Monthly Archives: September 2014

Coffee's Caffeine Buzz Evolved Separately from Tea's

Posted: September 6, 2014 at 2:42 am

Genome of the robusta variety reveals that caffeine-making evolved more than once, in part because pollinators developed a caffeine habit

Caffeine evolved long before sleep-deprived humans became addicted to it, probably to defend the coffee plant against predators and for other benefits. Credit: Thinkstock

Caffeine's buzz is so nice it evolved twice. The coffee genome has now been published, and it reveals that the coffee plant makes caffeine using a different set of genes from those found in tea, cacao and other perk-you-up plants.

Coffee plants are grown across some 11 million hectares of land, with more than two billion cups of the beverage drunk every day. It is brewed from the fermented, roasted and ground berries ofCoffea canephora andCoffea arabica, known as robusta and arabica, respectively. An international team of scientists has now identified more than 25,000 protein-making genes in the robusta coffee genome. The species accounts for about one-third of the coffee produced, much of it for instant-coffee brands such as Nescafe. Arabica contains less caffeine, but its lower acidity and bitterness make it more flavourful to many coffee drinkers. However, the robusta species was selected for sequencing because its genome is simpler than arabicas.

Caffeine evolved long before sleep-deprived humans became addicted to it, probably to defend the coffee plant against predators and for other benefits. For example, coffee leaves contain the highest levels of caffeine of any part of the plant, and when they fall on the soil they stop other plants from growing nearby.

Caffeine also habituates pollinators and makes them want to come back for more, which is what it does to us, too, says Victor Albert, a genome scientist at the University of Buffalo in New York, who co-led the sequencing effort. The results were published on September 4 inScience.

Dual origin When the team looked for gene families that distinguish coffee from other plants, those that make caffeine topped the list. The genes encode methyltransferase enzymes, which transform a xanthosine molecule into caffeine by adding methyl chemical groups in three steps. Tea and cacao, meanwhile, make caffeine using different methyltransferases from those the team identified in robusta. This suggests that the ability to make caffeine evolved at least twice, in the ancestor of coffee plants and in a common ancestor of tea and cacao, Albert says.

The genome could be used to identify genes that help the plant to combat diseases, such ascoffee rust, and to cope with climate change.

Caffeine-making genes might also be inactivated to create a tastier decaf. A coffee cultivar that is genetically engineered to be caffeine-free could be a welcome development for the many people who cannot tolerate the buzz. The process of removing caffeine currently involves chemical processing, and also affects the flavour (see 'Plant biotechnology: Make it a decaf'). I have to have a cup every morning, but I usually dont drink during the day because it makes me shaky, says Albert.

This article is reproduced with permission and was first published on September 4, 2014.

Read the original:
Coffee's Caffeine Buzz Evolved Separately from Tea's

Posted in Genome | Comments Off on Coffee's Caffeine Buzz Evolved Separately from Tea's

Meet the genes in the beans of your coffee

Posted: at 2:42 am

Wake up and smell the genome.

Researchers have pieced together the genetic atlas of the parent of the most commonly cultivated species of coffee plant and uncovered a rather independent streak in its evolution.

-----------

FOR THE RECORD

An earlier version of this post said 39 countries had exported 5.3 metric tons of coffee last year. Those countries exported 5.3 million metric tons.

-----------

Coffee developed its caffeine-generating capacity independently from its cousin, cacao, according to the first whole genome study of the plant behind the brew quaffed every morning by about 100 million Americans, published online Thursday in the journal Science.

Theres been a lot of genetic sleuthing on coffee, most of it far from the tree. We have a good idea about how caffeine affects animal (particularly human) genes and alters brain chemistry. We know which of our own genes seem to draw us toward consuming coffee, tea or chocolate as well. And theres also been a heady, if somewhat contradictory, brew of studies purporting to demonstrate caffeines beneficial and deleterious effects on humans.

But how caffeine production got started has been as hard to see as a spoon in a demitasse of espresso.

Coffee has been kind of an orphan crop," said UC Davis geneticist Juan F.Medrano, who was not involved in the study. "It has been kind of forgotten in terms of DNA research. Perhaps this opens the door to expand that area.

Read more:
Meet the genes in the beans of your coffee

Posted in Genome | Comments Off on Meet the genes in the beans of your coffee

Coffee got its buzz by a different route than tea

Posted: at 2:42 am

Dimas Ardian/Bloomberg/Getty Images

Robusta coffee berries left to dry in the Sun on Sumatra, in Indonesia.

Caffeine's buzz is so nice it evolved twice. The coffee genome has now been published, and it reveals that the coffee plant makes caffeine using a different set of genes from those found in tea, cacao and other perk-you-up plants.

Coffee plants are grown across some 11 million hectares of land, with more than two billion cups of the beverage drunk every day. It is brewed from the fermented, roasted and ground berries of Coffea canephora and Coffea arabica, known as robusta and arabica, respectively. An international team of scientists has now identified more than 25,000 protein-making genes in the robusta coffee genome. The species accounts for about one-third of the coffee produced, much of it for instant-coffee brands such as Nescafe. Arabica contains less caffeine, but its lower acidity and bitterness make it more flavourful to many coffee drinkers. However, the robusta species was selected for sequencing because its genome is simpler than arabicas.

Caffeine evolved long before sleep-deprived humans became addicted to it, probably to defend the coffee plant against predators and for other benefits. For example, coffee leaves contain the highest levels of caffeine of any part of the plant, and when they fall on the soil they stop other plants from growing nearby.

Caffeine also habituates pollinators and makes them want to come back for more, which is what it does to us, too, says Victor Albert, a genome scientist at the University of Buffalo in New York, who co-led the sequencing effort. The results were published on 4 September in Science1.

When the team looked for gene families that distinguish coffee from other plants, those that make caffeine topped the list. The genes encode methyltransferase enzymes, which transform a xanthosine molecule into caffeine by adding methyl chemical groups in three steps. Tea and cacao, meanwhile, make caffeine using different methyltransferases from those the team identified in robusta. This suggests that the ability to make caffeine evolved at least twice, in the ancestor of coffee plants and in a common ancestor of tea and cacao, Albert says.

The genome could be used to identify genes that help the plant to combat diseases, such as coffee rust, and to cope with climate change.

Caffeine-making genes might also be inactivated to create a tastier decaf. A coffee cultivar that is genetically engineered to be caffeine-free could be a welcome development for the many people who cannot tolerate the buzz. The process of removing caffeine currently involves chemical processing, and also affects the flavour (see 'Plant biotechnology: Make it a decaf'). I have to have a cup every morning, but I usually dont drink during the day because it makes me shaky, says Albert.

Read more here:
Coffee got its buzz by a different route than tea

Posted in Genome | Comments Off on Coffee got its buzz by a different route than tea

New gene mutations for Wilms tumor found

Posted: at 2:42 am

Researchers at UT Southwestern Medical Center and the Gill Center for Cancer and Blood Disorders at Children's Medical Center, Dallas, have made significant progress in defining new genetic causes of Wilms tumor, a type of kidney cancer found only in children.

Wilms tumor is the most common childhood genitourinary tract cancer and the third most common solid tumor of childhood.

"While most children with Wilms tumor are thankfully cured, those with more aggressive tumors do poorly, and we are increasingly concerned about the long-term adverse side effects of chemotherapy in Wilms tumor patients. We wanted to know -- what are the genetic causes of Wilms tumor in children and what are the opportunities for targeted therapies? To answer these questions, you have to identify genes that are mutated in the cancer," said Dr. James Amatruda, Associate Professor of Pediatrics, Molecular Biology, and Internal Medicine at UT Southwestern and senior author for the study.

The new findings appear in Nature Communications. Collaborating with Dr. Amatruda on the study were UT Southwestern faculty members Dr. Dinesh Rakheja, Associate Professor of Pathology and Pediatrics; Dr. Kenneth S. Chen, Assistant Instructor in Pediatrics; and Dr. Joshua T. Mendell, Professor of Molecular Biology. Dr. Jonathan Wickiser, Associate Professor in Pediatrics, and Dr. James Malter, Chair of Pathology, are also co-authors.

Previous research has identified one or two mutant genes in Wilms tumors, but only about one-third of Wilms tumors had these mutations.

"We wanted to know what genes were mutated in the other two-thirds. To accomplish this goal, we sequenced the DNA of 44 tumors and identified several new mutated genes," said Dr. Amatruda, who holds the Nearburg Family Professorship in Pediatric Oncology Research and is an Attending Physician in the Pauline Allen Gill Center for Cancer and Blood Disorders at Children's Medical Center. "The new genes had not been identified before. The most common, and in some ways the most biologically interesting, mutations were found in genes called DROSHA and DICER1. We found that these mutations affected the cell's production of microRNAs, which are tiny RNA molecules that play big roles in controlling the growth of cells, and the primary effect was on a family of microRNAs called let-7."

"Let-7 is an important microRNA that slows cell growth and in Wilms tumors in which DROSHA or DICER1 were mutated, let-7 RNA is missing, which causes the cells to grow abnormally fast," Dr. Amatruda said.

These findings have implications for future treatment of Wilms tumor and several other childhood cancers, including neuroblastoma, germ cell tumor, and rhabdomyosarcoma.

"What's exciting about these results is that we can begin to understand what drives the growth of different types of Wilms tumors. This is a critical first step in trying to treat the cancer based on its true molecular defect, rather than just what a tumor looks like under a microscope," Dr. Amatruda said. "Most importantly, we begin to think in concrete terms about a therapy, which is an exciting translational goal of our work in the next few years. This study also is a gratifying example of great teamwork. As oncologists, Dr. Chen and I were able to make rapid progress by teaming up with Dr. Rakheja, an expert pathologist, and with Dr. Mendell, a leading expert on microRNA biology."

According to the American Cancer Society, an estimated 510 cases of Wilms tumor will be diagnosed among children in 2014. Also called nephroblastoma, Wilms tumor is an embryonal tumor of the kidney that usually occurs in children under age 5, and 92 percent of kidney tumors in this age group are Wilms tumor. Survival rates for Wilms tumor have increased from 75 percent in 1975-1979 to 90 percent in 2003-2009.

Read more here:
New gene mutations for Wilms tumor found

Posted in Gene Medicine | Comments Off on New gene mutations for Wilms tumor found

Ohio State Gene Testing Could Unlock Key To Curing Cancer

Posted: at 2:42 am

COLUMBUS, Ohio - Cancer research goes beyond medicine at The Ohio State University's James Cancer Hospital.

Doctors conduct genetic testing at Ohio State, unraveling the genetic code of a specific cancer.

"The idea is can we identify what these cancers are, what's wrong with these cancers, and what's the right therapy for them?" said Dr. Sameek Roychowdhury.

Roychowdhury leads the precision cancer medicine program at the James. The focus of the program is just that precision.

Doctors have been analyzing tumors for years, but now it's so specific down to the genetic mutation.

"So if we saw 100 patients with breast cancer, we could literally find 100 different types of breast cancer," Roychowdhury said.

Getting to the genetic heart of the cancer, knowing what drives it and makes it grow and spread, is the key to finding the cancer, stopping it, and saving lives.

"It's going to be much more focusedon the exact gene that's disruptive," Roychowdhury said.

For example, Jared Gordon was diagnosed with stage four lung cancer at age 51.

The father of three was told that he had six months to live.

See the article here:
Ohio State Gene Testing Could Unlock Key To Curing Cancer

Posted in Gene Medicine | Comments Off on Ohio State Gene Testing Could Unlock Key To Curing Cancer

Politically Incorrect- Warren Markowitz (made with Spreaker) – Video

Posted: at 2:41 am


Politically Incorrect- Warren Markowitz (made with Spreaker)
Source: http://www.spreaker.com/user/radiomarkowitz/politically-incorrect-warren-markowitz Lets look at the world and the events of the day and discuss them ...

By: Warren Markowitz

See the rest here:
Politically Incorrect- Warren Markowitz (made with Spreaker) - Video

Posted in Politically Incorrect | Comments Off on Politically Incorrect- Warren Markowitz (made with Spreaker) – Video

Joan Rivers Comic Legend 1933 – 2014 – Video

Posted: at 2:41 am


Joan Rivers Comic Legend 1933 - 2014
Halfway through filming a video tribute to Joan Rivers I got the sad news that she #39;d died. No other comic has ever inspired me as much as she has. She was an outrageous, outspoken, politically...

By: Charlie Hides TV

Continue reading here:
Joan Rivers Comic Legend 1933 - 2014 - Video

Posted in Politically Incorrect | Comments Off on Joan Rivers Comic Legend 1933 – 2014 – Video

Censorship In China: Sky’s Mark Stone In Xinjiang Province – Video

Posted: at 2:41 am


Censorship In China: Sky #39;s Mark Stone In Xinjiang Province
Sky #39;s Mark Stone reveals some of the difficulties facing journalists attempting to report from China #39;s Xinjiang province, including fake identities and gover...

By: Sky News

Read more:
Censorship In China: Sky's Mark Stone In Xinjiang Province - Video

Posted in Censorship | Comments Off on Censorship In China: Sky’s Mark Stone In Xinjiang Province – Video

Blocked in China, Internet censorship – Video

Posted: at 2:41 am


Blocked in China, Internet censorship
Have you ever heard about internet censorship in China? If you are going to travel in China, please DO check out this video to know about the websites that are blocked in China. FB CEO Mark...

By: Learn Chinese with Meggie Liao

See more here:
Blocked in China, Internet censorship - Video

Posted in Censorship | Comments Off on Blocked in China, Internet censorship – Video

Ron Paul and Mark Spitznagel Talk Freedom, Farming, and the Fed

Posted: at 2:41 am

Ron Paul and Mark Spitznagel share a passion for non-interventionism, free markets, and Austrian economics. Congressman Paul served many years as a US Representative from Texas, spanning 1976 to 2013, and was a Republican presidential candidate in 2008 and 2012. He has written extensively on liberty and politics, including The Revolution: A Manifesto and End the Fed. Spitznagel is the founder of Universa Investments, an investment advisor that specializes in tail-hedging, and is the author of The Dao of Capital, for which Paul wrote the Foreword. The two friends sat down recently to discuss topics ranging from the liberty movement and agricultural policy, to the consequences of Federal Reserve monetary policy. Here is a transcript of their conversation:

Mark Spitznagel: Ron, you have been the galvanizing force of a resurgent liberty movement in the United States. Yet, we find ourselves in this world where interventionism is on the rise, and much of America remains complacent about it. For instance, I think we would agree that todays crony-capitalism and monetary-interventionism by central banks is at an unprecedented scale that will once again leave destruction in its wake. Why is America letting this happen, and moving away from its Jeffersonian ideals? Moreover, I have to ask you, has the liberty movement stalled, or even failed?

Ron Paul: Mark, on the surface and in Washington it may appear that interventionism is on the rise but in reality its on the defensive, more so than ever. Indeed there is a lot of complacency as that is frequently the rule for the majority of people regardless of the system. Where there is little complacency is with the intellectual leaders now leading the charge against the foreign and economic interventionists who have been in charge for decades and created the major crisis that we face today. Its never easy politically to turn off bad policies and many times we have to wait until the policies self-destruct. The philosophy of non-intervention is growing significantly and that is crucial since ideas do have consequences. The obvious failure of the current system, and the current intellectual leaders of the younger generation who are more favorably inclined toward non-intervention, provide the encouragement we need to clean up the mess. During my presidential campaigns, I was always quite pleased when students held up signs saying: You cured my apathy.

A question for you, Mark: I know you and a very few others like Jimmy Rogers know about authentic non-intervention in the economy, but what are Wall Street traders and investors like? Are they helpful in exposing crony-capitalism or are they part of the problem?

MS: Unfortunately, Wall Street cant help but respond to monetary intervention, like puppets to the Federal Reserve puppet master. Not only has the Fed turned just about every investor into a crazed gambler desperate for any yield above todays artificially low interest rates, for professional investors the desperation is compounded by the career risk associated with underperforming in the very next period. If youre fired for not having played the Feds game in the next round, who cares about what will happen in future rounds, and who cares about the long-run implications of this crony-capitalist game?

I see this temporal myopia at the very heart of Washington politics as well. If politicians dont get reelected each period, then from a career standpoint any concern for the future was for naught. It ranges far and wide, from corporate managers to, even more significantly, farmers: Think of how debt and farm policy distortions induce wringing out everything that we can from each harvest, even at the expense of future harvests (such as with soil erosion).

Frdric Bastiat said it best when he condemned the pursuit of a small present good that will be followed by a great evil to come, rather than a great good to come at the risk of a present small evil. The latter is extraordinarily difficult today. To me, your ability to focus away from the present and truly see the great good or evil to come was really so astonishing about your political career. What was your secret, Ron, and what kept you from losing sight of that?

RP: The simple answer (and theres a more detailed one) about my not losing sight is that I detest the current political process. Originally, I never expected to be elected and had one goal in mind: promote the Cause of Liberty. I firmly believed our country was headed in the wrong direction. I was confident that the Freedom Philosophy and the non-aggression principle offered the solutions to our problems. I had no interest in being molded or manipulated by those who held different views. Your views on political myopia are correct. This myopia, fueled by self-serving politicians and justified by economic mysticism, is at the heart of the problem. This myopia dictates that politicians, the day after theyre elected, start concentrating on the next election. The lobbyists love the system. They receive high rewards for getting benefits that frequently benefit a Members district. The lobbyists convince the voters that the system can be used for their benefit and the Member gets the credit. Good economic policy, moral principle, the Constitution, or challenging ones party leadership rarely enters into the equation. At times I think the myopia approaches blindness.

Your point about how the government farm program greatly distorts the market is a perfect example of how long bad policies can last when some people immediately benefit at the often gradual expense of others. It happens with all government programs. Dairy farmers and dairies, in protecting their interests, have made it difficult, if not impossible, to drink raw milk hardly a policy that a free society would endorse.

MS: Oh yes, a subject near and dear to my heart! Theres a parallel between the case where benefits from policies are concentrated in the few and the costs dispersed among the many, and the case where benefits are concentrated early on while the costs are dispersed over time. In both cases, for many people its not an obvious fight worth fighting. But of course it is worth fighting. When the State gives special privileges to certain crops, for instance, the result is an artificial, disease- and pest-prone monoculture and a distorted ecosystem and food system around those crops. CAFOs (concentrated animal feeding operations), corn syrup and the corn-fed-everything industries are products of government favoritism. More long-term, natural, and sustainable agricultural systems like organic or pasture-based are made to look impractical. Its crazy how much bureaucrats determine what we grow and what we eat. Sustainable farmers should all be libertarians. The problem is that many hippie types coming from the Left see big agricultural companies implementing these harmful policies, and they understandably conclude, Thats pure capitalism at work, thats how the profit motive leads to disaster when it comes to food. But no, thats cronyism at work, thats how government intervention leads to disaster. The very same thing happens with financial crises, of course capitalism is always wrongly accused. We blame the system when we interfere with its natural homeostatic functioning.

View original post here:
Ron Paul and Mark Spitznagel Talk Freedom, Farming, and the Fed

Posted in Ron Paul | Comments Off on Ron Paul and Mark Spitznagel Talk Freedom, Farming, and the Fed