{"id":69997,"date":"2012-04-26T01:13:39","date_gmt":"2012-04-26T01:13:39","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.designerchildren.com\/liberty-scraps-offshore-liquid-gas-terminal-plan\/"},"modified":"2012-04-26T01:13:39","modified_gmt":"2012-04-26T01:13:39","slug":"liberty-scraps-offshore-liquid-gas-terminal-plan","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/liberty\/liberty-scraps-offshore-liquid-gas-terminal-plan\/","title":{"rendered":"Liberty scraps offshore liquid gas terminal plan"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    ATLANTIC CITY, N.J. (AP) -- A company that proposed building a    liquefied natural    gas terminal off the central New Jersey coast has    withdrawn its application, saying it will start over on a new    plan in the future.  <\/p>\n<p>    Liberty Natural    Gas LLC had applied to the federal Maritime    Administration and the Coast Guard to build a facility    16 miles off Asbury Park.  <\/p>\n<p>    But Gov. Chris    Christie vetoed the plan in February 2011, saying it was    too risky to the state's crucial tourism and fishing    industries.  <\/p>\n<p>    The company kept pressing forward with the plan. But in an    April 10 letter to regulators, it noted it had made so many    changes to the proposal that a new application would be needed.  <\/p>\n<p>    \"This is a victory for the ocean and for the thousands of    citizens and scores of organizations that fought for five years    against this wrongful proposal,\" said Cindy Zipf, executive    director of the Clean Ocean Action environmental group. \"With    Governor Christie's firm opposition, this project was dead in    the water. It is about time they faced reality and withdrew    (or) terminated the project. It's over for now, but they are    lurking and may be back.\"  <\/p>\n<p>    Indeed, the company made clear it still plans to move forward    with a new version of the proposal at some point.  <\/p>\n<p>    \"Liberty completely redesigned its project, including by    scaling down its size from four buoys to two, eliminating the    onshore pipeline, changing the project location and    configuration to site the project exclusively offshore, and    redesigning its construction and techniques to substantially    reduce seabed impacts,\" the company wrote in its letter to    regulators.  <\/p>\n<p>    Because it had made so many changes to its initial application,    Liberty withdrew it and intends to submit a new one once    surveys and plans are completed.  <\/p>\n<p>    Liberty's plan was the last of three proposed offshore gas    projects in New Jersey waters to remain under consideration.    ExxonMobil had proposed a floating gas terminal called    BlueOcean Energy about 20 miles off the coast of Manasquan, and    The Atlantic Sea Island Group wanted to build a 63-acre    artificial island nearly 20 miles off Sandy Hook for a    liquefied natural gas port called \"Safe Harbor Energy.\"  <\/p>\n<p>    Liberty said its facility would rest on the ocean floor when    it's not being used, and would be far enough offshore so that    it would not be visible to beachgoers, even when it was being    utilized. It had hoped to have the project up and running by    2014.  <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>Read more:<br \/>\n<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/finance.yahoo.com\/news\/liberty-scraps-offshore-liquid-gas-184140196.html;_ylt=A2KJjagsoZhPghUAzyr_wgt.\" title=\"Liberty scraps offshore liquid gas terminal plan\">Liberty scraps offshore liquid gas terminal plan<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> ATLANTIC CITY, N.J. (AP) -- A company that proposed building a liquefied natural gas terminal off the central New Jersey coast has withdrawn its application, saying it will start over on a new plan in the future. Liberty Natural Gas LLC had applied to the federal Maritime Administration and the Coast Guard to build a facility 16 miles off Asbury Park.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/liberty\/liberty-scraps-offshore-liquid-gas-terminal-plan\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[193612],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-69997","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-liberty"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69997"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=69997"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69997\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=69997"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=69997"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=69997"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}