First of all, my opponent is trying to turn this debate into a moral issue. Morality should never be the basis of government. Justice and fairness should be. <\/p>\n
Pro, argues that this debate is no about \"Can the government censor?\" but about \"Should they?\" As I stated previously no they shouldn't. Just because something is allowed, doesn't mean we should do it. I can stuff my face with 10 slices of pizza, does it mean I should? No <\/p>\n
Pro, also mentioned I have not given example why censorship is bad. As you can read, I did. <\/p>\n
I can give a list why censorship is bad in all corners. Here we go. <\/p>\n
1. Dictators use censorship to promote a flattering image of themselves and for removing any information that goes against them. Whose to say the government can't do this too? <\/p>\n
2. Political parties around the world already use media censorship for their own benefit. It stifles the opposition, broadcasting only a particular point of view. <\/p>\n
3. Censorship makes us believe what were are told, not what we are not. Why do conspiracy theorists exist? Because they believe the government isn't telling us something. <\/p>\n
4. Area 51, 9\/11, New World Order. Do you really think the gorvernment should keep all those things censored. <\/p>\n
5. It makes the US complete hyprocite. The Constitution says we have Freedom of Speech, Press, Religion, Petition and Protest, so why does the gorvernment censor this? For there own benefit. <\/p>\n
Thank you. By the way, the voters can vote for whoever they want. Vote whatever you like! \ud83d\ude42 <\/p>\n
As to his rebuttals, they are also contradictory. I have not said that he did not give instances of bad censorship, I merely pointed out that a few bad examples does not imply that censorship in all circumstances is immoral. I would like to point out that my opponent has done nothing to refute my ethical system of utilitarianism or propose one of his own that is not logically contradictory. Under my ethical system, government should censor when the results of said censorship maximize happiness or minimize pain. Until my opponent addresses this point, I should be considered the winner. <\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Go here to read the rest: First of all, my opponent is trying to turn this debate into a moral issue. Morality should never be the basis of government. Justice and fairness should be Continue reading
\nDebate Argument: Censorship | Debate.org<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"