{"id":84076,"date":"2013-09-26T11:41:20","date_gmt":"2013-09-26T15:41:20","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.designerchildren.com\/missing-something-second-amendment-wrong-on-senate-site-critics-say\/"},"modified":"2013-09-26T11:41:20","modified_gmt":"2013-09-26T15:41:20","slug":"missing-something-second-amendment-wrong-on-senate-site-critics-say","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/second-amendment\/missing-something-second-amendment-wrong-on-senate-site-critics-say\/","title":{"rendered":"MISSING SOMETHING? Second Amendment wrong on Senate site, critics say"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>      By Maxim Lott    <\/p>\n<p>      FoxNews.com    <\/p>\n<p>        Shown, at right, is a screen shot of the Senate web entry        on the 2nd Amendment. The controversial passage is        highlighted.Reuters\/Senate.gov      <\/p>\n<p>    Does the Second Amendment guarantee an individual right to own    guns?  <\/p>\n<p>    The Supreme Court has ruled that it does. But you might be    confused if you visit the     official Senate web page on the Constitution, which says    only: \"Whether this provision protects the individual's right    to own firearms or whether it deals only with the collective    right of the people to arm and maintain a militia has long been    debated.\"  <\/p>\n<p>    That particular wording was posted on the Senate website in    2009, based on archived web pages at     The Internet Archive. However, that's one year after the    Supreme Court ruled: \"The Second Amendment protects an    individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service    in a militia, and to use that arm for traditionally lawful    purposes, such as self-defense.\"  <\/p>\n<p>    Given the court ruling, critics say the Senate site's    administrators are just wrong.  <\/p>\n<p>    \"After five-and-a-half years of litigation, the Supreme Court    unequivocally resolved the long-standing debate over the    meaning of the Second Amendment,\" Bob Levy, one of the lawyers    who won the 2008 Supreme Court case, told FoxNews.com.  <\/p>\n<p>    \"No one on either side of the gun debate -- with the possible    exception of those persons who devised the U.S. Senate's    official website explaining the Constitution -- doubts that the    Supreme Court has affirmed the individual rights view of the    Second Amendment,\" he added.  <\/p>\n<p>    The issue follows on the heels of a     similar Second Amendment controversy, in which a Texas    history textbook was found to claim that the Second Amendment    means \"the people have the right to keep and bear arms in a    state militia.\"  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Read more:<br \/>\n<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.foxnews.com\/politics\/2013\/09\/25\/senate-website-gets-2nd-amendment-wrong-critics-say\/\" title=\"MISSING SOMETHING? Second Amendment wrong on Senate site, critics say\">MISSING SOMETHING? Second Amendment wrong on Senate site, critics say<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> By Maxim Lott FoxNews.com Shown, at right, is a screen shot of the Senate web entry on the 2nd Amendment. The controversial passage is highlighted.Reuters\/Senate.gov Does the Second Amendment guarantee an individual right to own guns <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/second-amendment\/missing-something-second-amendment-wrong-on-senate-site-critics-say\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[193621],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-84076","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-second-amendment"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/84076"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=84076"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/84076\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=84076"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=84076"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=84076"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}