{"id":69817,"date":"2012-03-08T07:04:43","date_gmt":"2012-03-08T07:04:43","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.designerchildren.com\/criminalizing-free-speech-is-this-what-democracy-looks-like\/"},"modified":"2012-03-08T07:04:43","modified_gmt":"2012-03-08T07:04:43","slug":"criminalizing-free-speech-is-this-what-democracy-looks-like","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/free-speech\/criminalizing-free-speech-is-this-what-democracy-looks-like\/","title":{"rendered":"Criminalizing Free Speech: Is This What Democracy Looks Like?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    Criminalizing Free Speech: Is This What Democracy Looks    Like?  <\/p>\n<p>    By John W. Whitehead  <\/p>\n<p>    March 05, 2012  <\/p>\n<p>      Congress shall make no law  abridging the freedom of      speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably      to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of      grievances.First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution    <\/p>\n<p>    One of the key ingredients in a democracy is the right to    freely speak our minds to those who represent us. In fact, it    is one of the few effective tools we have left to combat    government corruption and demand accountability. But now, even    that right is being chipped away by statutes and court rulings    which weaken our ability to speak freely. Activities which were    once considered a major component of democratic life in America    are now being criminalized. Making matters worse, politicians    have gone to great lengths in recent years to evade their    contractual, constitutional duty to make themselves available    to us and hear our grievances. That is what representative    government is all about.  <\/p>\n<p>    Unfortunately, with gas prices rising, the economy tanking, the    increasingly unpopular war effort dragging on and public    approval of Congress at an all-time low, members of Congress    have been working hard to keep their unhappy constituents at a    distanceavoiding town-hall meetings, making minimal public    appearances while at home in their districts, only appearing at    events in controlled settings where theyre the only ones    talking, and if they must interact with constituents, doing so    via telephone town meetings or impromptu visits to local    businesses where the chances of being accosted by angry voters    are greatly minimized. Consider that in the summer of 2011, 60    percent of Congress refused to hold town hall meetings with    their constituents during their summer break. The ones who did    often charged a fee for attendance. For example, Rep. Paul Ryan    charged fifteen dollars per person for his public appearance,    and Rep. Dan Quayle charged 35 dollars per person.  <\/p>\n<p>    Now, in a self-serving move aimed more at insulating government    officials from discontent voters than protecting their hides,    Congress has overwhelmingly approved legislation that will keep    the public not just at arms length distance but a football    field away by making it a federal crime to protest or assemble    in the vicinity of protected government officials. The Trespass    Bill (the Federal Restricted Buildings and Grounds Improvement    Act of 2011) creates a roving bubble zone or perimeter around    select government officials and dignitaries (anyone protected    by the Secret Service), as well as any building or grounds    restricted in conjunction with an event designated as a    special event of national significance.  <\/p>\n<p>    The bills language is so overly broad as to put an end to free    speech, political protest and the right to peaceably assemble    in all areas where government officials happen to be present.    Rep. Justin Amash (R-MI) was one of only three members of the    House of Representatives to vote against the legislation. As he    explains:  <\/p>\n<p>      Current law makes it illegal to enter or remain in an area      where certain government officials (more particularly, those      with Secret Service protection) will be visiting temporarily      if and only if the person knows it's illegal to enter the      restricted area but does so anyway. The bill expands current      law to make it a crime to enter or remain in an area where an      official is visiting even if the person does not know it's      illegal to be in that area and has no reason to suspect it's      illegal.    <\/p>\n<p>      Some government officials may need extraordinary protection      to ensure their safety. But criminalizing legitimate First      Amendment activityeven if that activity is annoying to those      government officialsviolates our rights. I voted \"no.\" It      passed 388-3.    <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>Go here to see the original:<br \/>\n<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.gilmermirror.com\/view\/full_story\/17773583\/article-Criminalizing-Free-Speech--Is-This-What-Democracy-Looks-Like-?instance=lead_story_left_column\" title=\"Criminalizing Free Speech: Is This What Democracy Looks Like?\">Criminalizing Free Speech: Is This What Democracy Looks Like?<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> Criminalizing Free Speech: Is This What Democracy Looks Like? By John W. Whitehead March 05, 2012 Congress shall make no law abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.First Amendment to the U.S.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/free-speech\/criminalizing-free-speech-is-this-what-democracy-looks-like\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[162384],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-69817","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-free-speech"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69817"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=69817"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69817\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=69817"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=69817"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=69817"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}