{"id":57768,"date":"2015-02-19T06:43:53","date_gmt":"2015-02-19T11:43:53","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/deconstructing-the-dynamic-genome\/"},"modified":"2015-02-19T06:43:53","modified_gmt":"2015-02-19T11:43:53","slug":"deconstructing-the-dynamic-genome","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/transhuman-news-blog\/genome\/deconstructing-the-dynamic-genome\/","title":{"rendered":"Deconstructing the Dynamic Genome"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>Released: 17-Feb-2015 4:15 PM EST    Embargo expired: 18-Feb-2015 7:00 AM EST    Source Newsroom: Ludwig    Cancer Research        Contact Information         <\/p>\n<p>      Available for logged-in reporters only    <\/p>\n<p>    Newswise  February 18, 2015, New York, NY  Two    international teams of researchers led by Ludwig San Diegos    Bing Ren have published in the current issue of Nature    two papers that analyze in unprecedented detail the variability    and regulation of gene expression across the entire human    genome, and their correspondence with the physical structure of    chromosomes.  <\/p>\n<p>    We expect that our findings, which describe the interplay of    chromosomal structure, regulation and gene expression across a    broad array of tissues, will inform research in every branch of    mammalian biology and provide information of great value to the    study of most human diseases, not least cancer, said Ren.  <\/p>\n<p>    If the human genome is a recipe book, its chapters are 23    distinct chromosomeseach of which is stuffed, in rough    duplicate, into the nucleus of almost all the cells of the    human body. But how exactly is that single recipe book read    appropriately to build the bodys diverse constituency of    cells? Or, for that matter, to generate a community of humans    so variegated in their appearance, internal biochemistry and    susceptibility to disease?  <\/p>\n<p>    The two papers address key elements of these riddles. One    captures the extent to which the same genesknown as    allelesinherited from each parent are expressed at different    levels across the genome, so that each version of the gene    generates different amounts of the protein it encodes. It links    that difference in expression to the distribution and sequence    of enhancers on each copy of each chromosome. Enhancers are    stretches of DNA that do not encode proteins but can boost gene    expression from great distances along the linear strand of DNA.  <\/p>\n<p>    This is the first time that anyone has looked globally at how    gene expression differs between each matching pair of    chromosomes across a diverse set of cell types, and our    findings are striking, said Ren. Some 30 percent of the gene    set we carry is expressed variably across some 20 types of    tissues, depending on which parent the alleles came from. Much    of that variation appears to come from differences in sequences    that regulate the transcriptionor readingof genes.  <\/p>\n<p>    The other study examines how the three dimensional structure of    chromosomes and the distribution of biochemical (or epigenetic)    tags that regulate gene expression differ between different    types of cells. It also integrates data from the former paper    into this analysis to reveal how all of these phenomena    interact to control the appropriate expression of the genome.    Taken together, these findings add dimension and depth to our    understanding of the physical and functional dynamics of the    genome, and how its expression is globally regulated to    generate the sublime complexity of the human body.  <\/p>\n<p>    Both studies are invaluable to a deeper understanding of normal    biology as well as disease. The data will, for example, help    explain precisely why particular parental traits are often so    unevenly expressed and why specific deleterious mutations vary    in their effects from person to person. They will also serve as    a reference that researchers can use to develop a more    sophisticated understanding of how gene regulation and    chromosomal structure are altered in diseases such as cancer.  <\/p>\n<p>    Stemming from five years of research, the papers are two of six    published this week in Nature that capture the key discoveries    of the $300 million Roadmap Epigenomics Program of the US    National Institutes of Health. Ren led one of four reference    epigenome mapping centers for the program, and his center    focused primarily on how DNA and chromatinthe complex of DNA    and its protein packaging that makes chromosomesare chemically    tagged at specific places to control the expression of genes    across the human genome.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>See original here:<br \/>\n<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.newswise.com\/articles\/view\/629884\/?sc=rssn\/RK=0\/RS=bRUdJ1i20e5a9vEHUWK58DDPVz4-\" title=\"Deconstructing the Dynamic Genome\">Deconstructing the Dynamic Genome<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> Released: 17-Feb-2015 4:15 PM EST Embargo expired: 18-Feb-2015 7:00 AM EST Source Newsroom: Ludwig Cancer Research Contact Information Available for logged-in reporters only Newswise February 18, 2015, New York, NY Two international teams of researchers led by Ludwig San Diegos Bing Ren have published in the current issue of Nature two papers that analyze in unprecedented detail the variability and regulation of gene expression across the entire human genome, and their correspondence with the physical structure of chromosomes. We expect that our findings, which describe the interplay of chromosomal structure, regulation and gene expression across a broad array of tissues, will inform research in every branch of mammalian biology and provide information of great value to the study of most human diseases, not least cancer, said Ren.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/transhuman-news-blog\/genome\/deconstructing-the-dynamic-genome\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[25],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-57768","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-genome"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/57768"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=57768"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/57768\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=57768"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=57768"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=57768"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}