Daily Archives: February 12, 2013

David Lory VanDerBeek: Dorner Cover Up, Exposing Treason, Ron Paul Voters and the Run for Governor.
Gubernatorial candidate, David Lory VanDerBeek, joins Josh Tolley to talk about running for governor, arresting those who commit treason, and winning Nevada back for the people.

By: TheJoshTolleyChannel

See the original post here:
David Lory VanDerBeek: Dorner Cover Up, Exposing Treason, Ron Paul Voters and the Run for Governor. - Video

Ron Paul has NOT gone to the UN to strong-arm RonPaul.com
And it #39;s time to stop this claim and issue an apology!

By: Ron Paul Flix

Link:
Ron Paul has NOT gone to the UN to strong-arm RonPaul.com - Video

Ron Paul Responds to RonPaul.com
Fox Business News FAIR USE NOTICE: This video may contain copyrighted material. Such material is made available for educational purposes only. This constitutes a #39;fair use #39; of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Title 17 USC section 106A-117 of the US Copyright Law

By: ogchris100

See the original post here:
Ron Paul Responds to RonPaul.com - Video

Ron Paul Files Suit For RonPaul.com

By: video.foxnews.com Please like PigMine #39;s FaceBook page here: http://www.facebook.com Subscribe to http://www.youtube.com February 11, 2012 - Tamara Holder and Lis Wiehl discuss trademark battle between former congressman and his supportersFAIR USE NOTICE: This video may contain copyrighted material. Such material is made available for educational purposes only. This constitutes a #39;fair use #39; of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Title 17 USC section 106A-117 of the US Copyright Law.

By: PigMine2

Read the rest here:
Ron Paul Files Suit For RonPaul.com - Video

Libertarian folk hero and retired Rep. Ron Paul is fighting to take the domain name RonPaul.com from a legion of loyal supporters. And he's turning to an unlikely source for help, filing a complaint with an agency of the United Nations -- a body he's criticized for years.

The site owners response: Thats not cool! We want our old pre-retirement Ron Paul back!

The Texas Republican and three-time presidential candidate filed the complaint Friday with the U.N.'s World Intellectual Property Organization.

He argues at length in his complaint that he should have the domain name -- as well as one for RonPaul.org -- for free because he already has a common law trademark on his name.

Paul attorney David Warrington said the situation is a private arbitration that was arranged by the nonprofit Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, which was organized under California law.

He said WIPO was need to settle the dispute because the domain-name owners used a foreign registrar to get the domain name.

They subjected themselves to this proceeding in this forum when they registered RonPaul.com with an Australian registrar," Warrington said.

Beyond his 14 years in national politics, Paul argues, his trademark is further burnished by his many books, being widely quoted by scholars and having the reputation as a premier advocate for liberty in American politics.

The owners of the domain names say they are disappointed by the complaint, considering how many of them -- particularly the young, energetic supporters -- kept Pauls 2012 run energized through grassroots campaigning and fundraising.

Like thousands of fellow Ron Paul supporters, we put our lives on hold and invested five years of hard work into Ron Paul, RonPaul.com and Ron Paul 2012, the owners, who are getting a lawyer and have 20 days to prepare a complaint response, said on their site.

Read more:
Ron Paul looks to UN for help in website fight

Former Republican presidential hopeful Ron Paul has turned to the United Nations an agency hes criticized for years for assistance in taking back the domain names RonPaul.com and RonPaul.org from a group of Libertarian supporters.

The complaint calls for the agency to expropriate the two domain names from his supporters without compensation and hand them over to Mr. Paul, RonPaul.com states.

The Texas Republican filed the complaint with the U.N.s World Intellectual Property Organization, claiming he should acquire the domain names for free because he already has a common law trademark on his name, Fox News reports.

The sites owners have 20 days to prepare a response and are currently looking for a lawyer to help represent them in the case.

The owners expressed disappointment, labeling Mr. Pauls actions as not cool in a post on the site Friday that called for our old pre-retirement Ron Paul to return.

Back in 2007 we put our lives on hold for you, Ron, and we invested close to 10,000 hours of tears, sweat and hard work into this site at great personal sacrifice. We helped raise millions of dollars for you, we spread your message of liberty as far and wide as we possibly could, and we went out of our way to defend you against the unjustified attacks by your opponents, the statement said.

The group also criticized Mr. Pauls entirely out-of-character tweet on Feb. 4 about the death of a Navy Iraq War veteran in which he said, Chris Kyles death seems to confirm that he who lives by the sword dies by the sword. Treating PTSD at a firing range doesnt make sense.

Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

Read the original here:
Ron Paul looks to U.N. for help in website fight

A year ago, we pointed out how hypocritical it was for Ron Paul (at the time still a Congressional Representative and a candidate for President) to file a ridiculous lawsuit, clearly abusing trademark law, in an effort to unmask some anonymous internet users who had made a video that attacked another candidate, John Huntsman, and closed with a claim that the video was from Ron Paul supporters.

Many of Pauls' supporters actually believed the video was a fake, from Huntsman supporters, seeking to discredit Ron Paul. Even if that was true, there was simply no excuse to then abuse trademark law to try to take away someone's anonymity. And, yes, it was an abuse of trademark law -- as he both claimed trademark on his name and claimed that the video was a "use in commerce" (it was not). Even if you believe the videomakers should have been exposed, I would hope you'd agree that abusing a totally unrelated law to do so would be a mistake, and (to us) seemed to go 100% against the things Ron Paul claimed to stand for. Thankfully, a judge quickly agreed and killed the lawsuit.

In writing about this, many of Paul's more ardent supporters trashed us both in our comments, and on various Ron Paul websites. I'm a little curious how they feel now, in a similar situation, where Ron Paul has turned his legal sights on them. As a whole bunch of folks have sent in, Ron Paul has filed a UDRP complaint against the site RonPaul.com, seeking to have WIPO turn over the domain to him. RonPaul.com has basically been the central source for the massive grassroots effort that supported Ron Paul in his last two Presidential campaigns -- leading many other candidates to envy Paul's ability to connect with the internet generation. The reality, of course, was much of that actually had to do with a few of his most dedicated fans, and their ability to spread his message via a series of grassroots websites, including RonPaul.com. To have Paul turn around and seek to have WIPO turn over the domain is incredible on so many different levels, once again suggesting that many of the things Ron Paul claims to have believed in go completely out the window at times -- even when it involves turning on the very people who built up his reputation.

Even more bizarre is that not only is he turning on his most ardent supporters and effectively taking them to court, but he's using WIPO, a part of the United Nations, to do so. Ron Paul hates the UN and would like the US to leave the UN. As he once said:

The choice is very clear: we either follow the Constitution or submit to UN global governance. American national sovereignty cannot survive if we allow our domestic laws to be crafted by an international body. This needs to be stated publicly more often. If we continue down the UN path, America as we know it will cease to exist.

And yet, here he is, running to the UN, and trying to forcefully take away a super successful site from his biggest fans supporting him, using the force of that same United Nations? Incredible.

Reading through the background and history, and then digging into the claims Paul's lawyer makes, suggests that Paul has made a huge mistake here. The backstory is that in a recent interview Paul expressed some minor regret that he did not hold the domain:

Alex Jones: Well, God bless you, sir, I hope we can get you back again in a month. What are any other websites that are important, just http://www.CampaignForLiberty.org?

Ron Paul: Theres that, and well be listing some new things there because were making some other WebPages. Im going to have a home page. Unfortunately, I didnt have RonPaul.com, so Im going to have to have RonPaulsHomepage.com. That will be coming up, but its not ready yet.

In response, some of his fans told the site's operators they should look to hand over the site. The operators noted that over the past 4.5 years, and through two high profile Presidential campaigns, they were at the center of building up massive grassroots support for Paul, and they had not had any request for the domain, but they were happy to talk it over:

Visit link:
Ron Paul Wants UN To Take RonPaul.com Away From Site Owners