{"id":70925,"date":"2012-10-24T06:41:41","date_gmt":"2012-10-24T06:41:41","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.designerchildren.com\/is-google-a-free-speech-opportunist\/"},"modified":"2012-10-24T06:41:41","modified_gmt":"2012-10-24T06:41:41","slug":"is-google-a-free-speech-opportunist","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/free-speech\/is-google-a-free-speech-opportunist\/","title":{"rendered":"Is Google a free speech opportunist?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>      Rumors are swirling that the federal government is about to      sue Google over claims that the company rigs its search      results. Google has responded by invoking its right to free      speech  but not everyone is buying this.    <\/p>\n<p>      Tim Wu, a prominent law professor at Columbia, is not      convinced that Google is invoking its First Amendment rights      in good faith. He suggests that Google and other big      companies are cynically invoking constitutional freedoms as      part of a corporate deregulation agenda.    <\/p>\n<p>      Were living in a golden age of First Amendment      opportunism, said Wu, speaking Friday at a Penn Law School      conference titled       The Evolving Internet.    <\/p>\n<p>      In Wus view, search results are not really speech in the      first space. Instead, he argues, Googles algorithms are      closer to other automated communication tools like navigation      devices or even car alarms.    <\/p>\n<p>      Google, of course, doesnt share this view. The company      prefers to be       compared to a newspaper editor  whose choice of what to      put in the paper is an undisputed free speech right. In      practical terms, this means Google should be able to favor      its own restaurant reviews over competing services like Yelp.    <\/p>\n<p>      So who is right? Most of us would agree with Wu that Googles      search results fall somewhere in the middle of a      communication continuum where the editor is on one end and      the car alarm is on the other. The hard question is whether      Google is far enough along the line to qualify for the First      Amendment.    <\/p>\n<p>      More broadly, this dilemma doesnt apply just to Google. In      the age of the algorithm, other companies may also rush to      protect computer-based communication. Should Amazon, for      instance, be allowed to argue that its product recommendation      are a form of free speech?    <\/p>\n<p>      The point here is that the choice of whether or not to sue      Google is part of a larger process in which the country must      decide where free speech stops and legitimate regulation      begins.    <\/p>\n<p>      (Image bykentohvia      Shutterstock)    <\/p>\n<p>      More From paidContent.org<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>Originally posted here:<br \/>\n<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/finance.yahoo.com\/news\/google-free-speech-opportunist-161443293.html;_ylt=A2KLOzKSjYdQYVUAdkr_wgt.\" title=\"Is Google a free speech opportunist?\">Is Google a free speech opportunist?<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> Rumors are swirling that the federal government is about to sue Google over claims that the company rigs its search results. Google has responded by invoking its right to free speech but not everyone is buying this. Tim Wu, a prominent law professor at Columbia, is not convinced that Google is invoking its First Amendment rights in good faith <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/free-speech\/is-google-a-free-speech-opportunist\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[162384],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-70925","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-free-speech"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/70925"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/6"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=70925"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/70925\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=70925"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=70925"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=70925"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}