Daily Archives: December 6, 2014

DNA: Who insulted Chhattisgarh Naxal attack martyrs?
Chhattisgarh government has ordered a magisterial probe into the recovery from a garbage dump at a hospital of the blood-stained uniforms and shoes of CRPF personnel who were killed in a Naxal...

By: Zee News

Here is the original post:
DNA: Who insulted Chhattisgarh Naxal attack martyrs? - Video

*PRIMO COMMENTARY*(PRESENTAZIONE)-AW: DNA BOMB on DETROIT
Ciao a tutti raga scusatemi ancora per il commentary cerchero di migliorare cambier microfono al pi presto ci becchiamo al prossimo video bella.

By: MrRokz __

More:
*PRIMO COMMENTARY*(PRESENTAZIONE)-AW: DNA BOMB on DETROIT - Video

Solive Ambassadeur de la marque MONSTER DNA
SOLIVE est l #39;ambassadeur de la marque MONSTER DNA en partenariat avec la Boutique MAJESTIC Vodafone le seul revendeur agre de la marque MONSTER.

By: Monster Tahiti

Link:
Solive Ambassadeur de la marque MONSTER DNA - Video

*Fast* Solo DNA Bomb w/ ASM1 - Call of Duty: AW
The ASM1 is a beast, post-patch. DNA Bomb on Solar. Like, Comment and Sub for more. 🙂 Sub to Catalyst Pubstomping: http://bit.ly/11FfcHK.

By: Catalyst Kraken | Advanced Warfare Gameplays

Read the rest here:
*Fast* Solo DNA Bomb w/ ASM1 - Call of Duty: AW - Video

COD Advanced Warfare "DNA BOMB" GAMEPLAY (30 Gunstreak)!
Can We Hit 160 LIKES? If YES, There Will Be Another Video Up Tomorrow 🙂 ------ CONNECT WITH ME ------ Follow my Twitter - https://twitter.com/MiladTiger Follow my Facebook - https://www...

By: FS KING

Excerpt from:
COD Advanced Warfare "DNA BOMB" GAMEPLAY (30 Gunstreak)! - Video

SAN FRANCISCO (AP) A California appeals court struck down a state law that requires the collection of DNA from anyone arrested on suspicion of committing a felony.

The 1st District Court of Appeal said Wednesday that the state Constitution's ban on unreasonable search and seizure prohibited the DNA collection using a cheek swab. The law was approved by voters in 2004.

"We conclude that the DNA Act ... unreasonably intrudes on such arrestees' expectation of privacy," Presiding Justice J. Anthony Kline said in a 3-0 ruling.

There was no immediate order stopping police in California from continuing to collect DNA, and the appellate court's ruling could be appealed. Still, the ruling is important, said Julia Harumi Mass, a senior staff attorney at the American Civil Liberties Union of Northern California, which filed a brief in the case.

"It's one of the first opinions to recognize that DNA analysis is fundamentally different from a fingerprint," Mass said. "Arrestee DNA collection raises serious privacy concerns."

Supporters of the law say law enforcement's interest in solving cold cases, identifying crime suspects and even exonerating the wrongly accused outweigh privacy concerns raised by the forced DNA collections.

The state Attorney General's office is reviewing the decision, spokesman David Beltran said.

The appeals court in Wednesday's ruling was reviewing an earlier decision it issued on the law in light of a 2013 U.S. Supreme Court ruling that upheld a similar Maryland law. The earlier ruling also found the California law unconstitutional.

The appeals court said the Supreme Court decision did not apply in this case in part because of significant differences between Maryland's law and California's law. Maryland's law, for example, only allows the DNA of suspects to be tested after they have been charged with a crime. California's law allows testing even before charges are filed. The California law also applies to all felony suspects who are arrested regardless of the seriousness of the alleged crime.

The appellate ruling came in the case of Mark Buza, who was suspected of setting a police car on fire in San Francisco, but refused to provide a DNA sample after his arrest.

View original post here:
California court strikes down DNA collection law