{"id":70975,"date":"2012-11-02T02:43:24","date_gmt":"2012-11-02T02:43:24","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.designerchildren.com\/fleet-policy-vs-the-second-amendment\/"},"modified":"2012-11-02T02:43:24","modified_gmt":"2012-11-02T02:43:24","slug":"fleet-policy-vs-the-second-amendment","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/second-amendment\/fleet-policy-vs-the-second-amendment\/","title":{"rendered":"Fleet Policy vs. the Second Amendment"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    October 29, 2012  <\/p>\n<p>    A new issue has emerged, which is the clash of fleet policy    with an employees right to carry a concealed weapon for    self-protection. There arecurrently 18states that    provide a permit system for citizens to legally carry a    concealed weapon in a personal vehicle while parked on company    property. The statesare Alaska, Arizona, Florida,    Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Michigan,    Minnesota, Mississippi, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Texas,    Utah, and Wisconsin.  <\/p>\n<p>    For example, the Wisconsin law allows a permitted employee to    keep a firearm in a personal vehicle, even if it is used for    employment.  <\/p>\n<p>    (NOTE: For our international readers, the    Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitutionprovides a U.S.    citizen the constitutional right to lawfullypossess and    bear a firearm; however, various court rulings over the past    two centuries haveimposed certain restrictions.)  <\/p>\n<p>    Employers have long banned guns from the workplace as part of a    violence-prevention strategy, but those policies are being    tested in states that have passed laws allowing citizens to    carry concealed weapons. For instance, in the 2012 case    Mitchell v. University of Kentucky, the Kentucky Supreme Court    supported a wrongful termination claim by an employee of the    universitys medical center who was fired for legally storing a    weapon in his vehicle while on campus property.  <\/p>\n<p>    This issue has already affected other fleet managers. One    incident involved a major pizza chain. One of its drivers, who    had a legal permit to carry a weapon, fired it in self-defense,    killing an armed would-be robber. The driver faced no criminal    charges because prosecutors determined he acted in    self-defense. However, the company fired him for violating its    no-weapon rule.  <\/p>\n<p>    In another instance, a major document retrieval company fired    an employee in Georgia for carrying a weapon in her car. The    employee argued Georgia law does not prohibit an employee from    carrying a firearm while on company business. The employee    further argued she legally obtained a permit to carry the    weapon for self-defense, the weapon was secured in her car in    compliance with company policy, and she openly revealed she was    carrying a weapon when going through a security gate while    visiting a customer. The companys counter-argument was that    another employee was present in her car and it had a    zero-tolerance policy for any action that could endanger    employees or customers.  <\/p>\n<p>    These laws vary state by state, and a company would have to    thoroughly examine the laws of a particular jurisdiction to    determine the best policies for firearm regulations, said    Richard Alaniz, senior partner at Alaniz and Schraeder, a    national labor and employment firm based in Houston. In    general, in states that have enacted firearms-in-the-workplace    legislation, employers cannot prohibit an employee from    lawfully storing a gun out of sight in a locked vehicle.    Furthermore, employers generally cannot condition employment    upon whether an individual has a concealed weapon permit.  <\/p>\n<p>    Second Amendment advocates argue that a corporate    zero-tolerance policy violates employees legal rights. They    further question whether a company negates its responsibility    to protect employees when asking them to disarm. If a state    allows concealed weapons, advocates contend that firing an    employee (licensed to carry a firearm) because a gun is kept in    the car while parked at work is grounds for a wrongful    termination lawsuit.  <\/p>\n<p>    There are also several gray areas, such as employees who work    out of a home office where legal firearms may be kept. Would    this be considered a violation of company policy? If a company    allows employees to keep guns in their car while on its    premises, what are the implications if that employee is asked    by a manager to run an errand on company business? Many of    these issues do not have a clear legal answer, since firearm    workplace laws are relatively new, said Alaniz. The Texas    firearm-in-the-workplace statute did not take effect until    Sept. 11, 2011, and the statutes in Wisconsin and Utah took    effect November 2011.  <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>Read more:<br \/>\n<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.businessfleet.com\/Blog\/Market-Trends\/Story\/2012\/10\/Fleet-Policy-vs-the-Second-Amendment.aspx\" title=\"Fleet Policy vs. the Second Amendment\">Fleet Policy vs. the Second Amendment<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> October 29, 2012 A new issue has emerged, which is the clash of fleet policy with an employees right to carry a concealed weapon for self-protection. There arecurrently 18states that provide a permit system for citizens to legally carry a concealed weapon in a personal vehicle while parked on company property. The statesare Alaska, Arizona, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Texas, Utah, and Wisconsin <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/second-amendment\/fleet-policy-vs-the-second-amendment\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[193621],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-70975","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-second-amendment"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/70975"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=70975"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/70975\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=70975"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=70975"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=70975"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}