{"id":69625,"date":"2012-02-06T19:17:15","date_gmt":"2012-02-06T19:17:15","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.designerchildren.com\/georgia-supreme-court-strikes-down-assisted-suicide-restrictions-over-free-speech-concerns\/"},"modified":"2012-02-06T19:17:15","modified_gmt":"2012-02-06T19:17:15","slug":"georgia-supreme-court-strikes-down-assisted-suicide-restrictions-over-free-speech-concerns","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/free-speech\/georgia-supreme-court-strikes-down-assisted-suicide-restrictions-over-free-speech-concerns\/","title":{"rendered":"Georgia Supreme Court strikes down assisted suicide restrictions over free speech concerns"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    Atlanta \u2014 Georgia\u2019s top court on Monday struck down a state law    designed to discourage assisted suicides after a legal battle    brought by four members of a suicide group who said it also    violated free speech rights.  <\/p>\n<p>    The Georgia Supreme Court\u2019s unanimous ruling concludes the 1994    state law \u201crestricts speech in violation of the free speech    clauses\u201d of the U.S. and Georgia constitutions.  <\/p>\n<p>    The court\u2019s decision is a victory to members of the Final Exit    Network who challenged the law after they were charged in    February 2009 with helping a 58-year-old cancer-stricken man    die.  <\/p>\n<p>    Defense attorneys said the law violates First Amendment rights    because it bans people from publicly speaking about assisted    suicide. Prosecutors said the law applies only to those who    follow through on their talk by helping someone die.  <\/p>\n<p>    At issue is a 1994 Georgia law that makes it a felony for    anyone who \"publicly advertises, offers or holds himself or    herself out as offering that he or she will intentionally and    actively assist another person in the commission of suicide and    commits any overt act to further that purpose.\"  <\/p>\n<p>    At oral arguments in November, prosecutors said that the law    doesn\u2019t infringe on the free speech rights of people who    support assisted suicide _ only those who take concrete steps    to carry one out. They said Georgia law doesn\u2019t even ban    assisted suicide as long as it\u2019s not being publicly advertised.  <\/p>\n<p>    Defense attorneys countered that lawmakers should have adopted    a law specifically outlawing assisted suicide if the government    was interested in preventing it. They said the law punishes    only those involved in assisted suicides if they speak publicly    about it, but does nothing to block one from being carried out    by others who stay silent.  <\/p>\n<p>    The challenge was brought by four members of the network who    were arrested in February 2009 after John Celmer&#039;s death at his    north Georgia home. They were arrested after an eight-month    investigation by state authorities, in which an undercover    agent posing as someone seeking to commit suicide infiltrated    the group.  <\/p>\n<p>    A grand jury in March 2010 indicted Ted Goodwin, the group&#039;s    former president; group member Claire Blehr; ex-medical    director Dr. Lawrence D. Egbert; and regional coordinator    Nicholas Alec Sheridan. The four pleaded not guilty to charges    that they tampered with evidence, violated anti-racketeering    laws and helped the man kill himself, and their case has been    on hold while the Georgia Supreme Court considered their    challenge.  <\/p>\n<p>    The four hired a host of well-known defense attorneys, who    asked a Forsyth County judge in December to dismiss the charges    on free speech grounds. State attorneys said the law was aimed    at preventing assisted suicides from the likes of Dr. Jack    Kevorkian, the late physician who sparked the national    right-to-die debate.  <\/p>\n<p>    The judge rejected the defendants\u2019 request in April, ruling    that \"pure speech is in no way chilled or limited by the law,\u201d    sending the case on fast-track to the Georgia Supreme Court.    Monday\u2019s ruling could help reshape the state\u2019s end-of-life    policy, as well as determine the future of the criminal case    against the four, which has been on hold.  <\/p>\n<p>    Monday\u2019s opinion, penned by Justice Hugh Thompson, found that    although the state attempts to portray the law as a ban on    assisted suicide, the language of the law makes it \u201cundisputed\u201d    that Georgia doesn\u2019t ban all assisted suicides.  <\/p>\n<p>    It said lawmakers could have imposed a ban on all assisted    suicides with no restriction on protected speech, or it could    forbid all offers to assist in suicide that are followed by the    act. But lawmakers decided to do neither, the ruling said.  <\/p>\n<p>    \u201cThe State has failed to provide any explanation or evidence as    to why a public advertisement or offer to assist in an    otherwise legal activity is sufficiently problematic to justify    an intrusion on protected speech rights,\u201d the ruling said.  <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>Excerpt from:<br \/>\n<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/americustimesrecorder.com\/local\/x318441588\/Georgia-Supreme-Court-strikes-down-assisted-suicide-restrictions-over-free-speech-concerns\" title=\"Georgia Supreme Court strikes down assisted suicide restrictions over free speech concerns\">Georgia Supreme Court strikes down assisted suicide restrictions over free speech concerns<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> Atlanta \u2014 Georgia\u2019s top court on Monday struck down a state law designed to discourage assisted suicides after a legal battle brought by four members of a suicide group who said it also violated free speech rights.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/free-speech\/georgia-supreme-court-strikes-down-assisted-suicide-restrictions-over-free-speech-concerns\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[162384],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-69625","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-free-speech"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69625"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=69625"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69625\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=69625"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=69625"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=69625"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}