Daily Archives: January 9, 2015

What is Storj?
In this video I talk about storj, a new decentralize cloud based storage based off the bitcoin block chain. This amazing new service is being run on top of Florincoin and is currently in crowd...

By: GamersGoneTech

See more here:
What is Storj? - Video

Introduction to the Butterfly Labs Monarch bitcoin miner
Butterfly Labs Monarch bitcoin miner information on power connections and more.

By: ButterflyLabs

See the original post here:
Introduction to the Butterfly Labs Monarch bitcoin miner - Video

How to earn and use Bitcoins in India | Bitcoin Mining 2015 with Nvidia GTX 970 |
Hi Friends, This is a detailed tutorial on using bit coins in India or any other country ! It will tell you practical implementation of bit coins !

By: Tech Virus

Original post:
How to earn and use Bitcoins in India | Bitcoin Mining 2015 with Nvidia GTX 970 | - Video

Bitcoin Knowledge Podcast Episode 113
Breadwallet CEO Aaron Voisine discusses the first HD SPV mobile wallet.

By: runtogoldtv

See the original post here:
Bitcoin Knowledge Podcast Episode 113 - Video

Jan 7 Bitcoin Price Review - Time To Use Rule #2
When trading bitcoins you can expect the market will move before the news gets out - in other words, the market will do the unexpectable and your trading methods have to provide for that. ...

By: Bitcoin Price Review

Go here to read the rest:
Jan 7 Bitcoin Price Review - Time To Use Rule #2 - Video

Q A with Andreas Antonopoulos: Bitcoin in 2015 and beyond
What better way to return from a holiday break with none other than Andreas Antonopoulos. Andreas will address questions from the Dutch/Belgian #bitcoin community and talk about what 2015...

By: deBitcoin

More here:
Q&A with Andreas Antonopoulos: Bitcoin in 2015 and beyond - Video

The combined excitement over the currency and the Blockchain has kept the market capitalization above $4 billion for more than a year. This has attracted both imitators and innovators.

Bill Gates called Bitcoin a "technological tour de force." Enthusiasts believe it will become a more viable form of money and may even replace fiat currencies like the US dollar. Detractors point out that many bitcoin exchanges like Mt. Gox have been hacked, and bitcoin can be stolen from computer-based wallets if its proprietors are not careful. To be fair, one must point out that many sensationalist news articles have mistaken these third-party exchange problems for flaws with bitcoin. As bitcoiners correctly assert, bitcoin is quasi-impossible to counterfeit, and despite a descent in the price of bitcoin from its 2013 peak of around $1,200 to a current price in the $300s, it is still up tremendously from just pennies at its inception in 2009. Beyond its exchange rate, the ease with which one can transfer bitcoin from peer to peer with no intermediary and its deflationary, limited supply have been cited as revolutionary catalysts for more decentralized global finance.

But perhaps the revolution is already upon us. The bitcoin Blockchain is the distributed protocol used to create and transfer the currency, and its exponential growth in users and transactions has some very important implications. In simple terms, the Blockchain uses the computing power of thousands of specialized computers to solve very difficult mathematical equations that make the bitcoin network more secure. Because this network is "distributed" and does not rely on a single central database, it is much more robust than transfer means currently used by most financial institutions.

Imagine a set of irreversible, super-sticky dominoes where it is immediately apparent if someone attempts to cheat. You can&'t take the faulty domino off the table, so you just go back to the last legitimate domino and use it to continue the game in a different direction while banning the cheating player. The only way you can attack the Blockchain is through transparent, domino-like means that leave the culprits exposed to relatively straightforward corrections known as forks. In short, no one can fool mathematics.

The combined excitement over the currency and the Blockchain has kept the market capitalization above $4 billion for more than a year. This has attracted both imitators and innovators. Various developers are making attempts at Blockchains similar to bitcoin, each with its own digital currency.

The Next NXT team has assembled an interesting Blockchain that is much quicker than bitcoin for confirming transactions but lacks bitcoin's security by several orders of magnitude. Bitshares has interesting functions, but its creators make outlandish claims about potential financial performance that don't bode well, given the regulatory scrutiny that the sector is certain to attract.

The Ethereum development team includes Vitalik Buterin, who is very well respected in the cryptographic world, and is proposing some fascinating technological advances, but the end product is way behind schedule, even though the team raised a tidy sum from investors six months ago.

The Ripple platform has garnered a lot of venture capital funding, and there is talk of alliances with banks. Despite its financial resources, however, it lacks legitimacy among many bitcoin faithful, because its native currency was distributed primarily to its creators and continues to be owned by a single corporate entity. This type of ownership structure is antithetical to what most developers who take an interest in digital currencies are trying to build, because it leaves out the component of a distributed stake.

Part of the elegance the bitcoin Blockchain, derived from its distributed design, is that its infrastructure is strong and secure but also flexible. The code is organized so that autonomous developers can build various layers on top of it, incorporating and innovating toward many potential uses.

Counterparty is one platform loyal to bitcoin's protocol. The developers appear to be in tune with bitcoin's purpose, and their stated goal is to provide "reliable functionality" for the current bitcoin Blockchain versus creating an alternative model. Counterparty's aim is to harness the immense power of the Blockchain for uses like secure, distributed contracts, escrows, asset creation, and gaming. Though the Counterparty platform does have its own currency, XCP, the developers point out that the "address" used to store the currency can also be used to store bitcoin and vice versa. Counterparty's currency was established through an innovative process called "proof of burn," where users of the platform were able to "burn" bitcoins by sending them to a verifiably unspendable Bitcoin address and redeeming XCP in return. This transparency established legitimacy versus other bitcoin offshoots, whose developers treated themselves to opaque amounts of whatever digital asset is used to power their platform. Moreover, Counterparty seems to strike a healthy balance between the organic developer community necessary to build a strong platform and the venture capital investment required to make that platform a reality.

See the original post:
Beyond Bitcoin: Why Counterparty Has Won Support From Overstock's Chairman

Bitcoin transactions between individual users shouldn't be regulated but businesses offering services based on Bitcoin and other digital currencies should be regulated in a similar manner to other payment services, PayPal has argued.

In a submission (PDF) to the Senate inquiry examining the regulation of digital currencies, including Bitcoin, in Australia, the company argued that it is "important to draw a distinction between digital currencies, versus the companies that trade or facilitate transactions in digital currencies".

The submission states: "While the currency itself should not be regulated, and transactions by individual users without the assistance of intermediaries should not be regulated, companies that provide a financial service for digital currency transmission, for issuance or sale of digital currency, or for exchange with other currencies such as the Australian Dollar, should be regulated in a manner similar to the existing regulations that apply to other payment services.

"Those regulations, however, should be adapted to recognise the specific details of how different digital currencies work, particularly 'decentralised' digital currencies that are not controlled by a specific issuer."

The company added that regulators should clarify that the use of Blockchain-style technology for non-financial applications shouldn't be regulated in the same fashion as digital currencies and providers of digital currency services.

PayPal argued that as a provider of a digital wallet that accepts multiple types of currency it was already adequately regulated by existing laws and should not be caught up in legislation focussed on digital currencies.

"One of the factors that has discouraged PayPal from adding Bitcoin as an additional type of currency in the PayPal wallet is the lack of clarity related to regulation of digital currencies (as with other jurisdictions PayPal is regulated in Australia and is a significantly different business model to digital currencies)," the submission states.

PayPal is yet to include support for the cryptocurrency in its digital wallet or directly support processing of bitcoin-based transactions on its payments platform.

"At this stage, consumers will not be able to store Bitcoins in their PayPal digital wallets," the submission states.

"The rationale for this is that PayPal wants to ensure that while embracing innovation we remain committed to making payments safer and more reliable for customers all users of PayPal are linked to a specific named PayPal account, with consumer protection for buyers, but identity and consumer protection are not built into Bitcoin today. Therefore, we are proceeding gradually, with some support for merchants in the U.S. who want to accept Bitcoin, while holding off on other aspects."

Read the original here:
Bitcoin inquiry: PayPal calls for clarity on digital currencies