Daily Archives: February 3, 2015

Russia Launches British Communications Satellite Into Space – Video

Posted: February 3, 2015 at 6:49 pm


Russia Launches British Communications Satellite Into Space
For more WORLD NEWS "SUBSCRIBE" US MOSCOW, RUSSIA: Russia on Sunday carried out its first space launch of the year, using its commercial Proton rocket to send a British satellite into orbit....

By: World News Channel

Continued here:
Russia Launches British Communications Satellite Into Space - Video

Posted in Space Station | Comments Off on Russia Launches British Communications Satellite Into Space – Video

Kerbal Space Program – A TOTALLY WORKING SPACE STATION! – Video

Posted: at 6:49 pm


Kerbal Space Program - A TOTALLY WORKING SPACE STATION!
Hey guys this is The Farmboy here and i had a lot of fun making this video, i will do an episode like this every day! -----------------------------------------------------------...

By: The Farmboy Gaming Channel

View original post here:
Kerbal Space Program - A TOTALLY WORKING SPACE STATION! - Video

Posted in Space Station | Comments Off on Kerbal Space Program – A TOTALLY WORKING SPACE STATION! – Video

Freescast MoonQuest Episode 5 – The Secretary – Video

Posted: at 6:49 pm


Freescast MoonQuest Episode 5 - The Secretary
shadow and ndunk finish building the space station with their new secretary. HDX #39;s channel: https://www.youtube.com/user/TheHDXvideogames Freescast channel: ...

By: Freescast

Go here to read the rest:
Freescast MoonQuest Episode 5 - The Secretary - Video

Posted in Space Station | Comments Off on Freescast MoonQuest Episode 5 – The Secretary – Video

International Space Station Science Experiments (1080p) – Video

Posted: at 6:49 pm


International Space Station Science Experiments (1080p)
International Space Station Science Experiments (1080p) More videos: Space System HD - Exploring the International Space Station 1080pSpace System HD - Expl. Craft File Mods required: B9 ...

By: Cordell Pene

The rest is here:
International Space Station Science Experiments (1080p) - Video

Posted in Space Station | Comments Off on International Space Station Science Experiments (1080p) – Video

Can private companies replace space shuttle? Congress warms to the idea.

Posted: at 6:49 pm

From shop floors to launch pads at Cape Canaveral, momentum is building toward lofting the first commercial services to carry humans to and from the space station by the end of 2017.

The two companies NASA has selected for the job Boeing and Space Exploration Technologies are clearing initial, crucial milestones, and to keep the program moving, President Obama has proposed that the government spend $1.24 billion on the effort in fiscal 2016, which begins Oct. 1. That's up from $805 million the program received this year.

During the past five fiscal years, Congress repeatedly has provided less money for the program than the White House sought, although the gap has narrowed significantly. In the eyes of some analysts, Congress is increasingly warming to the program.

The 2017 target "will be here before we know it," and all indications are that the two companies are on pace to launch, says Eric Stallmer, president of the Commercial Spaceflight Federation, a Washington-based organization promoting commercial human spaceflight.

Indeed, the United States finds itself in a unique position with regard to human-spaceflight technology, according to John Elbon, vice president and general manager for space exploration at Boeing

"Never before in the history of human spaceflight has there been so much going on all at once," he observed during a recent briefing on the status of NASA's commercial-crew program.

Beyond the work his company and SpaceX are performing to build a commercial capability for human spaceflight, Sierra Nevada Corporation is working on its Dream Chaser craft for carrying humans into low-Earth orbit.

In addition, companies such as Blue Origin, Virgin Galactic, and Bigelow Aerospace are developing hardware to commercialize various aspects of human spaceflight. And NASA is pressing ahead with its own Space Launch System rocket and Orion crew capsule for deep-space exploration.

NASA's bid to turn over resupply of the space station to two commercial contractors began in 2010, when five companies received seed money. After whittling the number of companies to four and then three during the next two years, NASA picked Boeing and SpaceX as its two providers last September. The last contender to be eliminated, Sierra Nevada Corporation, filed a protest with the Government Accountability Office, but the GAO ruled in NASA's favor in January.

Boeing and SpaceX already have passed one of NASA's five milestones: approval of their long-term plans for earning the agency's OK for carrying astronauts. Meanwhile, the companies have been busy.

Link:
Can private companies replace space shuttle? Congress warms to the idea.

Posted in Space Station | Comments Off on Can private companies replace space shuttle? Congress warms to the idea.

Space Foundation Statement on President's Proposed NASA Budget

Posted: at 6:49 pm

Washington, D.C.,(Feb. 2, 2015) -- The Space Foundation today said it supports President Obama's FY2016 budget request for the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). That request, released today, calls for a FY2016 top line budget of $18.5 billion for the nation's space agency -- a $519 million increase over what Congress approved for the current fiscal year.

"The President's request is a move in the right direction," said Space Foundation Chief Executive Officer Elliot Pulham.

"The U.S. investment in NASA is a strategic investment in the future -- one that fuels our technology base, our global economic competitiveness, and our ability to lead international partnerships," Pulham said."In that context, we believe the NASA budget can, and should, continue to grow.The President's FY2016 budget request preserves International Space Station operations through 2024, increases NASA science programs by $43 million to $5.29 billion, keeps the SLS-Orion program on track to provide capabilities for human exploration beyond low earth orbit, and preserves a space technology budget of $724.8 million.

"The proposed budget also includes a credible aeronautics program, funded at $571.4 million," Pulham said, "and, very importantly, it keeps commercial crew transport programs on track with $1.2 billion in funding toward a competitive, two-supplier system that will return America to human spaceflight operations in just two years' time."

About the Space Foundation Founded in 1983, the Space Foundation is the foremost advocate for all sectors of space, and is a global, nonprofit leader in space awareness activities, educational programs and major industry events, including the annualSpace Symposium, in support of its mission "to advance space-related endeavors to inspire, enable and propel humanity." Space Foundation World Headquarters in Colorado Springs, Colo., USA, has a publicDiscovery Center, includingEl Pomar Space Gallery,Northrop Grumman Science Center featuring Science On a Sphere and the Lockheed Martin Space Education Center.The Space Foundation has a field office in Houston, and conducts government affairs from its Washington, D.C., office.It annually publishesThe Space Report: The Authoritative Guide to Global Space Activity,andthrough itsSpace CertificationandSpace Technology Hall of Fame programs,recognizes space-basedinnovations that have been adapted to improve life on Earth. Visitwww.SpaceFoundation.org, follow us onFacebook,Instagram,LinkedIn,Pinterest,TwitterandYouTube,and read our e-newsletterSpace Watch.

# # #

Please follow SpaceRef on Twitter and Like us on Facebook.

Continued here:
Space Foundation Statement on President's Proposed NASA Budget

Posted in Space Station | Comments Off on Space Foundation Statement on President's Proposed NASA Budget

What NASA would do with an extra half-billion dollars

Posted: at 6:49 pm

NASA Administrator Charles Bolden, left, discusses the agency's fiscal 2016 budget with reporters at the Kennedy Space Center while spaceport director Robert Cabana, right, looks on. William Harwood/CBS News

The Obama administration's fiscal 2016 budget includes $18.5 billion for NASA -- a half-billion-dollar increase -- that continues development of a new mega-rocket and capsule for deep space exploration and significantly boosts funding for commercial spacecraft to ferry crews to and from the space station, agency officials said Monday.

The budget proposal also includes funding to continue studies of a proposed crewed mission to visit an asteroid in the 2020s, to pay for ongoing and planned robotic Mars missions and to keep the $6 billion James Webb Space Telescope, the long-awaited successor to the Hubble Space Telescope, on track for launch in late 2018.

4 Photos

Astronomers revisit iconic nebula for a different look from 20 years ago

"President Obama today is proposing an FY 2016 budget of $18.5 billion for NASA, building on the significant investments the administration has made in America's space program over the past six years," NASA Administrator Charles Bolden told Kennedy Space Center workers.

Standing in front of an Orion deep space exploration capsule that completed an initial test flight in December, Bolden said the budget represented a "half billion-dollar increase over last year's enacted budget, and it is a clear vote of confidence to you, the employees of NASA, and the ambitious exploration program you are executing."

Repeating what has become a sort of mantra for senior NASA officials, Bolden said the agency "is firmly on a journey to Mars. Make no mistake, this journey will help guide and define our generation."

While eventual Mars flights are not expected until the mid 2030s at the earliest, NASA's long-range focus is the red planet, a goal Bolden promotes at every opportunity.

NASA's human exploration program accounts for nearly half of the agency's 2016 budget request, or $8.51 billion. That total includes $3.106 billion for International Space Station operations, $1.244 billion for commercial crew spacecraft, $2.863 billion for the Orion deep space capsule and the heavy-lift Space Launch System booster and $400 million for research and development.

View original post here:
What NASA would do with an extra half-billion dollars

Posted in Space Station | Comments Off on What NASA would do with an extra half-billion dollars

Deconstructing Consciousness,SpaceX Ritual=Mars Colonization, Microsofts HoloLens=Simulated Reality – Video

Posted: at 6:49 pm


Deconstructing Consciousness,SpaceX Ritual=Mars Colonization, Microsofts HoloLens=Simulated Reality
Deconstructing Consciousness, SpaceX Odyssey=Falcon 9 to Mars Colonization Transporter?SpaceX Crash Ritual = Microsoft #39;s HoloLens 10, Fiction is a Simulation...

By: BigfishStrategiesInc

Continue reading here:
Deconstructing Consciousness,SpaceX Ritual=Mars Colonization, Microsofts HoloLens=Simulated Reality - Video

Posted in Mars Colonization | Comments Off on Deconstructing Consciousness,SpaceX Ritual=Mars Colonization, Microsofts HoloLens=Simulated Reality – Video

Is It Ethical to Create Babies From Three DNA Sources? Absolutely

Posted: at 6:47 pm

The House of Commons in the U.K. has now voted to permit mitochondrial DNA replacement, which enables babies to be born who have DNA from three people.

Mitochondria are the batteries of our cells that provide energy for cell division and growth. We get ours from our mothers genes. If there is a defect in a mothers mitochondria, it can have devastating consequences for her children, resulting in almost certain death. But, by extracting a mitochondrion from a healthy donor egg, scientists are now able to conduct a miniature organ transplant on the cellular level to create a healthy baby through in vitro fertilization. Such a baby has its parents genes, except for one small but crucial portion obtained from a donor.

The need for the procedure is real. Somewhere around 4,000 children per year in the United States are born with a type of mitochondrial disease. Many do not survive more than a few months. Mitochondrial transplants would help prevent these diseases. So why not use them?

Critics give three main reasons; safety; creating babies with three parents; and the danger of opening the door to more genetic engineering. None of these objections provides a convincing reason against trying to treat what are often lethal diseases.

Is the procedure safe? When it was first tried by my NYULMC colleague, Jamie Grifo, at NYULMC in 2003 he was widely denounced as doing something unsafe with an embryo. The FDA brought his work to a halt. Grifo said he had plenty of data in rodents to show the technique was safe but decided not to push against the FDAs opposition. So what is different now that makes safety less of an issue?

Now we have data from monkeys. Convincing data. The creation of healthy primates was shown in 2009. And we have data from the creation of human embryos. A team of scientists at the Oregon National Primate Research Center and the Oregon Health & Science University proved in 2012 that the transplanted mitochondria made viable embryos. Safety is always an issue but the case for moving forward in the UK and the USA is strong.

Some say three parent babies are weird. It is true that a mitochondrion is taken from a donor but why this makes the donor in any way a parent is beyond me. If I give the battery from my car to a friend whose battery has died does that make me an owner of her car? And even if logic were stretched to say yes, it is not as if this is the first time we have seen babies with three parents. Sperm, egg, and embryo donation and surrogacynot to mention adoptionhave been around a long time without fracturing the nature of the family. This objection gets no traction.

Lastly some say mitochondrial transplants cross a bright ethical line. Changing genes in the lungs of people with immune disease or in the eyes of people with macular degeneration may fix the broken body part but, critics point out, the change is not passed on to future generations. When you change the mitochondria in an egg with a transplant, you make a change that is inherited by every single offspring of any child created from that egg. That is called germline engineering. Germline engineering of mitochondria moves beyond using genetic engineering to fix our body parts into directly engineering the traits of our children. It is a road that could lead, the critics warn, to eugenics.

Well, thats where they are wrong. Transplanting mitochondria is not going to be the method used to create enhanced babies. Traits like height, intelligence, strength, balance, and vision dont reside in the battery part of our cells.

We may well want to draw the line at genetic engineering aimed at making superbabies but all that is involved with mitochondria transplants is trying to prevent dead or very disabled ones. The latter goal is noble, laudable and ought to be praised not condemned.

View original post here:
Is It Ethical to Create Babies From Three DNA Sources? Absolutely

Posted in Genetic Engineering | Comments Off on Is It Ethical to Create Babies From Three DNA Sources? Absolutely

Coral reefs are in such bad shape that scientists may have to speed up their evolution

Posted: at 6:47 pm

The coral reefs of the world are in serious danger. A recent scientific report on corals in the Caribbean Sea, for instance, found that coral cover declined from 34.8 percent to 16.3 percent from 1970 to 2012.

One of the chief threats to corals is climate change. Not only do warmer waters stress the species, leading to bleaching events like the one pictured above. Climate change provides a double blow to corals because it also brings on ocean acidification, driven by increasing concentrations of carbon dioxide (caused by the burning of fossil fuels) dissolved in seawater. As sea waters acidify, corals have a harder time producing calcium carbonate, which is crucial to reef formation.

Thats why, in the latest issue of Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, a group of researchers from the Australian Institute of Marine Science and the Hawaii Institute of Marine Biology now tentatively propose something that they admit is extremely novel in conservation circles. Namely, they suggest that humans may need to intervene in the breeding of corals so as to assist their evolution.

Such anthropogenically enhanced corals may survive better, the researchers suggest, in a world of warming and acidifying seas. Moreover, this environmental engineering may be necessary as a last-ditch effort since, to be blunt, climate change is proceeding so fast with so much change already locked in that there may be no other choice.

So what are they planning to do? This isgenetic alteration, to be sure evolution always is but it isnot what we typically think of as genetic engineering.Although the development of GMO corals might be contemplated in extremis at a future time, we advocate less drastic approaches, notes the study.

Theyre not proposing Frankenstein coral, stressesNancy Knowlton, a marine scientist at the Smithsonian Institution who edited the paper.

Rather, assisted evolution entails a series of strategies that are perhaps best likened to the domestic breeding of anything from dogs to cows to pigeons to change their attributes. Charles Darwin called it artificial selection, as opposed to natural selection, which usually plays out over much longer periods of time.

For corals, heres how it might work. The researchers propose a number of strategies,some affecting corals and some affecting the communities of microbes that live with them in a symbiotic relationship.

For instance, scientists might identify strains of the appropriately namedSymbiodinium tiny microbes that live inside corals and are essentialto reef growth that are more resistant to temperatures. Then they could introduce this strain into corals in the wild that are struggling.

Yet anotherproposal, meanwhile, is actually guiding the evolution of Symbiodinium in the lab by using x-rays or chemicals that would lead the organisms to evolve and adapt more quickly.

See the article here:
Coral reefs are in such bad shape that scientists may have to speed up their evolution

Posted in Genetic Engineering | Comments Off on Coral reefs are in such bad shape that scientists may have to speed up their evolution