{"id":62798,"date":"2015-03-24T05:53:02","date_gmt":"2015-03-24T09:53:02","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/sc-quashes-section-66a-says-it-curbs-freedom-of-speech\/"},"modified":"2015-03-24T05:53:02","modified_gmt":"2015-03-24T09:53:02","slug":"sc-quashes-section-66a-says-it-curbs-freedom-of-speech","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/freedom-of-speech\/sc-quashes-section-66a-says-it-curbs-freedom-of-speech\/","title":{"rendered":"SC quashes Section 66A, says it curbs freedom of speech"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    New Delhi\/Kolkata\/Mumbai : The Supreme Court    on Tuesday struck down Section 66A of the Information    Technology Act, a controversial provision used to arrest people    for their social media postings. The verdict was hailed by the    victims, who described it as a victory for the common man's    free speech.  <\/p>\n<p>    \"Section 66A of the IT Act is struck down in its entirety...,\"    said an apex court bench of Justice J. Chelameswar and Justice    Rohinton Fali Nariman.  <\/p>\n<p>    The provision was so vaguely worded that any one could be    arrested for \"annoying and offensive\" postings on a complaint    even by a single individual.  <\/p>\n<p>    \"Our Constitution provides for liberty of thought, expression    and belief. In a democracy, these values have to be provided    within constitutional scheme. The law (Section 66A) is vague in    its entirety,\" said Justice Nariman pronouncing the judgment.  <\/p>\n<p>    \"There is no nexus between public order and discussion or    causing annoyance by dissemination of information. Curbs under    Section 66A of the IT Act infringes on the public right to    know.\"  <\/p>\n<p>    Minister for Information and Technology Ravi Shankar Prasad    said the government did not favour gagging dissent or honest    criticism expressed on social media.  <\/p>\n<p>    \"We respect communication of ideas on social media, not in    favour of curtailing honest criticism, dissent on social    media,\" he told the media.  <\/p>\n<p>    Victims on Tuesday hailed the Supreme Court's verdict.  <\/p>\n<p>    Jadavpur University professor Ambikesh Mahapatra, who was    arrested under the section in 2012 for circulating emails    mocking West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee, told IANS:    \"This is a victory of the common man's freedom of speech.\"  <\/p>\n<p>    \"This verdict will surely remove the fear psychosis that has    been developing among a large section of internet users that    they may get arrested for even innocuous of acts.\"  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Read more from the original source:<br \/>\n<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.ibn7.com\/india\/item\/93251-sc-quashes-section-66a-says-it-curbs-freedom-of-speech\/RK=0\/RS=4Gzwfpq95LgWMJH8i12YfJ4GCzQ-\" title=\"SC quashes Section 66A, says it curbs freedom of speech\">SC quashes Section 66A, says it curbs freedom of speech<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> New Delhi\/Kolkata\/Mumbai : The Supreme Court on Tuesday struck down Section 66A of the Information Technology Act, a controversial provision used to arrest people for their social media postings. The verdict was hailed by the victims, who described it as a victory for the common man's free speech. \"Section 66A of the IT Act is struck down in its entirety...,\" said an apex court bench of Justice J <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/freedom-of-speech\/sc-quashes-section-66a-says-it-curbs-freedom-of-speech\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[162383],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-62798","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-freedom-of-speech"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/62798"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=62798"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/62798\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=62798"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=62798"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=62798"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}