Daily Archives: October 11, 2014

Filmmaker critical of Obama found GUILTY!
A conservative filmmaker who dared to exercise his First Amendment rights to be critical of Barack Obama, has received a sentence from a federal judge that includes five years probation, 8...

By: CleanTVcom

Excerpt from:
Filmmaker critical of Obama found GUILTY! - Video

Oppression Agenda Day 4 Cat Calling is protected by the first amendment
http://biffburroghs.blogspot.com/ http://poxyrants.blogspot.com/ https://twitter.com/PoxySquirrel https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100001782467676 Thi...

By: Biff Burroughs

The rest is here:
Oppression Agenda Day 4 Cat Calling is protected by the first amendment - Video

Twitter filed a lawsuit against the federal government this week over First Amendment rights, marking the latest round in a battle between tech companies and the government over how much they can reveal about government requests for their user information.

This debate began when Edward Snowden revealed information about the PRISM program, which suggested that the government was asking tech companies for private user information. Tech companies can report the number of requests they receive in broad terms. Twitter hopes to put users at ease by giving them more detail about the requests, but the government is keeping them quiet.

Here are some questions we thought you might be asking:

What kinds of requests is Twitter is being told it can't talk about?

These are requests that basically could be related to people who the government thinks might be connected to, for example, terrorism. The government sends notices to a company like Twitter saying, "We want information about this individual or this group, and because it's a matter of national security, you can't even tell anyone we asked." In its lawsuit, Twitter is saying that it has a First Amendment right to reveal that the government is asking it for information.

What is the government saying?

The government says that this is a matter of national security and revealing any information at all could actually jeopardize the investigation.

Why is Twitter taking up this fight?

Twitter and other tech companies were really put on the spot when Edward Snowden leaked information about the so-called PRISM program, which suggested there was wide government surveillance of user information that was stored with tech companies. For a company like Twitter, Google, Microsoft or any of these big players, it left them in this position of not being able to deny or confirm how much information they had given to the government. This made their customers uneasy. So they basically have said to the government that they want to be able to say something, and they've been fighting with the government for at least some degree of transparency.

So they can't say anything at this point?

Read the rest here:
Twitter Is Suing The U.S. Over Free Speech (Its Own)