{"id":62794,"date":"2015-03-24T05:52:59","date_gmt":"2015-03-24T09:52:59","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/section-66a-of-it-act-timeline\/"},"modified":"2015-03-24T05:52:59","modified_gmt":"2015-03-24T09:52:59","slug":"section-66a-of-it-act-timeline","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/freedom-of-speech\/section-66a-of-it-act-timeline\/","title":{"rendered":"Section 66A of IT Act: Timeline"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>NEW DELHI: In a landmark judgment upholding freedom of    expression, the Supreme Court on Tuesday struck down a    provision in the cyber law which provides power to arrest a    person for posting allegedly \"offensive\" content on websites.    <\/p>\n<p>      According to reports, the apex court ruled that the section falls outside Article      19(2), which relates to Freedom of Speech, and thus has to be      struck down in its entirety.    <\/p>\n<p>      Hailing the Supreme Court's decision to strike down the      controversial Section 66A of the IT Act, Shreya Singhal, one      of the petitioners in the case, on Tuesday said that no one      would fear expressing their opinions online anymore.    <\/p>\n<p>      The first PIL on the issue was filed in 2012 by law student      Shreya Singhal, who sought amendment in Section 66A of the      Act, after two girls - Shaheen Dhada and Rinu Shrinivasan -      were arrested in Palghar in Thane district as one of them      posted a comment against the shutdown in Mumbai following      Shiv Sena leader Bal Thackeray's death and the other 'liked'      it.    <\/p>\n<p>      READ ALSO:       All you need to know about Section 66A of IT Act    <\/p>\n<p>            Centre defends Section 66A of IT Act    <\/p>\n<p>            Sec 66A draconian, but is needed: Govt    <\/p>\n<p>            Class 11 student sent to jail for Facebook post      against UP minister Azam Khan    <\/p>\n<p>      Blog:       Repeal section 66A: Law that permits jailing school kid for      Facebook post is objectionable and absurd    <\/p>\n<p>      In the wake of numerous complaints of harassment and arrests,      the apex court had on May 16, 2013, come out with an advisory      that a person, accused of posting objectionable comments on      social networking sites, cannot be arrested without police      getting permission from senior officers like IG or DCP.    <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Read the original here:<br \/>\n<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/timesofindia.feedsportal.com\/c\/33039\/f\/533916\/s\/44ba8dd1\/sc\/7\/l\/0Ltimesofindia0Bindiatimes0N0Cindia0CSection0E66A0Eof0EIT0EAct0ETimeline0Carticleshow0C466734560Bcms\/story01.htm\/RK=0\/RS=RZj4MTA1OjL3WSu.aYBZG4QNiNg-\" title=\"Section 66A of IT Act: Timeline\">Section 66A of IT Act: Timeline<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> NEW DELHI: In a landmark judgment upholding freedom of expression, the Supreme Court on Tuesday struck down a provision in the cyber law which provides power to arrest a person for posting allegedly \"offensive\" content on websites.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/freedom-of-speech\/section-66a-of-it-act-timeline\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[162383],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-62794","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-freedom-of-speech"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/62794"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=62794"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/62794\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=62794"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=62794"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=62794"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}