RSF began releasing their Press Freedom Index in 2002. RSF's secretary-general Christophe Deloire says the Index is based on \"the level of abuses, the extent of pluralism, media independence, the environment and self-censorship, the legislative framework, transparency and infrastructure.\" <\/p>\n
RSF sends out a questionnairre to \"partner organizations (18 freedom of expression NGOs located in all five continents), to our network of 150 correspondents, and to journalists, researchers, jurists and human rights activists.\" Along with state-sanctioned press suppression, the RSF incorporates general Internet freedoms and pressure from independent (usually militant) groups on journalists into the final score of a country. <\/p>\n
The more suppression of the press, the higher the score. RSF's complete methodology and formula can be read here. <\/p>\n
America's 46 ranked spot is a 13-position drop from 2013. The U.S. dropped four points in the Reporters Without Borders 100-point ranking system over the last year to an all-time low of 22 points. RSF ranked the U.S. lower in 2006, 2007 and their combined 2011\/2012 indexes, but there was a major change in the U.S. ranking system in 2013. <\/p>\n
From 2003 to 2012, the RSF had separate rankings for press freedom in the domestic U.S. and press freedom for \"extraterritorial\" regions (Iraq and Afghanistan). They combined these two rankings in 2013 and 2014. From 2011\/2012 to 2013, the combined U.S. ranking rose to 32, but its press freedom score dropped four points. <\/p>\n
That means while the U.S. ranking improved, press freedom was actually tightened, both in the U.S. and worldwide, where lowering scores paved the way for the U.S. to move up in the rankings. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n
RSF primarily cites the NSA\/Snowden scandal for the drop in the U.S.'s ranking and says \"the hunt for leaks and whistleblowers serves as a warning to those thinking of satisfying a public-interest need for information about the imperial prerogatives assumed by the worlds leading power,\" largely contribute to the drop in rank. The UK dropped three ranks itself for it's pressure on the Guardian, Glenn Greenwald and David Miranda. <\/p>\n
The graphs above and below indicate general volatility of the U.S.'s press freedoms. As the War on Terror escalates through 2007, so does the U.S.'s score. A brief rising of freedoms comes with the election of President Barack Obama, who was predicted to curb some of the Bush administration's hard-line policies, but as the years passed it became clear that the press faced increasing difficulty. The sharp fall from 20 in 2010 to 47 in 2011\/12 is a direct result of the arrests of journalists covering the Occupy movements. <\/p>\n
Overall, the Press Freedom Index's annual global indicator measured a 1.8 percent rise in global violations of freedom of information, from 3,395 to 3,456 points. RSF reports that \"alarmed by the Arab Spring turmoil, authoritarian regimes in the Arabian Peninsula and Central Asia have stepped up media censorship and surveillance to head off any 'attempt at destabilization.'\" <\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
View original post here: RSF began releasing their Press Freedom Index in 2002. RSF's secretary-general Christophe Deloire says the Index is based on \"the level of abuses, the extent of pluralism, media independence, the environment and self-censorship, the legislative framework, transparency and infrastructure.\" RSF sends out a questionnairre to \"partner organizations (18 freedom of expression NGOs located in all five continents), to our network of 150 correspondents, and to journalists, researchers, jurists and human rights activists.\" Along with state-sanctioned press suppression, the RSF incorporates general Internet freedoms and pressure from independent (usually militant) groups on journalists into the final score of a country. Continue reading
\nDissecting America's Low Press Freedom Ranking And The Situation Abroad<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"