Daily Archives: November 25, 2014

NSA Director: China Can Damage US Power Grid
China and "one or two" other countries are capable of mounting cyberattacks that would shut down the electric grid and other critical systems in parts of the...

By: Associated Press

More:
NSA Director: China Can Damage US Power Grid - Video

Utah Wants To Take The NSA #39;s Water Away
NowThisNews is the rst and only video news network built for people who love their phones and love social media. Follow NowThis anywhere and everywhere: NowThisNews.com Find us on ...

By: NowThis

See the original post here:
Utah Wants To Take The NSA's Water Away - Video

Glenn Greenwald: NSA-proofing your product is good for business

By: mikeroweRules12

Visit link:
Glenn Greenwald: NSA-proofing your product is good for business - Video

NBA 2K15 - MyCareer - Reunited with my highschool coach, teammates turned NSA
20 Points, 4 or more blocks, and then my teammates take my phone.

By: ThorntonVideos99

Go here to read the rest:
NBA 2K15 - MyCareer - Reunited with my highschool coach, teammates turned NSA - Video

NSA Spying Secrets Revealed at Pine Gap Menwith Hill
Visit my Website for more information on this and other related topics: http://www.occultphysics.com/ The NSA Echelon matrix revealed. In this presentation I provide incontrovertible proof...

By: Lightdescent

Read more from the original source:
NSA Spying Secrets Revealed at Pine Gap & Menwith Hill - Video

TMC Calls NSA #39;RSS Sympathiser #39;
Subscribe Now To Our Network Channels :- Times Now : http://goo.gl/U9ibPb The NewsHour Debate : http://goo.gl/LfNgFF ET Now : http://goo.gl/5XreUq Social Media Links :- Facebook - http://goo.gl/C..

By: TIMES NOW

Originally posted here:
TMC Calls NSA 'RSS Sympathiser' - Video

The U.S. National Security Agencys surveillance programs are legal and under close scrutiny by other parts of the government, the agencys internal privacy watchdog said Monday in an online Q&A.

NSA surveillance and data collection programs conform to the U.S. Constitution, Rebecca Richards, the agencys first civil liberties and privacy director, wrote during an hour-plus Q&A on Tumblr.

The NSA operates under rules that ensure that its activities fall within the parameters of the Constitution, Richards wrote when asked why she believes the surveillance programs are constitutional.

The oversight regime governing NSA is extensive, spanning all three branches of government, she added. The fact that NSA created my job highlights the value and importance NSA leadership places on privacy and civil liberties protections.

Critics have said some NSA surveillance programs violate the Constitutions Fourth Amendment, prohibiting unreasonable searches and seizures by the government.

One Q&A participant asked if U.S. residents fears of being discreetly spied on are merited.

The fears are not merited, Richards wrote. NSA is a foreign intelligence agency, she wrote. Our mission is to collect critical intelligence on foreign powers or their agents necessary to defend the country.

U.S. law requires that the NSA, when targeting a U.S. citizen for foreign intelligence purposes, to obtain a court order based on a finding of probable cause to believe the intended target is a foreign power or an agent of a foreign power, she added.

One participant paraphrased Benjamin Franklin to Richards: He who gives up freedom for safety deserves neither. The questioner then asked whether the NSAs erosion of the Fourth Amendment is fair and righteous, in regard to the principles on which the United States were founded?

Richards again defended the NSA: Intelligence agencies, just like other government agencies, have a responsibility to protect privacy and civil liberties, she wrote. In the course of our operations, we take great care to protect and safeguard personal privacy.

Read the original:
NSA privacy director defends agency's surveillance

Provided by National Journal NSA reforms

Privacy advocates, facing an uphill battle in a Republican-controlled Congress next year, will have to make a difficult choice.

Some argue that their best shot to curb the National Security Agency's powers will be to kill core provisions of the USA Patriot Act altogether. But other reformers aren't ready to take the post-9/11 law hostage.

The debate over whether to let the Patriot Act provisions expire in June threatens to splinter the surveillance-reform coalition. If the tech industry, privacy groups, and reform-minded lawmakers can't coalesce around a strategy soon, they may have little hope of reining in the surveillance state.

And with outrage over the Snowden revelations fading and fear over the Islamic State rising, the push for reform appears to have already lost its momentum.

The NSA critics are still licking their wounds after Senate Republicans blocked the USA Freedom Act last week. The bill, authored by Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy, would have prohibited the government's carte blanche collection of U.S. phone metadatathe numbers and time stamps of phone calls but not their actual contents.

The bill would have also extended key provisions of the Patriot Act for two years, including the controversial Section 215, which the NSA uses to justify its phone record collection program. But that wasn't enough for Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, Sen. Marco Rubio, and most of the Republican caucus, who warned that the bill would have helped terrorists kill Americans.

"This is the worst possible time to be tying our hands behind our backs. The threat from ISIL is real," McConnell said in a statement, using an alternative name for the Islamic State.

With the Republicans winning the Senate, McConnell is about to become the majority leader, giving him control over the chamber's agenda. Given his aggressive last-minute whipping against the Freedom Act, privacy advocates say it is difficult to imagine him pushing anything more than cursory changes to the NSA.

But with so many ways to block legislation in Congress, it's always easier to stop something than to pass it. That reality has already led some privacy advocates to want to kill any reauthorization of the Patriot Act that doesn't include substantial reforms to the government's spying powersa viewpoint that has already spawned a #Sunset215 hashtag.

Read the original here:
Patriot Act Deadline Threatens to Splinter NSA Reformers

Efforts to curb the National Security Agencys bulk collection of American phone metadata were dealt a blow with the defeat of the USA Freedom Act on Nov. 18. With a 58-42 vote, the bill failed to attract the 60 votes necessary to clear the Senate filibuster.

With Republicans taking control of Congress in January, privacy advocates are concerned that the vote represented the last chance to enact surveillance reform. Experts say its too close to call whether the new, GOP-controlled Congress will maintain the status quo or look to pass legislation that accomplishes some of the Freedom Acts objectives.

Theres enough uneasiness and opposition to the NSA that the GOP is split over what to do next, said Robert Jervis, a professor of political science and international affairs at Columbia University. Still, theres a broad political coalition thats in favor of surveillance, said Abraham Newman, an associate professor at the School of Foreign Service at Georgetown University.

Normally hawkish Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, voted for the bill.

Incoming Senate majority leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., referring to the terrorist group ISIS, said now is the worst time to tie our hands behind our backs and voted against it.

Incoming Senate judiciary chairman Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, voted against the bill. Rand Paul, R-Ky., a front-runner for the GOP 2016 presidential nomination, voted against it because of a provision to extend Section 215 of the Patriot Act, which provides the legal foundation for the data collection. It will expire on June 1 next year if not renewed.

The very likely outcome is that it will be renewed, Newman said, adding that a provision could be attached to another bill in the weeks before the June 1 deadline. Many provisions of the Patriot Act have sunset clauses, but, if you look, very few of them have ever actually sunset. It could be reauthorized through some omnibus legislation.

The USA Freedom Act proposed an end to the indiscriminate collection of American phone metadata and would have installed a privacy watchdog within Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court deliberations.

The USA Freedom Act would have also forced the NSA to reveal how many Americans are inadvertently ensnared in the investigation of foreign suspects and given technology companies the ability to be more transparent on the number of data requests they are forced to comply with.

If passed, the act would have ensured that the NSA still had access to phone metadata while keeping those records in the hands of phone companies. That raised eyebrows from the civil liberties community, with critics pointing to the recent news of Verizons nearly undetectable tracking cookie as proof that the corporate world is hardly a better privacy safeguard than the NSA.

Continued here:
NSA Reform Could Pit GOP Hawks Against Partys Libertarian Wing

TIME Politics intelligence New NSA Privacy Chief Promises Transparency The National Security Agency campus in Fort Meade, Md., June 6, 2013. Patrick SemanskyAP In a Q&A online, Rebecca Richards promised a new era in transparency at the United States eavesdropping agency

The National Security Agencys newly appointed Civil Liberties & Privacy Officer Rebecca Richards said Monday in an online Q& A she hopes to inject a sense of transparency into the secretive spy agency.

Until somewhat recently, relatively little information about NSA was public. And the information that was made available rarely discussed the safeguards in place to protect civil liberties and privacy, Richards said. One of my goals is to share what NSA does to protect civil liberties and privacy. This will take time, but we must start somewhere.

Richards conducted an online question and answer session Monday through the website of the Office of the Director of National Intelligence. Richards position was create earlier this year following recommendations from the White House on privacy reforms within the NSA. Those recommendations were made in response to revelations of privacy violations contained in documents leaked by former NSA contractor Edward Snowden.

Much of her Q&A was little more than a defense of the agency but Richards did identify her four primary goals as privacy chief.

Richards also revealed that the NSA is preparing to launch a privacy and civil liberties internship or work exchange program as part of its privacy initiative.

Read the rest here:
New NSA Privacy Chief Promises Transparency