{"id":9909,"date":"2013-01-11T03:45:49","date_gmt":"2013-01-11T03:45:49","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/following-dna-down-the-nanopore-rabbit-hole\/"},"modified":"2013-01-11T03:45:49","modified_gmt":"2013-01-11T03:45:49","slug":"following-dna-down-the-nanopore-rabbit-hole","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/transhuman-news-blog\/dna\/following-dna-down-the-nanopore-rabbit-hole\/","title":{"rendered":"Following DNA Down the Nanopore Rabbit Hole"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    DNA is a linear information storage medium, like a magnetic    tape, but written with a very limited character setjust A,    C, G, and T.  <\/p>\n<p>    Heres how we    read that tape today: we dub a copy of the tape, stop at some    point when we reach the character A, cut the tape    there, and toss the fragment into the A bin. Then we    make another copy, stopping at some point on another    A, snip the new copy short, and toss that    fragment into the bin. We repeat this millions of times, and    then start over again for C. And again for G    and T. When were done, we measure lengths of all of    the millions of A fragments, C fragments,    G fragments, and T fragments and then use a    computer to sort them by length and tell us where in the    sequence we encountered all of the As, Cs,    Gs, and Ts. What could go wrong?  <\/p>\n<p>    It would obviously be much quicker, cheaper, and more reliable    if we had a DNA-read-head, a device we could just run the    DNA-tape over to detect the sequence directly, in a single    pass. Back in 1995, George Church and colleagues figured    out one    approach: it might be possible to use a low intensity    electric current to pull long strands of DNA through    nanometer-scale pores in a membrane and measure the electric    field variations of the four nucleic acidsA, C, G,    Tas they passed through.  <\/p>\n<p>        Scientists are working on it, but were not there yet. Key    questions remain unanswered. One of them is fundamental: How    does DNA move through a pore? Does it slide through end-on? Or    does the pore grab it somewhere in between, bend it double, and    suck it through doubled over (like a strand of spaghetti    slurped up from the middle). Every cell in your body, after    all, carries about two or three meters of DNA. Even a mere    fragment of 50,000 base pairs is about 16.5 micrometers    longthousands of times the diameter of a nanopore. If mere    chance determines the orientation, one would expect that almost    all DNA should pass through a nanopore doubled over.  <\/p>\n<p>    Fortunately for the future of bedside genomics, that doesnt    seem to be the case. Researchers at Brown University have    developed an    elegant method for determining exactly how a DNA molecules    passes through a nanopore. They can see if it slips through    end-on or goes through doubled overand, if it does double    over, they can tell where along its length it folds.  <\/p>\n<p>    Physicists Mirna    Mihovilovic, Nick Hagerty, and Derek Stein followed the travels    of about 1100 pieces of double-stranded DNA (for    aficionados, they were 48,502 base-pair segments of    bacteriophage lambda, measuring about 16.5 micrometers in    length) as they slithered through an 8-nanometer-diameter pore    in a 20-nm-thick silicon nitride membrane, urged along by a 3.6    nanoampere current. They measured the current flowing through    the pore 50,000 times a second, and found it dropped when    passing DNA partially blocked the pore. The interruptions    lasted only a couple of milliseconds, and the magnitude of the    current reduction was proportional to the cross-section of DNA    blocking the porewhich is to say that the current dropped    about 0.28 nanoamperes when there was a single strand in the    pore, and about 0.56 nA when the DNA passed through sideways.    Thus, the current profile revealed the DNAs orientation: the    relative durations of the double-strand and single-strand    current reductions showed just where the molecule had folded.    (So a 3-millisecond drop of 0.28 nA might indicate that the DNA    had speared straight through the pore, while a 1.5-millisecond    drop of 0.56 nA indicated a fold exactly in the middle. The    diagram at right makes it clearer: ECD stands for event charge    deficit, the current drop integrated over time, which remains    approximately constant for each DNA passage.)  <\/p>\n<p>    The researchers found that DNA passes through the pore    smoothly, end-on, about 25% of the timefar more than most    current models would predict. This surprisingly high    proportionindicating, they say that the orientation is a    function of the configurational entropy of the approaching    polymerbodes well for developing a nanopore-based DNA direct    reader.  <\/p>\n<p>    Figures:Derek Stein\/Brown University  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Continued here:<br \/>\n<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/spectrum.ieee.org\/tech-talk\/at-work\/test-and-measurement\/following-dna-down-the-nanopore-rabbit-hole\" title=\"Following DNA Down the Nanopore Rabbit Hole\">Following DNA Down the Nanopore Rabbit Hole<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> DNA is a linear information storage medium, like a magnetic tape, but written with a very limited character setjust A, C, G, and T.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/transhuman-news-blog\/dna\/following-dna-down-the-nanopore-rabbit-hole\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[26],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-9909","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-dna"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9909"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9909"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9909\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9909"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9909"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9909"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}