{"id":61589,"date":"2015-03-16T16:47:30","date_gmt":"2015-03-16T20:47:30","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/column-the-first-amendment-and-the-oklahoma-racist-chant\/"},"modified":"2015-03-16T16:47:30","modified_gmt":"2015-03-16T20:47:30","slug":"column-the-first-amendment-and-the-oklahoma-racist-chant","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/first-amendment-2\/column-the-first-amendment-and-the-oklahoma-racist-chant\/","title":{"rendered":"Column: The First Amendment and the Oklahoma Racist Chant"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    University of Oklahoma President David Boren has expelled two    members of the Sigma Alpha Epsilon fraternity on his campus for    leading a horrifying racist chant. Does his decision violate    their First Amendment rights? And if it does, whats wrong with    this picture, in which a public university wouldnt be able to    sanction students who not only bar blacks from their    organization, but also refer to lynching in the process?  <\/p>\n<p>    A public university is bound by the First Amendment because    its an organ of the state. Admittedly, there is something    weird about this fact, because a public campus isnt inherently    different from a private one with respect to educational    function and goals. Some strange free-speech anomalies can    arise from treating a university like the government. For    example, professors sanction speech based on its content all    the time, by grading wrong answers lower than right ones. But    usually free speech bars such content discrimination.  <\/p>\n<p>    Discipline is another anomaly. A university is meant to be a    community of learning, and making such a community work    requires rules of decorum that are more restrictive than those    that should apply in the public square. The First Amendment    generally guarantees us the right to yell, scream, insult,    offend, condemn and denounce. None of these forms of speech    belong in the classroom, and few belong on a well-functioning    campus.  <\/p>\n<p>    In a perfect world, there might be a broad First Amendment    exemption for public campuses. But there isnt  so Borens    decision has to be judged by First Amendment standards.  <\/p>\n<p>    Applying ordinary free-speech doctrine, the expulsion looks    unconstitutional, as professor Eugene Volokh of the UCLA School    of Law has pointed out. Racist speech is still protected speech    under the First Amendment, no matter how repulsive. The    fraternity can be banned for race discrimination, which is    prohibited conduct. Speaking in favor of discrimination,    however, is generally protected.  <\/p>\n<p>    But Borens explanation for the expulsion rests on a different    theory. He said specifically that the students were being    expelled for their leadership role in leading a racist and    exclusionary chant, which has created a hostile educational    environment for others.  <\/p>\n<p>    The important words here are hostile educational environment.    Under federal anti-discrimination law, as interpreted by the    Department of Education, a university has an affirmative duty    to guarantee students an educational environment in which they    are free of hostility based on race or sex.  <\/p>\n<p>    You may have heard about this principle in connection with    Title IX, which prohibits discrimination based on sex. The law    has similarly been interpreted by Education Department to    require universities to protect students against a hostile    educational environment based on sex discrimination, including    sexual harassment.  <\/p>\n<p>    In the business context, the analogy would be to an employers    obligation to protect against a hostile workplace environment.  <\/p>\n<p>    So Boren was saying that the students are being expelled not    for their opinions per se, but because their speech was a form    of discriminatory conduct that would create a hostile    educational environment for black students. Given that the    speech was literally designed to inculcate the value of racial    discrimination by making pledges recite their commitment never    to admit a black member to the fraternity, this conclusion    seems plausible. Removing the chant leaders from campus is    intended to fulfill the educational goal of creating a    nonhostile educational environment.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Link:<br \/>\n<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.vnews.com\/opinion\/16089470-95\/column-the-first-amendment-and-the-oklahoma-racist-chant\/RK=0\/RS=9WfOV1oK8ddK3YhTdODC_YFrbLE-\" title=\"Column: The First Amendment and the Oklahoma Racist Chant\">Column: The First Amendment and the Oklahoma Racist Chant<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> University of Oklahoma President David Boren has expelled two members of the Sigma Alpha Epsilon fraternity on his campus for leading a horrifying racist chant. Does his decision violate their First Amendment rights? And if it does, whats wrong with this picture, in which a public university wouldnt be able to sanction students who not only bar blacks from their organization, but also refer to lynching in the process <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/first-amendment-2\/column-the-first-amendment-and-the-oklahoma-racist-chant\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[94877],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-61589","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-first-amendment-2"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/61589"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=61589"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/61589\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=61589"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=61589"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=61589"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}