{"id":59616,"date":"2012-07-31T10:15:54","date_gmt":"2012-07-31T10:15:54","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.designerchildren.com\/state-will-appeal-docs-vs-glocks-ruling\/"},"modified":"2012-07-31T10:15:54","modified_gmt":"2012-07-31T10:15:54","slug":"state-will-appeal-docs-vs-glocks-ruling","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/second-amendment\/state-will-appeal-docs-vs-glocks-ruling\/","title":{"rendered":"State Will Appeal &#039;Docs vs. Glocks&#039; Ruling"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    THE CAPITAL, TALLAHASSEE, July 31, 2012 -  <\/p>\n<p>    Brandon Larrabee, The News Service of Florida  <\/p>\n<p>    Gov. Rick Scott announced Monday that the state will appeal a    ruling barring the state from enforcing the \"docs vs. glocks\"    law, continuing the court battle over the line between    patients' rights under the Second Amendment and doctors' rights    under the First.  <\/p>\n<p>    \"This law was carefully crafted to respect the First Amendment    while ensuring a patients constitutional right to own or    possess a firearm without discrimination,\" Scott said in a    brief statement released by his office. \"I signed this    legislation into law because I believe it is constitutional and    I will continue to defend it.\"  <\/p>\n<p>    The appeal challenges a federal court's ruling blocking    enforcement of provisions of the law that would restrict    doctors and other medical providers from asking questions about    gun ownership during medical visits.  <\/p>\n<p>    U.S. District Court Judge Marcia Cooke ruled earlier this month    that the 2011 law, known formally as the Firearm Owners'    Privacy Act, was built largely on anecdotal evidence and that    lawmakers couldn't prove that Second Amendment rights would be    jeopardized or that patients with guns might face    discrimination.  <\/p>\n<p>    \"The state's arguments rest on a legislative illusion,\" Cooke    wrote.  <\/p>\n<p>    Backed by the National Rifle Association and the United    Sportsmen of Florida, the bill (HB 155) was approved by    lawmakers and signed by the Gov. Rick Scott in 2011. The bill    easily passed both chambers along largely party line votes of    88-30 in the House and 27-10 in the Senate.  <\/p>\n<p>    Supporters argued that doctors might refuse to treat patients    who had guns in their homes or that patients who declined to    answer the question might be turned away. They also raised the    possibility that patients' privacy rights might be violated if    their gun ownership were listed in medical records.  <\/p>\n<p>    But doctors countered that knowing what is in a patient's home     particularly a child's  gives them an opportunity to advise    their patients on how to stay safe.  <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>Follow this link:<br \/>\n<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.wctv.tv\/home\/headlines\/State-Will-Appeal-Docs-vs-Glocks-Ruling-164300136.html\" title=\"State Will Appeal &#39;Docs vs. Glocks&#39; Ruling\">State Will Appeal &#39;Docs vs. Glocks&#39; Ruling<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> THE CAPITAL, TALLAHASSEE, July 31, 2012 - Brandon Larrabee, The News Service of Florida Gov. Rick Scott announced Monday that the state will appeal a ruling barring the state from enforcing the \"docs vs. glocks\" law, continuing the court battle over the line between patients' rights under the Second Amendment and doctors' rights under the First.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/second-amendment\/state-will-appeal-docs-vs-glocks-ruling\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[193621],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-59616","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-second-amendment"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/59616"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=59616"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/59616\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=59616"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=59616"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=59616"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}