{"id":62014,"date":"2015-03-19T02:52:57","date_gmt":"2015-03-19T06:52:57","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/americans-growing-support-for-free-speech-doesnt\/"},"modified":"2015-03-19T02:52:57","modified_gmt":"2015-03-19T06:52:57","slug":"americans-growing-support-for-free-speech-doesnt","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/free-speech\/americans-growing-support-for-free-speech-doesnt\/","title":{"rendered":"Americans growing support for free speech doesnt &#8230;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    Americans tend to pick and choose who should be afforded civil    liberties to some degree, acenturies-old issue that has    flared up once again after a video ofracist chants    byUniversity of Oklahoma fraternity brothers went viral.    The university's president David Boren last weekexpelled    two studentsfilmed making the racist chants.  <\/p>\n<p>    The popularity of Boren's actions may be hard to nail down    (more on that later), butone fascinating trend in public    opinion has been quite clear.Americans have    becomemore supportiveof free speech for a variety    of controversial groups in recent decades, but    thisgrowing acceptancehas    not extended toracists.This finding comes from    thelong-running General Social Survey of U.S.    adults.Last year the surveyfound 60 percent saying    a \"person who believes blacks are genetically inferior\" should    be allowed to make a speech in their community, similarto    the share who said so in 1976 (62 percent).  <\/p>\n<p>    That absolute number might be surprising - a clear majority are    okaywith a racist speaking out - but they also    contrastwithlarger and growing shares of the public    who supportallowing speech from    othercontroversialgroups. Some 70 percent support    allowing a speech from aperson who wants the military to    run the country (70 percent), a communist (68 percent), and an    anti-religionist (79 percent).The only group where people    expressed less support for free speech than racists was \"a    Muslim clergyman who preaches hatred of the United States\"    -only 42 percent said this should be allowed. These    trends     were documented by Tom Smith and Jaesok Son of NORC at the    University of Chicago in 2013.  <\/p>\n<p>    Changing politics as well asattitudes toward sexuality    and religion help explain how free speech forsome groups    has become more tolerable while support for racists have stayed    lower.The Cold war is over,fewer people identify    with a religious faith than in the 1970s andacceptance    ofhomosexuality has grown rapidly.The stagnation of    tolerance for racist speech  while support for speech among    other groups has grown -- could indicate that the public is not    purely becoming more tolerant of the rights of groups they    dislike. Instead, the shifts could reflect greater public    agreement with the ideas of gay and lesbian people and those    who are less religious.  <\/p>\n<p>    Reactions to the Oklahoma case could be toughto gauge if    past surveys are any guide, perhaps due to the difficulty in    balancingbetween support forfree speech in general    and a desire to quashracism generally.Two national    surveysin 1989 and 1991 found aboutsix in 10 saying    college students who use racial slurs or published racist    magazines should not be expelled. But a similarly large    majority in a 1992 survey by Family Circle favored    probation for aBrown University student who yelled racial    slurs while drunk. More recently, a 2008survey by the    First Amendment Center found 54percent disagreeing with    the idea thatpeople should be allowed to say things in    public that might be offensive to racial groups.  <\/p>\n<p>    Peyton M. Craighill contributed to this report.  <\/p>\n<p>    Surveydetails  <\/p>\n<p>    The General Social    Survey was conducted by NORC at the University of Chicago    usingin-person interviews with a random national sample    of 2,538 adults from March31 to Oct.13, 2014. Results on    attitudes toward racists are based on 1,711 interviews and have    a margin of sampling error of three percentage    points.Data analysis was conducted by The Washington    Post.  <\/p>\n<p>    Question wording  <\/p>\n<p>    There are always some people whose ideas are considered bad or    dangerous by other people. If [INSERT]wanted to make a    speech in your community [INSERT],should he be allowed to    speak, or not? Answers: Yes, allowed\/Not allowed\/Don't    know\/Refused  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Link:<br \/>\n<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/blogs\/wonkblog\/wp\/2015\/03\/16\/americans-growing-support-for-free-speech-doesnt-include-racist-speech\/\" title=\"Americans growing support for free speech doesnt ...\">Americans growing support for free speech doesnt ...<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> Americans tend to pick and choose who should be afforded civil liberties to some degree, acenturies-old issue that has flared up once again after a video ofracist chants byUniversity of Oklahoma fraternity brothers went viral. The university's president David Boren last weekexpelled two studentsfilmed making the racist chants.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/free-speech\/americans-growing-support-for-free-speech-doesnt\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[162384],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-62014","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-free-speech"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/62014"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=62014"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/62014\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=62014"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=62014"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=62014"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}