Daily Archives: January 3, 2014

illuminati – The Skeptic's Dictionary – Skepdic.com

Posted: January 3, 2014 at 8:44 am

What is at stake is more than one small country [Kuwait], it is a big idea - a new world order, where diverse nations are drawn together in common cause to achieve the universal aspirations of mankind: peace and security, freedom, and the rule of law. Such is a world worthy of our struggle, and worthy of our children's future. --President George Bush in his state of the union address, January 16, 1991

The Illuminati were members of a secret society in Bavaria in the late 18th century. They had a political agenda that included republicanism and abolition of monarchies, which they tried to institute by means of subterfuge, secrecy, and conspiracy, including the infiltration of other organizations. They fancied themselves to be "enlightened" but they had little success and were destroyed within fifteen years of their origin (Pipes 1997).

Paranoid conspiracy theorists (PCTs) believe the Illuminati cabal still exists, either in its original form or as a paradigm for later cabals. Many PCTs believe "that large Jewish banking families have been orchestrating various political revolutions and machinations throughout Europe and America since the late eighteenth century, with the ultimate aim of bringing about a satanic New World Order."* What George Bush was talking about in his state of the union address in 1991 was no less than the establishment of a single world government with the anti-Christ (who some say is Bill Clinton (or is he a decoy?), but could be Pat Robertson or George W. Bush) at its head.

In the paranoid mind, the Illuminati succeeded in their goals, and have now infiltrated every government and every aspect of society. They are responsible for every evil and every unjust act that ever occurs anywhere; the fact that absolutely no evidence of their existence can be found only serves to make them stronger and more frightening. They are the demon in the closet, and will probably never disappear from the paranoid fantasy world of right-wing conspiracy theorists. --New England Skeptical Society

There are several "sects" of PCTs. Among the more popular are the militant Christian fundamentalist branch and the UFO/alien branch. They each think the others are evil or nuts but their paranoia has the same focus: the end is near.

the Illuminati and the anti-Christ

The Illuminati are hastening the coming of the anti-Christ and the end of the world.

For those of us who still accept the Bible as God's [sic] revealed will to man, it's a matter of great concern to see the increasing propaganda for, and emergence of, a New World Order.... both Old and New Testaments warned us that the culmination of history would be marked by the reunion of the nations of the old Roman Empire in Europe; the restoration of the state of Israel (and the increasing hostility of all nations toward her); the implementation of a one-world governmental system; the imposition of a world-wide cashless monetary system; the development of a synchretistic [sic] world religion, based upon man, and presided over by a false prophet; the rise to power of a benign world dictator, who (once firmly in control) would eliminate individual freedoms, demonstrate iron-willed ferocity and cruelty, and make himself the object of worship; and world-wide apostacy [sic], coupled with active persecution and execution of believing Jews and Christians. ---Jay Whitley

Mr. Whitley is prepared for Armageddon, however. He sells Emergency Dehydrated Food Kits.

the major players

See the original post here:
illuminati - The Skeptic's Dictionary - Skepdic.com

Posted in Illuminati | Comments Off on illuminati – The Skeptic's Dictionary – Skepdic.com

Adam Weishaupt – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Posted: at 8:44 am

Johann Adam Weishaupt (6 February 1748 18 November 1830[1][2][3][4]) was a German philosopher and founder of the Order of Illuminati, a secret society with origins in Bavaria.

Adam Weishaupt was born on 6 February 1748 in Ingolstadt[1][5] in the Electorate of Bavaria. Weishaupt's father Johann Georg Weishaupt (17171753) died[5] when Adam was five years old. After his father's death he came under the tutelage of his godfather Johann Adam Freiherr von Ickstatt[6] who, like his father, was a professor of law at the University of Ingolstadt.[7] Ickstatt was a proponent of the philosophy of Christian Wolff and of the Enlightenment,[8] and he influenced the young Weishaupt with his rationalism. Weishaupt began his formal education at age seven[1] at a Jesuit school. He later enrolled at the University of Ingolstadt and graduated in 1768[9] at age 20 with a doctorate of law.[10] In 1772[11] he became a professor of law. The following year he married Afra Sausenhofer[12] of Eichsttt.

After Pope Clement XIVs suppression of the Society of Jesus in 1773, Weishaupt became a professor of canon law,[13] a position that was held exclusively by the Jesuits until that time. In 1775 Weishaupt was introduced[14] to the empirical philosophy of Johann Georg Heinrich Feder[15] of the University of Gttingen. Both Feder and Weishaupt would later become opponents of Kantian idealism.[16]

On May day 1776 Weishaupt formed the "Illuminati". He adopted the name of "Brother Spartacus" within the order. Although the Order was not egalitarian or democratic internally, it sought to promote the doctrines of equality and freedom throughout society.[17]

The actual character of the society was an elaborate network of spies and counter-spies. Each isolated cell of initiates reported to a superior, whom they did not know, a party structure that was effectively adopted by some later groups.[17]

Weishaupt was initiated into the Masonic Lodge "Theodor zum guten Rath", at Munich in 1777. His project of "illumination, enlightening the understanding by the sun of reason, which will dispel the clouds of superstition and of prejudice" was an unwelcome reform.[17] Soon however he had developed gnostic mysteries of his own[citation needed], with the goal of "perfecting human nature" through re-education to achieve a communal state with nature, freed of government and organized religion. He began working towards incorporating his system of Illuminism with that of Freemasonry.[17]

Weishaupt's radical rationalism and vocabulary was not likely to succeed. Writings that were intercepted in 1784 were interpreted as seditious, and the Society was banned by the government of Karl Theodor, Elector of Bavaria, in 1784. Weishaupt lost his position at the University of Ingolstadt and fled Bavaria.[17]

He received the assistance of Duke Ernest II of Saxe-Gotha-Altenburg (17451804), and lived in Gotha writing a series of works on illuminism, including A Complete History of the Persecutions of the Illuminati in Bavaria (1785), A Picture of Illuminism (1786), An Apology for the Illuminati (1786), and An Improved System of Illuminism (1787). Adam Weishaupt died in Gotha on 18 November 1830.[1][2][3][4] He was survived by his second wife, Anna Maria (ne Sausenhofer), and his children Nanette, Charlotte, Ernst, Karl, Eduard, and Alfred.[2] Weishaupt was buried next to his son Wilhelm who preceded him in death in 1802.

After Weishaupt's Order of the Illuminati was banned and its members dispersed, it left behind no enduring traces of an influence, not even on its own erstwhile members, who went on in the future to develop in quite different directions.[18]

Read the original here:
Adam Weishaupt - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Posted in Illuminati | Comments Off on Adam Weishaupt – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jim Bennett: Free speech doesn't guarantee you a TV show

Posted: at 8:40 am

This undated image released by A&E shows Phil Robertson, flanked by his sons Jase Robertson, left, and Willie Robertson from the popular series "Duck Dynasty."

Zach Dilgard, Associated Press

Enlarge photo

On the surface, you would think Duck Dynastys Phil Robertson and comedian Bill Maher have very little in common. Phil is an unapologetic Christian conservative, while Bill is a left-wing atheist. Yet they share a bond of infamy that illustrates the hypocrisy of many so-called free speech advocates.

Both Phil and Bill have gotten into hot water for saying controversial things on national television. Whats ironic to me, however, is that those who were furious at Bill for his remarks are the ones defending Phil for his, and vice versa.

That drives me crazy.

A little background might be helpful. After the 9/11 attacks, Bill Maher took issue with President Bushs characterization of the terrorists as cowards, noting that it takes bravery to give your life in a cause, no matter how evil or misguided. We have been the cowards, lobbing cruise missiles from 2,000 miles away. That's cowardly," Maher said on his ABC late-night talk show Politically Incorrect. "Staying in the airplane when it hits the building, say what you want about it, it's not cowardly."

The outrage was immediate and widespread, especially given that he made these remarks just weeks after the attacks when emotions were still raw. Many called for ABC to fire Maher, and, while the network initially defended its host, the executives finally canceled the show. This resulted in indignant editorials from left-wing pundits who claimed that the sacking of Bill Maher was an affront to his fundamental constitutional rights.

Take columnist Dewayne Wickham, who wrote the following for USA Today: (Terrorists) don't tolerate dissent. They don't believe in free speech. We, on the other hand, do. At least that's what we say. He went on to lament the fact that Maher losing his job shows the kind of intolerance and irrationality terrorists display, and that rather than attempt to shut him up, Bill Maher's critics should hold him up as an example of one of this nation's greatest strengths: our freedom of speech.

Thats nifty. Its also stupid.

Read the original here:
Jim Bennett: Free speech doesn't guarantee you a TV show

Posted in Free Speech | Comments Off on Jim Bennett: Free speech doesn't guarantee you a TV show

Free speech campaigners hand petition to MP Jesse Norman

Posted: at 8:40 am

Free speech campaigners hand petition to MP Jesse Norman

11:26am Friday 3rd January 2014 in Local News By Paul Rogers

CAMPAIGNERS have handed a petition to MP Jesse Norman to see if a "gagging law" that could prevent charities and groups from speaking about certain issues could be amended.

Nearly 220,000 people had signed a petition for the Government to scrap or fix part two of the Transparency of Lobbying, Non-party Campaigning and Trade Union Administration Bill that is currently being debated in the House of Lords.

The campaigners claim that, if passed, the Bill would clamp down on freedom of speech and gag charities, campaigning groups and the rest of the civil society, rather than tackling "shady lobbying" by big business.

The petition was handed in to Mr Norman at Ross-on-Wye Library on Friday.

"I organised the petition because I support 38 degrees in their campaign to fix or scrap the gagging law as it is rushed through parliament," said Tricia Griffiths, who is from Hereford.

"I am mainly a Greenpeace and Friends of the Earth supporter, against fracking and pollution, and am Interested in campaigning for people friendly matters that are local to Herefordshire.

"It is important to me and other 38 degrees members to show our MP how much opposition there is to this law in it's current form."

Mr Norman said that he is happy to look at the Bill again and see if the proposed changes can be made.

Read the rest here:
Free speech campaigners hand petition to MP Jesse Norman

Posted in Free Speech | Comments Off on Free speech campaigners hand petition to MP Jesse Norman