Monthly Archives: March 2015

Ed Miliband on his biggest fear - Free Speech - BBC Three
http://www.bbc.co.uk/freespeech Ed Miliband answers questions from a BBC Free Speech audience in the run up to the May 2015 general election. This is his response to the question: What #39;s your...

By: BBC Three

See original here:
Ed Miliband on his biggest fear - Free Speech - BBC Three - Video

Undercurrent S14E6 - Is Free Speech Declining in Australia?
Story by: Melissa Blom.

By: WestTV Perth

See original here:
Undercurrent S14E6 - Is Free Speech Declining in Australia? - Video

Facebook Comments Aren #39;t Free Speech
Facebook Comments Aren #39;t Free Speech There is a debate around social media that Facebook comments are free speech. Since online comments are on platforms owned by someone else, that owner ...

By: Zennie62

Continued here:
Facebook Comments Aren't Free Speech - Video

AT THE CROSSROADS OF FREEDOM- MAX IGAN- PART1
http://www.kalki-movies.com/ PRESENTER AND PRODUCER MAX IGAN GIVES AN IMPORTANT INTERVIEW ON THE RIGHT TO FREE SPEECH AND ENQUIRY IN A WORLD INCREASING WITH ...

By: KALKI MOVIES

Continue reading here:
AT THE CROSSROADS OF FREEDOM- MAX IGAN- PART1 - Video

AT THE CROSSROADS OF FREEDOM-MAX IGAN-PART 2
from the website - http://www.kalki-movies.com/ The second and final part of a talk given by Max Igan on the importance of free speech and enquiry within our global society that is fast seeking...

By: KALKI MOVIES

See the original post here:
AT THE CROSSROADS OF FREEDOM-MAX IGAN-PART 2 - Video

WASHINGTON Texas commemorates the Confederacy in many ways, from an annual celebration of Confederate Heroes Day each January to monuments on the grounds of the state Capitol in Austin. Among the memorials is one that has stood for more than a century, bearing an image of the Confederate battle flag etched in marble.

But you're out of luck if you want to put that flag on your license plate. Texas says that would be offensive.

Now the Supreme Court will decide whether the state can refuse to issue a license plate featuring the battle flag without violating the free-speech rights of Texans who want one. The justices hear arguments Monday in a challenge brought by the Texas division of the Sons of Confederate Veterans.

The group sued over the state's decision not to authorize its proposed license plate with its logo bearing the battle flag, similar to plates issued by eight other states that were members of the Confederacy and Maryland.

The First Amendment dispute has brought together some unlikely allies, including the American Civil Liberties Union, anti-abortion groups, Americans United for Separation of Church and State, civil libertarian Nat Hentoff and conservative satirist P.J. O'Rourke.

"In a free society, offensive speech should not just be tolerated, its regular presence should be celebrated as a symbol of democratic health however odorous the products of a democracy may be," Hentoff, O'Rourke and others said in a brief backing the group.

Specialty plates are moneymakers for states, and Texas offers more than 350 varieties that took in $17.6 million last year, according to the state Department of Motor Vehicles. Nearly 877,000 vehicles among more than 19 million cars, pickup trucks and motorcycles registered in Texas carry a specialty plate, the department said.

They bear messages that include "Choose Life," ''God Bless Texas" and "Fight Terrorism," as well as others in support of Dr. Pepper, burrito and burger chains, Boy Scouts, Mothers Against Drunk Driving, blood donations, professional sports teams and colleges.

A state motor vehicle board rejected the Sons of Confederate Veterans application because of concerns it would offend many Texans who believe the flag is a racially charged symbol of repression. On the same day, the board approved a plate honoring the nation's first black Army units, the Buffalo Soldiers, despite objections from Native Americans over the units' roles in fighting Indian tribes in the West in the late 1800s.

"There are a lot of competing racial and ethnic concerns, and Texas doesn't necessarily handle them any way but awkwardly sometimes," said Lynne Rambo, a professor at the Texas A&M University School of Law in Fort Worth.

Read more from the original source:
Battle flag at center of Supreme Court free speech case

The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday takes up a free speech case on whether Texas was wrong in rejecting a specialty vehicle license plate displaying the Confederate flag - to some an emblem of Southern pride and to others a symbol of racism.

The nine justices will hear a one-hour oral argument in a case that raises the issue of how states can allow or reject politically divisive messages on license plates without violating free speech rights. States can generate revenue by allowing outside groups to propose specialty license plates that people then pay a fee to put on their vehicle.

The group Sons of Confederate Veterans says its aim is to preserve the "history and legacy" of soldiers who fought for the pro-slavery Confederacy in the U.S. Civil War. Its proposed design featured a Confederate battle flag surrounded by the words "Sons of Confederate Veterans 1896." The flag is a blue cross inlaid with white stars over a red background.

The group's Texas chapter said its members' free speech rights were violated when the state rejected the plate. Several other states have approved similar plates.

When Texas rejected the proposal in 2010, the state said it had received public comments that suggested "many members of the general public find the design offensive" in large part due to the Confederacy being synonymous with the institution of slavery.

A black Texas Democratic state senator, Royce West, said in 2011, "Ill-intended or not, why would African Americans want to be reminded of a legalized system of involuntary servitude, dehumanization, rape and mass murder?"

The New Orleans-based 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that Texas officials did not have grounds to reject the plate, prompting the state to seek high court review.

The legal issue is in part whether messages on state-issued license plates represent speech by the government or an endorsement of a private message. If determined to be private speech, the state's rejection could violate the U.S. Constitution's First Amendment free speech guarantee.

Steven Shapiro, legal director of the American Civil Liberties Union, which backs the Sons of Confederate Veterans, said although the flag "served as a banner for those who supported slavery and segregation ... Texas cannot pick and choose the plates it approves on ideological grounds."

A ruling is expected by the end of June.

Read more:
Confederate flag license plate battle reaches U.S. Supreme Court