{"id":66137,"date":"2015-06-11T23:44:44","date_gmt":"2015-06-12T03:44:44","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/noncoding-dna-wikipedia-the-free-encyclopedia\/"},"modified":"2015-06-11T23:44:44","modified_gmt":"2015-06-12T03:44:44","slug":"noncoding-dna-wikipedia-the-free-encyclopedia","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/transhuman-news-blog\/dna\/noncoding-dna-wikipedia-the-free-encyclopedia\/","title":{"rendered":"Noncoding DNA &#8211; Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    In genomics and    related disciplines, noncoding DNA sequences are    components of an organism's DNA that do not encode protein sequences. Some noncoding DNA is transcribed into functional    non-coding RNA molecules (e.g. transfer RNA,    ribosomal    RNA, and regulatory RNAs). Other functions of    noncoding DNA include the transcriptional and translational regulation of protein-coding    sequences, scaffold    attachment regions, origins of DNA replication,    centromeres and telomeres.  <\/p>\n<p>    The amount of noncoding DNA varies greatly among species. For    example, over 98% of the human genome is noncoding,[2]    while 20% of a typical prokaryote genome is noncoding.[3]    When there is much non-coding DNA, a large proportion appears    to have no biological function for the organism, as    theoretically predicted in the 1960s. Since that time, this    non-functional portion has often been referred to as \"junk    DNA\", a term that has elicited strong responses over the    years.[4]  <\/p>\n<p>    The international Encyclopedia of DNA Elements (ENCODE) project uncovered, by    direct biochemical approaches, that at least 80% of human    genomic DNA has biochemical activity.[5]    Though this was not necessarily unexpected due to previous    decades of research discovering many functional noncoding    regions,[3][6]    some scientists criticized the conclusion for conflating    biochemical activity with biological    function.[7][8][9][10][11]    Estimates for the biologically functional fraction of our    genome based on comparative genomics range between 8    and 15%.[12][13][14]    However, others have argued against relying solely on estimates    from comparative genomics due to its limited scope and also    because non-coding DNA has been found to be involved in    epigenetic activity and making the complexity    of species.[6][13][15][16]  <\/p>\n<p>    The amount of total genomic DNA varies widely between    organisms, and the proportion of coding and noncoding DNA    within these genomes varies greatly as well. More than 98% of    the human    genome does not encode protein sequences, including most    sequences within introns and most intergenic DNA.[2]    20% of a typical prokaryote genome is noncoding.[3]  <\/p>\n<p>    While overall genome size, and by extension the amount of    noncoding DNA, are correlated to organism complexity, there are    many exceptions. For example, the genome of the unicellular    Polychaos dubium (formerly known as    Amoeba dubia) has been reported to contain more than 200    times the amount of DNA in humans.[17]    The pufferfish Takifugu rubripes genome is only about one    eighth the size of the human genome, yet seems to have a    comparable number of genes; approximately 90% of the    Takifugu genome is noncoding DNA.[2]    The extensive variation in nuclear genome size among eukaryotic    species is known as the C-value enigma or    C-value paradox.[18]    Most of the genome size difference appears to lie in the    noncoding DNA.  <\/p>\n<p>    In 2013, a new \"record\" for the most efficient eukaryotic    genome was discovered with Utricularia gibba, a bladderwort plant that has only 3% noncoding    DNA and 97% of coding DNA. Parts of the noncoding DNA were    being deleted by the plant and this suggested that noncoding    DNA may not be as critical for plants, even though noncoding    DNA is useful for humans.[1]    Other studies on plants have discovered crucial functions in    portions noncoding DNA that were previously thought to be    negligible and have added a new layer to the understanding of    gene regulation.[19]  <\/p>\n<p>    Noncoding RNAs are functional RNA molecules that are not    translated into protein. Examples of noncoding RNA include    ribosomal    RNA, transfer RNA, Piwi-interacting RNA and microRNA.  <\/p>\n<p>    MicroRNAs are predicted to control the translational activity    of approximately 30% of all protein-coding genes in mammals    and may be vital components in the progression or treatment of    various diseases including cancer, cardiovascular disease, and    the immune    system response to infection.[20]  <\/p>\n<p>    Cis-regulatory    elements are sequences that control the transcription of a nearby gene.    Cis-elements may be located in 5' or 3' untranslated regions or within    introns. Trans-regulatory elements    control the transcription of a distant gene.  <\/p>\n<p>    Promoters facilitate the transcription    of a particular gene and are typically upstream of the coding    region. Enhancer sequences may also exert    very distant effects on the transcription levels of    genes.[21]  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Go here to read the rest:<br \/>\n<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Noncoding_DNA\" title=\"Noncoding DNA - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia\">Noncoding DNA - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> In genomics and related disciplines, noncoding DNA sequences are components of an organism's DNA that do not encode protein sequences. Some noncoding DNA is transcribed into functional non-coding RNA molecules (e.g.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/transhuman-news-blog\/dna\/noncoding-dna-wikipedia-the-free-encyclopedia\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[26],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-66137","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-dna"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66137"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=66137"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66137\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=66137"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=66137"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=66137"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}