{"id":93880,"date":"2014-02-17T20:40:54","date_gmt":"2014-02-18T01:40:54","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.designerchildren.com\/business-workshop-free-speech-facebook-and-protected-clicks\/"},"modified":"2014-02-17T20:40:54","modified_gmt":"2014-02-18T01:40:54","slug":"business-workshop-free-speech-facebook-and-protected-clicks","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/free-speech\/business-workshop-free-speech-facebook-and-protected-clicks\/","title":{"rendered":"Business Workshop: Free speech, Facebook and protected clicks"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>February 16, 2014 8:21 PM            Share with others:    <\/p>\n<p>      Is clicking the \"like\" button on Facebook a form of free      speech protected by the First Amendment?    <\/p>\n<p>      That was the issue at stake in Bland v. Roberts, in which six      former employees of the Hampton, Va., sheriff's office sued      the sheriff for wrongful discharge. The employees alleged      that the sheriff fired them as retaliation for their support      of his opponent's political campaign.    <\/p>\n<p>      The support that one of the former employees gave was to      click \"like\" on the opponent's Facebook page.    <\/p>\n<p>      The lower court dismissed the lawsuit, saying that merely      clicking a button was not the equivalent of expressing an      opinion that would be considered protected free speech. The      court felt that to constitute free speech, the employee would      have had to take much more substantive actions. The employees      appealed, backed by briefs from both Facebook and the      American Civil Liberties Union.    <\/p>\n<p>      And the appeals court ruled in favor of the employees and      reinstated the lawsuit.    <\/p>\n<p>      In making the decision, the appeals court applied the      standards used for older forms of communications, noting that      clicking the \"like button\" leads to a published statement      that is \"pure speech.\"    <\/p>\n<p>      The appeals court argued that there was no constitutional      difference between hitting the \"like\" button and typing a      message of support on a computer keyboard, which would be      protected speech.    <\/p>\n<p>      The case continues the trend of courts determining that the      free speech principles of old media apply to new media. And      the ruling demonstrates once again that employers should      tread lightly before taking punitive actions against      employees based on their activities on social media sites.    <\/p>\n<p>      -- Beth Slagle, Meyer, Unkovic & Scott, <a href=\"mailto:bas@muslaw.com\">bas@muslaw.com<\/a>    <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Read the original:<br \/>\n<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.post-gazette.com\/business\/legal\/2014\/02\/17\/Business-Workshop-Free-speech-Facebook-and-protected-clicks\/stories\/201402170003\" title=\"Business Workshop: Free speech, Facebook and protected clicks\">Business Workshop: Free speech, Facebook and protected clicks<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> February 16, 2014 8:21 PM Share with others: Is clicking the \"like\" button on Facebook a form of free speech protected by the First Amendment? That was the issue at stake in Bland v <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/free-speech\/business-workshop-free-speech-facebook-and-protected-clicks\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[162384],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-93880","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-free-speech"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/93880"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=93880"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/93880\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=93880"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=93880"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=93880"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}