Alex Linder Audio Books
Open Letters
Yggdrasil's Library
THE ORION PARTY
The Prometheus League
- Humanity Needs A World Government PDF
 - Cosmos Theology Essay PDF
 - Cosmos Theology Booklet PDF
 - Europe Destiny Essays PDF
 - Historical Parallels PDF
 - Christianity Examined PDF
 
News Blogs
Euvolution
- Home Page
 - Pierre Teilhard De Chardin
 - Library of Eugenics
 - Genetic Revolution News
 - Science
 - Philosophy
 - Politics
 - Nationalism
 - Cosmic Heaven
 - Eugenics
 - Future Art Gallery
 - NeoEugenics
 - Contact Us
 - About the Website
 - Site Map
 
Transhumanism News
Partners
Race Differences in Intelligence: a Global Perspective
  Richard Lynn 
  
University of Ulster, Coleraine, Northern Ireland 
  
THE MANKIND QUARTERLY, V31:3, Spring 1991, 255-296. 
  
The world literature on racial differences in intelligence is reviewed from 
  three points of view. Firstly, studies using intelligence tests indicate that 
  Caucasoids in North America, Europe and Australasia generally obtain mean IQs 
  of around 100. Mongoloids typically obtain slightly higher means in the range 
  of 100-106. African Negroids obtain mean IQs of around 70, while 
  Negroid-Caucasoids in the United States and Britain obtain means of about 85. 
  Amerindians and the South East Asian races typically obtain means in the range 
  of 85-95. 
  
A second source of evidence comes from studies of reaction times which 
  provide measures of the neurological efficiency of the brain. These studies 
  show that Mongoloids have the fastest reaction times, followed by Caucasoids 
  and then by Negroids. Thirdly, the races can be assessed for their 
  contributions to civilization. Here the Caucasoids and the Mongoloids have 
  made the most significant advances both in the foundation of the early 
  civilizations and in more recent developments. 
  
The existence of racial differences in intelligence has been known since 
  the time of the First World war when tests given to large numbers of military 
  conscripts in the United States revealed that blacks had an average 
  intelligence level about 15 IQ points below that of whites. In the following 
  decades there has been debate over the question of whether these differences 
  have a genetic basis. This debate has largely taken place in the context of 
  the differences in intelligence found in different racial populations in the 
  United States. Genetic theorists have pointed to the high heritability of 
  intelligence and the difficulties of formulating credible environmentalist 
  explanations to explain the difference (Jensen 1972, 1973, 1980; Eysenck, 
  1971). Environmentalists have pointed to a variety of factor-s which they 
  consider capable of explaining the low Negroid IQ, of which the most important 
  are bias in the tests, the adverse social and economic living conditions 
  experienced by blacks, discrimination and prejudice from white majorities and 
  the historical legacy of slavery which has demoralized blacks and destroyed 
  their family structure (Flynn, 1980; Jaynes and Williams, 1989; Mackintosh and 
  Mascie-Taylor, 1985). Neither side has yet succeeded in convincing the other 
  and the issue remains unresolved, although a recent poll has shown that the 
  majority of experts now believe there is some genetic basis to the low black 
  IQ (Snyderman and Rothman, 1988).
  
 The Purpose of the present paper is to consider the problem of racial 
  differences in intelligence in a global perspective. Part one of the paper 
  contains a review of the many studies which have been made of the intelligence 
  of different races throughout the world. The principal question here is 
  whether the world wide evidence supports the genetic or the environmental 
  position.
  
 In general terms the genetic theory requires that there should be a 
  reasonably high degree of consistency of the intelligence levels shown by 
  populations of different races in a variety of geographical locations. Thus, 
  Negroids should universally have lower intelligence levels than Caucasoids and 
  this difference should be found in Africa and the West Indies as well as in 
  the United States and Britain. The reason for this is that the genes or 
  alleles (alternative forms of genes) for low intelligence, if these exist, 
  should be present in all Negroid populations and not merely in those whose 
  ancestors were transported as slaves to the New World. Furthermore, Negroids 
  in the United States and Britain are nearly all Negroid Caucasoid hybrids 
  (Reed, 1969). Their Caucasoid genes should, on the genetic hypothesis, raise 
  their intelligence level as compared with the pure Negroids of Africa. Hence 
  the genetic theory demands that African Negroids should have lower 
  intelligence levels than the Negroid-Caucasoid hybrids of the United States 
  and Britain. Whether or not this is the case can be regarded as a test of the 
  genetic theory and any studies showing that pure African Negroids have higher 
  IQs than American or British Negroid hybrids would falsify the genetic 
  hypothesis.
  
 A similar degree of consistency of intelligence levels should be found for 
  all races if the intelligence is largely genetically determined. The 
  intelligence of Caucasoids should be approximately the same, whether they live 
  in the United States, Britain, Europe, Australia or New Zealand. The same 
  consistency should be present in the third major race of mankind, the 
  Orientals or Mongoloids, who are present not only in their native habitat of 
  north east Asia but also in the United States and Europe. Hence a world wide 
  examination of the consistency of racial differences in intelligence would 
  provide a perspective on the genetic and environmental theories which is 
  lacking in the studies carried out in the local contexts of the United States 
  and, more recently, in Britain.
  
 Part two of the paper deals with the question of whether the racial 
  differences in intelligence as measured by intelligence tests are also present 
  in reaction times, i.e. the speed of response to simple stimuli. The interest 
  of this question is that recent work has shown that reaction times are a 
  measure of intelligence and appear to represent differences in the 
  neurological efficiency of brain processes (Jensen, 1982; Eysenck, 1982). A 
  positive finding of racial differences in reaction times would rule out many 
  of the explanations for the intelligence differences advanced by 
  environmentalists such as bias in the tests, the legacy of slavery and so 
  forth, and would point to a genetically determined neurological basis for the 
  differences. Whether or not there are racial differences in reaction times 
  which run parallel with those in intelligence therefore provides a further 
  test of the genetic and environmental theories. 
  
  
Part three of the paper considers the racial differences in the foundation 
  and advancement of civilization. The establishment of civilization required 
  numerous discoveries such as the invention of writing and arithmetic and these 
  must have been due to the work of highly intelligent individuals. This part of 
  the paper considers whether the racial differences in the establishment of 
  civilizations are the same as those found in the performance of intelligence 
  tests.
  
 Intelligence Test Performance 
  
Intelligence tests were developed in the first two decades of the century 
  and in the following seventy years numerous studies have been published of the 
  intelligence of different peoples in many parts of the world. The principal 
  studies have been collated and classified by the race and are summarized in 
  Tables I through 6. Intelligence was initially conceptualized as a single 
  entity quantified by the intelligence quotient and many studies have reported 
  racial differences in terms of a single 1(2. The theoretical basis for 
  representing intelligence in terms of a single 1(2 is Spearman's (1927) work 
  identifying a general factor present in all cognitive tests and his 
  conceptualization of this as general intelligence, now known as Spearman's g, 
  and identified as a generalized problem solving ability which enters into the 
  performance of all cognitive tasks.
  
 This theory of intelligence was challenged in the nineteen thirties by 
  Thurstone (1938) who proposed an alternative model which dispensed with the 
  concept of Spearman's g and postulated six primary mental abilities designated 
  reasoning, spatial, numerical, verbal, perceptual speed and fluency abilities. 
  In the late nineteen-forties an integration of the Spearman and Thurstone 
  models was proposed by Burt (1949). This consisted of a hierarchical model of 
  intelligence in which Spearman's general factor was split into two correlated 
  group factors now generally known as the verbal and visuospatial abilities. 
  These can in turn be broken down further into narrower primary abilities, of 
  which some twenty to thirty have been identified (Cattell, 1971). Burt's model 
  is widely accepted in contemporary psychology and is adopted in this paper. 
  Where possible means for different populations are given for general 
  intelligence (Spearman's g) and for the verbal and visuospatial abilities. 
  Intelligence tests are normally calibrated with the mean IQ set at 100 and the 
  standard deviation at 15. This metric has been adopted and the mean IQ of 
  American Caucasoids set at 100 to serve as the standard in terms of which IQs 
  of all other populations are expressed. Further details of the methods used 
  for the calculations of mean IQs for different populations are given in the 
  appendix. 
  
Caucasoids 
  
Mean IQs for Caucasoid peoples in the United States, Britain, Continental 
  Europe, Australia and New Zealand are set out in Table 1. In this and in 
  subsequent tables summary results are given for the geographical location of 
  the sample, the age of the subjects, the numbers, the tests used and mean IQs 
  for general, verbal and visuospatial intelligence. General intelligence is 
  conceptualized as Spearman's g, the general factor present in all cognitive 
  tasks, and most effectively measured by tests of reasoning ability such as 
  Raven's Progressive Matrices and Cattell's Culture Fair Test. It can also be 
  measured by omnibus tests such as the Wechslers and the Stanford Binet. 
  Results from all these tests are entered in the tables under general 
  intelligence. Verbal 1Qs in the tables are derived from the verbal scales of 
  the Wechslers and from verbal comprehension scales in such tests as the 
  Differential Aptitude and the McCarthy. Visuospatial IQs are derived from the 
  performance scales of the Wechslers and from visuospatial scales in the 
  Differential Aptitude, the McCarthy and similar tests, and from figure copying 
  tests such as the Draw-a-Man.
  
 Inspection of the results set out in the table will show firstly that 
  Caucasoids in the United States and Britain obtain virtually identical mean 
  IQs. This was first demonstrated in the 1932 Scottish survey of Il years olds 
  who obtained a mean IQ of 99 on the American Stanford Binet. The subsequent 
  studies shown in the table under Scotland and Britain confirm this result. The 
  earlier standardization of tests in the United States were generally based on 
  normative samples of Caucasoids only, such as the early Stanford Rinet and 
  Wechsler tests, but the later standardizations such as the WISC-R included 
  Negroids. For this reason an adjustment has to be made to American means for 
  later tests, because when the mean of the American total population is set at 
  100, the mean of American Caucasoids is 102.25, as derived from the 
  standardization sample of the WISC-R (Jensen and Reynolds, 1982). 
  
Further inspection of the results set out in Table i shows that the mean 
  IQs from all these Caucasoid populations lies in the range of 94-107, with the 
  single exception of a low value of 87 for Spain found by Nieto Alegre et al 
  (1967). The variations between and within the countries are probably due 
  principally to differences in sampling accuracy and procedures and to 
  differences in living standards. Differences in sampling accuracy and 
  procedures can occur because of the difficulty of obtaining representative 
  samples and to differences in whether the mentally retarded are included. In 
  the case of children, those in private schools may or may not be included in 
  the samples. Sampling differences are probably largely responsible for a 
  number of the discrepancies in the means obtained from the same country, e.g. 
  the two studies of general intelligence in Australia give means of 95 and 104, 
  and the three studies of France give means of 98, 104 and 94.
  
 The largest discrepancy in the table is between the mean 1(2 of 87 for 
  Spain obtained by Nieto Alegre et al and the mean of 98 obtained by Buj. This 
  probably arises from a sampling difference between the two studies. Nieto 
  Alegre et al obtained their sample From military conscripts drawn from the 
  whole of Spain, whereas Buj drew his samples for Spain and other countries 
  from the populations of the capital cities. While the sampling procedure 
  adopted by Buj seems reasonable, it is probable that in less economically 
  developed countries like Spain with a rather backward peasant population there 
  are considerable differences between the mean IQs in the rural areas and in 
  cities. In fact in the Nieto Alegre study there was a range of approximately 
  15 IQ points between the means of the conscripts from the poorest rural 
  regions and the most prosperous and more urbanized centers. As countries have 
  become more industrialized the numbers of their rural peasantry have declined 
  and rural-urban differences in intelligence have largely disappeared. Thus 
  Scotland was a largely urbanized country by the 1930s and at this time there 
  was virtually no difference in mean IQ between urban and rural children 
  (Scottish Council for Research in Education, 1939). In addition to differences 
  in sampling, some of the differences between these Caucasoid populations may 
  also be ascribed to differences in living standards. There is a wide range of 
  these among this set of nations. For instance, in Spain which produced the 
  lowest mean IQ of 87 for military conscripts tested in 1965, the per capita 
  income in that year was 770 US dollars as compared with $2,003 in Britain and 
  $4,058 in the United States (United Nations, 1970). Low incomes have an 
  adverse effect on intelligence because poor people have less to spend on 
  nutritious foods and tend to have less leisure to give their children 
  cognitive stimulation. Nevertheless, in spite of these considerable 
  differences in living standards, the overall picture of the results summarized 
  in Table I is one of fairly close similarity of mean IQs among these diverse 
  Caucasoid populations.
  
 The last entries in Table 1 are for the IQs of Indians derived from the 
  Indian sub-continent, South Africa and Britain. The mean of 86 in India is 
  derived from a review by Sinha (1968) of the results of 17 studies of children 
  aged between 9 and 15 years and totalling in excess of 5,000. Mean IQs lie in 
  the range of 81 to 94, with an overall mean of approximately 86. But ethic 
  Indians in Britain obtain a mean of 96 which is within the range of other 
  Caucasoid populations. Their verbal IC~ of 89 is depressed, but this is 
  probably because their families are recent immigrants and have not yet 
  mastered the language. The British results suggest that when Indians is are 
  reared in an economically developed environment their intelligence level is 
  about the same as that of European Caucasoids. 
  
Mongoloids 
  
The Mongoloid peoples are those indigenous to north east Asia, north of the 
  Himalayas and east of the Yenisey river. Their mean IQs are set out in Table 
  2. It will be seen that for general intelligence the Mongoloid peoples tend in 
  the majority of studies to obtain somewhat higher means than Caucasoids. This 
  is the case in the United States, Canada, Europe, Japan, Hong Kong, Taiwan, 
  Singapore and The People's Republic of China. The range is from 97 to 110, 
  with a mean of around 106. The lowest figure is the mean of 97 obtained by 
  Stevenson et al for Japanese 6 year olds. One explanation for this result is 
  probably that Mongoloids tend to be late maturers. There is a good deal of 
  evidence for this reviewed in Lynn (1987). It will be noted that the same 
  investigators obtained a mean of 102 for Japanese 11 year olds. A further 
  factor is that Stevenson obtained his American comparison sample from the city 
  of Minneapolis in Minnesota and the mean Caucasoid IQ in Minnesota is 105 
  (Flynn, 1980, p. 107). ?'his means that 5 IQ points should be added to all of 
  Stevenson's Japanese means. 
  
There is some dispute about the mean IQs of ethnic Mongoloids in the United 
  States. Vernon (1982) reviewed the literature and concluded that the mean 
  non-verbal IQ (general intelligence) was around 110 and the verbal IQ 97. 
  These figures have been questioned by Flynn (1989) who maintains that the 
  respective means are approximately 100 and 97. The best single study of 
  American ethnic Mongoloids appears to be the Coleman et al (1966) report of 
  five age groups spanning the years 6-16 From which Flynn's figures are 
  derived. But there are problems with the Coleman study. One is that in this 
  and other studies the category of Orientals may include Filipinos, whose mean 
  IQ is about 85 (Flynn, 1991) and who therefore pull down the mean of ethnic 
  Chinese and Japanese. Filipinos constitute about 20 per cent ofi2lnerican 
  Orientals and if these are taken out of the Coleman sample the remainder who 
  are largely ethnic Chinese and Japanese obtain a mean non-verbal IQ of 103 and 
  a mean verbal IQ of 98. A further problem in the Coleman data concerns the 
  nature of the tests of "non verbal ability". Coleman himself is careful to 
  state that the non verbal tests used in his study were not measures of 
  intelligence. The tests were of math ability largely set out in verbal format 
  and this will have given the tests a verbal bias and handicapped Orientals 
  (Coleman 1990). Probably the Coleman non verbal ability tests should not be 
  considered as good measures of general intelligence or Spearman's g. The 
  weaknesses of the American studies of ethnic Orientals is that hardly any of 
  them provide a good measure of visuospatial abilities or of Spearman's g. 
  
If Flynn should prove to be correct it would appear that the mean IQ of 
  American ethnic Orientals is a little below that of Mongoloids in the 
  countries of the Pacific rim. The explanation for this may be that the early 
  Chinese and Japanese immigrants from whom the majority of ethnic Orientals are 
  derived may have been below the average intelligence levels of their parent 
  populations in Asia. The early immigrants came largely as laborers to build 
  the railways and do other unskilled work developing the infrastructure of the 
  west coast. This not particularly desirable work may have attracted those of 
  less than average ability. If this is so, the high educational and 
  occupational achievements of ethnic Orientals in the United States may be due 
  to high work motivation rather than high intelligence levels. 
  
A striking feature of the results for Mongoloids is that their verbal IQs 
  are consistently lower than their visuospatial IQs. In most studies the 
  differences are substantial amounting to between 10 to 15 IQ points. This 
  pattern is present in Japan, Hong Kong, the United States and Canada. It has 
  also been found among ethnic Japanese in Hawaii although these data are not 
  presented in a form from which mean IQs can be calculated (Nagoshi and 
  Johnson, 1987). This difference is also picked up in the United States in 
  performance on the Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT), on which ethnic Orientals 
  invariably do better than Caucasians on the mathematics test (largely a 
  measure of general intelligence and visuospatial ability) but less well than 
  Caucasians on the verbal test (Wainer, 1988). A further manifestation of the 
  strong visuospatial and weak verbal abilities of ethnic O1-iental Americans 
  lies in their tendency to do well in professions like science, architecture 
  and engineering which call for strong visuospatial abilities and poorly in law 
  which calls for strong verbal abilities. This pattern of occupational 
  achievement has been well documented by Weyl (1969, 1989) in his studies of 
  the achievements of the major American ethnic populations. His method involves 
  the analysis of the frequencies of ethnic names among those who have achieved 
  occupational distinction calculated in relation to their frequencies in the 
  general population. Thus he finds that common Chinese names like Wong are 
  greatly overrepresented in American Men and Women of Science, as compared with 
  their frequency in the general population, but under represented in Who's Who 
  in American Law. On the basis of this method he constructs a performance 
  co-efficient for which average achievement is 100. A co-efficient of 200 means 
  that an ethnic group appears twice as frequently in reference works of 
  occupational distinction as would be expected from its numbers in the total 
  population, while a co-efficient of 50 means that it appears half as often. In 
  his first study he finds that ethnic Chinese obtained performance 
  co-efficients of 506 in architecture, 308 in engineering and 438 in science 
  but only 54 in law (Weyl, 1969). His second study oil later data confirms this 
  pattern for the 1980s, when ethnic Chinese obtained a performance co-efficient 
  for science of 620, while for law their performance co-efficient was only 24. 
  
It is easy to understand how this remarkable disparity arises. Adolescents 
  typically discover that they tend to be good at some things and poor at 
  others. There is a natural tendency for- young people to concentrate on those 
  activities they are good at, be they sciences, languages, arts, music, sport 
  or whatever, and to make their careers in them. The reason that different 
  people are good at different things depends partly on genetic and partly on 
  environmental differences. The widespread appearance of the strong 
  visuospatial - weak verbal ability pattern among Mongoloids in so many 
  diver-se geographical locations suggests that it has a genetic basis and that 
  this is responsible for their striking over-achievement in the sciences and 
  architecture and under-achievement in law. 
  
Negroids 
  
The mean IQs of Negroids have invariably been found to be substantially 
  lower than those of Caucasoids. Many studies have been done in the United 
  States and by the mid-1960's Shuey (1966) was able to present a summary of 362 
  investigations. The overall mean IQ of American Negroids was approximately 85. 
  Subsequent studies in the United States such as those of Coleman (1966), 
  Broman, Nichols and Kennedy (1975) and others have confirmed that this is 
  about the right figure. 
  
As a result of these studies it is sometimes assumed that the mean IQ of 
  all Negroids is approximately 85 or 1 standard deviation below that of 
  Caucasoids. However, it has to be noted that almost all American Negroids are 
  Negroid-Caucasoid hybrids (Reed, 1989) and the same is probably true of most 
  Negroids in the West Indies and Britain. To obtain mean IQs Of pure Negroids 
  it is necessary to take samples in Africa. For this reason mean I(Zs for pure 
  African Negroids are listed separately in Table 3 from Negroid-Caucasoid 
  hybrids in the United States, Britain, the West Indies and South Africa. 
  
The first good study of the intelligence of pure African Negroids was 
  carried out in South Africa by Fick (1929). He used the American Army Beta 
  Test, a non verbal test devised in the United States in the First World War 
  for testing recruits who could not speak English, and administered it to 10-14 
  year old Caucasoid, Negroid and Colored (Negroid-Caucasoid hybrids) school 
  children. In relation to the Caucasoid mean of 100, based on more than 10,000 
  children, largely urban pure Negroid children obtained a mean IQ of 65, while 
  urban Colored children obtained a mean IQ of 84. It is interesting to note 
  that these South African Coloreds or Negroid-Caucasoid hybrids obtained a mean 
  IQ virtually identical to that of American Caucasoid-Negroid hybrids. 
  
The other studies of the IQs of pure Negroids summarized in Table 3 show 
  means in the range 65-81. Vernon tested his small sample in Kampala with a 
  number of tests and the overall mean was about 80, but this sample was drawn 
  from an academic secondary school and the result suggests that the mean for 
  the population would be around 70. The best single study of the Negroid 
  intelligence is probably that of Owen (1989), who presents results for 1093 16 
  year olds in the eighth grade who had been in school for around 8 years and 
  should have been well versed in paper and pencil tests. The test used was the 
  South African Junior Aptitude which is well constructed arid standardized and 
  provides measures of verbal arid non verbal reasoning, spatial ability, verbal 
  comprehension, perceptual speed and memory. The mean 1Q of the sample in 
  comparison with Caucasoid South African norms is 69. It is also around the 
  median of the studies listed in Table 3. It is proposed therefore to round 
  this figure up to 70 and take this as the approximate mean for pure Negroids. 
  
Negroid-Caucasoid Hybrids 
  
As noted, virtually all American Negroids are hybrids with some Caucasoid 
  ancestry. The same is probably the case with West Indian and British Negroids. 
  Although this has never been documented, West Indian Negroids lived as slaves 
  on white owned plantations from the 17th to the 19th century in similar 
  conditions to those of Negroids in the United States. There was undoubtedly a 
  certain amount of interbreeding between white estate owners and Negroid 
  slaves, which gave rise to a number of Negroid-Caucasoid hybrids whose 
  existence as a considerable class was noted by Anthony Trollope in his Tour of 
  the West Indies.
  
The results for Negroid-Caucasoid hybrids are shown in Table 4 . For the 
  United States, seven major- post Shuey (1966) studies are listed because of 
  their special interest by virtue of the large number of subjects, because 
  the), yield IQs for the verbal and visuospatial abilities, or because they are 
  derived from young children. These show that the Negroid mean 1Q of 
  approximately 85 is present among children as young as 2-6 year-olds.
  
 In Britain the three major studies of Negroids obtained mean IQs of 86, 94 
  and 87, broadly similar to those in the United States. Figures are available 
  for two Of the Caribbean islands, namely Barbados (mean IQ = 82) and Jamaica 
  (mean IQ = 66-75). 
  
The Negroid-Caucasoid differences appear to be of about the same magnitude 
  for general intelligence arid the verbal and visuospatial abilities. Detailed 
  studies by Jensen and his colleagues have shown that when samples are 
  carefully matched the Negroid-Caucasoid differences are greatest for general 
  intelligence (Spearman's g) and for the visuospatial abilities and less for 
  verbal ability (Jensen and Reynolds, 1982; Reynolds and Jensen, 1983; Naglieri 
  and Jensen, 1987). Nevertheless, the broad picture, taking the results as a 
  whole, is that the three abilities are of approximately equal magnitude. This 
  also appears to be the case ill South Africa according to the results of Owen. 
  
Amerindians 
  
The results of studies of the intelligence of Amerindians are summarized in 
  Table 5 . The mean general IQs have invariably been found to be somewhat below 
  that of Caucasoids. The largest study is that of Coleman et al (1966) which 
  obtained a mean of 94, but a number of studies have reported means in the 
  70-90 range. The median of the 15 studies listed is 89 which can be taken as a 
  reasonable approximation, indicating that the Amerindian mean IQ falls someway 
  between that of Caucasoids and Negroid-Caucasoid hybrids. The same 
  intermediate position is occupied by Amerindians ill performance on the 
  Scholastic Aptitude Test (Wainer, 1958). 
  
In addition, all the studies of Amerindians have found that they have 
  higher visuospatial than verbal IQs. The studies listed are those where the 
  Amerindians speak English as their first language, so this pattern of results 
  is unlikely to be solely due to the difficulty of taking the verbal tests. in 
  an unfamiliar language. The verbal-visuospatiaI disparity is also picked up in 
  the Scholastic Aptitude Test, where Amerindians invariably score higher on the 
  mathematical test than on the verbal (Wainer, 1988). The strong 
  visuospatial-weak verbal pattern of abilities in the Amerindians resembles 
  that of the Mongoloids, although in the Mongoloids the whole ability profile 
  is shifted upwards by some 10-15 IQ points. This similarity is not altogether 
  surprising in view of the close genetic relationship of the two races, 
  Amerindians being all offshoot of the Mongoloids who crossed the Bering 
  Straits from north east Siberia into Alaska at some time in prehistory. The 
  similarity of the cognitive profile of the two races suggests that this 
  profile was present in the common stock from which both contemporary races are 
  derived, and that some factor raised the intelligence levels in the Mongoloids 
  following the geographical differentiation of the two races.
  
 South East Asians
  
 The South East Asian races comprise Polynesians, Micronesians, 
  Melanesians, Maoris and Australian Aborigines. The results of intelligence 
  test studies of these subraces are shown in Table 6. Apart from the low mean 
  of 67 for a small sample of Australian Aborigine children, all the mean Iqs 
  lie in the range of 80-95. The one study to include measures of general, 
  verbal and visuospatial abilities for New Zealand Maoris shows that this group 
  does not share the strong visuospatial-weak verbal ability profile of 
  Mongoloids and Amerindians. Although the intelligence of this group of peoples 
  has not been extensively researched there are sufficient studies to suggest a 
  mean IQ2 of about 90. 
  
  
Racial Differences in Reaction Times 
  
It has often been argued that the racial differences in intelligence test 
  performance may be due to the tests being biased or to a variety of 
  environmental factors such as differences in education, experience of dealing 
  with visual representations, motivation, attitudes towards test taking and 
  nutrition. The alternative theory is that these differences have a genetic 
  basis. In order to test for which of these different explanations is correct, 
  a study has been carried out to determine whether the racial differences in 
  intelligence are also present in reaction times. The rationale of the study is 
  that reaction times provide a measure of the brain's neurological efficiency 
  in dealing with very simple tasks and are unaffected by education, motivation 
  and other environmental factors with the possible exception of extreme 
  malnutrition.
  
 It has been shown in a number of studies that reaction times are 
  positively associated with intelligence, and the explanation widely accepted 
  for this association is that reaction times provide a measure of the 
  neurological efficiency of the brain in analysis and decision making (Jensen, 
  1982: Eysenck, 1982). Hence if there are racial differences in reaction times 
  of the same kind as those present in intelligence test performance, it can be 
  inferred that these differences lie at the neurological level and probably 
  reflect genetic differences. 
  
  
Reaction times consist of the speed with which a subject reacts to simple 
  stimuli. Normally a light comes on and the subject has to press a button to 
  turn it off. Reaction time tasks can be varied to present different degrees of 
  difficulty. In the present study three reaction time tasks were used of 
  different degrees of difficulty. In the simplest task a single light comes on 
  and the subject moves his hand to switch it off. This response normally takes 
  around half a second. In more complex situations, one of several lights comes 
  on and has to be switched off. These are known as choice reaction times and 
  take a little longer. In a still more complex task, three lights come on of 
  which two are close together and one stands apart. Here the subject has to 
  judge which is the light that stands apart and switch it off. This is known as 
  the odd man out task. It is more difficult than the simpler reaction time 
  tasks and typically takes about twice as long. 
  
All three reaction time tasks were used in the present study. In addition, 
  the apparatus used in the investigation was designed to measure two separate 
  processes in reaction time tasks known as movement times and decision times. 
  in these tasks the subject has to make a decision about what to do (decision 
  times) and then execute the decision by moving the finger to switch off the 
  light (movement times). Both these times were recorded automatically on disks 
  by a microcomputer. 
  
The subjects used in the study consisted of 9 year old children 
  representative of the three major races of Mongoloids, Caucasoids and 
  Negroids. The Mongoloids were obtained from Hong Kong and Japan, the 
  Caucasoids from Britain and Ireland and the Negroids from South Africa. All 
  the children were drawn as socially representative samples from typical public 
  primary schools in their respective countries with the exception of the Irish 
  children who came from rural areas and whose mean IQ was rather lower than 
  would otherwise have been expected. 
  
  
In all the five samples decision times, movement times and variabilities 
  were negatively correlated with intelligence. Further details of the reaction 
  time apparatus, testing procedures and analyses of the relationship between 
  the reaction time measures and intelligence for the samples are given in 
  Shigehisa and Lynn (1991), Chan, Eysenck and Lynn (1991) and Lynn and Holmshaw 
  (1991). 
  
  
Summary statistics for the five samples giving the numbers tested, mean 
  IQs, means for the 12 reaction time measures and standard deviations for the 
  entire sample are shown in Table 7. The last column of the table gives product 
  moment correlations between the Progressive Matrices and the 12 reaction time 
  measures. it will be seen that the Hong Kong and Japanese children obtained 
  the highest mean IQs, fastest decision times and low decision time 
  variabilities, the British and Irish children were intermediate, while the 
  South African Negroids obtained the lowest means on the Progressive Matrices, 
  slowest decision times and highest variabilities. All the correlations are 
  high and five of the six are statistically significant. 
  
The movement times of the five populations do not show any consistent 
  overall relationship with Progressive Matrices scores. It is however 
  interesting to note that the Negroid children tend to have fast movement 
  times. In the complex and odd man out tasks their movement times are 
  significantly faster than those of British, Irish and Chinese children.
  
 It is known that the speed of reaction times is genetically determined to 
  a significant extent. This has been shown by Vernon (1989) in a study of 50 
  identical and 52 non-identical twins, which produced a heritability 
  coefficient of.51 for reaction times. Somewhat similar results have been 
  reported by Ho, Baker and Decker (1988) for two other speed of information 
  processing tasks which gave heritability coefficients of.47 and .24. These 
  authors have also shown that the positive correlation between measures of 
  speed of information processing and intelligence arises from common genetic 
  processes suggesting that common genetically controlled neurological 
  mechanisms are involved in the performance of both types of task. 
  
It is therefore considered that the most reasonable interpretation of the 
  Mongoloid-Caucasoid-Negroid results is that these reflect genetic differences 
  between the three racial groups. It is not considered likely that educational 
  differences could be involved because of the extreme simplicity of the tasks. 
  Motivational differences are improbable, because reaction times seem 
  unaffected by motivation (Jensen, 1982). It might be thought that nutritional 
  differences might be involved. 
  
However, the fact that the Negroid children performed faster than the 
  Caucasoid on movement times makes it unlikely that poor nutrition could have 
  reduced neural conduction rates. We are therefore left with genetically 
  determined differences in information processing capacities as the most 
  probable explanation of the Mongoloid-Caucasoid-Negroid differences in 
  decision times. 
  
Contributions to Civilization 
  
A third source of evidence on racial differences in intelligence lies in 
  the degree to which the various races have made significant intellectual, 
  scientific and technological discoveries and inventions. The argument is that 
  these advances are likely to be made by a few outstanding and highly 
  intelligent individuals. There will be more of these in a population where the 
  average level of intelligence is high, and hence the intelligence levels of 
  populations and whole races can be infer-red from their intellectual 
  achievements. 
  
The first writer to advance this argument was Galton (1869) but he limited 
  his analysis to the Greeks of the classical period, England and Scotland, the 
  Negroids and the Australian Aborigines. His conclusion was that the Creeks 
  produced the greatest number of intellectual advances and could therefore be 
  considered the most intelligent population. He placed the Scots marginally 
  above the English, and a long way below these he placed the Negroids and the 
  Aborigines. 
  
Galton's treatment of the problem was sketchy, but it provided the initial 
  idea on which others were to build. The most extensive analysis of this kind 
  was carried out by Baker (1974). He first set up twenty one criteria by which 
  the achievements of early civilizations could be judged. These were as 
  follows: 
>/p?
  
  
In the ordinary circumstances of life in public places, they cover the greater part of the trunk with clothes.
They keep the body clean and take care to dispose of its waste products.
They do not practice severe mutilation or deformation of the body, except for medical reasons.
They have knowledge of building in brick or stone, if the necessary materials are available in their territory.
Many of them live in towns or cities, which are linked by roads.
They cultivate food-plants.
They domesticate animals and use some of the larger ones for transport (or have in the past so used them), if suitable species are available.
They have knowledge of the use of metals, if these are available.
They use wheels.
They exchange property by the use of money.
They order their society by a system of laws, which are enforced in such a way that they ordinarily go about their various concerns in times of peace without danger of attack or arbitrary arrest.
They permit accused persons to defend themselves and to bring witnesses for their defence.
They do not use torture to extract information or for punishment.
They do not practice cannibalism.
Their religious systems include ethical elements and are not purely or grossly superstitious.
They use a script (not simply a succession of pictures) to communicate ideas.
There is some facility in the abstract use of numbers, without consideration of actual objects (or in other words, at least a start has been made in mathematics).
A calendar is in use, accurate to within a few days in the year.
Arrangements are made for the instruction or the young in intellectual subjects.
There is some appreciation of the fine arts.
Knowledge and understanding are valued as ends in themselves.
  Having set up these criteria, Baker proceeded to analyze the historical 
  record of the races to ascertain which have originated civilizations. His 
  conclusion was that the Caucasoid peoples developed all 21 components of 
  civilization in four independent locations. These were the Sumerian in the 
  valley of the Tigris and the Euphrates, the Cretian, the Indus Valley, and the 
  ancient Egyptian. The Mongoloids also developed a full civilization in the 
  Sinic civilization in China. The Amerindians achieved about half of the 21 
  components in the Maya society of Guatemala, a little less in the Inca and 
  Aztec societies, but these peoples never invented a written script, the wheel 
  (except possibly in children's toys), the principle of the arch in their 
  architecture, metal working, or money for the exchange of goods. The Negroids 
  and the Australian aborigines achieved virtually none of the criteria of 
  civilization. While Baker confined his analysis to the achievements of the 
  races in originating civilizations, there can be little doubt that the same 
  race differences appear in the historically later development of more advanced 
  cultures. During the last 2,000 years the many discoveries that constitute 
  developed peoples have been made only by the Caucasoid and Mongoloid peoples. 
  For the first sixteen hundred or so years of this period a case can be made 
  out that the Mongoloid civilization in China was marginally ahead. The Han 
  period of around 200-100 BC saw the introduction of written examinations for 
  candidates for the mandarin civil service, an idea which was considered an 
  advance when it was introduced into Britain some 2,000 years later (Bowman, 
  1989). printing was invented in China by about 800, some 600 years before it 
  was developed in Germany. When Marco Polo visited China about the year 1300 he 
  was amazed at the quality of civilization in the numerous prosperous cities 
  and particularly at the use of paper money, a concept not introduced into the 
  general use in Europe until the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. The 
  Chinese discovered gunpowder about the year 1050 and developed the technology 
  for using it for guns and not only, as popularly supposed, for fireworks. They 
  were the first to invent the principle of the magnetic compass. Their 
  technology for the manufacture of high quality porcelain was well ahead of 
  anything in Europe until the late eighteenth century. Details of these and 
  many other Chinese scientific and technological achievements are given in 
  Needham (1954). 
  
During the last five centuries the Caucasoid peoples of Europe and latterly 
  of North America have pulled ahead of the Mongoloids in science and 
  technology. This is probably because China has been run as a single 
  bureaucratic empire in which innovation has been discouraged first under the 
  emperors and more recently under the communists while Japan was isolated from 
  outside influences until relatively recently. Europe, in contrast, has been 
  divided into numerous states, many of which afforded a high degree of personal 
  freedom of thought, expression and technological innovation, and between which 
  there was open communication. Nevertheless, although the Europeans have 
  generally been ahead of the Mongoloids during the last five centuries, since 
  1950 the Japanese have provided a strong challenge and have surpassed the West 
  in the production of a number of high quality technological goods. 
  
A useful source for evaluating the contributions of the human races to 
  scientific and technological achievements is available in Asimov's (1989) 
  Chronology of Science and Discovery. This lists approximately 1,500 of the 
  most important scientific and technological discoveries and inventions which 
  have ever been made. The first three are bipedality, the manufacture of stone 
  tools and the use of fire which antedate the evolution of the races. 
  Thereafter every single invention and discovery was made by the Caucasian or 
  Mongoloid peoples. This compilation confirms the historical record. Who can 
  doubt that the Caucasoids and the Mongoloids are the only two races that have 
  made any significant contribution to civilization. 
  
Conclusion 
  
The studies of racial differences in intelligence test results, reaction 
  times and scientific and technological discoveries show a high degree of 
  consistency. All three sources of evidence indicate that the two races with 
  the highest intelligence levels are the Mongoloids and the Caucasoids. These 
  are followed by the Amerindians, while the south east Asian races and the 
  Negroids are ranked lowest. The intelligence test results and the reaction 
  times tend to indicate that average Mongoloid intelligence levels are a little 
  higher than those of Caucasoids, but the difference is relatively small as 
  compared with other racial differences. 'The general consistency of the 
  results from the three sources of evidence, and the consistency of the 
  different intellectual achievements of the races over a long historical 
  period, points to a substantial genetic determination for these differences. 
  If genetic factors were not involved, there would have been much greater 
  variation over time and place and the observed consistencies would not be 
  present. Whatever criteria are adopted, the Caucasoids and the Mongoloids are 
  the two most intelligent races and the historical record shows that this has 
  been the case for approximately the last 5,000 years. 
  
  
The environmentalist may argue that the Negroid peoples in Africa, the 
  Caribbean, the United States and Britain, and the Amerindians, Maoris and 
  Australian aborigines, all live in socially and economically impoverished 
  conditions, as compared with Caucasoids and Mongoloids, and that these 
  conditions are responsible for some or perhaps all of their low intelligence. 
  This argument call be met by the concept of genotype-environment correlation, 
  originally proposed by Ploinin, De Fries and Loehlin (1977) and developed by 
  Scarr and McCartney (1983). 
  
There are two processes of genotype-environment correlation which are 
  relevant to the present problem. The first is "passive" and has the effect 
  that children tend to be reared in environments which are correlated with 
  their own genetic potentialities. The principle applies for any trait which 
  has a heritability, and this is undoubtably true of intelligence, and in the 
  case of intelligence means that intelligent parents transmit the 
  characteristic genetically through their genes and environmentally through the 
  advantageous environment which they provide for their children. The two modes 
  of transmission have the effect that intelligent children tend to be reared in 
  intelligence-enhancing environments. This brings the genotypes and the 
  advantageous environments into positive correlation and implies that those 
  reared in advantageous environments tend to have superior genotypes. This 
  applies, for instance, to middle class children as compared with working class 
  children, and can also, arguably, be applied to Caucasoid and Mongoloid 
  children as contrasted with those of other races. There is a second "active" 
  type of genotype-environment correlation which states that people play an 
  active role in creating their own environments. Genotypically intelligent 
  peoples are able to create a socially and economically affluent environment to 
  an extent which cannot be done by less intelligent peoples. Scarr and 
  McCartney call this "niche building", and the two peoples who have been 
  successful in building socially and economically developed niches in which to 
  live and rear their children have been the Caucasoids and the Mongoloids. 
  
The argument frequently advanced that poor social and economic conditions 
  are responsible for the lower intelligence of the Negroids, Aborigines and 
  Amerindians places the cart before the horse. It assumes that the impoverished 
  environments of these peoples are simply the result of external circumstances 
  over which these peoples themselves have no control. Such a claim does not 
  stand up to examination. There are so many cases which it cannot explain, such 
  as the achievements of Chinese, Japanese, Korean and Vietnamese immigrants in 
  the United States and of Indians in Britain and Africa. The only plausible 
  explanation for why these peoples have succeeded where others, initially more 
  advantageously placed, have failed is that they have the right genotypes for 
  building socially and economically prosperous environments for themselves and 
  their families. 
  
Appendix: Notes on the Calculation of IQs 
  
One of the principal problems in the calculation of the mean IQs for the 
  various racial populations concerns the date at which the data were collected. 
  Mean IQs in the economically advanced nations have been increasing during the 
  last half century (Lynn and Hampson, 1986; Flynn, 1987). This poses the 
  problemof whether an adjustment should be made for this increase in studies 
  where a test standardized in the United States, Britain, Australia or New 
  Zealand has been administered some years later to another population. The 
  adjustment involves making an addition to the American, British or 
  Australasian means to allow for the time interval between the two test 
  administrations. The effect is generally to increase Caucasoid IQs in relation 
  to those of other peoples. The increases are however quite small and do not 
  remove the higher means obtained by Mongoloid populations, as shown in Lynn 
  (1987).
  
 For the present paper it was decided not to make such adjustments on two 
  grounds. Firstly, the rates of secular increase of intelligence vary widely 
  from about 1 to 6 IQ points per decade in studies of different age groups and 
  different tests. It is therefore impossible to obtain any precise estimate of 
  what adjustment would be appropriate for many of the tests. Secondly, the 
  great majority of the studies employ tests initially standardized in the 
  United States, Britain, Australia or New Zealand. These countries have high 
  standards of living in relation to other populations and therefore enjoy some 
  environmental advantage for the development of intelligence. This advantage is 
  to some degree counterbalanced by the earlier administration of the tests. The 
  decision was therefore made not to adjust the results for other populations 
  for the time differential between the two test administrations but to report 
  the mean IQs as originally published. However, tests given to racial groups in 
  the same country as the standardization samples have been reduced to allow for 
  the secular increase in the mean IQ of the base population. ?'his correction 
  applies to the Kline and Lee (1972) Canadian Chinese sample, whose mean IQs 
  are reduced by 7 IQ points to allow for the secular increase of intelligence 
  1947-1970; and to the Belgian Korean sample whose IQs are reduced by 10 points 
  to allow for a secular increase of intelligence in Belgium 19541983. Figures 
  for general intelligence are derived either from nonverbal reasoning tests 
  such as the Progressive Matrices and the Culture Fair, or from full scale 
  Wechsler IQ2s. In some studies only verbal and performance Wechsler IQs are 
  reported and where this is the case these have been averaged to give an 
  approximate figure for the full scale IQ. Where means for Wechsler subtests 
  are reported, the verbal IQs are calculated from Vocabulary, Information, 
  Comprehension, Similarities and Arithmetic, and Visuospatial IQs from Block 
  Design, Object Assembly, Picture Arrangement, Picture Completion and Mazes. 
  The reason for this is that factor analysis has shown that these are the best 
  measures of the two abilities (Jensen and Reynolds, 1982). In the case of non- 
  American standardizations of the Wechslers, IQs are calculated from the WISC 
  tests by reading the means off the standardization tables and converting to 
  American IQs. Buj's IQs are given in relation to a British mean of 100.
  
 References 
  
Asimov, I. 1989 Chronology of Science and Lovely London.. Grafton Books 
  
Baker, J. R. 1974 Race Oxford: Oxford University Press. 
  
Baughman, E. E. and Dahlstrom, W. G. Negro and White Children New York, 
  Academic Press.
  
 Beck, L. R. and St. George, R. 1983 The alleged cultural bias of the PAT: 
  Reading Comprehension and Reading Vocabulary Tests. New Zealand Journal of 
  Educational Studies, 18,32-47. 
  
Berte, R. 1961 Essai d'adaptation de l'echelle d'intelligence pour enfants 
  de D. Wechsler à des écoliers belges d'expression française, Brussels, Centre 
  National de Recherche de Psychotechnique Scolaire. 
  
Borjas, G. J. 1986 The self employment experiences of immigrants. Journal 
  of Human Resources. 21,485-506. 
  
Bourdier, G. 1964 Utilisation et nouvel etallonagedu P.M. 47 Bulletin de 
  Psychologie, 235,39-41. 
  
Bowman, M. L. 1989 Testing individual differences in Ancient China. 
  American Psychologist. 44,576-578. 
  
Brandt, I. 1978 Growth dynamics of low birth weight infants with emphasis 
  on the perinatal period. In: Human Growth vol. 2 ed. F. Falkner and J. M. 
  Tanner, pp. 557-516. New York: Plenum Press.
  
 Broman, S. H., Nichols, P. L., Kennedy, W. A. 1975 Pre-school IQ. New 
  York: J. Wiley.
  
 Broman, S. H., Nichols, P. L., Shaughnessey, P. and Kennedy, W. 1987 
  Retardation in Young Children. Hillsdale New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum 
  
Bruce, D. W., Hengeveld, M. and Radford, W. C. 1971 Some cognitive skills 
  in Aboriginal children in Victorian primary schools. Victoria, Australian 
  Council for educational Research.
  
 Burt, C. 1949 The structure of the mind: a review of the results of factor 
  analysis. British Journal of Educational Psychology. 19, 110-111. 
  
Buj, V. 1981 Average IQ values in various European countries. Personality 
  and Individual Differences, 2, 168-169 
  
Cattell, R. B. 1971 Abilities. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Centre de 
  Psychologie Appliquée 1957 Manual of the Weschler Intelligence Scale for 
  children. Paris, Centre de Psychologie Appliquée. 
  
Coleman, J. S. 1990 Personal Communication 
  
Coleman, J. S. et al Equality of Educational Opportunity. Washington, DC, 
  US Office of Education 
  
Cundick B. P. 1970 Measures of Intelligence of Southwest Indian students. 
  Journal of Social Psychology 81, 151-156 
  
Du Chateau, P. 1967 Ten point gap in Maori aptitudes. National Education. 
  49, 157-158. 
  
Eysenck, H. J. 1971 Race, intelligence and education. London: Temple Smith. 
  
  
Eysenck, H. J. 1982 A Model for Intelligence. Bolin: Springer-Verlag. 
  
Fahrmeier, E. D. Child Development, 46, 281-285. 
  
Fick, M. L. 1929 Intelligence test results of poor white, native (Zulu), 
  colored and Indian school children and the educational and social implications 
  South African Journal of Science. 26, 904-920. 
  
Firkowska, A., Ostrowska, A., Sokolowska, M., Stein, Z., Susser, M. and 
  Wald, I. 1978 Cognitive development and social policy Science. 200, 1357-1362.
  
 Fitzgerald, J. A. and Ludeman, W. W. 1926 The intelligence of Indian 
  children. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 6, 319-328.
  
 Flynn, J. R. 1980 Race IQ and Jensen. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. 
  1987 Massive IQ gains in 14 nations: what IQ tests really measure. 
  Psychological Bulletin. 101, 271-293. 1989 Rushton, evolution and race: an 
  essay on intelligence and virtue. The Psychologist, 2, 363-366.
  
 Frydman, M. and Lynn, R. 1989 The intelligence of Korean children adopted 
  in Belgium. Personality and Individual Differences, 10, 1323-1326. 
  
Galler, J. R., Ramsey, F. and Forde, V. 1986 A follow up study in the 
  influence of early malnutrition on subsequent development. Nutrition and 
  Behaviour. 3, 211-222. 
  
Galton, F. 1869 Hereditary Genius. London: Macmillan. 
  
Goodenough, F. L. 1926 Racial differences in the intelligence of school 
  children. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 9, 388-397. 
  
Goosens, G. 1952 Une application du test d'intelligence de R. B. Cattell. 
  Revue Belge de Psyhologie et de Pédagogie. 19, 115-124. 
  
Gould, S. J. 1981 The Mismeasure of Man. New York, Norton. 
  
Harker, R. K. 1978 Achievement and ethnicity: environmental deprivation or 
  cultural difference. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 13, 107-124. 
  
  
Hertzig, M. E., Birch, H. G., Richardson, S. A. and Tizard, J. 1972 
  Intellectual levels of school children severely malnourished during the first 
  two years of life. Pediatrics, 49, 814-824. 
  
Hodgkiss, J. 1979 British Manual for the Differential Attitude Tests 
  Windsor. Windsor. National Foundation for Educational Research. 
  
Ho, H-Z, Baker, L. A. and Decker, S. N. 1988 Covariation between 
  intelligence and speed of cognitive processing: genetic and environmental 
  influences. Behaviour Genetics. 18, 247-261. 
  
Howell, R. J., Evans, L. and Downing, L. N. 1958 A comparison of test 
  scores from the 16-17 year age group of Navajo Indians with standardisation 
  norms from the WAIS. Journal of Social Psychology. 47, 355-359. 
  
Jaynes, G. D. and Williams, R. M. 1989 A Common Destiny: Blacks and 
  American Society Washington DC. National Research Council. 
  
Jensen, A. R. 1972 Genetics and Education.. London. Methuen. 1973 
  Educability and Group Differences London. Methuen. I982 Reaction time and 
  psychometric g. In H. J. Eysenck (ed). A Model for Intelligence Berlin: 
  Springer-Verlag. 
  
Jensen, A. R. and Inouye, A. R. 1980 Level I and Level II abilities in 
  Asian, white and black children. Intelligence. 4, 41-49. 
  
Jensen, A. R. and Reynolds, C. R. 1982 Race, social class and ability 
  patterns on the WISC-R. Personality and Individual Differences, 3, 423-438. 
  
Jordheim, G. D. and Olsen, I. A. 1963 The use of a non-verbal test of 
  intelligence in the trust territory of the Pacific. American Anthropologist, 
  65, 1122-1125. 
  
Kline, C. L. and Lee, N. 1972 A transcultural study of dyslexia: analysis 
  of language disabilities in 277 Chinese children simultaneously learning to 
  read and write in English and in Chinese. Journal of Social Education, 6, 
  9-26. 
  
Kurth, von E. 1969 Erhohung der Leistungsnormen bei den farbigen 
  progressiven matrizen. Zeitschrift fur Psycliologie 177, 85-90. 
  
Lesser, G. S., Fifer, F. and Clark, H. 1965 Mental abilities of children 
  from different social class and cultural groups. Monographs of the Society for 
  Research in Child Development. 30. 
  
Linn, M C. and Petersen, A. C. I 986 A meta analysis of gender differences 
  in spatial ability: implications for mathematics and science achievement. In 
  J. S. Hyde and M. C. Linn (eds) The Psychology of Gender. Baltimore: Johns 
  Hopkins University Press. 
  
Lynn, R. 1977a The intelligence of the Japanese. Bulletin of the British 
  Psychological Society, 30, 69-72. 1977b The intelligence of the Chinese and 
  Malays in Singapore. The Mankind Quarterly. 18, 125-128. 1987 The intelligence 
  of the Mongoloids: a psychometric, evolutionary and neurological theory. 
  Personality and Individual Differences. 8, 813-844. 1990 The role of nutrition 
  in secular increases in intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences. 
  11, 273-285. 1991 Intelligence in China. Social Behaviour and Personality to 
  appear. 
  
Lynn, R., Chan, J. and Eysenck, H J. 1991 Reaction times and intelligence 
  in Chinese and British children. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 
  
Lynn, R. and Hampson, S. 1986a Intellectual abilities of Japanese children: 
  an assessment of 2½-8½ year olds derived from the McCarthy Scales of 
  Children's Abilities Intelligence. 10, 41-58. 
  
Lynn, R. and Hampson, S. 1986b Further evidence on the cognitive abilities 
  of the Japanese: data from the WPPSI. International Journal of Behavioural 
  Developments 10, 23-36. 1986c The structure of Japanese abilities: an analysis 
  in terms of the hierarchical model of intelligence Current Psychological 
  Research and Reviews, 4, 309-322. 1986d The rise of national intelligence: 
  evidence from Britain, Japan and the United States. Personality and Individual 
  Differences, 7, 23-32. 
  
Lynn, R., Hampson, S. and Bingham, R. 1987 Japanese, British and American 
  adolescents compared for Spearman's g and for the verbal, numerical and 
  visio-spatial abilities. Psychologia. 30, 137-144. 
  
Lynn, R., Hampson, S. L. and Iwawaki, S. 1987 Abstract reasoning and 
  spatial abilities among American, British and Japanese adolescents. The 
  Mankind Quarterly. 27, 397-434. 
  
Lynn, R. and Holmshaw, M. 1991 Black-white Differences in reaction times 
  and intelligence. Social Behavior and Personality. (to appear) 
  
Lynn, R., Pagliari, C. and Chan, J. 1988 Intelligence in Hong Kong measured 
  for Spearman's g and the visuo-spatial and verbal primaries Intelligence. 12, 
  423-433. 
  
Lynn, R. and Shigehisa, T. 1991 Reaction time-, and intelligence in British 
  and Japanese children. Journal of Biosocial Science. (to appear) 
  
McIntyre, G. A. 1938 The Standardization of Intelligence Tests in 
  Australia. Melbourne, University Press. 
  
Mackintosh, N. J. and Mascie-Taylor, C.G.N. 1985 The IQ question.. In 
  Education For All (The Swann Report) Cmnd paper 4453. London: HMSO. McShane, 
  D. A. and Plas, J. M. 1984 The cognitive functioning of American Indian 
  children: moving from the WISC to the WISC-R. School Psychology Review. 
  17,39-51. 
  
Manley, D. R. 1963 Mental ability in Jamaica. Social and Economic Studies, 
  12, 51-77. 
  
Maqsud, M. 1980 Extraversion, neuroticism, intelligence and academic 
  achievement in Northern Nigeria. British Journal l of Educational Psychology. 
  50., 71-73. 
  
Mercer J. R. 1984 What is a racially and culturally discriminating test? In 
  C. R. Reynolds and R. T. Brown (eds) Perspectives on bias in mental testing 
  New York, Plenum. 
  
Miele, F. 1979 Cultural bias in the WISC. Intelligence, 3, 149-164. 
  
Montie, J. E. and Fagan, J. F. 1988 Racial differences in IQ: item analysis 
  of the Stanford-Binet at 3 years. Intelligence, 12, 315-332. 
  
Murdock, J. and Sullivan, L. R. 1923 A contribution to the study of mental 
  and physical measurements in normal school children. American Physical 
  Educational Review, 28, 209-330. 
  
Naglieri, J. and Jensen, A. R. 1987 Comparison of black-white differences 
  on the WISC-R and the K-ABC: Spearman's hypothesis. Intelligence. 11, 21-43. 
  
Nagoshi, C. T. and Johnson, R. C. 1987 Cognitive abilities profiles of 
  Caucasian vs. Japanese subjects in the Hawaii family study of cognition. 
  Personality and Individual Differences 8, 581-583. 
  
Needham, J. 1954 Science and Civilisation in China. Cambridge: Cambridge 
  University Press. 
  
Nieto-Alegre, S., Navarro, L., Santa Cruz, G. and Dominguez, A. 1987 
  Difereneices regionales en la medida de la inteligencia con el test M. P. 
  Revista de Psicologia General y Aplicado, 22, 699-707. 
  
Notcutt, B. 1950 The measurement of Zulu intelligence. Journal of Social 
  Research. 1, 195-206.
  
 Nurcombe, B. and Moffit, P. 1970 Cultural deprivation and language 
  deficit. Australian Psychologist, 5, 249-259. 
  
Ombredane, A., Robaye, F. and Robaye, E. 1952 Analyse des résultats d'une 
  application experimentale du matrix 38 à 485 noirs Baluba. Bulletin contre 
  d'études et reserches psychotechniques, 7, 235-255. 
  
Owen, K. 1989 Test and item bias: the suitability of Junior Aptitude Test 
  as a common test battery for white, Indian and black pupils in Standard 7. 
  Pretoria: Human Sciences Research Council.
  
Pons, A. L. 1974 Administration of tests outside the cultures of their 
  origin. 26th Congress South African Psychological Association. 
  
Radclifre, J. A. and Turner, F. E. 1969 Manual for the Australian version 
  of late WISC. Hawthorn, Victoria: Australian Council for Educational Research.
  
 Raven, J. 1981 Manual for Raven's Progressive Matrices and Mill Hill 
  Vocabulary Scales. London, H. K. Lewis. 1986 Manual for Raven's Progressive 
  Matrices and Vocabulary Scales. Research Supplement 3. London, H. K. Lewis. 
  
Raven, J. and Court, J. H. 1989 Manual for Raven's Progressive Matrices s 
  and Vocabulary Scales Research - Supplement No. 4, London, H. K. Lewis. 
  
Reddington, M. J., and Jackson, K. 1981 Raven's colored progressive 
  matrices: a Queensland standardisation. ACER Bulletin. 30, 20-28.
  
Redmond, M. and Davies, F. R. J. 1940 The Standardisation of Two 
  Intelligence Tests. Wellington, New Zealand Council for Educational Research. 
  
Reed, T. E. 1969 Caucasian genes in American Negroes. Science. 165, 762-8 
  
Reschly, D. J. and Jipson, F. J. 1976 Ethnicity, geographical locale, age, 
  sex and urban-rural residence as variables in the prevalence of mild 
  retardation. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 81, 154-161.
  
 Reuning, H. 1988 Testing Bushmen in the Central Kalahari. In S. H. Irvine 
  and J. W. Berry (eds) Human Abilities in Cultural Context. Cambridge, 
  Cambridge University Press.
  
 Reynolds, C. R. and Jensen, A. R. 1983 WISC-R subscale patterns of 
  abilities of blacks and whites matched on full scale IQ. Journal of 
  Educational Psychology. 75, 207-214.
  
 Rodd, W. G. 1959 A cross cultural study of Taiwan's Schools. Journal of 
  Social Psychology. 50, 3-36. 
  
St. George, R. 1983 Some psychometric properties of the Queensland Test of 
  Cognitive Abilities with New Zealand, European and Maori children. New Zealand 
  Journal of Psychology. 12, 57-68. 
  
St. John, J., Krichev, A. and Bauman, E. 1976 North Western Ontario Indian 
  children and the WISC. Psychology in the Schools. 13, 407-411. 
  
Scarr, S., Caparulo, B. K., Ferdman, B. M., Tower, R. B. and Caplan, J. 
  1983 Developmental status and school achievements of minority and non-minority 
  children from birth to 18 years in a British Midlands town. British journal of 
  Developmental Psychology. 1, 31-48. 
  
Scarr, S. and McCartney, K. 1983 How people make their own environments: a 
  theory of geno-type-environment effects. Child Development 54, 424-435. 
  
Schmidtke, A., Schaller, S. and Becker, P. 1978 Raven-Matrizen Test Manual 
  Deutsche Bearbeilung Weinheim Beltz Test Gesellschaft, Berlin. 
  
Schreider, E. 1968 Quelques corrélations somatiques des tests mentaux. 
  Homo. 19, 38-43. 
  
Scottish Council for Research in Education 1933 The Intelligence of 
  Scottish Children. London: London University Press. 1939 The Intelligence of a 
  Representative Group of Scottish children. London: University of London Press. 
  1949 The Trend of Scottish Intelligence. London: University of London Press. 
  
Shigehisa, T. and I,ynn, R. 1991 Reaction times and intelligence in 
  Japanese children. International Journal of Psychology, 00, 000-000.
  
 Shuey, A. M. 1966 The Testing of Negro Intelligence. New York, Social 
  Science Press. 
  
Sinha, U. 1968 The use of Raven's Progressive Matrices in India. Indian 
  Educational Review, 3, 75-88. Skandinaviska Testforlaget 1970 Manual of the 
  Swedish WISC. Stockholm: Skandinaviska Testforlaget. 
  
Snyderman, M. and Rothman, S. 1988 The IQ Controversy, the Media and Public 
  Policy. New Brunswick, Transaction Books. 
  
Spearman, C. 1927 The abilities of man. New York: Macmillan. 
  
Stevenson, H. W., Stigler, J. W., Lee, S., Lucker, G. W., Kitanawa, S. and 
  Hsu, C. 1985 Cognitive performance and academic achievement of Japanese, 
  Chinese and American children. Child Development. 56, 718-734 
  
Susanne, C. and Sporoq, J. 1973 Etude de correlations existant entre des 
  tests psychotechniques et des mensurations cephaliques. Bulletin Societé Royal 
  Belge Anthropologie et Prehistorie, 84, 59-63. 
  
Teeter, A., Moore, C. and Petersen, J. 1982 WISC-R verbal and performance 
  abilities of Native America students referred for school learning problems. 
  Psychology in the Schools. 19, 39-44. 
  
Tesi, G. and Young, H. B. 1962 A standardisation of Raven's Progressive 
  Matrices 1938. Archivio Psicologia Neurologica & Psichiatra. 5, 455-464. 
  
Thurber, S. 1976 Changes in Navajo responses to the draw-a-man test. 
  Journal of Social Psychology, 99, 139-140. 
  
Thurstone, L. L. 1983 Primary Mental Abilities. Chicago, Chicago University 
  Press. 
  
Turner, G. H. and Penfold, D. J. 1952 The scholastic aptitude the Indian 
  children of the Caradoc reserve. Canadian Journal of Psychology. 6, 31-44. 
  United Nations 1970 National Accounts Statistics. New York, United Nations. 
  
Vejleskov, H. 1968 An analysis of Raven Matrix responses in fifth grade 
  children. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 9, 177-186. 
  
Vernon, P. A., 1989 The heritability of measures of speed of 
  information-processing Personality and Individual Differences. 10, 573-576. 
  
Vernon, P. E. 1969 Intelligence and Cultural Environment. London, Methuen. 
  1982 The Abilities and Achievements of Orientals in North America. New York: 
  Academic Press. 
  
Wainer, H. 1988 How accurately can we assess changes in minority 
  performance on the SAT? American Psychologist, 43, 774-778. 
  
Weinberg, W. A,, Dietz, S. G., Penick, E, C. and McAlister, W. H. 1974 
  Intelligence, reading achievement, physical size and social class. Journal of 
  Paediatrics, 85, 482-489. 
  
Weyl, N. 1969 Some comparative performance indexes of American ethnic 
  minorities. The Mankind Quarterly. 9, 106-128. 1989 The Geography of American 
  Achievement. Washington, DC: Scott-Townsend. 
  
Winick, M., Meyer, K. K. and Harris, R. C. 1975 Malnutrition and 
  environmental enrichment by early adoption. Science. 190, 1173-1175. 
  
Wober, M. 1969 The meaning and stability of Raven's Matrices Test among 
  Africans. International Journal of Psychology, 4, 229-235. 
  
Zahirnic, C., Girboveanu, M., Onofrei, A., Turcu, A., Voicu, G., Voicu, M. 
  and Visan, O. M. 1974 Etalonarea matriceolur progressive colorate Raven pe 
  copii de 6-1 0 ani in Municipal Bucuresti. Revue Psilologi. 20,313-321.
  
Transtopia
- Main
 - Pierre Teilhard De Chardin
 - Introduction
 - Principles
 - Symbolism
 - FAQ
 - Transhumanism
 - Cryonics
 - Island Project
 - PC-Free Zone
 
Prometheism News

