{"id":66291,"date":"2015-07-17T22:44:37","date_gmt":"2015-07-18T02:44:37","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/5-5645mm-nato-wikipedia-the-free-encyclopedia\/"},"modified":"2015-07-17T22:44:37","modified_gmt":"2015-07-18T02:44:37","slug":"5-5645mm-nato-wikipedia-the-free-encyclopedia","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/nato-2\/5-5645mm-nato-wikipedia-the-free-encyclopedia\/","title":{"rendered":"5.5645mm NATO &#8211; Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>5.5645mm NATO                                    <\/p>\n<p>          5.5645mm NATO with measurement, left to right: bullet,          empty case, complete round with bullet in case        <\/p>\n<p>    The 5.5645mm NATO (official NATO nomenclature 5.56 NATO) is an intermediate cartridge developed in the United States    and originally chambered in the M16 rifle. Under STANAG 4172, it is a    standard cartridge for NATO forces as well as many non-NATO    countries.[3] It is    derived from, but not identical to, the .223    Remington cartridge.  <\/p>\n<p>    In the 1950s, the 7.6251mm NATO rifle cartridge (sold    commercially as the .308 Winchester rifle cartridge)[4] was    selected to replace the .30-06 Springfield as the    standard NATO rifle cartridge. At the time of selection, there    had been criticism that the 7.6251mm NATO was too powerful for    lightweight modern service rifles, causing excessive recoil,    and that the ammunition did not allow for sufficient rate of fire in    modern combat.[citation    needed]  <\/p>\n<p>    The British had extensive evidence with their own experiments    into an intermediate cartridge since 1945    and were on the point of introducing a .280 inch (7mm)    cartridge when the selection of the 7.6251mm NATO was    made. The FN    company had also been involved.[5]    The concerns about recoil and effectiveness were effectively    overruled by the US within NATO, and the other NATO nations    accepted that standardization was more important at the time    than selection of the ideal cartridge.([6]The EM-2,    Rifle No.9 Mk1 or \"Janson rifle\", was an experimental British    assault rifle briefly adopted by British forces in 1951, but    the decision was overturned very shortly thereafter by Winston    Churchill's incoming government in an effort to secure NATO    standardisation of small arms and ammunition in the face of    American intransigence.) However, while the 7.6251mm NATO    round became NATO    standard, the US was already engaged in research of their own,    which ultimately led to the 5.5645mm NATO    cartridge.[citation    needed]  <\/p>\n<p>    During the late 1950s, ArmaLite and other U.S. firearm designers started their individual    Small Caliber\/High Velocity (SCHV) assault rifle experiments    using the commercial .222 Remington cartridge. When it became    clear that there was not enough powder capacity to meet U.S.    Continental Army Command's (CONARC) velocity and penetration    requirements, ArmaLite contacted Remington to create a similar    cartridge with a longer case body and shorter neck. This became    the .222 Remington Special. At the same time, Springfield Armory's Earle    Harvey had Remington create an even longer cartridge case    then known as the .224 Springfield. Springfield was forced to    drop out of the CONARC competition, and thus the .224    Springfield was later released as a commercial sporting    cartridge known as the .222 Remington Magnum. To    prevent confusion among all of the competing .222 cartridge    designations, the .222 Remington Special was renamed the    .223    Remington. With the U.S. military adoption of the ArmaLite    M16 rifle in 1963, the .223 Remington was standardized as the    5.5645mm NATO. As a commercial sporting cartridge the .223    Remington was introduced in 1964.  <\/p>\n<p>    The 5.5645mm cartridge, along with the M16 rifle, were    initially adopted by U.S. infantry forces as interim solutions    to address the weight and control issues experienced with the    7.6251mm round and M14 rifle. In the late 1950s, the Special Purpose Individual    Weapon program sought to create flechette rounds to allow troops to fire    sabot-type projectiles    to give a short flight time and flat trajectory with a muzzle    velocity of 1,200 metres per second (3,900ft\/s) to 1,500    metres per second (4,900ft\/s). At those speeds, factors    like range, wind drift, and target movement would no longer    affect performance. Several manufacturers produced varying    weapons designs, including traditional wooden, bullpup, \"space age,\" and    even multi-barrel designs with drum magazines. All used similar    ammunition firing a 1.8mm diameter dart with a plastic    \"puller\" sabot filling the case mouth. While the flechette ammo    had excellent armor penetration, there were doubts about their    terminal effectiveness against unprotected targets.    Conventional cased ammunition was more accurate and the sabots    were expensive to produce. The SPIW never created a weapons    system that was combat effective, so the M16 was retained, and    the 5.56mm round was kept as the standard U.S. infantry    rifle cartridge.[5]  <\/p>\n<p>    In a series of mock-combat situations testing in the early    1960s with the M16, M14 and AK-47, the Army found that the M16's small size and    light weight allowed it to be brought to bear much more    quickly.[citation    needed] Their final conclusion was that an    8-man team equipped with the M16 would have the same fire-power    as a current 11-man team armed with the M14.[citation    needed] U.S. troops were able to carry    more than twice as much 5.5645mm NATO ammunition as 7.6251mm    NATO for the same weight, which would allow them a better    advantage against a typical NVA unit armed with AK-47, AKM or Type 56 assault rifles.  <\/p>\n<p>    (*AK-47\/AKM magazines are much heavier than M14 and M16    magazines)  <\/p>\n<p>    In 1977, NATO members signed an agreement to select a second,    smaller caliber cartridge to replace the 7.6251mm NATO    cartridge.[9] Of the    cartridges tendered, the 5.5645mm NATO was successful, but not    the 55gr M193 round used by the U.S. at that time. The    wounds produced by the M193 round were so devastating that    many[10]    consider it to be inhumane.[11][12]    Instead, the Belgian 62gr SS109 round was chosen for    standardization. The SS109 used a heavier bullet with a steel    tip and had a lower muzzle velocity for better long-range    performance, specifically to meet a requirement that the bullet    be able to penetrate through one side of a steel helmet at 600    meters. This requirement made the SS109 (M855) round less    capable of fragmentation than the M193 and was considered more    humane.[13]  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Read more:<br \/>\n<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/5.56x45mm_NATO\" title=\"5.5645mm NATO - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia\">5.5645mm NATO - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> 5.5645mm NATO 5.5645mm NATO with measurement, left to right: bullet, empty case, complete round with bullet in case The 5.5645mm NATO (official NATO nomenclature 5.56 NATO) is an intermediate cartridge developed in the United States and originally chambered in the M16 rifle. Under STANAG 4172, it is a standard cartridge for NATO forces as well as many non-NATO countries.[3] It is derived from, but not identical to, the .223 Remington cartridge. In the 1950s, the 7.6251mm NATO rifle cartridge (sold commercially as the .308 Winchester rifle cartridge)[4] was selected to replace the .30-06 Springfield as the standard NATO rifle cartridge <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/nato-2\/5-5645mm-nato-wikipedia-the-free-encyclopedia\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[94882],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-66291","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-nato-2"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66291"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=66291"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66291\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=66291"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=66291"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=66291"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}