{"id":70917,"date":"2012-10-17T23:18:25","date_gmt":"2012-10-17T23:18:25","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.designerchildren.com\/amendment-two-strict-scrutiny-review-for-gun-laws\/"},"modified":"2012-10-17T23:18:25","modified_gmt":"2012-10-17T23:18:25","slug":"amendment-two-strict-scrutiny-review-for-gun-laws","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/second-amendment\/amendment-two-strict-scrutiny-review-for-gun-laws\/","title":{"rendered":"Amendment two: Strict scrutiny review for gun laws"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    Leesville, La. -- The    second amendment to be voted on the Nov. 6 general ballot is an    amendment dealing with strict scrutiny for gun laws.    The amendment states whether someone \"supports an amendment to    the Constitution of the State of Louisiana to provide that the    right to keep and bear arms is a fundamental right and any    restriction of that right requires the highest standard of    review by a court?\"    The three levels of law review include rational basis,    intermediate scrutiny and strict scrutiny, with rational baas    being the lowest and most common standard, according to the    Public Affairs Research Council of Louisiana (PAR). Strict    scrutiny is reserved for cases about the validity of laws that    may infringe on an individual's fundamental rights.    Traditionally, Louisiana has been recognized as having some of    the least restrictive gun laws in the state because it is an    \"open carry\" state.    Under strict scrutiny, a law must pass three tests in order to    be considered valid. First, the government must first prove    that it has a compelling interest that justifies the passage of    the law; second, the law may not be overly broad in its reach;    and third, the law must also be the least restrictive means of    achieving the state's compelling interest.    A vote for the amendment, according to PAR, would require that    any laws restricting the right to keep and bear arms be subject    to the highest level of judicial review, known as strict    scrutiny. Voting for the amendment would also delete a line in    the constitution that says the right to keep and bear arms    shall not prevent the passage of laws to prohibit the carrying    of concealed weapons.    A \"no\" vote would retain the existing language in the    constitution, which affirms that the right to keep and bear    arms shall not be abridged but does to require strict scrutiny    of arms laws and expressly allows the Legislature to regulate    concealed weapons.    Supporters of the amendment say that this amendment would give    Louisiana the strongest protection of guns rights in the    nation. In addition, the change would protect the Second    Amendment rights of residents in the future.    Those who oppose the amendment say that if passed, the    amendment could lead to some laws used to help prosecute    criminals could be overturned, and any of the statutes    regarding the possession and carrying of guns could be    affected.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>View original post here:<br \/>\n<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.leesvilledailyleader.com\/article\/20121017\/NEWS\/121019738\/-1\/news\" title=\"Amendment two: Strict scrutiny review for gun laws\">Amendment two: Strict scrutiny review for gun laws<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> Leesville, La. -- The second amendment to be voted on the Nov. 6 general ballot is an amendment dealing with strict scrutiny for gun laws <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/second-amendment\/amendment-two-strict-scrutiny-review-for-gun-laws\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[193621],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-70917","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-second-amendment"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/70917"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=70917"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/70917\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=70917"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=70917"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=70917"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}