{"id":70939,"date":"2012-10-26T21:27:30","date_gmt":"2012-10-26T21:27:30","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.designerchildren.com\/maryland-defends-state-gun-law\/"},"modified":"2012-10-26T21:27:30","modified_gmt":"2012-10-26T21:27:30","slug":"maryland-defends-state-gun-law","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/second-amendment\/maryland-defends-state-gun-law\/","title":{"rendered":"Maryland defends state gun law"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    RICHMOND  Attorneys for the state of Maryland argued Wednesday    in federal court that a law requiring residents to provide a    good and substantial reason for seeking handgun permits is a    reasonable restriction that promotes safety without violating    the Second Amendment.  <\/p>\n<p>    The U.S. 4th Circuit Court    of Appeals heard arguments Wednesday from the state and    from gun-rights advocates on opposite sides of a U.S. District Court decision    that struck down the law as unconstitutional.  <\/p>\n<p>    State attorneys argued the requirement is no different from    many common restrictions placed on permit applicants, while    their opponents contended that the state is unlawfully forcing    residents to explain why they want to exercise a fundamental    right.  <\/p>\n<p>    Were certainly not asking the court to tell Maryland how to    regulate handguns, said Alan    Gura, a prominent gun-rights attorney representing the    plaintiff in the case. All were saying is that they proceed    with the understanding that there is an issue of fundamental    rights here.  <\/p>\n<p>    The three-judge panel peppered the attorneys with questions    during Wednesdays proceedings, which lasted about 45 minutes.  <\/p>\n<p>    Many of their questions centered on how Marylands law compares    to restrictions on handgun permits in other states, and whether    previous court cases establish or deny a right to carry    handguns outside ones home.  <\/p>\n<p>    Maryland Assistant Attorney General Matthew Fader argued that the    states restriction is no less legitimate than other widely    accepted regulations on the Second Amendment, such as outlawing    gun possession in certain public places or denying permits to    people with histories of violence.  <\/p>\n<p>    What the plaintiffs want is not the right to carry for    self-defense, but to carry for no reason at all, said Mr. Fader, who criticized the    lower courts decision    as an activist ruling delivered in broad political consensus    against gun control.  <\/p>\n<p>    After court adjourned, State Police Secretary Col. Marcus L.    Brown said that he considers the law to be a crucial safety    measure that has helped to reduce gun violence.  <\/p>\n<p>    Our number-one responsibility is fighting crime, he said.    And if the state feels this is the way to do it, then Maryland    State Police supports the law.  <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>Read more from the original source:<br \/>\n<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtontimes.com\/news\/2012\/oct\/24\/maryland-defends-state-gun-law\/?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;amp;utm_medium=RSS\" title=\"Maryland defends state gun law\">Maryland defends state gun law<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> RICHMOND Attorneys for the state of Maryland argued Wednesday in federal court that a law requiring residents to provide a good and substantial reason for seeking handgun permits is a reasonable restriction that promotes safety without violating the Second Amendment. The U.S.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/second-amendment\/maryland-defends-state-gun-law\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[193621],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-70939","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-second-amendment"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/70939"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=70939"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/70939\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=70939"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=70939"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=70939"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}