{"id":70502,"date":"2012-08-07T07:10:31","date_gmt":"2012-08-07T07:10:31","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.designerchildren.com\/freedom-of-speech-not-at-work\/"},"modified":"2012-08-07T07:10:31","modified_gmt":"2012-08-07T07:10:31","slug":"freedom-of-speech-not-at-work","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/free-speech\/freedom-of-speech-not-at-work\/","title":{"rendered":"Freedom of Speech? Not at Work"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    In America you can say pretty much whatever you want, wherever    you want to say it. Unless, that is, youre at work. Simply    put, there is no First Amendment right to free speech in the    workplacepotentially perilous for many employees in a    polarized political year with a tight presidential race.  <\/p>\n<p>    Current news provides plenty of examples of just how much    leeway managers have to limit their workers freedom of speech,    or to encourage political activity among employees. On Aug. 2,    an Arizona-based medical supplies manufacturer, Vante,    dismissed CFO Adam Smith for     berating a Tucson Chick-fil-A employee for working at what    he considered a homophobic company. Chick-fil-A has made        national headlines recently for its presidents    controversial comments about same-sex marriage.  <\/p>\n<p>    I dont know how you live with yourself and work here, Smith    says in a video of the exchange, which was posted on    YouTube (GOOG). This is    a horrible corporation with horrible values. You deserve    better. Vante quickly fired Smith, and posted its regrets    about the incident in a     statement on the home page of its website.  <\/p>\n<p>    Bosses and those who work under them are not equal when it    comes to free-speech legal claims. Employers have the right to    take action against any employee who engages in political    speech that company leaders find offensive. With a few narrow    exceptions the Constitution and the federal laws derived from    it only protect a persons right to expression from government    interference, not from the restrictions a private employer may    impose, lawyers say.  <\/p>\n<p>    Employers are not similarly restricted in expressing their    political views or encouraging support for a particular    candidate or cause. Not only can employers remind employees of    the upcoming election and encourage them to vote, but they can    base continued employment on whether a worker agrees to    contribute money or time to the bosss favorite political    candidate, so long as theres no state law prohibiting it.    (Eight states and the District of Columbia have laws protecting    employees from such mandates.)  <\/p>\n<p>    Consider the case of David Siegel, founder of Orlando    (Fla.)-based Westgate Resorts, the nations biggest time-share    developer and the man behind what is planned to be the     largest house in America. In February, Siegel told    Bloomberg Businessweek that his efforts were largely    responsible for the 2000 election of President George W. Bush.    Im not bragging,     Im just stating the fact: I personally got George W. Bush    elected, he said. I had my managers do a survey on every    employee. If they liked Bush, we made them register to vote.    But not if they liked Gore. Siegel also said his companys    call center made 80,000 calls on behalf of Bushs campaign.  <\/p>\n<p>    While federal statutes such as the 1964 Civil Rights Act, the    Age Discrimination in Employment Act, the Americans with    Disabilities Act, the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination    Act, and the National Labor Relations Act limit companies    rights to fire or hire workers and prevent them from joining    unions, these restrictions are based only on race, religion,    ethnicity, sex, age, and a few other protected categories.    Political opinion isnt protected by any of these statutes.  <\/p>\n<p>    The First Amendment applies only to employees of the    government in certain situations, and all citizens when theyre    confronted by the government, says Mark Trapp, an employment    lawyer with Epstein Baker Green in Chicago. In other words,    freedom to speak your mind doesnt really exist in work    spaces.  <\/p>\n<p>    Its a limitation that retired Air Force Colonel Morris Davis    knows well. The former prosecutor of the Guantanamo Bay    military commissions, who was appointed by President George W.    Bush, resigned over what he perceived as systematic    mistreatment and abuse of prisoners by U.S. soldiers at the    detention camp. After taking a job with the Library of    Congress, he was fired in late 2009 for refusing to recant the    contents of pieces published in the Wall Street    Journal and the Washington Post criticizing the    Obama administrations failure to close the prison.  <\/p>\n<p>    I was shocked to see the limits of the First Amendment,    Morris says. We like to think that our rights are carved in    granite, but instead it turns out theyre carved in sand.    Morris now teaches law at Howard University; the American Civil    Liberties Union has sued the Library of Congress seeking    Morriss reinstatement.  <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>Read the original:<br \/>\n<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.businessweek.com\/articles\/2012-08-03\/where-free-speech-goes-to-die-the-workplace\/\" title=\"Freedom of Speech? Not at Work\">Freedom of Speech? Not at Work<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> In America you can say pretty much whatever you want, wherever you want to say it.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/free-speech\/freedom-of-speech-not-at-work\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[162384],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-70502","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-free-speech"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/70502"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=70502"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/70502\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=70502"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=70502"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=70502"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}