Kirsten Powers writes about politics, human rights and faith for USA Today and The Daily Beast. Chris Zarconi\/Intelligence Squared U.S. hide caption <\/p>\n
Kirsten Powers writes about politics, human rights and faith for USA Today and The Daily Beast. <\/p>\n
There is agreement on both the political left and right that a majority of college professors in the United States are liberal or left-of-center. But do liberals stifle free speech particularly that of political and social conservatives on college campuses? <\/p>\n
Social conservatives often argue that campuses, as a whole, are generally hostile to views that don't conform to the social and political left. Conservatives and evangelicals are rarely asked to speak at colleges and universities, they argue. And they point to numerous incidents where, when schools have asked conservatives to speak, those invitations have been revoked after clamor from left-leaning students and faculty. <\/p>\n
But there are many who disagree with the premise that liberals quash intellectual diversity on college campuses. They argue that criticism is not censorship, but that conservatives too often label it as such. And when speech has been curtailed at colleges, they say, it's far more often by administrators seeking to quell or ward off campus disruption than by left-leaning students and faculty. <\/p>\n
In the latest event from Intelligence Squared U.S., two teams faced off on in an Oxford-style debate on the motion, \"Liberals Are Stifling Intellectual Diversity On Campus.\" In these events, the team that sways the most people by the end of the debate is declared the winner. <\/p>\n
Before the debate at George Washington University in Washington, D.C., 33 percent of the audience voted in favor of the motion, 21 percent were opposed and 46 percent were undecided. After the debate, 59 percent agreed with the motion, while 32 percent disagreed, making the team arguing in favor of the motion the winner. <\/p>\n
FOR THE MOTION <\/p>\n
Greg Lukianoff, president of the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE), is the author of Unlearning Liberty: Campus Censorship and the End of American Debate and Freedom from Speech. He has published articles in The Wall Street Journal, The Washington Post, The New York Times, Stanford Technology Law Review, The Chronicle of Higher Education and numerous other publications. He is also a blogger for Huffington Post and authored a chapter in the anthology New Threats to Freedom. Lukianoff is a frequent guest on local and national syndicated radio programs, has represented FIRE on national television and has testified before the U.S. Senate about free speech issues on America's campuses. He is a co-author of FIRE's Guide to Free Speech on Campus. <\/p>\n
Angus Johnston (left), founder of StudentActivism.net, and Jeremy Mayer, a professor at George Mason University, argue against the motion, \"Liberals Are Stifling Intellectual Diversity On Campus.\" Chris Zarconi\/Intelligence Squared U.S. hide caption <\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
View original post here: Kirsten Powers writes about politics, human rights and faith for USA Today and The Daily Beast. Chris Zarconi\/Intelligence Squared U.S. hide caption Kirsten Powers writes about politics, human rights and faith for USA Today and The Daily Beast Continue reading
\nDebate: Do Liberals Stifle Intellectual Diversity On The College Campus?<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"