Daily Archives: November 3, 2014

NATO (The North Atlantic Treaty Organization Military Alliance) Facts Part – 2 – Video

Posted: November 3, 2014 at 2:51 pm


NATO (The North Atlantic Treaty Organization Military Alliance) Facts Part - 2
NATO (The North Atlantic Treaty Organization Military Alliance) Facts Part - 2.

By: hindu judaic

View original post here:
NATO (The North Atlantic Treaty Organization Military Alliance) Facts Part - 2 - Video

Posted in NATO | Comments Off on NATO (The North Atlantic Treaty Organization Military Alliance) Facts Part – 2 – Video

Georgia Confirms NATO Bid: Tbilisi seeks NATO membership despite Russian opposition – Video

Posted: at 2:51 pm


Georgia Confirms NATO Bid: Tbilisi seeks NATO membership despite Russian opposition
Georgian Defence Minister Irakli Alasania said he was grateful for the terms offered to Georgia during a recent NATO summit in Wales and appreciated German involvement to integrate Georgia...

By: UKRAINE TODAY

See the original post:
Georgia Confirms NATO Bid: Tbilisi seeks NATO membership despite Russian opposition - Video

Posted in NATO | Comments Off on Georgia Confirms NATO Bid: Tbilisi seeks NATO membership despite Russian opposition – Video

Russia Probes NATO Air Defences: Kremlin jets launch provocative incursions across Europe – Video

Posted: at 2:51 pm


Russia Probes NATO Air Defences: Kremlin jets launch provocative incursions across Europe
NATO aircraft are continuing to track Russian strategic bombers flying over the Atlantic and Black Sea and sorties of Russian fighters over the Baltic in what the 28-nation security bloc described...

By: UKRAINE TODAY

Read this article:
Russia Probes NATO Air Defences: Kremlin jets launch provocative incursions across Europe - Video

Posted in NATO | Comments Off on Russia Probes NATO Air Defences: Kremlin jets launch provocative incursions across Europe – Video

Former NSA director Michael Hayden explains Controversial surveillance Program ; Inside the NSA – Video

Posted: at 2:50 pm


Former NSA director Michael Hayden explains Controversial surveillance Program ; Inside the NSA
Former NSA director Michael Hayden explains Controversial surveillance Program ; Inside the NSA General Michael Hayden is a retired four-star general who ser...

By: samuel ezerzer

Visit link:
Former NSA director Michael Hayden explains Controversial surveillance Program ; Inside the NSA - Video

Posted in NSA | Comments Off on Former NSA director Michael Hayden explains Controversial surveillance Program ; Inside the NSA – Video

Victorious Lawsuit Against The NSA – Video

Posted: at 2:50 pm


Victorious Lawsuit Against The NSA
In a WND TV interview, Larry Klayman, founder of Freedom Watch, talks about his victorious lawsuit against portions of the NSA spying program, and what we ca...

By: WNDTV

See the article here:
Victorious Lawsuit Against The NSA - Video

Posted in NSA | Comments Off on Victorious Lawsuit Against The NSA – Video

Fingerprints: iPhone Users Forfeit Fifth Amendment. – Video

Posted: at 2:49 pm


Fingerprints: iPhone Users Forfeit Fifth Amendment.
Court rules fingerprints have no fifth amendment right. What does this mean for the rest of our biometric data? .

By: TheRiverMersey

See the article here:
Fingerprints: iPhone Users Forfeit Fifth Amendment. - Video

Posted in Fifth Amendment | Comments Off on Fingerprints: iPhone Users Forfeit Fifth Amendment. – Video

Editorial: Applying the Fifth Amendment in the era of smartphones

Posted: at 2:49 pm

A person suspected of a crime cannot be compelled to divulge to authorities the passcode that would unlock his smartphone. To allow this would be a clear violation of the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution.

But a fingerprint doesn't share those same protections. At least according to a recent ruling from a Circuit Court judge in Virginia, who found that compelling a suspect to unlock his fingerprint-protected smartphone is just fine and dandy.

There's some logic here, but it's pretty badly flawed. The thinking behind the decision: The Fifth Amendment to the Constitution states that an individual cannot be forced to testify against himself. As such, compelling someone to fork over a smartphone's passcode -- which would amount to testimony -- would violate the Fifth Amendment.

But a fingerprint, the judge said, is another story. It's more like a key, which the law has long allowed authorities to obtain from a criminal suspect.

While one can understand the legal distinction that forms the basis for the ruling, it doesn't long hold up under scrutiny.

The Fifth Amendment states, in part: "No person shall be ... compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself." This is the right that people are invoking when they refuse to testify on the grounds that they may incriminate themselves.

So legally, a passcode is a kind of testimony, but a key isn't.

Which is fine as far as it goes. But this is exactly where the judge went wrong.

A fingerprint can be akin to a key -- or not. In the matter at hand, what it is, in effect, is a replacement for a passcode, which is information that used to be inside the user's head. If we'd once unlocked our phones with physical keys -- like those that open a door or start the car -- the reasoning would make sense, as the fingerprint would be a replacement for same.

But that's simply not the case. We used to unlock our phones with information in our heads. And that information was protected by the Fifth Amendment. One's fingerprint, simply a replacement for the old memorized pass code, ought reasonably be afforded that same protection.

The rest is here:
Editorial: Applying the Fifth Amendment in the era of smartphones

Posted in Fifth Amendment | Comments Off on Editorial: Applying the Fifth Amendment in the era of smartphones

Fourth Amendment – Video

Posted: at 2:49 pm


Fourth Amendment
Leave a like please.

By: Dfigster

See the original post:
Fourth Amendment - Video

Posted in Fourth Amendment | Comments Off on Fourth Amendment – Video

Fourth Amendment (United States Constitution …

Posted: at 2:49 pm

Fourth Amendment,amendment (1791) to the Constitution of the United States, part of the Bill of Rights, that forbids unreasonable searches and seizures of individuals and property. For the text of the Fourth Amendment, see below.

Introduced in 1789, what became the Fourth Amendment struck at the heart of a matter central to the early American experience: the principle that, within reason, Every mans house is his castle, and that any citizen may fall into the category of the criminally accused and ought to be provided protections accordingly. In U.S. constitutional law, the Fourth Amendment is the foundation of criminal law jurisprudence, articulating both the rights of persons and the responsibilities of law-enforcement officials. The balance between these two forces has undergone considerable public, political, and judicial debate. Are the amendments two clauses meant to be applied independently or taken as a whole? Is the expectation of privacy diminished depending on where and what is suspected, sought, and seized? What constitutes an unreasonable search and seizure?

The protections contained in the amendment have been determined less on the basis of what the Constitution says than according to what it has been interpreted to mean, and, as such, its constitutional meaning has inherently been fluid. The protections granted by the U.S. Supreme Court have expanded during periods when the court was dominated by liberals (e.g., during the tenure of Chief Justice Earl Warren [195369]), beginning particularly with Mapp v. Ohio (1961), in which the court extended the exclusionary rule to all criminal proceedings; by contrast, during the tenure of the conservative William Rehnquist (19862005) as chief justice, the court contracted the rights afforded to the criminally accused, allowing law-enforcement officials latitude to search in instances when they reasonably believed that the property in question harboured presumably dangerous persons.

The full text of the amendment is:

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

Read the rest here:
Fourth Amendment (United States Constitution ...

Posted in Fourth Amendment | Comments Off on Fourth Amendment (United States Constitution …

Rachel Maddow: Joni Ernst has ‘Second Amendment Remedies’ Too! – Video

Posted: at 2:49 pm


Rachel Maddow: Joni Ernst has #39;Second Amendment Remedies #39; Too!
From The Rachel Maddow Show on MSNBC. Reich-Wing Watch: "Fighting Despotism, Saving Democracy" Reich-Winger (adj.): an individual who #39;s views are so far-right that they are ideologically...

By: Reich-Wing Watch

Go here to see the original:
Rachel Maddow: Joni Ernst has 'Second Amendment Remedies' Too! - Video

Posted in Second Amendment | Comments Off on Rachel Maddow: Joni Ernst has ‘Second Amendment Remedies’ Too! – Video