabetes and coronary heart disease are identified, genetic services may be required for those at high risk. Testing for genetic factors that affect drug prescribing will also increasingly become an important activity.

Related Genetics Conferences | Human Genetics Conferences | Conference Series LLC

World Congress onHuman Genetics, 31 October 02 November 2016 (Valencia, Spain); International Conference on Clinical andMolecular Genetics, 28-30 November 2016 (Chicago, USA); 6thInternational Conference on Genomics &Pharmacogenomics, 22-24 September 2016 (Berlin, Germany); International Conference on Genetic Counselling AndGenomic Medicine, 11-12 August, 2016 (Birmingham, UK); Cell &Gene TherapyCongress, 19-21 May 2016 ( San Antonio, USA); The 44nd Biennial American Cytogenetics Conference,16-18 May, 2016 (Oregon, USA); The European Human Genetics Conference 2016, 21-24 May, 2016 (Barcelona, Spain); 4th International workshop on Cancer Genetic & Cytogenetic Diagnostics, 6-8 April, 2016, (Nijmegen, Netherlands); Chromatin and Epigenetics, 20-24 Mar 2016 (Whistler, Canada); Game of Epigenomics Conference, 24 - 26 April 2016 (Dubrovnik, Croatia)

Track 3:Genomics: Disease & Evolution

Genomicsis a discipline ingeneticsthat appliesrecombinant DNA,DNA sequencingmethods, andbioinformaticsto sequence, assemble, and analyze the function and structure ofgenomes(thecompleteset of DNA within a single cell of an organism).Advances in genomics have triggered a revolution in discovery-based research to understand even the most complex biological systems such as the brain.The field includes efforts to determine the entireDNA sequenceof organisms and fine-scalegenetic mapping. The field also includes studies of intragenomic phenomena such asheterosis,epistasis,pleiotropyand other interactions betweenlociandalleleswithin the genome.In contrast, the investigation of the roles and functions of single genes is a primary focus ofmolecular biologyorgeneticsand is a common topic of modern medical and biological research. Research of single genes does not fall into the definition of genomics unless the aim of this genetic, pathway, and functional information analysis is to elucidate its effect on, place in, and response to the entire genome's networks.

Related Genetics Conferences | Human Genetics Conferences | Conference Series LLC

Cell &Gene TherapyCongress, 19-21 May 2016 (San Antonio, USA); International Conference on Clinical andMolecular Genetics, 28-30 November 2016 (Chicago, USA); World Congress onHuman Genetics, 31 October 02 November 2016 (Valencia, Spain); 2nd International Congress on Neuroimmunology and Therapeutics, March 31-April 02, 2016 (Atlanta, USA); 2nd International Conference and Exhibition on Antibodies, July 14-15, 2016 (Philadelphia, USA); 16th International Congress of Immunology, August 21-26, 2016 (Melbourne, Australia); IMMUNOLOGY 2016, AAI Annual Meeting, May 1317, 2016 (Seattle, WA); 4th International workshop on Cancer Genetic & Cytogenetic Diagnostics, 6-8 April, 2016, (Nijmegen, Netherlands); Chromatin and Epigenetics, 20-24 Mar 2016 (Whistler, Canada); Game of Epigenomics Conference, 24 - 26 April 2016 (Dubrovnik, Croatia)

Track 4: Cancer Genetics:

Canceris agenetic disorderin which the normal control ofcell growthis lost.Cancer geneticsis now one of the fastest expandingmedical specialties. At themolecularlevel, cancer is caused bymutation(s)inDNA, which result in aberrantcellproliferation. Most of these mutations areacquiredand occur insomatic cells. However, some peopleinherit mutation(s) in thegerm line. The mutation(s) occur in two classes of cellulargenes:oncogenesandtumor suppressor genes. Under normal conditions, tumor suppressor genes regulate cellular differentiation and suppression of proliferation. Mutations in these genes result in unchecked cellular proliferation resulting in tumors with abnormalcell cyclesand tumor proliferation. The tumor suppressor genes contribute to cancer by the inactivating ofloss of function mutation.

Related Genetics Conferences | Human Genetics Conferences | Conference Series LLC

International Conference onCervical Cancer,22-23 September, 2016 (Vienna, Austria); 6th World Congress onCancer Therapy, 01-03 December, 2016 (Baltimore, USA); 13th Global Summit onCancer Therapy17-19 October, 2016 (Dubai, UAE); International Conference onPancreaticand Colorectal Cancer, 29-30 March, 2016 (Atlanta, USA); Global Summit onMelanomaAnd Carcinoma, 14-15 July, 2016 (Brisbane, Australia); Chromatin andEpigeneticin Cancer ( Atlanta, Georgia); Advances inOvarianCancer Research: Exploiting Vulnerabilities (Orlando, Florida); Advance inBreast CancerResearch ( Washington, DC); Advances inPediatric CancerResearch (Florida); New Horizons in Cancer Research Conference (Sanghai, China).

Track 5:Stem cells and Regenerative Medicine

Many of the stem cells being studied are referred to aspluripotent, meaning they can give rise to any of the cell types in the body but they cannot give rise on their own to an entirely new body. (Only the earliest embryonic cells, which occur just after fertilization, can give rise to a whole other organism by themselves.) Other stem cells, such as the ones found in the adult body, aremultipotent, meaning they can develop into a limited number of different tissue types. One of the most common stem cell treatments being studied is a procedure that extracts a few stem cells from a person's body and grows them in large quantities in the laboratorywhat scientists refer to as expanding the number of stem cells. Once a sufficient number have been produced in this manner, the investigators inject them back into the patient. You could say that medicine up until now has been all about replacements. If your heart valve isn't working, you replace it with another valve, say from a pig. With regenerative medicine, you're treating the cause and using your own cells to perform the replacement. The hope is that by regenerating the tissue, you're causing the repairs to grow so that it's like normal.

Genetic disorders may or may not be heritable, i.e., passed down from the parents' genes. In non-heritable genetic disorders, defects may be caused by new mutations or changes to the DNA

Related Genetics Conferences | Human Genetics Conferences | Conference Series LLC

Track 6:Cancer and Genome Integrity

The research program in the Genome Integrity is focused on the exploration of the causes and effects of genomic instability, mechanisms of DNA repair and the study of DNA repair breakdown as an initiating or protective event in aging and cancers. The program will emphasize a mechanistic understanding of the pathways that maintain genomic integrity, the intersection of these pathways with normal cellular physiology and cancer and the application of these insights to the development of new therapeutic strategies.The Genome integrity has made major contributions towards a detailed understanding of DNA repair pathway selection as a primary influence on genomic stability and drug resistance/sensitivity in breast and ovarian cancers and the influential role of DNA repair proteins in the promotion of specific hematological malignancies

Related Genetics Conferences | Human Genetics Conferences | Conference Series LLC

World Congress onHuman Genetics, 31 October 02 November 2016 (Valencia, Spain); International Conference on Clinical andMolecular Genetics, 28-30 November 2016 (Chicago, USA); 6thInternational Conference on Genomics &Pharmacogenomics, 22-24 September 2016 (Berlin, Germany); International Conference on Genetic Counselling andGenomic Medicine, 11-12 August, 2016 (Birmingham, UK); Cell &Gene TherapyCongress, 19-21 May 2016 ( San Antonio, USA); The 44nd Biennial American Cytogenetics Conference,16-18 May, 2016 (Oregon, USA); The European Human Genetics Conference 2016, 21-24 May, 2016 (Barcelona, Spain); 4th International workshop on Cancer Genetic & Cytogenetic Diagnostics, 6-8 April, 2016, (Nijmegen, Netherlands); Chromatin and Epigenetics, 20-24 Mar 2016 (Whistler, Canada); Game of Epigenomics Conference, 24 - 26 April 2016 (Dubrovnik, Croatia)

Track 7:Diabetes and Obesity

The UK is officially the 'fattest' country in Europe, with approximately1 in 5adults overweight and one in every 15 obese. Over the next 20 years, the number of obese adults in the country is forecast to soar by a staggering 73% to 26 million people. According to health experts, such a rise would result in more than a million extra cases oftype 2 diabetes,heart diseaseandcancer. Obesity is also no longer a condition that just affects older people, although the likelihood does increase with age, and increasing numbers of young people have been diagnosed with obesity. While the exact causes of diabetes are still not fully understood, it is known that factors up the risk of developing different types of diabetes mellitus.For type 2 diabetes, this includes being overweight or obese (having a body mass index - BMI - of 30 or greater).In fact, obesity is believed to account for 80-85% of the risk of developing type 2 diabetes, while recent research suggests that obese people are up to 80 times more likely to develop type 2 diabetes than those with aBMI of less than 22.

Related Genetics Conferences | Human Genetics Conferences | Conference Series LLC

International Conference on Clinical andMolecular Genetics, 28-30 November 2016 (Chicago, USA); 6thInternational Conference on Genomics &Pharmacogenomics, 22-24 September 2016 (Berlin, Germany); World Congress onHuman Genetics, 31 October 02 November 2016 (Valencia, Spain); International Conference on Genetic Counselling andGenomic Medicine, 11-12 August, 2016 (Birmingham, UK); Cell &Gene TherapyCongress, 19-21 May 2016 ( San Antonio, USA); Game of Epigenomics Conference, 24 - 26 April 2016 (Dubrovnik, Croatia); The 44nd Biennial American Cytogenetics Conference,16-18 May, 2016 (Oregon, USA); The European Human Genetics Conference 2016, 21-24 May, 2016 (Barcelona, Spain); 4th International workshop on Cancer Genetic & Cytogenetic Diagnostics, 6-8 April, 2016, (Nijmegen, Netherlands); Chromatin and Epigenetics, 20-24 Mar 2016 (Whistler, Canada)

Track 8:Congenital disorders

Congenital disorder, also known ascongenital disease,birth defectoranomaly is a condition existing at or beforebirth regardless of cause. Of these diseases, those characterized by structural deformities are termed "congenital anomalies" and involve defects in a developingfetus. Birth defects vary widely in cause and symptoms. Any substance that causes birth defects is known as ateratogen. Some disorders can be detected before birth throughprenatal diagnosis(screening). Birth defects are present in about 3% of newborns in USA.Congenital anomalies resulted in about 632,000 deaths per year in 2013 down from 751,000 in 1990.[9]The type with the greatest numbers of deaths arecongenital heart disease(323,000), followed byneural tube defects(69,000).

Related Genetics Conferences | Human Genetics Conferences | Conference Series LLC

4th International Conference on Integrative Biology, July 18-20, 2016 (Berlin, Germany); International Conference on Genetic Counseling and Genomic Medicine, August 11-12, 2016 (Birmingham, UK); International Conference on Synthetic Biology, August 15-17, 2016 (London, United Kingdom); International Conference on Clinical andMolecular Genetics, 28-30 November 2016 (Chicago, USA); World Congress onHuman Genetics, 31 October02 November 2016 (Valencia, Spain); Mitochondrial Dynamics (D2), April 3-7, 2016 (Colorado, USA); Mitochondrial Medicine 2016, June 15-18, 2016 (Seattle,USA); The 2016 Gordon Research Conference on Mitochondria & Chloroplasts, June 19-24, 2016 (Vermont, USA); Chromatin and Epigenetics, 20-24 Mar 2016 (Whistler, Canada); Game of Epigenomics Conference, 24 - 26 April 2016 (Dubrovnik, Croatia)

Track 9:Cytogenetics

Cytogeneticsis a branch ofgeneticsthat is concerned with the study of the structure and function of the cell, especially the chromosomes. It includes routine analysis ofG-bandedchromosomes, other cytogenetic banding techniques, as well asmolecular cytogeneticssuch asfluorescentin situhybridization(FISH) andcomparative genomic hybridization(CGH). Chromosomes were first observed in plant cells byKarl Wilhelm von Ngeliin 1842. Their behavior in animal (salamander) cells was described byWalther Flemming, the discoverer ofmitosis, in 1882. The name was coined by another German anatomist,von Waldeyerin 1888.

The next stage took place after the development of genetics in the early 20th century, when it was appreciated that the set of chromosomes (thekaryotype) was the carrier of the genes. Levitsky seems to have been the first to define the karyotype as thephenotypicappearance of thesomaticchromosomes, in contrast to theirgeniccontents. Investigation into the human karyotype took many years to settle the most basic question: how many chromosomes does a normaldiploidhuman cell contain? In 1912,Hans von Winiwarterreported 47 chromosomes inspermatogoniaand 48 inoogonia, concluding anXX/XOsex determinationmechanism. Painterin 1922 was not certain whether the diploid number of man was 46 or 48, at first favoring 46.He revised his opinion later from 46 to 48, and he correctly insisted on man having anXX/XYsystem. Considering their techniques, these results were quite remarkable.

Related Genetics Conferences | Human Genetics Conferences | Conference Series LLC

Track 10:Transplantation

Transplantation is the transfer (engraftment) of human cells, tissues or organs from a donor to a recipient with the aim of restoring function(s) in the body. When transplantation is performed between different species, e.g. animal to human, it is named xenotransplantation. Development of the field of organ and tissue transplantation has accelerated remarkably since the human major histocompatibility complex (MHC) was discovered in 1967. Matching of donor and recipient for MHC antigens has been shown to have a significant positive effect on graft acceptance. The roles of the different components of the immune system involved in the tolerance or rejection of grafts and in graft-versus-host disease have been clarified. These components include: antibodies, antigen presenting cells, helper and cytotoxic T cell subsets, immune cell surface molecules, signaling mechanisms and cytokines that they release. The development of pharmacologic and biological agents that interfere with the alloimmune response and graft rejection has had a crucial role in the success of organ transplantation Combinations of these agents work synergistically, leading to lower doses of immunosuppressive drugs and reduced toxicity. Reports of significant numbers of successful solid organ transplants include those of the kidneys, liver, heart and lung. The use of bone marrow transplantation for hematological diseases, particularly hematological malignancies and primary immunodeficiencies, has become the treatment of choice in many of these conditions

Related Genetics Conferences | Human Genetics Conferences | Conference Series LLC

World Congress onHuman Genetics, 31 October 02 November 2016 (Valencia, Spain); International Conference on Clinical andMolecular Genetics, 28-30 November 2016 (Chicago, USA); 6thInternational Conference on Genomics &Pharmacogenomics, 22-24 September 2016 (Berlin, Germany); International Conference on Genetic Counselling andGenomic Medicine, 11-12 August, 2016 (Birmingham, UK); Cell &Gene TherapyCongress, 19-21 May 2016 ( San Antonio, USA); The 44nd Biennial American Cytogenetics Conference,16-18 May, 2016 (Oregon, USA); The European Human Genetics Conference 2016, 21-24 May, 2016 (Barcelona, Spain); 4th International workshop on Cancer Genetic & Cytogenetic Diagnostics, 6-8 April, 2016, (Nijmegen, Netherlands); Chromatin and Epigenetics, 20-24 Mar 2016 (Whistler, Canada); Game of Epigenomics Conference, 24 - 26 April 2016 (Dubrovnik, Croatia)

Track 11:Neurodevelopmental disorders

Neurodevelopmental disordersare impairments of the growth and development of the brain orcentral nervous system. A narrower use of the term refers to a disorder of brain functionthat affectsemotion,learning ability,self-controlandmemoryand that unfolds as the individualgrows. The term is sometimes erroneously used as an exclusive synonym forautismandautism spectrumdisorders. The development of the brain is orchestrated, tightly regulated, and genetically encoded process with clear influence from the environment. This suggests that any deviation from this program early in life can result in neurodevelopmental disorders and, depending on specific timing, might lead to distinct pathology later in life. Because of that, there are many causes of neurodevelopmental disorder, which can range from deprivation,geneticandmetabolic diseases, immune disorders,infectious diseases,nutritionalfactors, physical trauma, and toxic and environmental factors. Some neurodevelopmental disorderssuch asautismand otherpervasive developmental disordersare considered multifactorialsyndromes(with many causes but more specific neurodevelopmental manifestation).

RelatedGenetics Conferences|Human Genetics Conferences|Conference Series LLC

International Conference on Clinical andMolecular Genetics, 28-30 November 2016 (Chicago, USA); 6thInternational Conference on Genomics &Pharmacogenomics, 22-24 September 2016 (Berlin, Germany); World Congress onHuman Genetics, 31 October 02 November 2016 (Valencia, Spain); International Conference on Genetic Counselling andGenomic Medicine, 11-12 August, 2016 (Birmingham, UK); Cell &Gene TherapyCongress, 19-21 May 2016 ( San Antonio, USA); Game ofEpigenomicsConference, 24 - 26 April 2016 (Dubrovnik, Croatia); The 44nd Biennial AmericanCytogeneticsConference,16-18 May, 2016 (Oregon, USA); The EuropeanHuman GeneticsConference 2016, 21-24 May, 2016 (Barcelona, Spain); 4thInternational workshop onCancer Genetic&CytogeneticDiagnostics, 6-8 April, 2016, (Nijmegen, Netherlands); Chromatin andEpigenetics, 20-24 Mar 2016 (Whistler, Canada)

Track12:Pharmacogenetics

Pharmacogeneticsis the study of inheritedgeneticdifferences in drugmetabolic pathwayswhich can affect individual responses to drugs, both in terms of therapeutic effect as well as adverse effects.The term pharmacogenetics is often used interchangeably with the termpharmacogenomicswhich also investigates the role of acquired and inherited genetic differences in relation to drug response and drug behavior through a systematic examination of genes, gene products, and inter- and intra-individual variation in gene expression and function. In oncology,pharmacogeneticshistorically is the study ofgerm line mutations(e.g.,single-nucleotide polymorphismsaffecting genes coding for liver enzymes responsible for drug deposition andpharmacokinetics), whereaspharmacogenomicsrefers tosomatic mutationsintumoralDNA leading to alteration in drug response (e.g.,KRASmutations in patients treated withanti-Her1biologics).

RelatedGenetics Conferences|Human Genetics Conferences|Conference Series LLC

International Conference on Clinical andMolecular Genetics, 28-30 November 2016 (Chicago, USA); 6thInternational Conference on Genomics &Pharmacogenomics, 22-24 September 2016 (Berlin, Germany); World Congress onHuman Genetics, 31 October 02 November 2016 (Valencia, Spain); International Conference on Genetic Counselling andGenomic Medicine, 11-12 August, 2016 (Birmingham, UK); Cell &Gene TherapyCongress, 19-21 May 2016 ( San Antonio, USA); Game ofEpigenomicsConference, 24 - 26 April 2016 (Dubrovnik, Croatia); The 44nd Biennial AmericanCytogeneticsConference,16-18 May, 2016 (Oregon, USA); The EuropeanHuman GeneticsConference 2016, 21-24 May, 2016 (Barcelona, Spain); 4thInternational workshop onCancer Genetic&CytogeneticDiagnostics, 6-8 April, 2016, (Nijmegen, Netherlands); Chromatin andEpigenetics, 20-24 Mar 2016 (Whistler, Canada)

Track13:Pharmacogenomics

Pharmacogenomics is the study of how genes affect a persons response to drugs. This relatively new field combines pharmacology (the science of drugs) and genomics (the study of genes and their functions) to develop effective, safe medications and doses that will be tailored to a persons genetic makeup. Many drugs that are currently available are one size fits all, but they dont work the same way for everyone. It can be difficult to predict who will benefit from a medication, who will not respond at all, and who will experience negative side effects (called adverse drug reactions). Adverse drug reactions are a significant cause of hospitalizations and deaths in the United States. With the knowledge gained from the Human Genome Project, researchers are learning how inherited differences in genes affect the bodys response to medications. These genetic differences will be used to predict whether a medication will be effective for a particular person and to help prevent adverse drug reactions.The field of pharmacogenomics is still in its infancy. Its use is currently quite limited, but new approaches are under study in clinical trials. In the future, pharmacogenomics will allow the development of tailored drugs to treat a wide range of health problems, including cardiovascular disease,Alzheimer disease, cancer, HIV/AIDS, and asthma.

RelatedGenetics Conferences|Human Genetics Conferences|Conference Series LLC

International Conference on Clinical andMolecular Genetics, 28-30 November 2016 (Chicago, USA); 6thInternational Conference on Genomics &Pharmacogenomics, 22-24 September 2016 (Berlin, Germany); World Congress onHuman Genetics, 31 October 02 November 2016 (Valencia, Spain); International Conference on Genetic Counselling andGenomic Medicine, 11-12 August, 2016 (Birmingham, UK); Cell &Gene TherapyCongress, 19-21 May 2016 ( San Antonio, USA); Game ofEpigenomicsConference, 24 - 26 April 2016 (Dubrovnik, Croatia); The 44nd Biennial AmericanCytogeneticsConference,16-18 May, 2016 (Oregon, USA); The EuropeanHuman GeneticsConference 2016, 21-24 May, 2016 (Barcelona, Spain); 4thInternational workshop onCancer Genetic&CytogeneticDiagnostics, 6-8 April, 2016, (Nijmegen, Netherlands); Chromatin andEpigenetics, 20-24 Mar 2016 (Whistler, Canada)

Track14:Drug discovery

Driven by chemistry but increasingly guided by pharmacology and the clinical sciences,drugresearch has contributed more to the progress of medicine during the past century than any other scientific factor. Improving the science ofdrug developmentand regulation is important in fulfilling the public health. The advent of molecular biology and, in particular, of genomic sciences is having a deep impact ondrug discovery. Emphasis is placed on the contrast between the academic and industrial research operating environments, which can influence the effectiveness of research collaboration between the two constituencies, but which plays such an important role indrug innovation. The strategic challenges that research directors face are also emphasized.

RelatedGenetics Conferences|Human Genetics Conferences|Conference Series LLC

International Conference on Clinical andMolecular Genetics, 28-30 November 2016 (Chicago, USA); 6thInternational Conference on Genomics &Pharmacogenomics, 22-24 September 2016 (Berlin, Germany); World Congress onHuman Genetics, 31 October 02 November 2016 (Valencia, Spain); International Conference on Genetic Counselling andGenomic Medicine, 11-12 August, 2016 (Birmingham, UK); Cell &Gene TherapyCongress, 19-21 May 2016 ( San Antonio, USA); Game ofEpigenomicsConference, 24 - 26 April 2016 (Dubrovnik, Croatia); The 44nd Biennial AmericanCytogeneticsConference,16-18 May, 2016 (Oregon, USA); The EuropeanHuman GeneticsConference 2016, 21-24 May, 2016 (Barcelona, Spain); 4thInternational workshop onCancer Genetic&CytogeneticDiagnostics, 6-8 April, 2016, (Nijmegen, Netherlands); Chromatin andEpigenetics, 20-24 Mar 2016 (Whistler, Canada)

Track15:Bioinformatics in Human Genetics

Recent developments, including next-generation sequencing (NGS), bio-ontologies and the Semantic Web, and the growing role of hospital information technology (IT) systems and electronic health records, amass ever-increasing amounts of data before human genetics scientists and clinicians. However, they have ever-improving tools to analyze those data for research and clinical care. Correspondingly, the field of bioinformatics is turning to research questions in the field of human genetics, and the field of human genetics is making greater use of bioinformatic algorithms and tools. The choice of "Bioinformatics and Human Genetics" as the topic of this special issue of Human Mutation reflects this new importance of bioinformatics and medical informatics in human genetics. Experts from among the attendees of the Paris 2010 Human Variome Project symposium provide a survey of some of the "hot" computational topics over the next decade. These experts identify the promise-what human geneticists who are not themselves bioinformaticians stand to gain-as well as the challenges and unmet needs that are likely to represent fruitful areas of research.

RelatedGenetics Conferences|Human Genetics Conferences|Conference Series LLC

International Conference on Clinical andMolecular Genetics, 28-30 November 2016 (Chicago, USA); 6thInternational Conference on Genomics &Pharmacogenomics, 22-24 September 2016 (Berlin, Germany); World Congress onHuman Genetics, 31 October 02 November 2016 (Valencia, Spain); International Conference on Genetic Counselling andGenomic Medicine, 11-12 August, 2016 (Birmingham, UK); Cell &Gene TherapyCongress, 19-21 May 2016 ( San Antonio, USA); Game ofEpigenomicsConference, 24 - 26 April 2016 (Dubrovnik, Croatia); The 44nd Biennial AmericanCytogeneticsConference,16-18 May, 2016 (Oregon, USA); The EuropeanHuman GeneticsConference 2016, 21-24 May, 2016 (Barcelona, Spain); 4thInternational workshop onCancer Genetic&CytogeneticDiagnostics, 6-8 April, 2016, (Nijmegen, Netherlands); Chromatin andEpigenetics, 20-24 Mar 2016 (Whistler, Canada)

Track16:Anthropology

Anthropologyis the study ofhumanity.Its main subdivisions aresocialandcultural anthropology, which describes the workings of societies around the world,linguistic anthropology, which investigates the influence of language in social life, and biological or physical anthropology. Anthropology concerns long-term development of the human organism.Archaeology, which studies past human cultures through investigation of physical evidence, is thought of as a branch of anthropology in the United States, although in Europe, it is viewed as a discipline in its own right, or grouped under related disciplines such as history.

RelatedGenetics Conferences|Human Genetics Conferences|Conference Series LLC

International Conference on Clinical andMolecular Genetics, 28-30 November 2016 (Chicago, USA); 6thInternational Conference on Genomics &Pharmacogenomics, 22-24 September 2016 (Berlin, Germany); World Congress onHuman Genetics, 31 October 02 November 2016 (Valencia, Spain); International Conference on Genetic Counselling andGenomic Medicine, 11-12 August, 2016 (Birmingham, UK); Cell &Gene TherapyCongress, 19-21 May 2016 ( San Antonio, USA); Game ofEpigenomicsConference, 24 - 26 April 2016 (Dubrovnik, Croatia); The 44nd Biennial AmericanCytogeneticsConference,16-18 May, 2016 (Oregon, USA); The EuropeanHuman GeneticsConference 2016, 21-24 May, 2016 (Barcelona, Spain); 4thInternational workshop onCancer Genetic&CytogeneticDiagnostics, 6-8 April, 2016, (Nijmegen, Netherlands); Chromatin andEpigenetics, 20-24 Mar 2016 (Whistler, Canada)

1. Scope and Importance of Human Genetics:

Scope: The Scope of the conference is to gather all the Doctors, Researchers, Business Delegates and Scientists to approach and deliver all the attendees about the latest scientific advancements on the respective sphere. This Human Genetics Conference is the premier event focusing on understanding individual and organizational behaviour and decision-making related to genetics and molecular biology, biotechnology, pharmaceuticals, medicals and academia.

Importance: Conference on Human Genetics is a much celebrated conference which basically deals with the latest research and developments in the sphere of genetics and molecular biology. This Conference will provide a perfect platform to all the International mix of leading Research Scholars, and Scientists achieved eminence in their field of study, research academicians from the universities and research institutions, industrial research professionals and business associates along with Ph.D. Students to come and inform all the attendees about the latest scientific advancements on the respective sphere.

2. Why its in Valencia, Spain?

In the last decade, pre-implantation genetic diagnosis and screening (PGD; PGS) have become widely used in IVF treatments: in 2005 nearly 6000 PGD/PGS (5 per cent of all IVF cycles) had been performed in Europe. The diffusion of these technologies, however, is not homogenous; whilst in some countries PGD is prohibited and in others is hardly implemented, Spain performs 33 per cent of all the PGD/PGS (ESHRE 2007). Combining the analysis of juridical documents with semi-structured interviews to past and present members of the Spanish National Assisted Reproduction Committee (CNRHA), this study suggests that the remarkable diffusion of PGD/PGS in Spain may be largely due to the interaction between the growing momentum enjoyed by embryonic stem cell research and a vibrant expansion of IVF business along the Mediterranean coast. In this process, genetic issues per se seem to play a minor role, although the prevention of genetic diseases constitutes the formal rationale for the extension of PGD from monogenic, early onset diseases to polygenic, late-onset ones.

3. Member Associated with Human Genetics Research

The Members who are associated with Genetics Research includes Societies, Associations, Institutes, Universities and other Research Organizations.

A. City Statistics: Approximately, more than 2876 members involved in Genetics and related researches in the city of Valencia.

B. Country Statistics: Approximately, more than 17775 members involved in Genetics and related researches in Spain.

C. Worldwide statistics: Europe: Approximately, more than 56083 members involved in Genetics and related researches. USA: Approximately, more than 24285 members involved in Genetics and related researches. Global: Approximately, 1291100 members involved in Genetics and related researches.

4. Societies Associated with Human Genetics Research

Some of the renowned societies involved in genetic research

A. Societies in Valencia and Spain:

B. Societies in Europe:

C. Societies in Globe:

5. Industries Associated with Human Genetics Research:

The Major Industries or Companies and laboratories associated with Genetics research are listed below:

A. By City - Some of the major companies in Valencia:

Sistemas Genomicos, Reproductive Genetics Unit, Paterna (Valencia); Instituto de Medicina Genmica, IMEGEN, Paterna (Valencia); LifeSequencing; Oncovision etc.

B. By Country Some of the major companies in Spain:

AC-Gen Reading Life SL, Valladolid; Cidegen, SL, Salamanca; Diagnostico Genetico Canarias, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria; Genetadi Biotech, GENETADI, Derio-BILBAO (SPAIN); GENETAQ, Molecular Genetics Centre, Malaga; Genetracer Biotech, Santander; Genyca, Madrid; Health in Code S.L., Corua; Innovagenomics S.L, Innovagenomics, Salamanca; Diagnostics in Iron Metabolism Diseases (DIRON), Badalona

C. Global:

Abbott Laboratories; AutoGenomics; Biocartis; Bio-Rad Laboratories; Cepheid; EKF Diagnostics; Elitech Group; IntegraGen; Interpace Diagnostics; Myriad Genetics; Perkin Elmer; Qiagen; Quest Diagnostics; Roche Diagnostics; WaferGen Biosystems

6. Universities Associated with Human Genetics

A. City Statistics:

University of Valencia , Universidad catolica de Valencia, Valencian international university, CEU Cardenal Herrera University, La Universidad Catlica de Valencia

B. Country Statistics - Spain:

University of Zaragosa, University of Barcelona, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Universidad Complutense de Madrid , Universidad Autonoma de Madrid

C. Worldwide Statistics:

European university Switzerland, Vilnius university, Uppsala University, Universita degli study di Torino, Maastricht University, Graz University of Technology, Harvard University, Leiden University Medical Center, Center for Human and Clinical Genetics, University of Oxford, Stanford University, University of Cambridge.

7. Market Value on Human Genetics Research:

The global market for Genetic Testing is forecast to reach US$2.2 billion by 2017. Increasing knowledge about the potential benefits in genetic testing is one of the prime reasons for the growth of the genetic testing market. Advancements in the genetic testing space, aging population and a subsequent rise in the number of chronic diseases, and increasing incidence of cancer cases are the other factors propelling growth in the genetic testing market.

Read this article:
Genetics Conferences | Human Genetics Conferences | Europe ...

Posted in Human Genetics | Comments Off

Ron Paul – New Jersey 101.5

Posted: at 1:41 pm

Former President Bill Clinton. (AP Photo/Danny Johnston, File)

WASHINGTON (AP) -- In the year that will pass before the 2016 campaign for president formally kicks off with the votes in the Iowa Caucus, any number of candidates, donors, political operatives - and people who have nothing to do with American politics - will shape the race for the White House. Here's a look at 10 people (OK, 12 people) who will be worth watching in the next year.

If you look back and watch footage from the first Presidential debate all the way back in 1992, maybe Ross Perot wasn't nuts like everyone thought.

By: Irene Lenhart

How can Ron Paul be so accurate in his predictions on the cause and effect of U.S intervention on economics, foreign affairs, and individual freedoms, yet still be widely ignored...

BY: Irene Lenhart

Were you at Independence Mall in Philadelphia on Sunday 4/22/12 for the Ron Paul Rally? Did you see me? I was the person in the raincoat with an umbrella....oh never mind.

Kidding aside,4300-plus heard the weather report, dragged out their parkas, umbrellas, and rain boots, packed up their enthusiasm and headed

Republican presidential contender Ron Paul says he's friendly with GOP front-runner Mitt Romney but that he's not planning to endorse Romney anytime soon.

Fresh off victories in Iowa and New Hampshire, Mitt Romney has a clear lead in South Carolinas upcoming primary and is poised to go 3-for-3 according to Monmouth University poll released this morning. The former Massachusetts governor registers 33% support among likely Republican voters in Saturdays primary. Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich places second at 22%. Former Pennsylvania Senator Rick Santorum (14%) and Texas Congressman Ron Paul (12%) are in a close contest for third place. Rick Perry trails with 6%. Jon Huntsman earned 4% before he pulled out of the race yesterday.

At least $12.5 million in ads have blanketed Iowa's airwaves ahead of Tuesday's Republican presidential caucuses, with hard-hitting spots awash in ghoulish images and startling claims.

Excerpt from:
Ron Paul - New Jersey 101.5

Posted in Ron Paul | Comments Off

Skylab – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Posted: March 9, 2016 at 6:43 pm

Skylab Skylab as photographed by its departing final crew (Skylab 4) Station statistics COSPAR ID 1973-027A Call sign Skylab Crew 3 per mission (9 total) Launch May 14, 1973 17:30:00 UTC Launch pad Kennedy Space Center LC-39A Reentry July 11, 1979 16:37:00 UTC near Perth, Australia Mission status Complete; uncontrolled re-entry Mass 150,300lb (68,175kg)[1] w/o Apollo CSM Length 82.4 feet (25.1m) w/o Apollo CSM Width 55.8 feet (17.0m) w/ one solar panel Height 36.3 feet (11.1m) w/ telescope mount Diameter 21.67 feet (6.6m) Pressurised volume 12,417cuft (351.6m3) Perigee 269.7mi (434.0km) Apogee 274.6mi (441.9km) Orbital inclination 50 Orbital period 93.4 min Orbits per day 15.4 Days in orbit 2,249 days Days occupied 171 days Number of orbits 34,981 Distance travelled ~890,000,000 mi (1,400,000,000 km) Statistics as of Re-entry July 11, 1979

Skylab was a space station launched and operated by NASA and was the United States' first space station. Skylab orbited Earth from 1973 to 1979, and included a workshop, a solar observatory, and other systems. It was launched unmanned by a modified Saturn V rocket, with a weight of 150,300 pounds (68,175kg).[1] Three manned missions to the station, conducted between 1973 and 1974 using the Apollo Command/Service Module (CSM) atop the smaller Saturn IB, each delivered a three-astronaut crew. On the last two manned missions, an additional Apollo / Saturn IB stood by ready to rescue the crew in orbit if it was needed.

The station was damaged during launch when the micrometeoroid shield separated from the workshop and tore away, taking one of two main solar panel arrays with it and jamming the other one so that it could not deploy. This deprived Skylab of most of its electrical power, and also removed protection from intense solar heating, threatening to make it unusable. The first crew was able to save it in the first in-space major repair, by deploying a replacement heat shade and freeing the jammed solar panels.

Skylab included the Apollo Telescope Mount, which was a multi-spectral solar observatory, Multiple Docking Adapter (with two docking ports), Airlock Module with EVA hatches, and the Orbital Workshop, the main habitable volume. Electrical power came from solar arrays, as well as fuel cells in the docked Apollo CSM. The rear of the station included a large waste tank, propellant tanks for maneuvering jets, and a heat radiator.

Numerous scientific experiments were conducted aboard Skylab during its operational life, and crews were able to confirm the existence of coronal holes in the Sun. The Earth Resources Experiment Package (EREP) was used to view Earth with sensors that recorded data in the visible, infrared, and microwave spectral regions. Thousands of photographs of Earth were taken, and records for human time spent in orbit were extended. Plans were made to refurbish and reuse Skylab, using the Space Shuttle to boost its orbit and repair it. However, development of the Shuttle was delayed, and Skylab reentered Earth's atmosphere and disintegrated in 1979, with debris striking portions of Western Australia. Post-Skylab NASA space laboratory projects included Spacelab, Shuttle-Mir, and Space Station Freedom (later merged into the International Space Station).

Rocket engineer Wernher von Braun, science fiction writer Arthur C. Clarke, and other early advocates of manned space travel, expected until the 1960s that a space station would be an important early step in space exploration. Von Braun participated in the publishing of a series of influential articles in Collier's magazine from 1952 to 1954, titled "Man Will Conquer Space Soon!". He envisioned a large, circular station 250 feet (75m) in diameter that would rotate to generate artificial gravity and require a fleet of 7,000-ton (6,500-metric ton) space shuttles for construction in orbit. The 80 men aboard the station would include astronomers operating a telescope, meteorologists to forecast the weather, and soldiers to conduct surveillance. Von Braun expected that future expeditions to the Moon and Mars would leave from the station.[2]:25

The development of the transistor, the solar cell, and telemetry, led in the 1950s and early 1960s to unmanned satellites that could take photographs of weather patterns or enemy nuclear weapons and send them to Earth. A large station was no longer necessary for such purposes, and the United States Apollo program to send men to the Moon chose a mission mode that would not need in-orbit assembly. A smaller station that a single rocket could launch retained value, however, for scientific purposes.[2]:5560

In 1959, von Braun, head of the Development Operations Division at the Army Ballistic Missile Agency, submitted his final Project Horizon plans to the U.S. Army. The overall goal of Horizon was to place men on the Moon, a mission that would soon be taken over by the rapidly forming NASA. Although concentrating on the Moon missions, von Braun also detailed an orbiting laboratory built out of a Horizon upper stage,[3]:23 an idea used for Skylab.[3]:9 A number of NASA centers studied various space station designs in the early 1960s. Studies generally looked at platforms launched by the Saturn V, followed up by crews launched on Saturn IB using an Apollo Command/Service Module,[3]:10 or a Gemini capsule[3]:14 on a Titan II-C, the latter being much less expensive in the case where cargo was not needed. Proposals ranged from an Apollo-based station with two to three men, or a small "canister" for four men with Gemini capsules resupplying it, to a large, rotating station with 24 men and an operating lifetime of about five years.[3]:1314 A proposal to study the use of a Saturn S-IVB as a manned space laboratory was documented in 1962 by the Douglas Aircraft Company.[4]

The Department of Defense (DoD) and NASA cooperated closely in many areas of space.[2]:198202 In September 1963, NASA and the DoD agreed to cooperate in building a space station.[3]:17 The DoD wanted its own manned facility, however,[2]:203 and in December it announced Manned Orbital Laboratory (MOL), a small space station primarily intended for photo reconnaissance using large telescopes directed by a two-man crew. The station was the same diameter as a Titan II upper stage, and would be launched with the crew riding atop in a modified Gemini capsule with a hatch cut into the heat shield on the bottom of the capsule.[3]:1719[5][6] MOL competed for funding with a NASA station for the next five years[3]:15 and politicians and other officials often suggested that NASA participate in MOL or use the DoD design.[2]:203 The military project led to changes to the NASA plans so that they would resemble MOL less.[3]:17

NASA management was concerned about losing the 400,000 workers involved in Apollo after landing on the moon in 1969.[3]:20,22 A reason von Braun, head of NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center during the 1960s, advocated for a smaller station after his large one was not built was that he wished to provide his employees with work beyond developing the Saturn rockets, which would be completed relatively early during Project Apollo.[2]:61 NASA set up the Apollo Logistic Support System Office, originally intended to study various ways to modify the Apollo hardware for scientific missions. The office initially proposed a number of projects for direct scientific study, including an extended-stay lunar mission which required two Saturn V launchers, a "lunar truck" based on the Lunar Module (LEM), a large manned solar telescope using a LEM as its crew quarters, and small space stations using a variety of LEM or CSM-based hardware. Although it did not look at the space station specifically, over the next two years the office would become increasingly dedicated to this role. In August 1965, the office was renamed, becoming the Apollo Applications Program (AAP).[3]:20

As part of their general work, in August 1964 the Manned Spacecraft Center (MSC) presented studies on an expendable lab known as Apollo "X", short for Apollo Extension System. "Apollo X" would have replaced the LEM carried on the top of the S-IVB stage with a small space station slightly larger than the CSM's service area, containing supplies and experiments for missions between 15 and 45 days' duration. Using this study as a baseline, a number of different mission profiles were looked at over the next six months.

In November 1964, von Braun proposed a more ambitious plan to build a much larger station built from the S-II second stage of a Saturn V. His design replaced the S-IVB third stage with an aeroshell, primarily as an adapter for the CSM on top. Inside the shell was a 10-foot (3.0m) cylindrical equipment section. On reaching orbit, the S-II second stage would be vented to remove any remaining hydrogen fuel, then the equipment section would be slid into it via a large inspection hatch. This became known as a "wet workshop" concept, because of the conversion of an active fuel tank. The station filled the entire interior of the S-II stage's hydrogen tank, with the equipment section forming a "spine" and living quarters located between it and the walls of the booster. This would have resulted in a very large 33-by-45-foot (10.1 by 13.7m) living area. Power was to be provided by solar cells lining the outside of the S-II stage.[3]:22

One problem with this proposal was that it required a dedicated Saturn V launch to fly the station. At the time the design was being proposed, it was not known how many of the then-contracted Saturn Vs would be required to achieve a successful Moon landing. However, several planned Earth-orbit test missions for the LEM and CSM had been canceled, leaving a number of Saturn IBs free for use. Further work led to the idea of building a smaller "wet workshop" based on the S-IVB, launched as the second stage of a Saturn IB.

A number of S-IVB-based stations were studied at MSC from mid-1965, which had much in common with the Skylab design that eventually flew. An airlock would be attached to the hydrogen tank, in the area designed to hold the LEM, and a minimum amount of equipment would be installed in the tank itself in order to avoid taking up too much fuel volume. Floors of the station would be made from an open metal framework that allowed the fuel to flow through it. After launch, a follow-up mission launched by a Saturn IB would launch additional equipment, including solar panels, an equipment section and docking adapter, and various experiments. Douglas Aircraft, builder of the S-IVB stage, was asked to prepare proposals along these lines. The company had for several years been proposing stations based on the S-IV stage, before it was replaced by the S-IVB.[3]:25

On April 1, 1966, MSC sent out contracts to Douglas, Grumman, and McDonnell for the conversion of a S-IVB spent stage, under the name Saturn S-IVB spent-stage experiment support module (SSESM).[3]:30 In May, astronauts voiced concerns over the purging of the stage's hydrogen tank in space. Nevertheless, in late July it was announced that the Orbital Workshop would be launched as a part of Apollo mission AS-209, originally one of the Earth-orbit CSM test launches, followed by two Saturn I/CSM crew launches, AAP-1 and AAP-2.

MOL remained AAP's chief competitor for funds, although the two programs cooperated on technology. NASA considered flying experiments on MOL, or using its Titan IIIC booster instead of the much more expensive Saturn IB. The agency decided that the Air Force station was not large enough, and that converting Apollo hardware for use with Titan would be too slow and too expensive.[3]:4548 The DoD later canceled MOL in June 1969.[3]:109

Design work continued over the next two years, in an era of shrinking budgets.[7] (NASA sought $450 million for Apollo Applications in fiscal year 1967, for example, but received $42 million.)[2]:6465 In August 1967, the agency announced that the lunar mapping and base construction missions examined by the AAP were being canceled. Only the Earth-orbiting missions remained, namely the Orbital Workshop and Apollo Telescope Mount solar observatory.

The success of Apollo 8 in December 1968, launched on the third flight of a Saturn V, made it likely that one would be available to launch a dry workshop.[2]:66 Later, several Moon missions were canceled as well, originally to be Apollo missions 18 through 20. The cancellation of these missions freed up three Saturn V boosters for the AAP program. Although this would have allowed them to develop von Braun's original S-II based mission, by this time so much work had been done on the S-IV based design that work continued on this baseline. With the extra power available, the wet workshop was no longer needed;[3]:109110 the S-IC and S-II lower stages could launch a "dry workshop", with its interior already prepared, directly into orbit.

[1]

A dry workshop simplified plans for the interior of the station.[3]:130Industrial design firm Raymond Loewy/William Snaith recommended emphasizing habitability and comfort for the astronauts by, for example, providing a wardroom for meals and relaxation,[3]:133134 and a window to view Earth and space, although astronauts who participated in Skylab planning were dubious about the designers' focus on areas such as color schemes.[3]:137 Habitability had not previously been an area of concern when building spacecraft, due to their small volume and brief mission durations, but the Skylab missions would last for months.[3]:133 NASA sent a scientist on Jacques Piccard's Ben Franklin submarine in the Gulf Stream in July and August 1969, to learn how six people would live in an enclosed space for four weeks.[3]:139140

Astronauts were uninterested in watching movies on a proposed entertainment center or playing games, but did want books and individual music choices.[3]:137 Food was also important; early Apollo crews complained about its quality, and a NASA volunteer found living on the Apollo food for four days on Earth to be intolerable; its taste and composition, in the form of cubes and squeeze tubes, were unpleasant. Skylab food significantly improved on its predecessors by prioritizing edibility over scientific needs.[3]:141142

Each astronaut had a private sleeping area the size of a small walk-in closet, with a curtain, sleeping bag, and locker.[8]:82 Designers also added a shower[3]:139[8]:80 and a toilet;[3]:152158[8]:30 the latter was both for comfort and to obtain precise urine and feces samples for examination on Earth.[3]:165

Rescuing astronauts from Skylab was possible in the most likely emergency circumstances. The crew could use the CSM to quickly return to Earth if the station suffered serious damage. If the CSM failed, the spacecraft and Saturn IB for the next Skylab mission would have been launched with two astronauts to retrieve the crew; given Skylab's ample supplies, its residents would have been able to wait up to several weeks for the rescue mission.[9]

On August 8, 1969, the McDonnell Douglas Corporation received a contract for the conversion of two existing S-IVB stages to the Orbital Workshop configuration. One of the S-IV test stages was shipped to McDonnell Douglas for the construction of a mock-up in January 1970. The Orbital Workshop was renamed "Skylab" in February 1970 as a result of a NASA contest.[3]:115 The actual stage that flew was the upper stage of the AS-212 rocket (the S-IVB stage - S-IVB 212). The mission computer used aboard Skylab was the IBM System/4Pi TC-1, a relative of the AP-101 Space Shuttle computers. A Saturn V originally produced for the Apollo program before the cancellation of Apollo 18, 19, and 20 was repurposed and redesigned to launch Skylab.[10] The Saturn V's upper stage was removed, but with the controlling Instrument Unit remaining in its standard position.

Skylab was launched on May 14, 1973 by the modified Saturn V. The launch is sometimes referred to as Skylab 1, or SL-1. Severe damage was sustained during launch and deployment, including the loss of the station's micrometeoroid shield/sun shade and one of its main solar panels. Debris from the lost micrometeoroid shield further complicated matters by pinning the remaining solar panel to the side of the station, preventing its deployment and thus leaving the station with a huge power deficit.[3]:253255

Immediately following Skylab's launch, Pad A at Kennedy Space Center Launch Complex 39 was deactivated, and construction proceeded to modify it for the Space Shuttle program, originally targeting a maiden launch in March 1979. The manned missions to Skylab would occur from Launch Pad 39B.

Three manned missions, designated SL-2, SL-3 and SL-4, were made to Skylab. The first manned mission, SL-2, launched on May 25, 1973 atop a Saturn IB and involved extensive repairs to the station. The crew deployed a parasol-like sunshade through a small instrument port from the inside of the station bringing station temperatures down to acceptable levels and preventing overheating that would have melted the plastic insulation inside the station and released poisonous gases. This solution was designed by NASA's "Mr. Fix It" Jack Kinzler, who won the NASA Distinguished Service Medal for his efforts. The crew conducted further repairs via two spacewalks (extra-vehicular activity, or EVA). The crew stayed in orbit with Skylab for 28 days. Two additional missions followed, with the launch dates of July 28, 1973 (SL-3) and November 16, 1973 (SL-4), and mission durations of 59 and 84 days, respectively. The last Skylab crew returned to Earth on February 8, 1974.

Skylab orbited Earth 2,476 times during the 171 days and 13 hours of its occupation during the three manned Skylab missions. Astronauts performed ten spacewalks, totaling 42 hours and 16 minutes. Skylab logged about 2,000 hours of scientific and medical experiments, 127,000 frames of film of the Sun and 46,000 of Earth.[3]:340 Solar experiments included photographs of eight solar flares, and produced valuable results[8]:155 that scientists stated would have been impossible to obtain with unmanned spacecraft.[3]:342344 The existence of the Sun's coronal holes were confirmed because of these efforts.[3]:357 Many of the experiments conducted investigated the astronauts' adaptation to extended periods of microgravity.

A typical day began at 6 AM Central Time Zone.[3]:307308 Although the toilet was small and noisy, both veteran astronautswho had endured earlier missions' rudimentary waste-collection systemsand rookies complimented it.[3]:165,307[8]:80[12] The first crew enjoyed taking a shower once a week, but found drying themselves in weightlessness[12] and vacuuming excess water difficult; later crews usually cleaned themselves daily with wet washcloths instead of using the shower. Astronauts also found that bending over in weightlessness to put on socks or tie shoelaces strained their stomach muscles.[3]:306308

Breakfast began at 7 AM. Astronauts usually stood to eat, as sitting in microgravity also strained their stomach muscles. They reported that their foodalthough greatly improved from Apollowas bland and repetitive, and weightlessness caused utensils, food containers, and bits of food to float away; also, gas in their drinking water contributed to flatulence. After breakfast and preparation for lunch, experiments, tests and repairs of spacecraft systems and, if possible, 90 minutes of physical exercise followed; the station had a bicycle and other equipment, and astronauts could jog around the water tank. After dinner, which was scheduled for 6 PM, crews performed household chores and prepared for the next day's experiments. Following lengthy daily instructions (some of which were up to 15 meters long) sent via teleprinter, the crews were often busy enough to postpone sleep.[3]:309,334[13]:27

Each Skylab mission set a record for the amount of time astronauts spent in space. The station offered what a later study called "a highly satisfactory living and working environment for crews", with enough room for personal privacy.[13]:24 Although it had a dart set,[14]playing cards, and other recreational equipment in addition to books and music players, the window with its view of Earth became the most popular way to relax in orbit.[8]:7980,134135

Overview of most major experiments:[15] Skylab 3 carried several more experiments, such as to observe Comet Kohoutek.

Skylab was abandoned after the end of the SL-4 mission in February 1974, but to welcome visitors the crew left a bag filled with supplies and left the hatch unlocked.[16] NASA discouraged any discussion of additional visits due to the station's age,[3]:335,361 but in 1977 and 1978, when the agency still believed the Space Shuttle would be ready by 1979, it completed two studies on reusing the station.[13]:3-1[16] By September 1978, the agency believed Skylab was safe for crews, with all major systems intact and operational.[13]:3-2 It still had 180 man-days of water and 420 man-days of oxygen, and astronauts could refill both;[16] the station could hold up to about 600 to 700 man-days of drinkable water and 420 man-days of food.[13]:27

The studies cited several benefits from reusing Skylab, which one called a resource worth "hundreds of millions of dollars"[13]:113 with "unique habitability provisions for long duration space flight."[13]:311 Because no more operational Saturn V rockets were available after the Apollo program, four to five shuttle flights and extensive space architecture would have been needed to build another station as large as Skylab's 12,400 cubic feet (350m3) volume.[13]:1-12 to 1-13 Its ample sizemuch greater than that of the shuttle alone, or even the shuttle plus Spacelab[13]:28was enough, with some modifications, for up to seven astronauts[13]:231 of both sexes,[13]:314 and experiments needing a long duration in space;[13]:113 even a movie projector for recreation was possible.[13]:311

Proponents of Skylab's reuse also said repairing and upgrading Skylab would provide information on the results of long-duration exposure to space for future stations.[16] The most serious issue for reactivation was stationkeeping, as one of the station's gyroscopes had failed[3]:361 and the attitude control system needed refueling; these issues would need EVA to fix or replace. The station had not been designed for extensive resupply. However, although it was originally planned that Skylab crews would only perform limited maintenance[8]:34 they successfully made major repairs during EVA, such as the SL-2 crew's deployment of the solar panel[8]:7375 and the SL-4 crew's repair of the primary coolant loop.[3]:317[8]:130[13]:321 The SL-2 crew fixed one item during EVA by, reportedly, "hit[ting] it with [a] hammer."[8]:89

Some studies also said, beyond the opportunity for space construction and maintenance experience, reactivating the station would free up shuttle flights for other uses,[13]:113 and reduce the need to modify the shuttle for long-duration missions.[13]:2-9 to 2-10 Even if the station were not manned again, went one argument, it would serve as a useful experimental platform.[13]:261

The reactivation would likely have occurred in four phases:[16]

The first three phases would have required about $60 million in 1980s dollars, not including launch costs.

After a boost of 6.8 miles (10.9km) by SL-4's Apollo CSM before its departure in 1974, Skylab was left in a parking orbit of 269 miles (433km) by 283 miles (455km)[3]:361 that was expected to last until at least the early 1980s, based on estimates of the 11-year sunspot cycle that began in 1976.[3]:361[20] NASA began considering the potential risks of a space station reentry as early as 1962, but decided to not incorporate a retrorocket system in Skylab due to cost and acceptable risk.[3]:127129

The spent 49-ton Saturn V S-II stage which had launched Skylab in 1973 remained in orbit for almost two years, and made an uncontrolled reentry on January 11, 1975.[21] Some debris, most prominently the five heavy J-2 engines, likely survived to impact in the North Atlantic Ocean. Although this event did not receive heavy media or public attention, it was followed closely by NASA and the Air Force, and helped emphasize the need for improved planning and public awareness for Skylab's eventual reentry.[citation needed]

British mathematician Desmond King-Hele of the Royal Aircraft Establishment predicted that Skylab would de-orbit and crash to earth due to increased solar activity. NASA initially denied this but accepted after his calculations were checked.[citation needed] Greater-than-expected solar activity[3]:362 heated the outer layers of Earth's atmosphere and increased drag on Skylab. By late 1977, NORAD accurately forecast a reentry in mid-1979;[20] a National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) scientist criticized NASA for using an inaccurate model for the second most-intense sunspot cycle in a century, and for ignoring NOAA predictions published in 1976.[3]:362363

The reentry of the USSR's nuclear powered Cosmos 954 in January 1978, and the resulting radioactive debris fall in northern Canada, drew more attention to Skylab's orbit. Although Skylab did not contain radioactive materials, the State Department warned NASA about the potential diplomatic repercussions of station debris.[3]:363Battelle Memorial Institute forecast that up to 25 tons of metal debris could land in 500 pieces over an area 4,000 miles long and 1,000 miles wide. The lead-lined film vault, for example, might land intact at 400 feet per second.[22]

Ground controllers re-established contact with Skylab in March 1978[20] and recharged its batteries.[23] Although NASA worked on plans to reboost Skylab with the Space Shuttle through 1978 and the TRS was almost complete, the agency gave up in December when it became clear that the shuttle would not be ready in time;[3]:363367[17] its first flight, STS-1, did not occur until April 1981. Also rejected were proposals to launch the TRS using one or two unmanned rockets[16] or to attempt to destroy the station with missiles.[22]

Skylab's demise was an international media event, with merchandising of T-shirts and hats with bullseyes,[22] wagering on the time and place of re-entry, and nightly news reports. The San Francisco Examiner offered a $10,000 prize for the first piece of Skylab delivered to its offices; the competing Chronicle offered $200,000 if a subscriber suffered personal or property damage.[23] NASA calculated that the odds of station re-entry debris hitting any human were 1 to 152 and when multiplied by 4 billion becomes 1 in 600 billion for a specific human,[24] although the odds of debris hitting a city of 100,000 or more were 1 to 7 and special teams were readied to head to any country hit by debris and requesting help.[23]

We assume that Skylab is on the planet Earth, somewhere.

In the hours before re-entry, ground controllers adjusted Skylab's orientation to try to minimize the risk of re-entry on a populated area.[23] They aimed the station at a spot 810 miles (1,300km) south southeast of Cape Town, South Africa, and re-entry began at approximately 16:37 UTC, July 11, 1979.[3]:371 The Air Force provided data from a secret tracking system able to monitor the reentry.[25] The station did not burn up as fast as NASA expected, however. Due to a 4% calculation error, debris landed southeast of Perth, Western Australia,[3]:371 and was found between Esperance and Rawlinna, from 31 to 34S and 122 to 126E, about 130150km radius around Balladonia. Residents and an airline pilot saw dozens of colorful fireworks-like flares as large pieces broke up in the atmosphere.[22] The Shire of Esperance facetiously fined NASA A$400 for littering, a fine which remained unpaid for 30 years.[26] The fine was paid in April 2009, when radio show host Scott Barley of Highway Radio raised the funds from his morning show listeners and paid the fine on behalf of NASA.[27][28]

Seventeen-year-old Stan Thornton found 24 pieces of Skylab at his home in Esperance. A Philadelphia businessman flew him, his parents, and his girlfriend to San Francisco, where he collected the Examiner prize.[3]:371[22] In a coincidence for the organizers, the annual Miss Universe pageant was scheduled to be held a few days later, on July 20, 1979 in Perth. A large piece of Skylab debris was displayed on the stage.[29] Analysis of the debris showed that the station had not disintegrated until 10 miles above the Earth, much lower than expected.[22]

After the demise of Skylab, NASA focused on the reusable Spacelab module, an orbital workshop that could be deployed with the Space Shuttle and returned to Earth. The next American major space station project was Space Station Freedom, which was merged into the International Space Station in 1993, and launched starting in 1998. Shuttle-Mir was another project, and led to the U.S. funding Spektr, Priroda, and the Mir Docking Module in the 1990s.

Skylab 5 would have been a short 20-day mission to conduct scientific experiments and boost Skylab into a higher orbit. Vance Brand (commander), William B. Lenoir (science pilot), and Don Lind (pilot) would have been the crew for this mission, with Brand and Lind being the prime crew for the Skylab Rescue flights.[30] Brand and Lind also trained for a mission that would have aimed Skylab for a controlled deorbit.[25]

In addition to the flown Skylab space station, a second flight-quality backup Skylab space station had been built during the program. NASA considered using it for a second station in May 1973 or later, to be called Skylab B (S-IVB 515), but decided against it. Launching another Skylab with another Saturn V rocket would have been very costly, and it was decided to spend this money on the development of the Space Shuttle instead. The backup is on display at the National Air and Space Museum in Washington, D.C.

A full-size training mock-up once used for astronaut training is located at the Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center visitor's center in Houston, Texas. Another full-size training mock-up is at the U.S. Space & Rocket Center in Huntsville, Alabama. Originally displayed indoors, it was subsequently stored outdoors for several years to make room for other exhibits. To mark the 40th anniversary of the Skylab program, the Orbital Workshop portion of the trainer was restored and moved into the Davidson Center in 2013.[31][32] NASA transferred the backup Skylab to the National Air and Space Museum in 1975. On display in the Museum's Space Hall since 1976, the orbital workshop has been slightly modified to permit viewers to walk through the living quarters.[33]

The numerical identification of the manned Skylab missions was the cause of some confusion. Originally, the unmanned launch of Skylab and the three manned missions to the station were numbered SL-1 through SL-4. During the preparations for the manned missions, some documentation was created with a different scheme -- SLM-1 through SLM-3for those missions only. William Pogue credits Pete Conrad with asking the Skylab program director which scheme should be used for the mission patches, and the astronauts were told to use 1-2-3, not 2-3-4. By the time NASA administrators tried to reverse this decision, it was too late, as all the in-flight clothing had already been manufactured and shipped with the 1-2-3 mission patches.[34]

From 1966 to 1974, the Skylab program cost a total of $2.2 billion or $10 billion in 2010 dollars with inflation. As its three three-man crews spent 510 total man-days in space, each man-day cost approximately $20 million in 2010 dollars, compared to $7.5 million for the International Space Station.[35]

An astronaut mannequin dines aboard the backup Skylab at the Smithsonian NASM.

SkyLab commemorative stamp, Issue of 1974. The commemorative stamp reflects initial repairs to the station, including the parasol sunshade.

Vanguard (T-AGM-19) seen as a NASA Skylab tracking ship. Note the tracking radar and telemetry antennas.

Robbins Medallions issued for Skylab Missions.

See original here:
Skylab - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Posted in Space Station | Comments Off

Biology/DNA

Posted: at 6:43 pm

Forensic scientists analyze biological evidence to help solve a variety of crimes. These analyses can show that biological materials from a specific individual was found at a crime scene, can help inform how a victim may have died, and can even bring identity to unknown human remains found in advanced stages of decomposition. Forensic biology is used to determine what types of biological stains, such as blood or semen, are left at a crime scene and to link those stains to individuals through DNA analysis.

Partnership with Applied Genetics Group We work closely with the NIST Applied Genetics Group, which focuses on developing standards and technology to support the use of DNA testing in human identification. For example, with the Applied Genetics Group, we helped develop Standard Reference Material for DNA profiling to ensure that forensic laboratories produce consistent results. We also supported their research to enable forensic scientists to obtain DNA profiles from items that have previously been unsuccessful in yielding DNA results using conventional DNA analysis markers. This has enabled more information to be entered into DNA databases, which is useful when attempting to provide leads in unsolved crimes with degraded evidence and establishing the identity of victims after a mass disaster. In addition, we supported the Applied Genetics Group efforts to improve the processes used to evaluate evidence items that contain DNA mixtures and their research to speed up the forensic DNA analysis process.

Technical Working Group on Biological Evidence PreservationThe proper long-term storage and preservation of biological evidence has become increasingly newsworthy as states throughout the U.S. enact legislation allowing post-conviction DNA testing of evidence. In August 2010, we partnered with the National Institute of Justice to lead the Technical Working Group on Biological Evidence Preservation, which examines current policies, procedures, and practices in biological evidence collection, storage, and preservation. The primary objective of the working group was to establish best practices, based in science, to reduce the premature destruction and degradation of biological evidence, thus ensuring its availability for future analysis.

The Technical Working Group on Biological Evidence Preservation has released The Biological Evidence Preservation Handbook: Best Practices for Evidence Handlers. The Handbook addresses packaging and storage, tracking and chain of custody, and disposition of biological evidence. For more information on the Handbook and the working group, visit the Technical Working Group on Biological Evidence Preservation's page.

The rest is here:
Biology/DNA

Posted in DNA | Comments Off

The Selfish Gene (Popular Science): 9780192860927 …

Posted: at 6:41 pm

Richard Dawkins' brilliant reformulation of the theory of natural selection has the rare distinction of having provoked as much excitement and interest outside the scientific community as within it. His theories have helped change the whole nature of the study of social biology, and have forced thousands of readers to rethink their beliefs about life. In his internationally bestselling, now classic volume, The Selfish Gene, Dawkins explains how the selfish gene can also be a subtle gene. The world of the selfish gene revolves around savage competition, ruthless exploitation, and deceit, and yet, Dawkins argues, acts of apparent altruism do exist in nature. Bees, for example, will commit suicide when they sting to protect the hive, and birds will risk their lives to warn the flock of an approaching hawk. This revised edition of Dawkins' fascinating book contains two new chapters. One, entitled "Nice Guys Finish First," demonstrates how cooperation can evolve even in a basically selfish world. The other new chapter, entitled "The Long Reach of the Gene," which reflects the arguments presented in Dawkins' The Extended Phenotype, clarifies the startling view that genes may reach outside the bodies in which they dwell and manipulate other individuals and even the world at large. Containing a wealth of remarkable new insights into the biological world, the second edition once again drives home the fact that truth is stranger than fiction.

Continued here:
The Selfish Gene (Popular Science): 9780192860927 ...

Posted in Gene Medicine | Comments Off

Cryptocurrency Analytic Company: Arbitrage – Bitcoinist.net

Posted: March 8, 2016 at 9:43 pm

We started early stage testing on our system around November of 2013. During the period of November to January our company took on about five clients for our Alpha period. After a successful alpha period, we incorporated in early January as a Delaware C corporation. We then began our beta period, where we have been open to clients for services.Since then we have added 10 more clients, and continue taking on about one client every week or two weeks. We began with one market pair(bitstamp vs btc-e using BTC) and have since expanded our selection of markets to four, with each pair able to connect to each of the other exchanges ( ie bitstamp vs bitfinex, bitstamp vs kraken, ect).

Allow me to answer number 3, which will take care of the Ponzi scheme question. Suffice to say we are MUCH different than any other tradingpool or fund that directly takes BTC from their clients.

Our system was designed by myself to get around a few problems that exist in the field of Bitcoin proprietary trading:

Here is how we address all of those concerns:

The risk factors are holding your BTC or LTC on an exchnage, whichshould be profiled before trusting them. The second risk factor isholding BTC as 50% of your portfolio, which may change in price to thedownside, but may also change in price to the upside. Our trading itselfintroduces no risk as when it buys 1 BTC it also sells 1 BTC. For amarket neutral position. If our models are very off during trading wemay lose money to exchange fees, but our system is designed so that thishas never happened, and foreseeable will never happen.

We are able to consistently execute this strategy because once anaccount is set up we are 100% automatic. Our system is well tested andhas an excellent tech team backing it for great up-time.

Currently we are operational, are taking new clients, and have fourmarket open for trade including Bitstamp, Bitfinex, Btce, and the newlyintroduced Kraken. In our older markets pairs in BTC we have beenshowing between 2-4 % a month from the USD deposited. Our newestaddition has been the same trade in LTC and it has blown by expectationsreturning over 8% in its first month of operations.

Our future development plans include an event that should behappening very soon. We hope to introduce a full client log-in, withpersonalized returns displayed with live data. This already under heavydevelopment and should be released at the end of July. For people interested, you many want to know a minimum of $5000 is required per account. Also, they charge a fee of 20% monthly which is payable via USD or Bitcoin. Do note during their trial period its only 15%.

For more information visit :https://www.cryptocurrencyanalytics.com/Photo Source: Bing Images

View original post here:
Cryptocurrency Analytic Company: Arbitrage - Bitcoinist.net

Posted in Cryptocurrency | Comments Off

Definition of Cryptocurrency | Coin Pursuit

Posted: at 9:43 pm

What exactly is cryptocurrency, how did it get its name, and how is it coded? Take a look at Coin Pursuit's plain-English definition of the term.

When you see the word root crypto in the English language, it comes from the Greek, meaning hidden or private. From it, we get words like encryption and decryption, which relate to the coding of a message, and its decoding once it's received. Even the English word cryptwhich uses the Greek root in its purest formrefers to a private hiding place, a sanctuary for the remains of a loved one.

Cryptocurrency, then, means money that is made hidden and privateand therefore secureby means of encryption, or coding. All aspects of cryptocurrency are protected by long and complicated blocks of code, each of which is unique to the item or person it's protecting. As an investor, or someone taking part in a transaction, you're identified by a one-of-a-kind code, as is the person or company with whom you're doing business. Each coin of cryptocurrency itself has its own code, and smaller denominations have their own, as well, depending on what amount is needed for a transaction. Finally, the transaction itself is identified with its own code. Layer upon layer of encryption is one of the things that makes cryptocurrency unique, secure and anonymous, if you so choose. And all that coding and concealment is what gives cryptocurrency its apt name.

As is true in any technical field, the industry of cryptocurrency not only has its unique jargon, but often terms that have synonyms that are used interchangeably. Therefore, we'd like to clear the air on that specific point right here: when you see the terms digital currency or alternative currency hereor in any other source, for that matterthose are just additional terms for cryptocurrency. As a matter of fact, you'll more than likely see digital currency used more often, as it has a less-technical and more user-friendly feel to it.

Next Introductory Topic: Cryptocurrency Origins

Posted in Cryptocurrency | Comments Off

A Complete Guide for CryptoCurrency Investors & Traders …

Posted: at 9:43 pm

There's so much noise, so much chatter, so much conflicting information out there about the world of digital currency. Even people who are used to investing can find their heads spinning as they try to sort out all the information they're bombarded with about cryptocurrency. And if you're new to investing, wellit can be downright confusing and intimidating. If only there was an unbiased source of clear information a potential investor could really use, a place to sort the facts from all that noise.

Look no further, folks; you're there.

Coin Pursuit was created with one goal in mind: to help the alternative currency investor navigate the minefield of information that's swirling around this new and robust industry. We're investors ourselves, and we discovered early on just how difficult it was to find straightforward info about even the basics of investing. The facts are out there, but they're scattered all over the Internetand they're often drowned out by people with skin in the game who have agendas and products to market. We realized the average investor doesn't have hours and hours of spare time to scour the web for the facts they need. We also saw the need for a comprehensive and thoroughly-researched site that could be bookmarked and referred to by both the new and experienced investor alike.

From this perceived need, Coin Pursuit was born. We'll be doing thorough research, and will sort out the facts from the rumors. The information we find will be put into clear and easy-to understand language, and will be passed along to you. We'll cover the full spectrum of the cryptocurrency industry, from its basic concepts to its most current trends. Here, you'll also find links and details about all the resources you'll ever need to make your investment experience enjoyable andhopefullyprofitable.

There's also another way we're helping traders cut down on the noise and distractions they often find online, and that's our exclusive and interactive SliceFeeds portal. Those of you who use Twitter or Facebook, or try to sort through the content on forums or sites like Reddit, know it can take a lot of time as you try to locate a specific piece of information, or connect with one person directly. SliceFeeds eliminates all that hassle by concentrating all your contacts and cryptocurrency information in one place. Its network is divided into three easy-to-use sections: the network page shows statistics at a glance; the feeds page displays updates as they happen; and your profile page allows you to customize your own personal network-within-the-network. Members will also be able to monetize their unique contributions to the community; for example, bloggers can offer subscriptions (payable in digital currency, of course) for access to their exclusive content, and merchants will be able to advertise their companies and products through SliceFeeds, as well. With SliceFeeds, the days of sorting through dozens of unrelated tweets and forum posts are over; you'll be able to find the digital currency info you need, when you need it.

It's our mission to be the most expansive and expanding resource for digital currency information. And that means fresh information, so stop by often; we're constantly updating our content. So, if you've just got a casual interest in alternative currencies, or you're a hardcore investoror if you fall anywhere in betweenCoin Pursuit will be your trusted resource.

Continued here:
A Complete Guide for CryptoCurrency Investors & Traders ...

Posted in Cryptocurrency | Comments Off

Monthly Archives: March 2016

Blogs | The Tor Blog

Tor Browser Download | Rocky Bytes

Genetics Conferences | Human Genetics Conferences | Europe …

Ron Paul – New Jersey 101.5

Skylab – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Biology/DNA

The Selfish Gene (Popular Science): 9780192860927 …

Cryptocurrency Analytic Company: Arbitrage – Bitcoinist.net

Definition of Cryptocurrency | Coin Pursuit

A Complete Guide for CryptoCurrency Investors & Traders …

The Prometheus League

Breaking News and Updates

Prometheism

Forbidden Fruit

The Evolutionary Perspective

Transtopia Menu

Library Updates

Library Books

Future Euvolution

Lucid Dreams from Childhood

Genetic Revolution

Speciation + Self-Directed Evolution