Monthly Archives: January 2014

The Reality of Free Speech

By: YourRightToBeStupid

See the article here:
The Reality of Free Speech - Video

Hate speech vs free speech: Prashant Bhushan under attack
The Social Network: Lawyer and senior AAP leader Prashant Bhushan makes a statement about holding referendum in Kashmir inviting vandals to attack his party #39;...

By: NDTV

Read more here:
Hate speech vs free speech: Prashant Bhushan under attack - Video

Eleanor McCullen clutches a baby's hat knit in pink and blue as she patrols a yellow semicircle painted on the sidewalk outside a Planned Parenthood health clinic on a frigid December morning with snow in the forecast.

The painted line marks 35 feet from the clinic's entrance and that's where the 77-year-old McCullen and all other abortion protesters and supporters must stay under a Massachusetts law that is being challenged at the U.S. Supreme Court as an unconstitutional infringement on free speech. Arguments are set for Wednesday.

Outside the line, McCullen and others are free to approach anyone with any message they wish. They risk arrest if they get closer to the door.

With her pleasant demeanor and grandmotherly mien, McCullen has become the new face of a decades-old fight between abortion opponents asserting their right to try to change the minds of women seeking abortions and abortion providers claiming that patients should be able to enter their facilities without being impeded or harassed.

In 2000, the Supreme Court upheld a different buffer zone in Colorado in a decision that some free speech advocates, who also support abortion rights, heavily criticized. Noted First Amendment lawyer Floyd Abrams recently called the decision in Hill v. Colorado "what may well be the most indefensible First Amendment ruling so far this century."

The three dissenters in that case Justices Anthony Kennedy, Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas remain on the court. They have been joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Samuel Alito, who may be willing to provide the two additional votes in support of the protesters.

McCullen and other abortion opponents sued over the limits on their activities at Planned Parenthood health centers in Boston, Springfield and Worcester. At the latter two sites, the protesters say they have little chance of reaching patients arriving by car because they must stay 35 feet from the entrance to those buildings' parking lots.

Planned Parenthood provides health exams for women, cancer screenings, tests for sexually transmitted diseases, birth control and abortions at the clinic, although on this day Boston clinic employees said no abortions were performed.

McCullen doesn't know which services arriving patients are seeking, but she said that women arriving with someone else usually are about to have an abortion because they need a ride home.

Sometimes McCullen is able to start a conversation before a woman reaches the yellow line. Protesters can usually be close by when people emerge from taxicabs.

Read more here:
High Court Case: Abortion Clinic Protest-Free Zone

The Yosemite Community College District Board of Trustees on Wednesday introduced its newly-phrased policy on free speech, after drawing criticism in September that led to a lawsuit.

It was the first meeting run by Lynn Martin, of Sonora, former Columbia College counselor and instructor, who was recently elected board chairwoman.

Martin has served on the board since 2010, representing Area 1, including Tuolumne County, eastern Stanislaus County and parts of Calaveras counties. She was selected chairwoman at the its annual organizational meeting in December and succeeds chairman Abe Rojas, of Turlock.

The meeting saw the first reading of the districts revised Time, Place and Manner policy governing free speech on district property.

The district drew national attention after Army veteran Robert Van Tuinen, a student at its Modesto Junior College campus, was prevented from handing out copies of the U.S. Constitution on Sept. 17, which is Constitution Day.

Van Tuinen sued the district, claiming infringements on his First Amendment rights protecting free speech. Talks over the lawsuit continued Wednesday in closed session.

For the full story see today's Union Democrat.

More:
Free speech policy gets reworking