{"id":9608,"date":"2013-01-05T02:41:31","date_gmt":"2013-01-05T02:41:31","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/chinese-journalists-mount-rare-protest-over-an-alleged-act-of-government-censorship\/"},"modified":"2013-01-05T02:41:31","modified_gmt":"2013-01-05T02:41:31","slug":"chinese-journalists-mount-rare-protest-over-an-alleged-act-of-government-censorship","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/transhuman-news-blog\/censorship\/chinese-journalists-mount-rare-protest-over-an-alleged-act-of-government-censorship\/","title":{"rendered":"Chinese journalists mount rare protest over an alleged act of government censorship"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    BEIJING  Chinese journalists reacted furiously Friday to what    they said was heavy-handed official censorship of a New Years    message from a popular Guangdong newspaper, setting up a    crucial early     challenge for new leader Xi Jinping.  <\/p>\n<p>    The dispute began when the propaganda chief in the southern    province, Tuo Zhen, apparently went behind the backs of the    editors of the reform-minded paper Southern Weekly and directed    that changes be made to the unsigned front-page piece. Tuo    deleted some parts and inserted new passages  in some places,    adding factual errors  after the papers top editors had    signed off on the Jan. 2 article and gone home, several editors    and reporters said later on their Twitter-like microblogs,    called weibo.  <\/p>\n<p>    Censorship of Chinas print media is a long-standing and    ubiquitous practice, but having a government official actually    rewrite an article before publication, and without consulting    the editors, was considered an unusual intrusion even by    Chinese standards.  <\/p>\n<p>    The original message was titled Chinas dream, the dream of    constitutionalism and it expressed the hope that China would    become a country ruled by law and the constitution, according    to the journalists. Only if constitutionalism is realized, and    power effectively checked, can citizens voice their criticisms    of power loudly and confidently, it said.  <\/p>\n<p>    The version that appeared in the paper, however, was a    sycophantic piece titled We are now closer to our dream than    ever, which praised the work of the ruling Communist Party and    omitted references to constitutionalism, democracy and    equality.  <\/p>\n<p>    Beijings censors tried to contain the resulting indignation by    ordering all the weibo postings about the controversy deleted.    According to the China Digital Times Web site, which tracks    Chinese censorship issues, the Central Propaganda Department        issued an urgent notice on Jan. 3 saying, Upon receipt    of this message, controlling departments in all locales must    immediately inform reporters and editors that they may not    discuss the Southern Weekly New Years greeting on any public    platforms.  <\/p>\n<p>    The complaining journalists suddenly found their weibo posts    deleted, and some had their accounts shut down.  <\/p>\n<p>    But the controversy only intensified Friday with a    rare open letter from    a prominent group of former journalists affiliated with    Southern Weekly calling Tuos actions dictatorial and also    ignorant and excessive, according to a translation provided    by the Hong Kong-based China Media Project, which studies    mainland media issues. By late Friday, more than 50 former    journalists had endorsed the letter.  <\/p>\n<p>    The journalists letter directly criticized Tuo, a member of    the Guangdong Communist Party Standing Committee with oversight    of propaganda, saying, In this era in which hope is necessary,    he is obliterating hope; in this era in which equality is    yearned for, his actions are haughty and condescending; in this    era of growing open-mindedness, his actions are foolish and    careless.  <\/p>\n<p>    The journalists added, If media lose all credibility and    influence, then we ask, how is the ruling Party to speak? They    also said that since Xis election, the general attitude at    home and overseas ... has been one of optimism.    But they asked whether the central government supported    Tuos actions and demanded that he be deemed unsuitable for    his position.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Excerpt from:<br \/>\n<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/feeds.washingtonpost.com\/c\/34656\/f\/636708\/s\/2733010e\/l\/0L0Swashingtonpost0N0Cworld0Casia0Ipacific0Cchinese0Ejournalists0Emount0Erare0Eprotest0Eover0Ean0Eact0Eof0Egovernment0Ecensorship0C20A130C0A10C0A40C34bafe40A0E56880E11e20E89de0E76c1c54b14180Istory0Bhtml0Dwprss0Frss0Iworld\/story01.htm\" title=\"Chinese journalists mount rare protest over an alleged act of government censorship\">Chinese journalists mount rare protest over an alleged act of government censorship<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> BEIJING Chinese journalists reacted furiously Friday to what they said was heavy-handed official censorship of a New Years message from a popular Guangdong newspaper, setting up a crucial early challenge for new leader Xi Jinping.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/transhuman-news-blog\/censorship\/chinese-journalists-mount-rare-protest-over-an-alleged-act-of-government-censorship\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[19],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-9608","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-censorship"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9608"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9608"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9608\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9608"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9608"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9608"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}