{"id":69172,"date":"2016-07-05T23:49:02","date_gmt":"2016-07-06T03:49:02","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/debra-j-saunders-the-libertarian-alternative-gary-johnson\/"},"modified":"2016-07-05T23:49:02","modified_gmt":"2016-07-06T03:49:02","slug":"debra-j-saunders-the-libertarian-alternative-gary-johnson","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/libertarian\/debra-j-saunders-the-libertarian-alternative-gary-johnson\/","title":{"rendered":"Debra J. Saunders &#8211; The Libertarian Alternative, Gary Johnson"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>        |      <\/p>\n<p>        Posted: Jul 03, 2016 12:01 AM      <\/p>\n<p>    Both support efforts to legalize marijuana for recreational    use. With Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton their parties'    presumptive nominees -- Johnson branded Clinton and Trump the    \"two most polarizing figures\" to ever run for the White House    -- the Libertarian ticket has a shot in November.  <\/p>\n<p>    Before he spoke at the Lincoln Initiative's Reboot Conference    on Thursday, I sat down with Johnson and asked him what the    chances are that he could win. \"They exist,\" he answered, and    that is a game change. Johnson was the Libertarian nominee in    2012 and garnered 1.2 million votes, or just under 1 percent of    the vote. His name did not appear on any national polls. In    2016, that has changed. Johnson polled with 10 percent support    in two recent national polls included in the RealClearPolitics    polling average, which computes his support at 7.9 percent.  <\/p>\n<p>    Third-party candidates need to exhibit 15 percent or more    support in five national polls to win a seat at the national    presidential debates. Johnson thinks his ticket will exceed    that threshold. If the American people have a chance to hear    what Johnson and Weld have to say, their smaller-government    approach could resonate with middle-of-the-road voters. Johnson    urges people who are interested in his candidacy to take the    iSideWith quiz that asks voters their positions on domestic and    national security issues and then matches them up with    presidential candidates. I tried it and found I side with    Johnson on 94 percent of issues -- whereas with Trump it's 81    percent of the time and with Clinton it's 67 percent.  <\/p>\n<p>    Most Republican candidates give lip service to fiscal    restraint, without offering specifics about which spending they    would cut. When I interviewed him in 2011, Johnson boasted    about his record number of vetoes and asserted that he could    have cut \"a third of state government and no one would have    noticed the difference.\" If he could wave a magic wand, Johnson    told me Thursday, he \"would abolish the Department of    Education.\" He also would abolish the Department of Housing and    Urban Development because local governments should choose what    works for them. But he doesn't have a magic wand, so if    elected, he'd have to work with the government as it exists. He    said he will propose a 20 percent cut in spending. If Congress    were to give him legislation that would cut spending less than    he asked, well, anything under zero percent growth presents a    drastic improvement over past practices.  <\/p>\n<p>    Clinton is vulnerable, Johnson believes, because with her,    \"government's the solution to everything. Everything's free, so    taxes are going to go up.\" The former governor of a border    state, Johnson has been appalled at Trump's characterization of    undocumented immigrants as rapists and other types of    criminals.  <\/p>\n<p>    Some Republicans will support Clinton because they prefer her    hawkish foreign policy approach to Johnson's less martial    stands. Johnson wants to break with the status quo. He supports    letting U.S. troops finish their mission to destroy the Islamic    State group. (\"ISIS has attacked us,\" he explained.) But    Johnson wants to get U.S. troops out of Afghanistan. He    believes they should have been deployed to go after al-Qaida,    but not the Taliban. If we don't pull out troops now, Johnson    said, Washington will leave troops in Afghanistan for decades.    I have my own fear -- a destabilized region that will breed    havoc around the world.  <\/p>\n<p>    It's an honest disagreement, which is more than I can say about    so much of 2016 politics. Somehow both parties have nominated    candidates who don't really pass the smell test. Shame on    Democrats for nominating a candidate likely to invite dozens of    ethics investigations. Shame on Republican voters for picking    the one candidate who could hand the White House to Clinton.    Voters who are hungry for a positive alternative should pay    attention. You can listen to Gary Johnson for a whole hour and    not feel dirty afterward.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Continued here: <\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/townhall.com\/columnists\/debrajsaunders\/2016\/07\/03\/the-libertarian-alternative-gary-johnson-n2186486\" title=\"Debra J. Saunders - The Libertarian Alternative, Gary Johnson\">Debra J. Saunders - The Libertarian Alternative, Gary Johnson<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> | Posted: Jul 03, 2016 12:01 AM Both support efforts to legalize marijuana for recreational use. With Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton their parties' presumptive nominees -- Johnson branded Clinton and Trump the \"two most polarizing figures\" to ever run for the White House -- the Libertarian ticket has a shot in November.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/libertarian\/debra-j-saunders-the-libertarian-alternative-gary-johnson\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[187826],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-69172","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-libertarian"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69172"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=69172"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69172\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=69172"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=69172"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=69172"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}